心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 2025-2039.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.02025
收稿日期:
2022-09-30
出版日期:
2023-11-15
发布日期:
2023-08-28
通讯作者:
仝宇光, E-mail: yumuchenxiang@sina.com
基金资助:
TONG Yuguang(), LI Ying, CHEN Jie
Received:
2022-09-30
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-08-28
摘要:
伴随着SPaCEN理论的提出, 阅读对社会认知能力的促进作用引起了广泛关注。共情作为重要的社会认知能力之一, 在文本阅读中的加工机制及影响因素尚未形成统一的理论模型。共情在文本阅读中的加工机制可以从共情诱发通路的多样化, 共情体验的影响因素及其后效, 共情与文本阅读共享的脑区三方面进行剖析。未来亟需在基础加工层面和应用层面进行多维研究, 促进读者健康人格的发展和完善。
中图分类号:
仝宇光, 李颖, 陈杰. (2023). 有温度的阅读:共情在文本阅读中的加工机制. 心理科学进展 , 31(11), 2025-2039.
TONG Yuguang, LI Ying, CHEN Jie. (2023). Warm reading: Clarifying the mechanisms of empathy in text reading. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(11), 2025-2039.
[1] |
陈丽娟, 徐晓东. (2020). 文学阅读如何影响读者的心理理论. 心理科学进展, 28(3), 434-442.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00434 |
[2] | 陈庆荣, 杨亦鸣. (2017). 古诗阅读的认知机制: 来自眼动的证据. 中国社会科学, 38(3), 48-76. |
[3] | 康廷虎, 王旎撰, 高吴平. (2020). 记叙文阅读中主人公转换对情境模型更新的影响. 心理与行为研究, 18(1), 1-7. |
[4] | 鲁忠义, 马红霞. (2011). 主角情绪和时间信息对情境模型加工的影响. 心理学报, 43(7), 763-770. |
[5] | 王德华. (2019). 唐前辞赋句式演变与诗歌韵律节奏. 文学评论, 63(3), 110-120. |
[6] |
张秀平, 张玉萍, 杨晓虹, 杨玉芳. (2017). 语篇情绪理解及其认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 25(8), 1289-1298.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01289 |
[7] |
赵丽华, 杨运梅, 李晶. (2022). 儿童阅读与心理理论间的关系. 心理科学进展, 30(1), 65-76.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00065 |
[8] | Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94 |
[9] | Altmann, D. P. U. (2018). Beyond beauty-affective and aesthetic processes in reading and art perception (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Freien Universität, Dahlem. |
[10] |
Altmann, U., Bohrn, I. C., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fact vs fiction-how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss098 URL pmid: 22956671 |
[11] | Archer, D., & Finger, K. (2018, March). Walking in another's virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers? Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved August 27, 2022, from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/virtual-reality-news-empathy.php |
[12] | Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. Plos One, 8(1), Article e55341. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 |
[13] |
Barnes, J. L. (2018). Imaginary engagement, real-world effects: Fiction, emotion, and social cognition. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000124
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000124 URL |
[14] | Batini, F., Bartolucci, M., & Timpone, A. (2018). The effects of reading aloud in the primary school. Psychology and Education, 55(1-2), 111-122. |
[15] | Batson, C. D. (2011). Empathy-induced altruism:Friend or foe of the common good? In D. R.Forsyth & C. L.Hoyt (Eds.), For the greater good of all. Jepson studies in leadership (pp. 29-47). New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116269_3 |
[16] | Best, J. (2020). Reading literary fiction: More empathy, but at what possible cost. North American Journal of Psychology, 22(2), 269-288. |
[17] |
Best, J. (2021). To teach and delight: The varieties of learning from fiction. Review of General Psychology, 25(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020977173
doi: 10.1177/1089268020977173 URL |
[18] |
Bohn-Gettler, C. M. (2019). Getting a grip: The PET framework for studying how reader emotions influence comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(5-6), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1611174
doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1611174 URL |
[19] |
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language-A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2669-2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021 URL |
[20] |
Breithaupt, F. (2012). A three-person model of empathy. Emotion Review, 4(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421375
doi: 10.1177/1754073911421375 URL |
[21] | Cameron, C. D. (2018). Motivating empathy: Three methodological recommendations for mapping empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(11), e12418. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12418 |
[22] |
Chlebuch, N., Goldstein, T. R., & Weisberg, D. S. (2020). Fact or fiction?: Clarifying the relationship between reading and the improvement of social skills. Scientific Study of Literature, 10(2), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.20007.chl
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[23] |
Chow, H. M., Mar, R. A., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Wagage, S., & Braun, A. R. (2015). Personal experience with narrated events modulates functional connectivity within visual and motor systems during story comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 36(4), 1494-1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22718
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22718 URL pmid: 25545633 |
[24] | Christiansen, C. E. (2021). Does fiction reading make us better people? Empathy and morality in a literary empowerment programme. Ethnos, https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2021.2007158 |
[25] | Clinton, A. J., & Pollini, R. A. (2021). Using positive empathy interventions to reduce stigma toward people who inject drugs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 616729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616729 |
[26] |
Cohen, O. (2021). Teaching self-critical empathy: Lessons drawn from The Tortilla Curtain and Half of a Yellow Sun. English in Education, 55(2), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1686953
