ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1318-1330.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01318

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    

共同进食影响食物消费的“双刃剑”效应及作用机制

王楚珺, 宛小昂()   

  1. 清华大学心理学系, 北京 100084
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-25 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-04-23
  • 通讯作者: 宛小昂 E-mail:wanxa@tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    清华大学春风基金计划, 清华大学自主科研项目未来社计师专项(202223)

The “double-edged sword” effect of eating together on food consumption and its mechanisms

WANG Chujun, WAN Xiaoang()   

  1. Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2022-08-25 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-04-23
  • Contact: WAN Xiaoang E-mail:wanxa@tsinghua.edu.cn

摘要:

人们在生活中与他人一起就餐的社会性进食行为即为共食, 心理学视角下的共食与共同消费、共同体验等概念之间存在着联系与区别, 共食也可在不同维度上分为不同的类型。此外, 共食对食物消费的影响可整合为一种“双刃剑”效应, 并根据不同类型的共食在进食行为上的差异最终形成相应的理论模型。根据该模型, 共食在不同理论视角下会促进个体的健康饮食(积极效应), 也会导致个体产生不健康的进食行为(消极效应)。未来研究应深入探讨如何助推并削弱共食对食物消费的消极影响、运用前沿技术探究多元交互的共食、探究共食后的情绪感知以整合共食与其他进食行为的优势。

关键词: 共食, 食物选择, 食物摄入, 食物评价, “双刃剑”效应

Abstract:

From a psychological perspective, eating together refers to the social eating that individuals consume the same or different foods with others at the same time, in the same physical space or the same virtual space. There are overlaps but also differences between the concepts of eating together and joint consumption as well as co-experiencing, with eating together falling into the scope of joint consumption and including co-experiencing. Considering that eating together is a complex eating behavior, an elaborate classification of eating together helps us understand this concept in a more structured way. Depending on the eating purpose, eating together can be classified as eating-together for social and eating-together for leisure. According to the different eating types and eating space, eating together can be categorized into shared eating-together or separate eating-together, and physical eating-together and digital eating-together, respectively. Moreover, eating together can influence individuals’ food consumption, such as resulting in people’s more choices of healthy foods or less consumption of food compared with solitary eating, which is beneficial to their health (positive effect). Conversely, eating together also leads to people’s choices of unhealthy foods or excessive consumption of foods (negative effect). Therefore, the impact of eating together on food consumption can be integrated into a theoretical model of the “double-edged sword” effect. In terms of food choices, from the perspective of social modeling, eating together promotes individuals to make choices that are favorable or unfavorable to their health, depending on the healthiness of others’ choices; whereas individuals may choose palatable but unhealthy food because eating together depletes their own cognitive resources based on the intertemporal choice theory; according to risk shift theory, people tend to choose unhealthy foods as other diners can diversify the risk of unhealthy eating. In terms of food intake, the presence of others during eating together induces a social facilitation effect that may lead individuals to consume excessive foods; by contrast, eating together driven by impression management motivates people to create a positive impression by controlling their food intake. As for food perception and evaluation, eating together can amplify individuals’ perception of foods based on the cognitive or emotional pathway. It should be noted that since eating together can be divided into different types along different dimensions, these various types of eating together exert different impacts on people’s food consumption. For example, digital eating-together may result in less food intake than physical eating-together as individuals who are eating in different contexts and space are not likely to be influenced by social norms. Although behaviors similar to eating together (e.g., co-experiencing) can also be driven by these theoretical mechanisms, the behavioral outcomes induced by these theories may differ from the influence of eating together, which further highlights the uniqueness and complexity of eating together. Given that eating together not only promotes individuals’ healthy eating but also results in the negative effect on their food consumption, future research can explore the interventions for healthy eating to alleviate the negative effect of eating together. The Nudge Theory is likely to provide a systematic theoretical framework to help individuals gain a positive and healthy experience of eating together. Researchers should also conduct cross-level studies to investigate multiple interactions of eating together by utilizing cutting-edge technologies, rather than merely focusing on individual-level behaviors. In addition to the influence on food consumption, the “double-edged sword” effect of eating together on emotions can be further explored by future research, and researchers should integrate the advantages of eating together and other eating behaviors to thoroughly investigate the influence of eating together on people’s eating experience. In conclusion, reviewing the mechanisms and outcomes of the influence of eating together on food consumption can provide some insights into how social context exerts an impact on eating behaviors in order to facilitate people’s healthy eating.

Key words: eating together, food choice, food intake, food evaluation, “double-edged sword” effect

中图分类号: