ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2002, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3): 280-284.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

内隐和外显记忆测验的信度比较研究及思考

李德忠;刘凤华   

  1. 山东师范大学教科院心理系,山东师范大学教科院心理系 济南250014 ,济南250014
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2002-06-25 发布日期:2002-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 李德忠

RELIABILITY COMPARISONS BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY MEASURES

Li Dezhong, Liu Fenghua (College of Educational Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014)   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2002-06-25 Published:2002-06-25

摘要: 任务分离的实验范式以功能分离和随机独立性等证据说明不同记忆任务的底层系统或加工机制。近期研究发现,两种记忆测量重测信度、复本信度和分半信度差异显著,内隐测验的信度更低一些,因而对变量效果缺乏足够的敏感性。两种测验信度差异对任务分离提出了区别于系统说或加工观点的另外解释。以后在研究外显和内隐记忆分离的时候应该慎重考虑测验信度的检验问题,还应通过各种方法来提高内隐记忆测验的信度,使两种记忆测验的信度具有可比性。

关键词: 功能分离, 随机独立性, 信度, 构想效度, 统计功效

Abstract: The evidences of functional dissociation and stochastic independence confirmed task dissociation between implicit and explicit measures. The dissociations have been assumed to indicate that the memory process or memory systems underlying performance in explicit tests differ from those underlying performance in implicit memory tests. However, recent studies showed that reliabilities of implicit measures were significantly lower than that of explicit measures. As a consequence, if simple functional dissociations are to be used in future research, more attention needs to be paid to the statistical power of the relevant group comparisons and to the psychometric qualities of the memory measurement instruments.

Key words: functional dissociation, stochastic independence, reliability, construct validity, statistical power