心理科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 1878-1886.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01878 cstr: 32111.14.2021.01878
收稿日期:
2020-12-07
出版日期:
2021-10-15
发布日期:
2021-08-23
基金资助:
ZHANG Lu, WU Yuntena(), JIN Tonglin
Received:
2020-12-07
Online:
2021-10-15
Published:
2021-08-23
摘要:
I3模型塑造了一个解释个体行为的理论框架, 认为所有的行为都来自刺激、驱力和抑制三个因素的组合, 任何一个因素都可以独立于其余两个而变化, 其结构是由一个结果(行为)、一个中介(行为倾向)和三个因素(刺激、驱力和抑制)组成的12条路径的综合模型。这12条路径通过描述18个问题来预测个体在具体背景下的行为机制, 比如攻击行为、进食行为等。为有效促进该理论的应用, 文章对该理论的合理性、科学性、独特价值, 以及存在的问题进行评价, 并进一步提出未来的研究方向。
中图分类号:
张璐, 乌云特娜, 金童林. (2021). I3模型视角下个体行为的表达机制. 心理科学进展 , 29(10), 1878-1886.
ZHANG Lu, WU Yuntena, JIN Tonglin. (2021). The expression mechanism of individual behavior in the perspective of I3 model. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(10), 1878-1886.
效应 | 路径 | 理论问题 |
---|---|---|
1 | 路径1 | 刺激因素对行为的影响? |
2 | 路径2 | 抑制因素对行为的影响? |
3 | 路径3 | 驱力因素对行为的影响? |
4 | 路径4 | 驱力因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
5 | 路径5 | 抑制因素和驱力因素对行为的影响? |
6 | 路径6 | 抑制因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
7 | 路径7 | 抑制因素×刺激因素×驱力因素交互作用对行为的影响? |
8 | 路径8 | 刺激因素对行为倾向的影响? |
9 | 路径9 | 驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
10 | 路径10 | 刺激因素和驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
11 | 路径11 | 行为倾向对行为的影响? |
12 | 路径12 | 抑制因素在行为倾向和行为之间的调节作用? |
13 | 路径8/11 | 行为倾向在刺激因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
14 | 路径9/11 | 行为倾向在驱力因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
15 | 路径10/11 | 行为倾向在刺激×驱力交互作用和行为之间的中介作用? |
16 | 路径8/12 | 抑制对刺激→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
17 | 路径9/12 | 抑制对驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
18 | 路径10/12 | 抑制对刺激×驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
表1 I3模型的18个效应问题
效应 | 路径 | 理论问题 |
---|---|---|
1 | 路径1 | 刺激因素对行为的影响? |
2 | 路径2 | 抑制因素对行为的影响? |
3 | 路径3 | 驱力因素对行为的影响? |
4 | 路径4 | 驱力因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
5 | 路径5 | 抑制因素和驱力因素对行为的影响? |
6 | 路径6 | 抑制因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
7 | 路径7 | 抑制因素×刺激因素×驱力因素交互作用对行为的影响? |
8 | 路径8 | 刺激因素对行为倾向的影响? |
9 | 路径9 | 驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
10 | 路径10 | 刺激因素和驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
11 | 路径11 | 行为倾向对行为的影响? |
12 | 路径12 | 抑制因素在行为倾向和行为之间的调节作用? |
13 | 路径8/11 | 行为倾向在刺激因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
14 | 路径9/11 | 行为倾向在驱力因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
15 | 路径10/11 | 行为倾向在刺激×驱力交互作用和行为之间的中介作用? |
16 | 路径8/12 | 抑制对刺激→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
17 | 路径9/12 | 抑制对驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
18 | 路径10/12 | 抑制对刺激×驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
[1] | 姜永志. (2014). 西方心理学理论分类体系的反思与建构. 心理科学进展, 22(2), 348-356. |
[2] | 李佳洁, 于彤彤. (2020). 基于助推的健康饮食行为干预策略. 心理科学进展, 28(12), 2052-2063. |
[3] | 尚新民. (1988). 环境·心理·行为——兼论西方行为主义心理学的兴起与衰落. 心理学探新, 4, 39-44. |
[4] | 王延松, 霍涌泉. (2007). 后现代主义心理学在元理论方面的反思. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 29(6), 239- 242. |
[5] | 辛自强. (2002). 智能结构三层次理论述评. 心理科学, 25(6), 686-766. |
[6] | 叶浩生. (2003). 论理论心理学的概念、性质与作用. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2(3), 58-61. |
[7] |
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T URL |
[8] |
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
pmid: 11752478 |
[9] |
Anderson, C. A., Deuser, W. E., & DeNeve, K. M. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(5), 434-448.
