心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 845-858.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00845
侯悍超, 倪士光, 林书亚, 王蒲生
收稿日期:
2023-03-29
出版日期:
2024-05-15
发布日期:
2024-03-05
通讯作者:
倪士光, E-mail: ni.shiguang@sz.tsinghua.edu.cn
基金资助:
HOU Hanchao, NI Shiguang, LIN Shuya, WANG Pusheng
Received:
2023-03-29
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-03-05
摘要: 共情计算是指使用人工智能和大数据技术来预测、识别、模拟和生成人类的共情, 是传统心理学共情研究与计算机科学交叉的新兴研究领域。本研究构建了一个数据层、模型层与任务层的普适性研究框架, 总结了一个包括个体共情测评、共情内容分类、共情回应系统和共情对话生成的4个新主题分析框架, 建立了面向心理健康、教育学习、商业服务和公共管理等心理应用的场景创新。未来研究有必要建构高整合的共情计算理论模型、建设高可信的共情心理行为特征数据集, 并通过以人为中心的评价体系验证并改进共情计算的研究效度。共情计算有益于将当前人际共情研究扩展到智能社会新型人-AI关系研究中。心理学家在该领域承担引领、评估和改进等角色, 并与计算机科学家紧密合作, 共同推动共情计算理论基础更坚实, 效果检验更可靠, 应用创新更贴近实际需求。
侯悍超, 倪士光, 林书亚, 王蒲生. (2024). 当AI学习共情:心理学视角下共情计算的主题、场景与优化. 心理科学进展 , 32(5), 845-858.
HOU Hanchao, NI Shiguang, LIN Shuya, WANG Pusheng. (2024). When AI learns to empathize: Topics, scenarios, and optimization of empathy computing from a psychological perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(5), 845-858.
[1] 彭凯平, 刘世群, 倪士光.(2018). 移动互联网时代的社会科学研究工具: 众包的争议与发展. [2] 苏悦, 刘明明, 赵楠, 刘晓倩, 朱廷劭.(2022). 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法. [3] 王燕青, 龚少英, 姜甜甜, 吴亚男.(2022). 情感代理能否提高多媒体学习的效果? [4] 岳童, 黄希庭.(2016). 共情特质的神经生物学基础. [5] Abdul-Mageed M., Buffone A., Peng H., Giorgi S., Eichstaedt J., & Ungar L. (2017). Recognizing pathogenic empathy in social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 448-451. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14942 [6] Alves-Oliveira P., Sequeira P., Melo F. S., Castellano G., & Paiva A. (2019). Empathic robot for group learning. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300188 [7] Asada, M. (2015). Towards artificial empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0253-z [8] Awad E., Dsouza S., Kim R., Schulz J., Henrich J., Shariff A., Bonnefon J.-F., & Rahwan I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 [9] Barriere V., Tafreshi S., Sedoc J., & Alqahtani S. (2022). WASSA 2022 shared task: Predicting empathy, emotion and personality in reaction to news stories. In [10] Bošnjaković, J., & Radionov, T. (2018). Empathy: Concepts, theories and neuroscientific basis. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research, 54(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.20471/dec.2018.54.02.04 [11] Brett J. D., Becerra R., Maybery M. T., & Preece D. A. (2023). The psychometric assessment of empathy: Development and validation of the Perth Empathy Scale. [12] Buechel S., Buffone A., Slaff B., Ungar L., & Sedoc J. (2018). Modeling empathy and distress in reaction to news stories. In [13] Cai, Y. (2006). Empathic computing. In Y. Cai, & J. Abascal (Eds.), [14] Camacho-Morles J., Slemp G. R., Pekrun R., Loderer K., Hou H., & Oades L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3 [15] Cao S., Fu D., Yang X., Wermter S., Liu X.,& Wu, H.(2021). [16] Chakravarthula S. N., Xiao B., Imel Z. E., Atkins D. C., & Georgiou P. (2015). Assessing empathy using static and dynamic behavior models based on therapist’s language in addiction counseling. In [17] Chen G.-D., Lee J.-H., Wang C.-Y., Chao P.-Y., Li L.-Y., & Li T.-Y. (2012). An empathic avatar in a computer- aided learning program to encourage and persuade learners. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 62-72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.62 [18] Chen M. Y., Li S., & Yang Y. (2022). EmpHi: Generating empathetic responses with human-like intents. In [19] Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563 [20] Cuff B. M. P., Brown S. J., Taylor L., & Howat D. J. (2014). Empathy: A Review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466 [21] Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 [22] de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. [23] de Waal, F. B. M. (2012). The antiquity of empathy. Science, 336(6083), 874-876. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220999 [24] D'mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2013). AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(4), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128 [25] Elliott R., Bohart A. C., Watson J. C., & Greenberg L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022187 [26] Gaume J., Hallgren K. A., Clair C., Schmid Mast M., Carrard V., & Atkins D. C. (2019). Modeling empathy as synchrony in clinician and patient vocally encoded emotional arousal: A failure to replicate. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(3), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000322 [27] Ge Y., Li W., Chen F., Kayani S., & Qin G. (2021). The theories of the development of students: A factor to shape teacher empathy from the perspective of motivation. [28] Gibson J., Can D., Xiao B., Imel Z. E., Atkins D. C., Georgiou P., & Narayanan S. (2016). A deep learning approach to modeling empathy in addiction counseling. In [29] Gibson J., Malandrakis N., Romero F., Atkins D. C., & Narayanan S. S. (2015). Predicting therapist empathy in motivational interviews using language features inspired by psycholinguistic norms. In [30] Groh M., Ferguson C., Lewis R., & Picard R. W. (2022). Computational empathy counteracts the negative effects of anger on creative problem solving. In [31] Grühn D., Rebucal K., Diehl M., Lumley M., & Labouvie- Vief G. (2008). Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion, 8(6), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014123 [32] Guo Y. R.,& Goh, D. H.-L.(2016). Evaluation of affective embodied agents in an information literacy game. [33] Hall J. A.,& Schwartz, R.(2019). Empathy present and future. [34] Hangartner D., Gennaro G., Alasiri S., Bahrich N., Bornhoft A., Boucher J., .. Donnay K. (2021). Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), Article e2116310118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118 [35] Hill, C. E. (2009). [36] Imel Z. E., Barco J. S., Brown H. J., Baucom B. R., Baer J. S., Kircher J. C., & Atkins D. C. (2014). The association of therapist empathy and synchrony in vocally encoded arousal. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(1), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034943 [37] Ishii R., Otsuka K., Kumano S., Higashinaka R., & Tomita J. (2018). Analyzing gaze behavior and dialogue act during turn-taking for estimating empathy skill level. In [38] Jing A., Gupta K.,McDade, J., Lee, G. A., & Billinghurst, M.(2022). Comparing gaze-supported modalities with empathic mixed reality interfaces in remote collaboration. In [39] Jolliffe D.,& Farrington, D. P.(2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. [40] Khanpour H., Caragea C., & Biyani P. (2017). Identifying empathetic messages in online health communities. In [41] Kosinski, M. (2023). [42] Kumano S., Otsuka K., Mikami D.,& Yamato, J.(2011). Analyzing empathetic interactions based on the probabilistic modeling of the co-occurrence patterns of facial expressions in group meetings. In [43] Leite I., Pereira A., Mascarenhas S., Martinho C., Prada R.,& Paiva, A.(2013). The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. [44] Li C., Wang J., Zhang Y., Zhu K., Hou W., Lian J., Luo F., Yang Q., & Xie X. (2023). [45] Li S., Lu S., Ni S.,& Peng, K.(2019). Identifying psychological resilience in Chinese migrant youth through multidisciplinary language pattern decoding. [46] Lin S., Lin L., Hou C., Chen B., Li J., & Ni S. (2023). [47] Lin Z., Madotto A., Shin J., Xu P., & Fung P. (2019). MoEL: Mixture of empathetic listeners. In [48] Litvak M., Otterbacher J., Ang C. S., & Atkins D. (2016). Social and linguistic behavior and its correlation to trait empathy. In [49] Liu S., Zheng C., Demasi O., Sabour S., Li Y., Yu Z., Jiang Y., & Huang M. (2021). Towards emotional support dialog systems. In [50] Lomas, T. (2023). Stranger than we can imagine: The possibility and potential significance of non-human forms of consciousness and wellbeing. [51] Loveys K., Sagar M., Billinghurst M., Saffaryazdi N.,& Broadbent, E.(2022). Exploring empathy with digital humans. In [52] Lv X., Yang Y., Qin D., Cao X.,& Xu, H.(2022). Artificial intelligence service recovery: The role of empathic response in hospitality customers’ continuous usage intention. [53] Ma F., Li Y., Ni S., Huang S.