人因学发展的新取向

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01521

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前新技术、人机交互的新特征、社会和人的新需求给中国人因学(Human Factors)的进一步发展创造了一个有利时机。本文首先讨论和分析了一些具有代表性的开拓了人因学科研究深度和广度的新技术和新途径, 包括神经人因学, 认知工程, 协同认知系统, 社会技术系统; 以及人因学科应用中的一些挑战和策略。然后, 就进一步发展我国的人因学科, 本文提出首先要解决的问题是建立多学科交叉的人因学科的科研教育体制, 并在此基础上, 注重理论创新, 以创新设计为突破点, 在智能系统、用户体验、航天航空和医疗健康等领域中优先发展和应用。当前迫切需要解决的是, 建立完善的人因学科高校教育体系, 建立完善的人因学科多学科交叉的科研体系, 以及建立人因学科行业资质标准和设计标准体系。

关键词: 人因学, 人因工程, 工效学, 人机交互, 用户体验

Abstract:

Emerging technologies, new features of human-computer interaction, and unique social and human needs have created a favorable opportunity for the further development of Human Factors and related disciplines in China. This paper first discusses and analyzes some representative new technologies and new approaches, including neuroergonomics, cognitive engineering, joint cognitive systems, and sociotechnical systems, that have expanded the depth and breadth of Human Factors and related fields of study. The paper then discusses the challenges and strategies in the applications of Human Factors and related disciplines. To further develop these academic fields in our country, this paper proposes three actions. The first action to take is to solve the problem of establishing an interdisciplinary research and education system. The second and third actions are to pay attention to innovations in Human Factors theories and take innovative design as the breakthrough point. Intelligent systems, user experience, space and aviation, and health care are the domains with high priority for research and application of Human Factors and related areas of study. At present, four urgent steps are necessary: (a) establish a fully developed higher education system, (b) organize an interdisciplinary research structure, (c) institute professional certification, and (d) develop a system for Human Factors design standards.

Key words: Human factors, human factors engineering, ergonomics, human-computer interaction, user experience

中图分类号:

B849

许为, 葛列众. (2018). 人因学发展的新取向. 心理科学进展 , 26(9), 1521-1534.

Wei XU, Liezhong GE. (2018). New trends in human factors. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1521-1534.

