心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1288-1302.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01288
收稿日期:
2022-10-10
出版日期:
2023-07-15
发布日期:
2023-04-23
通讯作者:
宋晓蕾
E-mail:songxiaolei@snnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Received:
2022-10-10
Online:
2023-07-15
Published:
2023-04-23
Contact:
SONG Xiaolei
E-mail:songxiaolei@snnu.edu.cn
摘要:
联合行动是日常生活中非常普遍的一种人际互动形式。成功的联合行动依赖于个体之间有效的协同, 其中共同表征能力是人际协同的基础, 但在联合行动中个体如何表征自我与他人的行为, 目前说法尚未统一。在从认知表征视角对联合行动中人际协同的过程、机制及其理论解释系统梳理和分析的基础上, 提出人际协同的多重表征模型, 即可从空间、具身和社会性表征三个维度理解和解释联合行动中人际协同的内容和过程, 并尝试将其应用于智能人机交互领域人机协同与组队的研究和落地。
中图分类号:
宋晓蕾, 董梅梅. (2023). 人际协同的多重表征模型——基于认知表征的视角. 心理科学进展 , 31(7), 1288-1302.
SONG Xiaolei, DONG Meimei. (2023). A multidimensional representation model of interpersonal collaboration: From the perspective of cognitive representation. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(7), 1288-1302.
[1] |
郭人豪, 王婷, 张积家. (2020). 多元语言文化对个体情境下与社会情境下认知转换功能的差异性影响——来自锡伯族的证据. 心理学报, 52(9), 1071-1086. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01071
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01071 URL |
[2] | 兰玉琪, 刘松洋. (2020). 人工智能技术下的产品用户体验研究综述. 包装工程, 41(24), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.24.004 |
[3] | 林琳琳, 刘文, 王薇薇, 龚平. (2021). 幼儿在联合行动中共同表征能力的发展. 心理科学, 44(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210109 |
[4] | 刘亚, 王振宏, 孔风. (2011). 情绪具身观:情绪研究的新视角. 心理科学进展, 19(1), 50-59. |
[5] | 宋晓蕾. (2015). 基于客体的空间一致性效应:功能可见性或空间位置编码? 心理科学, 38(5), 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2015.05.008 |
[6] |
宋晓蕾, 贾筱倩, 赵媛, 郭晶晶. (2020). 情绪对联合行动中共同表征能力的影响机制. 心理学报, 52(3), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00269
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00269 URL |
[7] |
宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. (2018). 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响. 心理学报, 50(9), 975-984. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00975
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00975 URL |
[8] | 宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 张诗熠, 张俊婷. (2017). 人际情境对幼儿联合Simon效应的影响机制. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.03.03 |
[9] |
宋晓蕾, 王丹, 张欣欣, 贾筱倩. (2020). 基于客体的一致性效应的产生机制. 心理学报, 52(6), 669-681. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00669
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00669 URL |
[10] | 孙效华, 张义文, 秦觉晓, 李璟璐, 王舒超. (2020). 人机智能协同研究综述. 包装工程, 41(18), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.18.001 |
[11] | 肖承丽, 范丫, 徐刘飞, 周仁来. (2019). 以人为中心的人-机器人自然空间语言交互. 应用心理学, 25(4), 319-331. |
[12] |
肖承丽, 隋雨檠, 肖苏衡, 周仁来. (2021). 空间交互研究新视角: 多重社会因素的影响. 心理科学进展, 29(5), 796-805. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00796
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00796 URL |
[13] |
徐胜, 宋晓蕾. (2016). 联合Simon效应:现状、影响因素与理论解释. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00367
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00367 URL |
[14] | 许为. (2019). 四论以用户为中心的设计: 以人为中心的人工智能. 应用心理学, 25(4), 291-305. |
[15] | 许为. (2022). 六论以用户为中心的设计:智能人机交互的人因工程途径. 应用心理学, 28(3), 195-213. |
[16] |
许为, 葛列众. (2018). 人因学发展的新取向. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1521-1534. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01521
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01521 URL |
[17] |
许为, 葛列众. (2020). 智能时代的工程心理学. 心理科学进展, 28(9), 1409-1425. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01409
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01409 URL |
[18] | 杨帅, 黄希庭, 陈有国, 傅于玲, 刘孟超. (2014). 人际距离调节自我-他人的神经表征: 来自oFRN的证据. 心理学报, 46(5), 666-676. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00666 |
[19] | 叶浩生. (2014). “具身”涵义的理论辨析. 心理学报, 46(7), 1032-1042. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.001032 |
[20] | 叶浩生. (2016). 镜像神经元的意义. 心理学报, 48(4), 444-456. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00444 |
[21] |
Aron, A., Mclaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S. C., & Aron, E. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 101-132. http://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000008
doi: 10.1080/10463280440000008 URL |
[22] |
Astolfi, L., Toppi, J., Ciaramidaro, A., Vogel, P., Freitag, C. M., & Siniatchkin, M. (2020). Raising the bar: Can dual scanning improve our understanding of joint action? Neuroimage, 216, 116813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116813
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116813 URL |
[23] |
Atkinson, M. A., Simpson, A., Skarratt, P. A., & Cole, G. G. (2014). Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation? Acta Psychologica, 150, 85-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.003 URL pmid: 24859672 |
[24] |
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9
doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9 URL pmid: 21573746 |
[25] |
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3(3-4), 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910801900908
doi: 10.1080/17470910801900908 URL pmid: 18633833 |
[26] |
Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2015). My partner is also on my mind: Social context modulates the N1 response. Experimental Brain Research, 233(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4092-9
doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4092-9 URL pmid: 25224703 |
[27] | Baess, P., Weber, T., & Bermeitinger, C. (2018). Sharing different reference frames: How stimulus setup and task setup shape egocentric and allocentric Simon effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2063. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02063 |
[28] |
Barchiesi, G., Zazio, A., Marcantoni, E., Bulgari, M., di San Pietro, C. B., Sinigaglia, C., & Bortoletto, M. (2022). Sharing motor plans while acting jointly: A TMS study. Cortex, 151, 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.007 URL pmid: 35447381 |
[29] |
Beaurenaut, M., Dezecache, G., & Grèzes, J. (2021). Action co-representation under threat: A social Simon study. Cognition, 215, 104829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104829
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104829 URL |
[30] |
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2009). The computation of social behavior. Science, 324(5931), 1160-1164. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1169694
doi: 10.1126/science.1169694 URL pmid: 19478175 |
[31] |
Bolt, N. K., & Loehr, J. D. (2017). The predictability of a partner's actions modulates the sense of joint agency. Cognition, 161, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.004
doi: S0010-0277(17)30004-5 URL pmid: 28110236 |
[32] |
Bolt, N. K., & Loehr, J. D. (2021). The motor-related brain activity that supports joint action: A review. Acta Psychologica, 212, 103218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103218
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103218 URL |
[33] |
Brunet, E., Sarfati, Y., Hardy-Baylé, M.-C., & Decety, J. (2000). A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 11(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0525
URL pmid: 10679187 |
[34] |
Carpenter, M. (2009). Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01026.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01026.x URL pmid: 25164940 |
[35] |
Cerullo, S., Fulceri, F., Muratori, F., & Contaldo, A. (2021). Acting with shared intentions: A systematic review on joint action coordination in autism spectrum disorder. Brain and Cognition, 149(1), 105693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105693
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105693 URL |
[36] | Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2018). Response coordination emerges in cooperative but not competitive joint task. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1919. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01919 |
[37] | Cochet, H., & Guidetti, M. (2018). Contribution of developmental psychology to the study of social interactions: Some factors in play, joint attention and joint action and implications for robotics. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01992 |
[38] |
Curioni, A., Vesper, C., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2019). Reciprocal information flow and role distribution support joint action coordination. Cognition, 187, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.006
doi: S0010-0277(19)30033-2 URL pmid: 30797991 |
[39] |
Curtin, A., Tong, S., Sun, J., Wang, J., Onaral, B., & Ayaz, H. (2019). A systematic review of integrated functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 84. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00084
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00084 URL pmid: 30872985 |
[40] |
Czeszumski, A., Eustergerling, S., Lang, A., Menrath, D., Gerstenberger, M., Schuberth, S.,... König, P. (2020). Hyperscanning: A valid method to study neural inter-brain underpinnings of social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039 URL pmid: 32180710 |
[41] |
De Vicariis, C., Pusceddu, G., Chackochan, V. T., & Sanguineti, V. (2022). Artificial partners to understand joint action: Representing others to develop effective coordination. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 30, 1473-1482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3176378
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3176378 URL |
[42] | Dittrich, K., Dolk, T., Rothe-Wulf, A., Klauer, K. C., & Prinz, W. (2013). Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(8), 1725-1736. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z |
[43] |
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How "social" is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 84. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084 URL pmid: 21687453 |
[44] |
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974 URL pmid: 25249991 |
[45] |
Ferraro, L., Iani, C., Mariani, M., Milanese, N., & Rubichi, S. (2011). Facilitation and interference components in the joint Simon task. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2711-2
doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2711-2 URL pmid: 21556819 |
[46] |
Ford, R., & Aberdein, B. (2015). Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: Empathy and friendship. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00962
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00962 URL pmid: 26217281 |
[47] |
Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain Research, 1079(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.054
URL pmid: 16680812 |
[48] |
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593
doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.593 URL |
[49] |
Gonzalez, D. A., Studenka, B. E., Glazebrook, C. M., & Lyons, J. L. (2011). Extending end-state comfort effect: Do we consider the beginning state comfort of another? Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.009 URL pmid: 21272840 |
[50] |
Grynszpan, O., Sahaï, A., Hamidi, N., Pacherie, E., Berberian, B., Roche, L., & Saint-Bauzel, L. (2019). The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action. Consciousness and Cognition, 75, 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820 URL |
[51] |
Hamzei, F., Vry, M.-S., Saur, D., Glauche, V., Hoeren, M., Mader, I.,... Rijntjes, M. (2015). The dual-loop model and the human mirror neuron system: An exploratory combined fMRI and DTI study of the inferior frontal gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2215-2224. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv066
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv066 URL |
[52] |
Hartmann, M., Fischer, M. H., & Mast, F. W. (2019). Sharing a mental number line across individuals? The role of body position and empathy in joint numerical cognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(7), 1732-1740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818809254
doi: 10.1177/1747021818809254 URL |
[53] |
Heard, J., & Adams, J. A. (2019). Multi-dimensional human workload assessment for supervisory human-machine teams. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13(3), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419847906
doi: 10.1177/1555343419847906 URL |
[54] |
Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M.(2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20(7), 794-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9280.2009.02367.X
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02367.x URL pmid: 19493327 |
[55] | Hopcroft, R. L. (2013). Neurosociology and theory of mind (ToM). In D. D. Franks & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of Neurosociology (pp. 231-241), New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_16 |
[56] | Hornbæk, K., Mottelson, A., Knibbe, J., & Vogel, D. (2019). What do we mean by "interaction"? An analysis of 35 years of chi. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 26(4), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325285 |
[57] |
Iacoboni, M. (2008). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
doi: 10.1146/psych.2009.60.issue-1 URL |
[58] |
Iani, C., Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Arcuri, L., & Rubichi, S. (2011). The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2651-x
doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2651-x URL pmid: 21472442 |
[59] |
Iani, C., Ciardo, F., Panajoli, S, Lugli, L & Rubichi, S. (2019). The role of the co-actor’s response reachability in the joint Simon effect: Remapping of working space by tool use. Psychological Research. 85(2), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6
doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01271-6 URL |
[60] | Keller, P. E. (2012). Mental imagery in music performance:Underlying mechanisms and potential benefits. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252(1), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06439.x |
[61] |
Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0394
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0394 URL |
[62] |
Kiernan, D., Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2012). Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 914-920. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1 URL |
[63] |
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2006). The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(3), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00415.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00415.x URL |
[64] |
Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 2021-2031. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0006
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0006 URL |
[65] |
Konvalinka, I., Bauer, M., Stahlhut, C., Hansen, L. K., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Frontal alpha oscillations distinguish leaders from followers: Multivariate decoding of mutually interacting brains. Neuroimage, 94, 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.003
doi: S1053-8119(14)00144-X URL pmid: 24631790 |
[66] |
Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.694823
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2012.694823 URL pmid: 22671131 |
[67] |
Li, J., Dong, S., Chiou, E. K., & Xu, J. (2020). Reciprocity and its neurological correlates in human-agent cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(5), 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.2992224
doi: 10.1109/THMS.6221037 URL |
[68] |