doi: 10.1080/04250494.2019.1686953 URL |
[27] |
Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
doi: 10.1177/1754073914558466 URL |
[28] |
Dallacqua, A. K., Sheahan, A., & Davis, A. N. (2022). Teaching the comic Yummy to engage adolescent empathy, critical reflection, and community awareness. Journal of Moral Education, 51(3), 404-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1890554
doi: 10.1080/03057240.2021.1890554 URL |
[29] |
Del Rey, R., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ortega- Ruiz, R., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship. Learning and Individual Differences, 45(4), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.021
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.021 URL |
[30] | Devlin, H. C., Zaki, J., Ong, D. C., & Gruber, J. (2014). Not as good as you think? Trait positive emotion is associated with increased self-reported empathy but decreased empathic performance. Plos One, 9(10), e110470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110470 |
[31] |
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037999
doi: 10.1037/a0037999 URL |
[32] |
Egan, C., Cristino, F., Payne, J. S., Thierry, G., & Jones, M. W. (2020). How alliteration enhances conceptual- attentional interactions in reading. Cortex, 124(3), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.005
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.005 URL |
[33] |
Eklund, J., Anderson-Straberg, T., & Hansen, E. M. (2009). “I've also experienced loss and fear”: Effects of prior similar experience on empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00673.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00673.x URL pmid: 18705672 |
[34] |
Eklund, J. H., & Meranius, M. S. (2021). Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(2), 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022 URL pmid: 32888755 |
[35] |
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020). Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature, 29(2), 124-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020927134
doi: 10.1177/0963947020927134 URL |
[36] |
Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(5), 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053747658
doi: 10.1162/0898929053747658 URL pmid: 15904540 |
[37] |
Foster, P. H., Russell, L. L., Peakman, G., Convery, R. S., Bouzigues, A., Greaves, C. V., … Jiskoot, L. C. (2022). Examining empathy deficits across familial forms of frontotemporal dementia within the GENFI cohort. Cortex, 150(5), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.012
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.012 URL |
[38] | Gladstein, G. A. (1983). Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(4), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.467 |
[39] | Guarisco, M. S., Brooks, C., & Freeman, L. M. (2017). Reading books and reading minds: Differential effects of wonder and the crossover on empathy and theory of mind. Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature, 2(2), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2017.3.1.24-54 |
[40] | Hartung, F., Wang, Y., Mak, M., Willems, R. M., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Out of the Ordinary: Neural correlates of literary form and emotional content in aesthetic engagement with literature. PsyArXiv. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tuwmz |
[41] | Hartung, F., & Willems, R. M. (2020). Amount of fiction reading correlates with higher connectivity between cortical areas for language and mentalizing. BioRxiv. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.139923 |
[42] |
Hecht, M., Kloß, A., & Bartsch, A. (2022). Stopping the stigma. How empathy and reflectiveness can help reduce mental health stigma. Media Psychology, 25(3), 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1963991
doi: 10.1080/15213269.2021.1963991 URL |
[43] | Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., & Zaki, J. (2018). Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. Plos One, 13(10), e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494 |
[44] |
Hsu, C. T., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: Haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroreport, 25(17), 1356-1361. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000272
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000272 URL |
[45] | Hughes, C., Cassidy, B. S., Faskowitz, J., Avena- Koenigsberger, A., Sporns, O., & Krendl, A. C. (2019). Age differences in specific neural connections within the Default Mode Network underlie theory of mind. Neuroimage, 191(8), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.024 |
[46] | Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive poetik: Elemente eines modells des literarischen lesens (Neurocognitive poetics:Elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott& A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und gedicht: Wie wir unsere wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492-524). Munich, Germany: Carl Hanser Verlag. |
[47] | Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M.Willems (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135-159). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2140.7445 |
[48] |
Johnson, D. R. (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab- Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.08joh
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[49] | Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (2022). How poetry evokes emotions. Acta Psychologica, 224(3), Article 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103506 |