参考文献

1	曹石, 秦裕林, 沈模卫 . ( 2013). 驾驶经验与横向控制的ACT-R认知体系结构建模. 科学通报, 58( 21), 2078-2086.
2	陈立 . ( 1935). 工业心理学概观. 北京: 商务印书馆.
3	陈善广, 姜国华, 王春慧 . ( 2015). 航天人因工程研究进展. 载人航天, 21( 2), 95-105.
4	陈善广, 王春慧, 陈晓萍, 姜国华 . ( 2015). 长期空间飞行中人的作业能力变化特性研究. 航天医学与医学工程, 28( 1), 1-10.
5	陈迎春 . ( 2013). 民机驾驶舱人机工效综合仿真理论与方法研究. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社.
6	葛列众, 孙梦丹, 王琦君 . ( 2015). 视觉显示技术的新视角: 交互显示. 心理科学进展, 23( 4), 539-546.
7	葛列众, 李宏汀, 王笃明 . ( 2017). 工程心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
8	李鹏程, 张力, 戴立操, 蒋建军, 罗迪凡 . ( 2016). 核电厂操纵员的情景意识失误与预防控制研究. 原子能科学技术, 50( 2), 323-331.
9	毛茅, 张宇博, 饶培伦 . ( 2015). 急诊室人的失误影响因素概述. 人类工效学, 21( 1), 61-65.
10	庞小月, 郭睿桢, 姚乃埌, 于佳林, 余诗贤, 王慈, 高在峰 . ( 2014). 体感交互人因学研究回顾与展望. 应用心理学, 20(3), 243-251.
11	全国人类工效学标准化技术委员会, 中国标准出版社第四编辑室. ( 2009a). 人类工效学标准汇编: 物理环境卷. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
12	全国人类工效学标准化技术委员会, 中国标准出版社第四编辑室. ( 2009b). 人类工效学标准汇编: 一般性指导原则及人-系统交互卷. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
13	全国人类工效学标准化技术委员会, 中国标准出版社第四编辑室. ( 2009c). 人类工效学标准汇编: 人体测量与生物力学卷. 北京: 中国标准出版社.
14	孙向红, 吴昌旭, 张亮, 瞿炜娜 . ( 2011). 工程心理学作用、地位和进展. 中国科学院院刊, 26( 6), 650-660.
15	吴朝辉, 俞一鹏, 潘纲, 王跃明 . ( 2014). 脑机融合系统综述. 生命科学, 26( 6), 645-649.
16	许卫 . ( 2004). 有关自动化飞机驾驶舱的人机工效学问题. 国际航空, ( 5), 49-51.
17	许为 . ( 2003). 自动化飞机驾驶舱中人-自动化系统交互作用的心理学研究. 心理科学, 26( 3), 523-524.
18	许为 . ( 2017). 再论以用户为中心的设计: 新挑战和新机遇. 人类工效学, 23( 1), 82-86.
19	许为, 陈勇 . ( 2012). 人机工效学在民用客机研发中应用的新进展及建议. 航空科学技术, ( 6), 18-21.
20	许为, 陈勇 . ( 2013). 民用客机人机工效学适航认证及对策. 民用飞机设计与研究, ( 2), 24- 30, 80.
21	许为, 陈勇 . ( 2014). 从驾驶舱设计和适航来减少由设计引发的飞行员人为差错的挑战和途径. 民用飞机设计与研究, ( 3), 5-11.
22	薛澄岐 . ( 2015). 复杂信息系统人机交互数字界面设计方法及应用. 南京: 东南大学出版社.
23	姚永杰, 刘秋红, 王庆敏, 史卫民 . ( 2016). 舰载机航空人机工效研究的紧迫问题. 医学争鸣, 7( 1), 8-11.
24	张丽川, 李宏汀, 葛列众 . ( 2009). Tobii眼动仪在人机交互中的应用. 人类工效学, 15( 2), 67-69.
25	郑燕, 王璟, 葛列众 . ( 2015). 自适应用户界面研究综述. 航天医学与医学工程, 28( 2), 145-150.
26	Baldwin, C. L., &Coyne, J. ( 2005). Dissociable aspects of mental workload: Examinations of the P300 ERP component and performance assessments. Psychologia, 48, 102-119.
27	Bennett, K. B. ( 2017). Ecological interface design and system safety: One facet of Rasmussen's legacy. Applied Ergonomics, 59( 2), 625-636.
28	BCPE. Board of Certification in Professional Ergonomics (BCPE). Retrieved April 3, 2018, from .
29	Borghetti, B. J., Giametta J. J., & Rusnock. ( 2017). Assessing continuous operator workload with a hybrid scaffolded neuroergonomic modeling approach. Human Factors, 59( 1), 134-146.
30	Burns C. M., & Hajdukiewicz, J. .( 2004) . Ecological interface design. London: CRC Press.
31	Cao, S., & Liu, Y. L. ( 2013). Queueing network-adaptive control of thought rational (QN-ACTR): An integrated cognitive architecture for modelling complex cognitive and multi-task performance. International Journal of Human Factors Modelling and Simulation, 4( 1), 63-86.
32	Carayon, P. ( 2006). Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 525-535.
33	Cooke, N. J. ( 2017). How can human factors/ergonomics take on the NAE grand challenges? Retrieved April 3, 2018, from .
34	Dul J., Bruder R., Buckle P., Carayon P., Falzon P., Marras W. S., … van der Doelen, B. ( 2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55( 4), 377-395.
35	Endsley, M. R. ( 1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
36	Endsley M. R. ( 2000). Errors in situation assessment: Implications for system design. In: P. E., Elzer, R. H. Ktuwe, & P. F. Boussoffara, (Eds.), Human error and system design and management (pp. 15-26). London: Springer.
37	Endsley M. R. & Jones, D. G. ( 2012). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design (2nd ed). London: CRC Press.
38	Endsley M. R., Hoffman R., Kaber D., & Roth E. ( 2007). Cognitive engineering and decision making: An overview and future course. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1( 1), 1-21.
39	Evans H., Buckland G., & Lefer D. ( 2004). They made America: From the steam engine to the search engine: Two centuries of innovators. Boston: Little Brown.
40	Farooq, U., & Grudin, J. ( 2016). Human computer integration. Interactions, 23, 27-32.
41	Foyle D. C., & Hooey, B. L.( 2007) . Human performance modeling in aviation. London: CRC Press.
42	Hendrick H. W., & Kleiner, B. .( 2002). Macroergonomics: Theory, methods, and applications. London: CRC Press.
43	Hobbs, A. & Lyall, B. ( 2016). Human factors guidelines for unmanned aircraft systems. Ergonomics in Design, 24( 3), 23-28.
44	Hollnagel E., & Woods, D. D.( 2005) . Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. London: CRC Press.
45	Howell, W. C. ( 2001). The HF/E parade: A tale of two models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45( 1), 1-5.