-L., & Zhang L. (2022). Data augmentation for audio-visual emotion recognition with an efficient multimodal conditional GAN. Applied Sciences, 12(1), Article 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010527 [54] Majumder N., Hong P., Peng S., Lu J., Ghosal D., Gelbukh A., Mihalcea R., & Poria S. (2020). MIME: MIMicking emotions for empathetic response generation. In [55] Mathur L., Spitale M., Xi H., Li J.,& Matarić, M. J.(2021). Modeling user empathy elicited by a robot storyteller. In [56] Meyers S., Rowell K., Wells M.,& Smith, B. C.(2019). Teacher empathy: A model of empathy for teaching for student success. [57] Mooradian T. A., Davis M., & Matzler K. (2011). Dispositional empathy and the hierarchical structure of personality. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0099 [58] Morelli S. A., Ong D. C., Makati R., Jackson M. O., & Zaki J. (2017). Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(37), 9843-9847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702155114 [59] Moyers, T. B., & Miller, W. R. (2013). Is low therapist empathy toxic? [60] Oker A., Pecune F., & Declercq C. (2020). Virtual tutor and pupil interaction: A study of empathic feedback as extrinsic motivation for learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3643-3658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10123-5 [61] Omitaomu D., Tafreshi S., Liu T., Buechel S., Callison-Burch C., Eichstaedt J., Ungar L., & Sedoc J. (2022). [62] OpenAI J. A., Steven A., Sandhini A., Lama A., Ilge A., Florencia L. A., .. Barret Z. (2023). [63] Pelau C., Dabija D.-C.,& Ene, I.(2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. [64] Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 [65] Qian Y., Wang B., Ma S., Bin W., Zhang S., Zhao D., Huang K., & Hou Y. (2023). [66] Rashkin H., Smith E. M., Li M., & Boureau Y.-L. (2019). Towards empathetic open-domain conversation models: A new benchmark and dataset. In [67] Reniers R. L.E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A.(2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. [68] Roorda D. L., Koomen H. M. Y., Spilt J. L., & Oort F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793 [69] Roshdy A., Kork S. A., Karar A., Sabi A. A., Barakeh Z. A., ElSayed F., Beyrouthy T., & NAIT-ALI A. (2021). Machine empathy: Digitizing human emotions. In [70] Sabour S., Zheng C., & Huang M. (2022). CEM: Commonsense-aware empathetic response generation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(10), 11229-11237. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21373 [71] Schurz M., Radua J., Tholen M. G., Maliske L., Margulies D. S., Mars R. B., Sallet J., & Kanske P. (2021). Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 147(3), 293-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000303 [72] Sharma A., Lin I. W., Miner A. S., Atkins D. C., & Althoff T. (2021). Towards facilitating empathic conversations in online mental health support: A reinforcement learning approach. In [73] Sharma A., Lin I. W., Miner A. S., Atkins D. C., & Althoff T. (2023). Human-AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 [74] Sharma A., Miner A. S., Atkins D. C., & Althoff T. (2020). A computational approach to understanding empathy expressed in text-based mental health support. In [75] Stosic M. D., Fultz A. A., Brown J. A.,& Bernieri, F. J.(2022). What is your empathy scale not measuring? The convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of five empathy scales. [76] Sun H., Lin Z., Zheng C., Liu S., & Huang M. (2021). PsyQA: A Chinese dataset for generating long counseling text for mental health support. In [77] Terzis V., Moridis C. N.,& Economides, A. A.(2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. [78] Tojib D., Abdi E., Tian L., Rigby L., Meads J., & Prasad T. (2023). What’s best for customers: Empathetic versus solution-oriented service robots. [79] Tong F., Lederman R.,D'Alfonso, S., Berry, K., & Bucci, S.