doi: 10.1177/0146167295215002 URL |
[10] | Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum. |
[11] |
Braat, M., Engelen, J., van Gemert, T., & Verhaegh, S. (2020). The rise and fall of behaviorism: The narrative and the numbers. History of Psychology, 23(3), 252-280.
doi: 10.1037/hop0000146 URL |
[12] |
Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2019). Effects of instigation, anger, and emotion regulation on intimate partner aggression: Examination of “perfect storm” theory. Psychology of Violence, 9(2), 186-195.
doi: 10.1037/vio0000190 |
[13] |
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574-609.
doi: 10.1177/1094428116641191 URL |
[14] |
Chen, Y. (2020). An investigation of the influencing factors of Chinese WeChat users' environmental information-sharing behavior based on an integrated model of UGT, NAM, and TPB. Sustainability, 12(7), 1-19.
doi: 10.3390/su12010001 URL |
[15] |
Denson, T. F., Capper, M. M., Oaten, M., Friese, M., & Schofield, T. O. (2011). Self-control training decreases aggression in response to provocation in aggressive individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 252-256.
doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.001 URL |
[16] |
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 263-271.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613483774 URL |
[17] |
Finkel, E. J. (2007). Impelling and inhibiting forces in the perpetration of intimate partner violence. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 193-207.
doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.193 URL |
[18] | Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 model:Metatheory, theory, and evidence. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 1-104). Academic Press. |
[19] |
Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 263-277.
pmid: 11519931 |
[20] |
Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Slotter, E. B., McNulty, J. K., Pond, R. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2012). Using I3 theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 533-549.
doi: 10.1037/a0025651 pmid: 21967005 |
[21] | Finkel, E. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 452-474). Oxford. |
[22] |
Finkel, E. J., & Hall, A. N. (2018). The I3 model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125-130.
doi: S2352-250X(17)30063-5 pmid: 29279210 |
[23] | Finkel, E. J., Herbst, K. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2011). The obesity superhighway: An I3theory analysis of unhealthy food consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 38, 491-493. |
[24] |
Finkel, E. J., & Slotter, E. B. (2009). An I3 theory analysis of human sex differences in aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3/4), 249-311.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09990951 URL |
[25] | Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press. |
[26] |
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692-731.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 pmid: 16910748 |
[27] |
Grom, J. L., Crane, C., Leone, R. M., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. (2019). Sexual violence perpetration within intimate relationships: An I3 model analysis of the effects of sexual violence victimization and psychological flexibility. Sexual Abuse, 33(1), 114-132.
doi: 10.1177/1079063219877176 URL |
[28] |
Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.032 URL |
[29] | Hellsten, L. A. M., Hendry, B. P., McIntyre, L. J., Koole, M., & Myburgh, J. E. (2020, January). Reimagining the I3 model: Addressing the limitations of the I3 model as applied to cyberbullying in Saskatchewan. Paper presented at the meeting of 2020 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, CA. |
[30] |
Hill, R. J. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244-245.
doi: 10.2307/2065853 URL |
[31] |
Larrick, R. P., Timmerman, T. A., Carton, A. M., & Abrevaya, J. (2011). Temper, temperature, and temptation: Heat-related retaliation in baseball. Psychological Science, 22(4), 423- 428.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611399292 URL |
[32] | Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
[33] |
Li, J. B., Nie, Y. G., Boardley, I. D., Dou, K., & Situ, Q. M. (2015). When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 544-555.
doi: 10.1002/ab.v41.6 URL |
[34] |
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
pmid: 16968208 |
[35] |
Markwald, R. R., Melanson, E. L., Smith, M. R., Higgins, J., Perreault, L., Eckel, R. H., & Wright, K. P. (2013). Impact of insufficient sleep on total daily energy expenditure, food intake, and weight gain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(14), 5695-5700.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216951110 URL |
[36] |
Masrom, M. B., Busalim, A. H., Abuhassna, H., & Mahmood, N. H. N. (2021). Understanding students' behavior in online social networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(6), 1-27.
doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7 URL |
[37] |
Mazur, L. B. (2020). Progress in psychological science. The importance of informed ignorance and curiosity-driven questions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54, 613-624.
doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09538-z URL |
[38] |
Montuoro, P., & Mainhard, T. (2017). An investigation of the mechanism underlying teacher aggression: Testing I3 theory and the General Aggression Model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 497-517.