46	Human Factors Ergonomics Society ( HFES). ( 2016, Sept). HFES comments on the national science foundation strategic plan. Retrieved May 29, 2018, from
47	Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ( HFES). ( 2018). Directory of human factors/ergonomics graduate programs in the United States and Canada. Retrieved April 3, 2018, from
48	Jeon, M. ( 2017). Emotions and affect in human factors and human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
49	Kitson, L. ( 2011). User-led does not equal user-centered. UX Magazine, 17. Retrieved May 29, 2018, from
50	Lundberg, J. ( 2015). Situation awareness systems, states and processes: A holistic framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16( 5), 447-473.
51	Mcilroy, R. C., & Stanton, N. A. ( 2015). Ecological interface design two decades on: whatever happened to the SRK taxonomy? IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45( 2), 145-163.
52	Naikar, N. ( 2017). Cognitive work analysis: An influential legacy extending beyond human factors and engineering. Applied Ergonomics, 59, 528-540.
53	Norman, D. ( 1986). Cognitive engineering. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
54	Parasuraman R. & Rizzo, M.( 2006). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55	Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. U. ( 2010). Cumulative knowledge and progress in human factors. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 623-651.
56	Rasmussen J., Pejtersen A. M., & Goodstein L. P. ( 1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
57	Rouse W. B., Pennock P. J., Oghbaie M., & Liu C. ( 2017). Interactive visualizations for decision support: Application of Rasmussen's abstraction-aggregation hierarchy. Applied Ergonomics, 59, 541-553.
58	Rebelo F., Noriega P., Duarte E., & Soares M. ( 2012). Using virtual reality to assess user experience. Human Factors, 54( 6), 964-982.
59	Schulz C. M., Endsley M. R., Kochs E. F., Gelb A. W., & Wagner K. J. ( 2013). Situation awareness in anesthesia: Concept and research. Anesthesiology, 118( 3), 729-742.
60	Sheridan, T. B. ( 2016). Human-robot interaction: status and challenges. Human Factors, 58( 4), 525-532.
61	Skibsted, J. M., & Hansen, R. B. ( 2011). User-led innovation can’t create breakthroughs. Harvard Business Review. , 2014-05-08.
62	Stedmon, A., Richards, D., Frumkin, L., & Fussey, P. (2016). Human factors insecurity: User-centred and socio-technical perspectives. Security Journal, 29, 1-4.
63	Vicente, K. J. ( 1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64	Wickens C. D., Hollands J. G., Banbury S., & Parasuraman, R.( 2012) . Engineering psychology and human performance (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Psychology Press.
65	Xu W., Dainoff M. J., & Mark L. S. ( 1999). Facilitate complex search tasks in hypertext by externalizing functional properties of a work domain. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 11( 3), 201-229.
66	Xu, W. ( 2007). Identifying problems and generating recommendations for enhancing complex systems: Applying the abstraction hierarchy framework as an analytical tool. Human Factors, 49( 6), 975-994.
67	Xu, W. ( 2014). Enhanced ergonomics approaches for product design: A user experience ecosystem perspective and case studies. Ergonomics, 57( 1), 34-51.
68	Xu, W. & Furie, D. ( 2016). Designing for unified experience: a new perspective and a case study. In Angelina. C. Sparks & N. Science (Eds.), Ergonomics: Challenges, applications and new perspectives ( pp. 137-165). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

[1]	蒋倩妮, 庄想灵, 马国杰. 自动驾驶汽车与行人交互中的沟通界面设计：基于行人过街决策模型的评估[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1979-1992.
[2]	许为, 葛列众. 智能时代的工程心理学[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1409-1425.
[3]	阚红, 朱艳菲, 汪亚珉. 学习论视角下的教育工效学理论模型的发展与应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(10): 1726-1737.
[4]	周勇;曾艳;杨家忠;石荣;王泉川. 基于多传感器数据的航空管制员情境意识的计算[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(11): 1879-1885.
[5]	易欣;葛列众;刘宏艳. 正负性情绪的自主神经反应及应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(1): 72-84.
[6]	葛燕;陈亚楠;刘艳芳;李稳;孙向红. 电生理测量在用户体验中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(6): 959-967.
[7]	贾会宾;赵庆柏;周治金. 心理负荷的评估：基于神经人因学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(8): 1390-1399.
[8]	刘静;孙向红. 什么决定着用户对产品的完整体验?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(1): 94-106.
[9]	宋国萍. 军事应激下的认知工效学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(2): 169-.
[10]	葛列众;胡凤培. 多元视觉显示的工效学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2001, 9(3): 201-204.