(2022). Digital therapeutic alliance with fully automated mental health smartphone apps: A narrative review. [80] Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L., Gomez A. N., Kaiser Ł., & Polosukhin I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In [81] Wambsganss T., Soellner M., Koedinger K. R., & Leimeister J. M. (2022). Adaptive empathy learning support in peer review scenarios. In [82] Wang H. L., Wu Z. Z., & Lang J. Y. (2020). [83] Wang X., Li X., Yin Z., Wu Y., & Liu Jia. (2023). [84] Xiao B., Bone D., Van Segbroeck M., Imel Z. E., Atkins D. C., Georgiou P. G., & Narayanan S. S. (2014). Modeling therapist empathy through prosody in drug addiction counseling. In [85] Xiao B., Can D., Georgiou P. G., Atkins D., & Narayanan S. S. (2012). Analyzing the language of therapist empathy in motivational interview based psychotherapy. In [86] Xiao B., Imel Z. E., Atkins D. C., Georgiou P. G., & Narayanan S. S. (2015). Analyzing speech rate entrainment and its relation to therapist empathy in drug addiction counseling. In [87] Xiao B., Imel Z. E., Georgiou P., Atkins D. C., & Narayanan S. S. (2016). Computational analysis and simulation of empathic behaviors: A survey of empathy modeling with behavioral signal processing framework. Current Psychiatry Reports, 18(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0682-5 [88] Xiao B., Imel Z. E., Georgiou P. G., Atkins D. C., & Narayanan S. S. (2015). "Rate my therapist": Automated detection of empathy in drug and alcohol counseling via speech and language processing. PLoS One, 10(12), Article e0143055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143055 [89] Xu A., Liu Z., Guo Y., Sinha V., & Akkiraju R. (2017). A new chatbot for customer service on social media. In [90] Yalçın, Ö. N., & DiPaola, S. (2020). Modeling empathy: Building a link between affective and cognitive processes. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(4), 2983-3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09753-0 [91] Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608-1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679 [92] Zhang, J., & Centola, D. (2019). Social networks and health: New developments in diffusion, online and offline. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041421 [93] Zhou K., Aiello L. M., Scepanovic S., Quercia D., & Konrath S. (2021). The language of situational empathy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449087 [94] Zhu S., Yu T., Xu T., Chen H., Dustdar S., Gigan S., .. Pan Y. (2023). Intelligent computing: The latest advances, challenges, and future. |
[1] | 吴波, 张傲杰, 曹菲. 专业设计、用户设计还是AI设计?设计源效应的心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(6): 995-1009. |
[2] | 舒丽芳, 王魁, 吴月燕, 陈斯允. 人工智能指导对消费者长期目标追求的多阶段影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 451-464. |
[3] | 黄心语, 李晔. 人机信任校准的双途径:信任抑制与信任提升[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 527-542. |
[4] | 尹萌, 牛雄鹰. 与AI“共舞”:系统化视角下的AI−员工协作[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(1): 162-176. |
[5] | 涂艳, 蒿坡, 龙立荣. 工作替代还是工作转型?技术型工作不安全感的内涵、影响后果及来源[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(8): 1359-1373. |
[6] | 宋晓蕾, 董梅梅. 人际协同的多重表征模型——基于认知表征的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(7): 1288-1302. |
[7] | 仝宇光, 李颖, 陈杰. 有温度的阅读:共情在文本阅读中的加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(11): 2025-2039. |
[8] | 蒋路远, 曹李梅, 秦昕, 谭玲, 陈晨, 彭小斐. 人工智能决策的公平感知[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1078-1092. |
[9] | 邓士昌, 许祺, 张晶晶, 李象千. 基于心灵知觉理论的AI服务用户接受机制及使用促进策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 723-737. |
[10] | 杨群, 朱兵, 俞奕铭, 张敬敏, 薛孟孟. 应激环境下亲社会性的增加:来自不同类型的亲社会偏好的研究证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2809-2824. |
[11] | 袁玉琢, 骆方. 人工智能辅助的自闭症早期患者的筛查与诊断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2303-2320. |
[12] | 姜力铭, 田雪涛, 任萍, 骆方. 人工智能辅助下的心理健康新型测评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(1): 157-167. |
[13] | 程诚, 郭培杨, 杨丽, 王梦雅. 基于三元精神病态模型的精神病态认知-情感加工框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1628-1646. |
[14] | 曹思琪, 刘勋, 伍海燕. 共情可控?以自上而下视角考察共情的可调节性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1420-1429. |
[15] | 霍超, 李祚山, 孟景. 自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情干预:扬长还是补短?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 849-863. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||