幼儿对所有权权利的理解

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02153

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对物品的所有权意味着所有者对所有物具有多重权利, 如触碰、使用、更改、追踪和转移等。研究发现, 3岁幼儿就能理解, 所有者对自己的物品具有触碰权和使用权, 而他人不具有。但是, 他们理解所有物的更改权、追踪权和转移权, 却相对滞后。这提示对不同所有权权利表征的发展可能是分化的。此外, 3岁幼儿还理解所有者具有赋予他人使用所有物的权利, 还会积极维护这种权利, 并对阻止权利实施的行为表示抗议, 说明他们也能理解二级所有权权利。为什么幼儿对不同所有权权利的表征会出现分化, 其背后的机制需要未来研究的探索。此外, 某些公共物品(如公共汽车)本身存在着所有权权利相分离的情况, 幼儿是如何表征的, 也值得我们进行研究。不同文化对所有权权利的侧重不同, 提示我们有必要对所有权权利认知的发展进行跨文化检验。

关键词: 所有权权利, 所有权三元理论, 多维权利理论, 二级所有权权利

Abstract:

To own an object means that the owner has many informative rights to the object, such as touching, using, changing, tracking and transferring. Research revealed that 3-year-old children understand that an owner have exclusive rights to touch and use his/her own objects but others do not, but their understandings of owners’ rights to change, track and transfer property are relatively poorer. This indicates that the development of children’s representation of ownership rights may not be synchronous. Three-year- olds understand that an owner has right to entitle others to use his/her property, and actively maintain this. When someone prevents the enforcement of this right, they will protest. This demonstrates that young children are aware of second-order ownership rights. In future studies, the mechanisms underlying the dissociation among representations of different ownership rights should be explored. Besides, it is worthwhile investigating how children represent ownership rights of public property (such as buses). Different cultures may put different weight on specific ownership right, which calls for more cross-cultural studies.

Key words: ownership right, tripartite account of ownership right, multi-dimensional account of ownership right, second-order entitlements

中图分类号:

B844

李占星, 牛更枫, 喻丰, 朱莉琪. (2018). 幼儿对所有权权利的理解. 心理科学进展 , 26(12), 2153-2160.

LI Zhanxing, NIU Gengfeng, YU Feng, ZHU Liqi. (2018). Preschoolers’ understanding of ownership rights. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(12), 2153-2160.