Liepelt, R., Klempova, B., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Ragert, P., Nitsche, M. A., & Hommel, B. (2015). The medial frontal cortex mediates self-other discrimination in the joint Simon task: A tDCS Study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 30(3), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000158
doi: 10.1027/0269-8803/a000158 URL |
[69] |
Liu, T., Saito, G., Lin, C., & Saito, H. (2017). Inter-brain network underlying turn-based cooperation and competition: A hyperscanning study using near-infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8684. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09226-w
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09226-w URL pmid: 28819162 |
[70] |
Loehr, J. D., Kourtis, D., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Monitoring individual and joint action outcomes in duet music performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1049-1061. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00388
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00388 URL pmid: 23489144 |
[71] |
Loehr, J. D., & Vesper, C. (2016). The sound of you and me: Novices represent shared goals in joint action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1061029
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1061029 URL |
[72] |
Meagher, B. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014). The costs of cooperation: Action-specific perception in the context of joint action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033850
doi: 10.1037/a0033850 URL |
[73] |
Michael, J., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). Observing joint action: Coordination creates commitment. Cognition. 157, 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.024
doi: S0010-0277(16)30214-1 URL pmid: 27610745 |
[74] |
Milward, S. J., Kita, S., & Apperly, I. A. (2014). The development of co-representation effects in a joint task: Do children represent a co-actor? Cognition, 132(3), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.008
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.008 URL pmid: 24853630 |
[75] |
Novembre, G., Ticini, L. F., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Keller, P. E. (2014). Motor simulation and the coordination of self and other in real-time joint action. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1062-1068. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst086
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst086 URL pmid: 23709353 |
[76] | Peeters, M. M. M., van Diggelen, J., van den Bosch, K., Bronkhorst, A., Neerincx, M. A., Schraagen, J. M., & Raaijmakers, S. (2021). Hybrid collective intelligence in a human-AI society. AI & SOCIETY, 36(1), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01005-y |
[77] |
Pérusseau-Lambert, A., Anastassova, M., Boukallel, M., Chetouani, M., & Grynszpan, O. (2019). The social Simon effect in the tactile sensory modality: A negative finding. Cognitive Processing, 20(3), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00911-4
doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00911-4 URL pmid: 30993409 |
[78] |
Pesquita, A., Whitwell, R. L., & Enns, J. T. (2018). Predictive joint-action model: A hierarchical predictive approach to human cooperation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1751-1769. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1393-6
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1393-6 URL |
[79] | Porcu, E., Bölling, L., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2016). Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 972-977. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1093-8 |
[80] |
Quintard, V., Jouffre, S., Croizet, J.-C., & Bouquet, C. A. (2020). The influence of passionate love on self-other discrimination during joint action. Psychological Research, 84(1), 51-61. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0981-z
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0981-z URL pmid: 29340772 |
[81] |
Roberts, J. W., Maiden, J., & Lawrence, G. P. (2021). Sequential aiming in pairs: The multiple levels of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 239(5), 1479-1488. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06060-5
doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06060-5 URL pmid: 33683404 |
[82] |
Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people's behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1130-1133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.016
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.016 URL |
[83] |
Sahaï, A., Desantis, A., Grynszpan, O., Pacherie, E., & Berberian, B. (2019). Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: Comparing human and machine co-agents. Consciousness and Cognition, 67, 44-55. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.008
doi: S1053-8100(18)30115-6 URL pmid: 30522081 |
[84] |
Sahaï, A., Pacherie, E., Grynszpan, O., & Berberian, B. (2017). Predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human vs. human-machine interactions: A review. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 11, 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052 URL |
[85] |