doi: 10.1111/bjep.12161 pmid: 28485009 |
[39] | Morton, L. C. (2014). The dieting paradox: Using I3 theory to explain counter-regulatory eating. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC. |
[40] | Myburg, J. E., Andrie, S., & Hellsten, L. A. (2016). Cyberbullying from the perspective of I3 theory: The role of instigating triggers and impelling forces. Education Matters: The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1-6. |
[41] |
Priest, G. (2020). Metatheory and dialetheism. Logical Investigations, 26(1), 48-59.
doi: 10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-1-48-59 URL |
[42] | Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in aggression. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). American Psychological Association. |
[43] |
Slotter, E. B., Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S. Jr., Lambert, N. M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 291-305.
doi: 10.1037/a0024915 pmid: 21823802 |
[44] |
Smith, E. R. (2012). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1-3.
doi: 10.1037/a0026676 URL |
[45] |
Stämpfli, A. E., Stöckli, S., Brunner, T. A., & Messner, C. (2020). A dieting facilitator on the fridge door: Can dieters deliberately apply environmental dieting cues to lose weight? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-11.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00001 URL |
[46] |
Stroebe, W., Mensink, W., Aarts, H., Schut, H., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). Why dieters fail: Testing the goal conflict model of eating. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 26-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.005 URL |
[47] |
Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110-138.
doi: 10.1037/a0030849 URL |
[48] |
Valle, C. G., Nezami, B. T., & Tate, D. F. (2020). Designing in-app messages to nudge behavior change: Lessons learned from a weight management app for young adults. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 95-101.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.004 URL |
[49] |
Watrin, J. P., & Darwich, R. (2012). On behaviorism in the cognitive revolution: Myth and reactions. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 269-282.
doi: 10.1037/a0026766 URL |
[50] |
Winiewski, M., Budziszewska, M., & Świder, M. (2019). Differentiated content of verbal aggression: Effect of gender on insults in secondary schools in Poland. School Psychology International, 40(5), 493-509.
doi: 10.1177/0143034319867745 |
[51] |
Wong, R. Y. M., Cheung, C. M. K., & Xiao, B. (2017). Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 247- 257.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.022 URL |
[52] |
Zagaria, A., Ando, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 521-562.
doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5 pmid: 32297037 |
[1] | 李虎, 李建国, 曾磊, 苏凌洁. 非工作时间工作连通行为对员工影响的元分析——工作自主性和心理脱离的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 411-424. |
[2] | 肖瑶, 王雪珂, 冯廷勇. 人类为什么会拖延?基于多模态多组学视角的解读[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(3): 520-536. |
[3] | 黄晗静, 饶培伦. 老年用户与智能系统的多层次人机共融理论探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 223-235. |
[4] | 彭晨明, 屈奕帆, 郭晓凌, 陈增祥. 人工智能服务对消费者道德行为的双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 236-255. |
[5] | 卫旭华, 焦文颖. 权力接近−抑制行为理论:基于元分析的理论拓展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 274-290. |
[6] | 金乐帆, 张宁. 提升癌症筛查率的行为助推干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 336-350. |
[7] | 秦环宇, 刘展呈, 谢志鹏, 吕林祥. 以“手”为攻, 匠心独具: 营销中的手工制作效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 362-380. |
[8] | 刘庚, 韩翼, 卢俊阳. 领导倾听内涵及其多层次效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 25-41. |
[9] | 张玥, 董艺佳, 蒋奖. 从领域到属性:亲环境行为测量的问题及建议[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(1): 163-175. |
[10] | 丁颖, 汪紫滢, 李卫东. 抑郁症疼痛加工的行为特点及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1315-1327. |
[11] | 周嘉雯, 王明怡. 新冠疫情下的儿童青少年健康危险行为:基于家庭风险的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1328-1341. |
[12] | 周蕾, 林浇敏, 陈艺琦, 梁泳超, 古晨妍, 孙祺章. 不确定性跨期决策视角下绿色行为的心理机制及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1048-1056. |
[13] | 李俊朋, 周临舒, 江俊, 王丹妮, 蒋存梅. 音乐对亲社会行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1179-1194. |
[14] | 陈丝璐, 张光磊, 刘文兴, 田园. 感激导向人力资源管理实践的驱动机制及其作用机理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(6): 908-927. |
[15] | 崔智淞, 贾建锋, 邹纯龙, 李瑞芹. 组织如何应对职场摸鱼?职场网络闲逛行为的作用结果及其反馈效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(5): 738-753. |
阅读次数 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 1553
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 893
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||