参考文献 50

1	程南华, 李占星, 朱莉琪 . ( 2018). 儿童的社会权力认知及其与社会行为的关系. 心理科学进展, 26( 2), 283-293.
2	李占星, 朱莉琪 . ( 2016). 儿童基于不同线索的所有权判断及其文化差异. 心理科学进展, 24( 12), 1889-1896.
3	Bertram, C. ( 2014). Property in the moral life of humans. Social Philosophy and Policy, 30( 1-2), 404-424.
4	Blake, P.R., &Harris, P.L . ( 2009). Children's understanding of ownership transfers. Cognitive Development, 24( 2), 133-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.01.002 URL
5	Blumenthal, J.A. ( 2009). "To be human” A psychological perspective on property law. Tulane Law Review, 83, 1-56.
6	Brosnan, S.F. ( 2011). Property in nonhuman primates. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 9-22. doi: 10.1002/cd.293 URL pmid: 21671338
7	Chen X. Y., Li D., Liu J. S., Chen H. C., & Zhao S. M . ( 2016). Judgments of damage to public versus private property in Chinese children at different historical times. Developmental Science, 21( 1), e12506. doi: 10.1111/desc.12506 URL pmid: 27981739
8	Cram, F., &Ng, S.H . ( 1989). Children’s endorsement of ownership attributes. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 63-75.
9	Corlatean T., Popescu-Cruceru A., & Asmarandei A . ( 2012). Characteristics of the public and private property right. Romanian Statistical Review, 60( 2), 301-305.
10	DeScioli, P., &Wilson, B.J . ( 2011). The territorial foundations of human property. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32( 5), 297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.003 URL
11	Dixon, S. ( 2015). Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! Object requests, ownership and entitlement in a children's play session. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.009 URL
12	Friedman, O., &Ross, H . ( 2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1-8. doi: 10.1002/cd.292 URL pmid: 21671337
13	Gelman S. A., Manczak E. M., Was A. M., & Noles N. S . ( 2016). Children Seek Historical Traces of Owned Objects. Child Development, 87( 1), 239-255. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12453 URL
14	Gelman S. A., Martinez M., Davidson N. S., & Noles N. S . ( 2018). Developing digital privacy: Children's moral judgments concerning mobile GPS devices. Child Development, 89( 1), 17-26. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12826 URL
15	Gelman S. A., Noles N. S., & Stilwell S . ( 2014). Tracking the actions and possessions of agents. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6( 4), 599-614. doi: 10.1111/tops.12106 URL pmid: 4214137
16	Hitch G. J., Halliday S., Schaafstal A. M ., & Schraagen, J. M. C. ( 1988). Visual working memory in young children. Memory & Cognition, 16( 2), 120-132. doi: 10.3758/BF03213479 URL pmid: 3352517
17	Hohfeld, W.H. ( 1913). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied to judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal, 23( 1), 16-59. doi: 10.2307/785533 URL
18	Hook, J. ( 1993). Judgments about the right to property from preschool to adulthood. Law and Human Behavior, 17( 1), 135-146. doi: 10.1007/BF01044542 URL
19	Huh, M., &Friedman, O . ( 2017). Young children’s understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology, 53( 4), 686-697. doi: 10.1037/dev0000284 URL pmid: 28221050
20	Kanngiesser, P., &Hood, B.M . ( 2014). Young children's understanding of ownership rights for newly made objects. Cognitive Development, 29, 30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.09.003 URL
21	Kim, S., &Kalish, C.W . ( 2009). Children's ascriptions of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24( 3), 322-336. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.004 URL
22	McEwan S., Pesowski M. L., & Friedman O . ( 2016). Identical but not interchangeable: Preschoolers view owned objects as non-fungible. Cognition, 146, 16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.011 URL pmid: 26398861
23	Merrill, T.W. ( 1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77( 4), 730-755.
24	Nancekivell, S.E., &Friedman, O . ( 2014). Mine, yours, no one’s: Children’s understanding of how ownership affects object use. Developmental Psychology, 50( 7), 1845-1853.
25	Nancekivell, S.E., &Friedman, O . ( 2017). "Because it's hers": When preschoolers use ownership in their explanations. Cognitive Science, 41( 3), 827-843. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12358 URL pmid: 26936795
26	Nancekivell S. E., Millar C. J., Summers P. C., & Friedman O . ( 2016). Ownership rights. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Blackwell: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
27	Nancekivell S. E., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Friedman O . ( 2013). Young children’s understanding of ownership. Child Development Perspectives, 7( 4), 243-247. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12049 URL
28	Neary, K.R., &Friedman, O . ( 2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85( 1), 326-337. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12120 URL pmid: 23638945
29	Noles, N.S., &Gelman, S.A . ( 2014). You can’t always want what you get: Children’s intuitions about ownership and desire. Cognitive Development, 31, 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.02.002 URL pmid: 25018586
30	Oyserman D., Coon H. M., & Markus K . ( 2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128( 1), 3-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 URL pmid: 11843547
31	Pesowski, M.L., &Friedman, O . ( 2018). Using versus liking: Young children use ownership to predict actions but not to infer preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.007 URL
32	Riedl K., Jensen K., Call J., & Tomasello M . ( 2015). Restorative justice in children. Current Biology, 25( 13), 1731-1735.
33	Ross H., Friedman O., & Field A . ( 2015). Toddlers assert and acknowledge ownership rights. Social Development, 24( 2), 341-356. doi: 10.1111/sode.12101 URL
34	Ross, H.S. ( 1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32( 1), 90-101. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.90 URL
35	Ross, H.S. ( 2013). Effects of ownership rights on conflicts between toddler peers. Infancy, 18( 2), 256-275. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00121.x URL
36	Ross H. S. , & Conant, C. L.(1992) . The social structure of early conflict: Interaction, relationships and alliances In C U Shantz & W W Hartup (Eds), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp 153-185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37	Rossano F., Rakoczy H., & Tomasello M . ( 2011). Young children's understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121( 2), 219-227.
38	Rudmin, F.W. ( 1994). Cross-cultural psycholinguistic field research: Verbs of ownership and possession. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25( 1), 114-132.
39	Ruff, H.A., &Lawson, K.R . ( 1990). Development of sustained, focused attention in young children during free play. Developmental Psychology, 26( 1), 85-93. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.1.85 URL
40	Schmidt M. F. H., Rakoczy H., & Tomasello M . ( 2013). Young children understand and defend the entitlements of others. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116( 4), 930-944. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.06.013 URL pmid: 24094684
41	Searle J. R. ( 2010). Making the social world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42	Shaw A., Li V., & Olson K. R . ( 2012). Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas. Cognitive Science, 36( 8), 1383-1403. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01265.x URL pmid: 22946443
43	Sheridan K. M., Konopasky A. W., Kirkwood S., & Defeyter M. A . ( 2016). The effects of environment and ownership on children’s innovation of tools and too material selection. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London, 371 ( 1690), 1-7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0191 URL pmid: 26926281
44	Snare, F. ( 1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9( 2), 200-206.
45	Stake, J.E. ( 2004). The property 'instinct'. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359( 1451), 1763-1774.
46	Tahej P. K., Ferrel-Chapus C., Olivier I., Ginhac D., & Rolland J. P . ( 2012). Multiple representations and mechanisms for visuomotor adaptation in young children. Human Movement Science, 31( 6), 1425-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.02.016 URL pmid: 22704964
47	Van de Vondervoort, J.W ., &Friedman, O . ( 2015). Parallels in preschoolers' and adults' judgments about ownership rights and bodily rights. Cognitive Science, 39( 1), 184-198. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12154 URL pmid: 25066448
48	Van de Vondervoort, J. W., &Hamlin, J.K . ( 2015). Young children remedy second- and third-party ownership violations. Trends in Cognitive Science, 19( 9), 490-491. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.006 URL pmid: 26250861
49	Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Meinz P., & Friedman O . ( 2017). Children's judgments about ownership rights and body rights: Evidence for a common basis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.007 URL pmid: 27888693
50	Wellman H. M., Fang F. X., Liu D., Zhu L. Q., & Liu G. X . ( 2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17( 12), 1075-1081. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01830.x URL pmid: 17201790