[50] |
Kang, O., & Wheatley, T. (2017). Pupil dilation patterns spontaneously synchronize across individuals during shared attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(4), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000271
doi: 10.1037/xge0000271 URL |
[51] |
Karam, K. M., & Elfiel, H. (2020). An experimental study of the effect of close reading versus casual reading of social drama on the stimulation of the cognitive capacity of empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 10(1), 4-34. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.119016.kar
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[52] |
Keen, S. (2006). A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207-236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20107388
doi: 10.1353/nar.2006.0015 URL |
[53] |
Keen, S. (2008). Strategic empathizing: Techniques of bounded, ambassadorial, and broadcast narrative empathy. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, 82(3), 477-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374712
doi: 10.1007/BF03374712 URL |
[54] | Keen, S. (2010). Narrative empathy. In F. L.Aldama (Eds.), Toward a cognitive theory of narrative acts (pp. 61-94). Texas, United States: University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/721579-004 |
[55] | Keen, S. (2011). Empathetic hardy: Bounded, ambassadorial, and broadcast strategies of narrative empathy. Poetics Today, 32(2), 349-389. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-1162695 |
[56] | Keen, S. (2017). Narrative empathy: A universal response to fiction?. Literary Universals Project. Retrieved August 27, 2022, from https://literary-universals.uconn.edu/2017/10/07/narrative-empathy-a-universal-response-to-fiction |
[57] | Keen, S. (2019). Twenty-first-century fictional experiments with emotion and cognition. In S.Baumbach & B.Neumann (Eds.), New approaches to the twenty-first- century anglophone novel (pp. 59-77). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-32598-5_4 |
[58] | Kidd, D., & Castano, E. (2019). Reading literary fiction and theory of mind: Three preregistered replications and extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 522-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775410 |
[59] | Komeda, H., Kosaka, H., Fujioka, T., Jung, M., & Okazawa, H. (2019). Do individuals with autism spectrum disorders help other people with autism spectrum disorders? An investigation of empathy and helping motivation in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00376 |
[60] | Koopman, E. M. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50(3), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008 |
[61] |
Koopman, E. M. (2016). Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041
doi: 10.1037/aca0000041 URL |
[62] | Koopman, E. M. (2018). Does originality evoke understanding? The relation between literary reading and empathy. Review of General Psychology, 22(2), 169-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000107 |
[63] | KUZMIČOVÁ, A., MANGEN, A., STØLE, H., & BEGNUM, A. C. (2017). Literature and readers’empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature, 26(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704729 |
[64] |
Langkau, J. (2020). The empathic skill fiction can’t teach us. Philosophical Psychology, 33(3), 313-331. https://doi. org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1731446
doi: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1731446 URL |
[65] | Learn, L., & Cueto, M. (2017, January). The effect of fictional literature on empathy in children. Paper presented at the meeting of MOL2NET'17, Conference on Molecular, Biomedical, Computational & Network science and Engineering, Basel, Switzerland.https://doi:10.3390/mol2net-03-05115 https://doi:10.3390/mol2net-03-05115 |
[66] |
Lenhart, J., Dangel, J., & Richter, T. (2020). The relationship between lifetime book reading and empathy in adolescents: Examining transportability as a moderator. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 16(4), 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000341
doi: 10.1037/aca0000341 URL |
[67] |
Lin, F. H., Liu, Y. F., Lee, H. J., Chang, C. H., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Yeh, J. N., & Kuo, W. J. (2019). Differential brain mechanisms during reading human vs. machine translated fiction and news texts. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49632-w
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 URL |
[68] |
Lüdtke, J., Meyer-Sickendieck, B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036826
doi: 10.1037/a0036826 URL |
[69] | Małecki, W., Pawłowski, B., & Sorokowski, P. (2016). Literary fiction influences attitudes toward animal welfare. Plos One, 11(12), e0168695. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168695 |
[70] |
Malecki, W., Pawłowski, B., Sorokowski, P., & Oleszkiewicz, A. (2019). Feeling for textual animals: Narrative empathy across species lines. Poetics, 74(3), 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.11.003
doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2018.11.003 URL |
[71] |
Malyn, B. O., Thomas, Z., & Ramsey-Wade, C. E. (2020). Reading and writing for well-being: A qualitative exploration of the therapeutic experience of older adult participants in a bibliotherapy and creative writing group. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(4), 715-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12304
doi: 10.1002/capr.v20.4 URL |
[72] |