Schmitz, L., Vesper, C., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2017). Co-representation of others’ task constraints in joint action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(8), 1480-1493. http://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000403
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000403 URL |
[86] |
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009
URL pmid: 16406326 |
[87] |
Sebanz, N., & Frith, C. (2004). Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0104-5
URL pmid: 14699409 |
[88] |
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1756-8765.2009.01024.X
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x URL pmid: 25164938 |
[89] | Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88(3), B11-B21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X |
[90] |
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1234-1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234 URL |
[91] |
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859-870. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859 URL |
[92] |
Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Is it really my turn? An event-related fmri study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2(2), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701237989
doi: 10.1080/17470910701237989 URL pmid: 18633808 |
[93] |
Sellaro, R., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Liepelt, R., & Hommel, B. (2015). Referential coding does not rely on location features: Evidence for a nonspatial joint Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(1), 186-195. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0038548
doi: 10.1037/a0038548 URL |
[94] | Sinigaglia, C., & Butterfill, S. A. (2020). Motor representation and action experience in joint action. In A. Fiebich (Ed.), Minimal cooperation and shared agency (pp. 181-193). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29783-1_11 |
[95] | Sun, H.-M., & Thomas, L. E. (2013). Biased attention near another's hand following joint action. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00443 |
[96] |
Surtees, A., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2016). I've got your number: Spontaneous perspective-taking in an interactive task. Cognition, 150, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.014
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.014 URL pmid: 26848735 |
[97] |
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Hung, D.-L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2015-2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20144
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20144 URL |
[98] |
van der Weiden, A., Aarts, H., Prikken, M., & van Haren, N. E. M. (2016). Individual differences in action co-representation: Not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance. Experimental Brain Research, 234(2), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4475-6
doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4475-6 URL pmid: 26525711 |
[99] |
van der Weiden, A., Porcu, E., & Liepelt, R. (2022). Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action. Psychological Research, 87(2), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01674-y URL pmid: 35507019 |
[100] |
Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 998-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002 URL pmid: 20598504 |
[101] |
Vesper, C., van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G.,& Sebanz, N., (2013). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028066
doi: 10.1037/a0028066 URL |
[102] | Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Review of Philosophy & Psychology, 2(2), 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0057-0 |
[103] |
Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460-473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460 URL pmid: 15869341 |
[104] |
Wolf, W., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Joint attention, shared goals, and social bonding. British Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12144
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12144 URL pmid: 26256821 |
[105] |
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1238
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238 URL |
[106] |
Wynne, K. T., & Lyons, J. B. (2018). An integrative model of autonomous agent teammate-likeness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(3), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1260181
doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2016.1260181 URL |
[107] |
Yang, Q., Song, X., Dong, M., Li, J., & Proctor, R. W. (2021). The Underlying neural mechanisms of interpersonal situations on collaborative ability: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Social Neuroscience, 16(5), 549-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2021.1965017
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1965017 URL |
[1] | 蒋倩妮, 庄想灵, 马国杰. 自动驾驶汽车与行人交互中的沟通界面设计:基于行人过街决策模型的评估[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1979-1992. |
[2] | 许为, 葛列众. 人因学发展的新取向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1521-1534. |
[3] | 徐胜;宋晓蕾. 联合Simon效应:现状、影响因素与理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 367-378. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||