[1]	昌思琴, 黄辰, 戴元富, 蒋长好. VR训练对轻度认知障碍老年人认知功能的影响及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 322-335.
[2]	刘豫, 毕丹丹, 赵凯宾, 史怡明, Hanna Y. Adamseged, 晋争. 儿童挑食行为的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2025, 33(2): 305-321.
[3]	莫李澄, 李奇, 张丹丹. 婴儿对情绪信息的加工：认知发展特征及脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(12): 2100-2108.
[4]	郭桐阳, 莫李澄, 张丹丹. 婴儿面孔和注视方向加工的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1670-1679.
[5]	贾云丞, 程刚, 丁芳媛, 陈加, 龙女, 陈玉荣, 林楠. 对中性婴儿面孔注意偏向与表情不确定性的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1393-1407.
[6]	黄景, 刘丽聪, 李明钰, 龙奕名, 李小俚. 基于眼动信号来源的认知老化差异性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1408-1415.
[7]	张天羽, 张亚利, 张向葵. 社交网站使用对青少年身体不满意的影响及其内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1514-1527.
[8]	雷怡, 梅颖, 王金霞, 袁子昕. 焦虑青少年无意识恐惧的神经机制及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1221-1232.
[9]	唐甜, 王雨, 巩芳颍, 石可, 李喜, 刘伟, 陈宁. 家庭教养方式与中国青少年积极发展的关系：系列元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1302-1314.
[10]	何婷, 胡惠南, 乔璐, 杨靓靓, 李明英, 蔺秀云. 父母应对社会化如何影响儿童青少年适应：基于长时与实时时间轴的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(8): 1342-1353.
[11]	曾庆贺, 崔晓宇, 唐为, 李娟. 记忆辨别力受老化影响的认知神经机制及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1138-1151.
[12]	詹紫薇, 王梦梦, 索涛, 蒋艳菊. “一个连续过程”与“三个阶段”：抑郁青少年情绪失调的原因探析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(6): 928-938.
[13]	蒋莹, 胡佳, 冯靓瑜, 任启丹. 贫困经历下稀缺心态对儿童执行功能的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(5): 728-737.
[14]	岳佳莹, 刘欣怡, 张孟可, 陈旭. 母亲的依恋风格影响对婴儿敏感性的认知过程[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(4): 627-638.
[15]	喻婧, 牛程程, 徐红州, 姜海鑫, 林国俊, 吴柯, 续子含. 志愿服务对老年人认知功能的改善及神经心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(3): 413-420.