Mar, R. A. (2004). The neuropsychology of narrative: Story comprehension, story production and their interrelation. Neuropsychologia, 42(10), 1414-1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.016
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.016 URL pmid: 15193948 |
[73] |
Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5-6), 454-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209 URL |
[74] | Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151 |
[75] |
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM
doi: 10.1515/COMM.2009.025 URL |
[76] | Martignano, A., Herrera, F., Castano, E., & Konrath, S. (2019, May). Virtual reality can increase empathy: A preregistered meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Convention for the Association for Psychological Science, Washington, D.C. |
[77] |
Mayshak, R., Sharman, S. J., Zinkiewicz, L., & Hayley, A. (2017). The influence of empathy and self-presentation on engagement with social networking website posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 71(6), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.026
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.026 URL |
[78] | Montgomery, P., & Maunders, K. (2015). The effectiveness of creative bibliotherapy for internalizing, externalizing, and prosocial behaviors in children: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 55(8), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.010 |
[79] |
Mumper, M. L., & Gerrig, R. J. (2019). How does leisure reading affect social cognitive abilities. Poetics Today, 40(3), 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-7558080
doi: 10.1215/03335372-7558080 URL |
[80] | Nussbaum, M. C. (1998). Poetic justice: The literary imagination and public life. Political Theory, 26(4), 557-583. |
[81] |
Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
doi: S1364-6613(16)30070-5 URL pmid: 27449184 |
[82] | Panto, F., Saito, T., Morita, N., & Ogai, Y. (2022). The correlation between enjoying fictional narratives and empathy in Japanese Hikikomori. F1000research, 10, Article 776. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55398.1 |
[83] |
Pianzola, F., Bálint, K., & Weller, J. (2019). Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 9(2), 163-194. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19013.pia
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[84] | Pigden, A. R. (2021). Is the pen mightier than the sword? Testing the effects of fiction on empathy and aggression, and introducing a hybrid model of media effects (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Otago, Dunedin. |
[85] | Pinker, S. (2012). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York: Viking. |
[86] | Roshanaei, M., Tran, C., Morelli, S., Caragea, C., & Zheleva, E. (2019, October). Paths to empathy: Heterogeneous effects of reading personal stories online. Symposium conducted at the meeting of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Washington, DC. |
[87] | Salem, S., Weskott, T., & Holler, A. (2017). Does narrative perspective influence readers’ perspective-taking? An empirical study on free indirect discourse, psycho-narration and first-person narration. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.225 |
[88] |
Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Stocker, G. (2021). Experiencing literature on the E-reader: The effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 319-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12337
doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12337 URL pmid: 33888920 |
[89] |
Sellers, J. A. (2021). Eliciting empathy through the study of literature in the world language classroom. Hispania, 104(3), 363-367. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2021.0090
doi: 10.1353/hpn.2021.0090 URL |
[90] |
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). The neural bases for empathy. The Neuroscientist, 17(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410379268
doi: 10.1177/1073858410379268 URL |
[91] |
Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011
URL pmid: 16904182 |
[92] | Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x |
[93] | Somers, T. (2020). Levels of empathy when reading fiction versus listening to fiction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dun Laoghaire Institute of Art, Design and Technology, Dublin. |
[94] |
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016). Reading fiction and reading minds: The role of simulation in the default network. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv114
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv114 URL pmid: 26342221 |
[95] |
Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.68
URL pmid: 12558204 |
[96] |
Topić, M. K. (2021). Emotional engagement, but not transportation leads to higher empathy after reading a fictional story, in more agreeable participants. Primenjena Psihologija, 14(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.2.211-227
doi: 10.19090/pp.2021.2 URL |
[97] |
Tribe, K. V., Papps, F. A., & Calvert, F. (2021). “It just gives people hope”: A qualitative inquiry into the lived experience of the Harry Potter world in mental health recovery. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 74(3), 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2021.101802
doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2021.101802 URL |
[98] |
Turner, R., & Felisberti, F. M. (2018). Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature, 8(2), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19003.tur
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[99] | van Lissa, C. J., Caracciolo, M., van Duuren, T., & van Leuveren, B. (2018). Difficult empathy. The effect of narrative perspective on readers’ engagement with a first- person narrator. DIEGESIS: Interdisciplinary E-Journal for Narrative Research, 5(1), 43-63. |
[100] | Verhoeven, J. (2017). The effect of physical proximity on empathy and prosocial behavior through reading (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Twente, Enschede. |
[101] |
Võ, M. L. H., Boettcher, S. E., & Draschkow, D. (2019). Reading scenes: How scene grammar guides attention and aids perception in real-world environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29(5), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.009
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.009 URL |
[102] |
Wagner, I. C., Rütgen, M., & Lamm, C. (2020). Pattern similarity and connectivity of hippocampal-neocortical regions support empathy for pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(3), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa045
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa045 URL pmid: 32248233 |
[103] |
Walkington, Z., Wigman, S. A., & Bowles, D. (2020). The impact of narratives and transportation on empathic responding. Poetics, 80(3), 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101425
doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101425 URL |
[104] |
Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421379
doi: 10.1177/1754073911421379 URL |
[105] |
Wedel, A., Müller, C. R., & Greiner, F. (2022). Diagnostic cases in pre-service teacher education: Effects of text characteristics and empathy on text-based cognitive models. Educational Psychology, 42(6), 694-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2047615
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2022.2047615 URL |
[106] |
Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Harding, J. F., Johnson, S. B., Canfield, C. F., Seery, A. M., … Mendelsohn, A. L. (2019). Links between shared reading and play, parent psychosocial functioning, and child behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Pediatrics, 213(10), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.037
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.037 URL |
[107] |
Werner, C., & Lüdtke, J. (2021). Empathy’s role in different levels of understanding literature: Empirical and philosophical perspectives. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 79(2), 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpab019
doi: 10.1093/jaac/kpab019 URL |
[108] |
Willard, J., & Buddie, A. (2019). Enhancing empathy and reading for pleasure in psychology of gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(3), 398-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319845616
doi: 10.1177/0361684319845616 URL |
[109] |
Wimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., & Ferguson, H. J. (2021). The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition: Two experiments following a multi-method approach. Scientific Study of Literature, 11(2), 223-265. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.21010.wim
doi: 10.1075/ssol URL |
[110] | Yuill, N., & Martin, A. F. (2016). Curling up with a good e-book: Mother-child shared story reading on screen or paper affects embodied interaction and warmth. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01951 |
[111] |
Zhang, J., Park, S., Cho, A., & Whang, M. (2022). Significant measures of gaze and pupil movement for evaluating empathy between viewers and digital content. Sensors, 22(5), 1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051700
doi: 10.3390/s22051700 URL |
[112] |
Zhao, Q., Neumann, D. L., Yan, C., Djekic, S., & Shum, D. H. (2021). Culture, sex, and group-bias in trait and state empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 561930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.561930
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.561930 URL |
[1] | 杨群, 朱兵, 俞奕铭, 张敬敏, 薛孟孟. 应激环境下亲社会性的增加:来自不同类型的亲社会偏好的研究证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2809-2824. |
[2] | 程诚, 郭培杨, 杨丽, 王梦雅. 基于三元精神病态模型的精神病态认知-情感加工框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1628-1646. |
[3] | 曹思琪, 刘勋, 伍海燕. 共情可控?以自上而下视角考察共情的可调节性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1420-1429. |
[4] | 霍超, 李祚山, 孟景. 自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情干预:扬长还是补短?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 849-863. |
[5] | 金国敏, 李丹. 慈悲冥想对利他行为的影响及其认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 978-986. |
[6] | 陈丽娟, 徐晓东. 文学阅读如何影响读者的心理理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 434-442. |
[7] | 苏彦捷, 谢东杰, 王笑楠. 认知控制在第三方惩罚中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1331-1343. |
[8] | 潘彦谷, 肖遥, 胡俞, 刘广增, 李知洋. 安全依恋对共情和利他行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2077-2083. |
[9] | 康一奇, 种霞, 吴南. 自闭症早期预警:联合注意和共情的发生发展及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1223-1231. |
[10] | 岳童, 黄希庭, 刘光远. 催产素对共情反应的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 442-453. |
[11] | 阎博, 樊富珉, 喻丰. 动觉共情干预在舞蹈动作治疗中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 496-502. |
[12] | 孙俊才, 刘萍. 共情优势的视觉加工证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 7-7. |
[13] | 钟毅平, 占友龙, 李琎, 范伟. 道德决策的机制及干预研究: 自我相关性与风险水平的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102. |
[14] | 敬娇娇;高闯;牛更枫. 互联网使用对共情的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 652-661. |
[15] | 竭 婧, 庄梦迪, 罗品超, 郑希付. 神经科学视角下的共情研究热点[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1922-1931. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||