Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (6) : 1019-1019     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01019
Regular Articles |
Communicative language cognition theory
Hengchao ZHANG()
Department of Psychology, School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China
Download: PDF(395 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Communicative language cognition is a typical representation of communicative cognition, and language is a typical medium in the process of communication and interaction. Communicative language has the characteristics of interaction, cooperation, collective reward and personal responsibility, which results in the complexity, flexibility and practical function of communicative language cognition process. The article focuses on induction and review: the theory of peer specificity, time process theory and consciousness theory in communicative language processing. Future research should furtherly explore: the naturalness of the experimental context of communicative language cognition, the inclusiveness of experimental angle and purpose, the relationship between language cognition and nonverbal cognition, etc..

Keywords communication      language      cognition     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: Hengchao ZHANG     E-mail: zhhengch@126.com
Issue Date: 28 April 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hengchao ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Hengchao ZHANG. Communicative language cognition theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1019-1019.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01019     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I6/1019
[1] 张恒超 . ( 2013). 参照性交流中的“听者设计”. 心理发展与教育, 29( 5), 552-560.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82720X/201305/47268721.html
[2] 张恒超 . ( 2017 a). 共享因素对参照性交流双方学习的影响. 心理学报, 49( 2), 197-205.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201702/671433872.html
[3] 张恒超 . ( 2017 b). 参照性交流双方学习和语言注意特征的比较. 心理研究, 10( 1), 24-30.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlyj201701004
[4] 张恒超 . ( 2017 c). 共享方式对参照性交流学习过程和选择性注意的影响. 心理学探新, 37( 4), 307-312.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx201704004
[5] 张恒超 . ( 2017 d). 参照性交流学习中语言内容和选择性注意的变化特点. 心理技术与应用, 5( 7), 385-393.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xljsyyy201707001
[6] 张恒超 . ( 2018). 交流语言认知特征. 心理科学进展, 26( 2), 270-282.
[7] Arnold J. E., Kahn J. M., & Pancani G. C . ( 2012). Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19( 3), 505-512.
pmid: 22419403 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-012-0233-y
[8] Arnold J. E., Tanenhaus M. K., Altmann R. J., & Fagnano M . ( 2004). The old and thee, uh, new. Psychological Science, 15, 578-582.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x
[9] Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46( 2), 391-418.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X01928153
[10] Bell A., Brenier J. M., Gregory M., Girand C., & Jurafsky D . ( 2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60( 1), 92-111.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X08000600
[11] Beyer, H., & Liebe, U. (2015). Three experimental approaches to measure the social context dependence of prejudice communication and discriminatory behavior. Social Science Research, 49, 343-355.
pmid: 25432623 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0049089X14001720
[12] Branigan H. P., Pickering M. J., Pearson J., McLean J. F., & Brown A . ( 2011). The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers. Cognition, 121, 41-57.
pmid: 21723549 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027711001363
[13] Brennan S. E., Chen X., Dickinson C. A., Neider M. B., & Zelinsky G. J . ( 2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106( 3), 1465-1477.
pmid: 17617394 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027707001448
[14] Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H . ( 1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22( 6), 1482-1493.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
[15] Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E . ( 2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 274-291.
pmid: 25164933 url: http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/tops.2009.1.issue-2
[16] Brentari, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Language Emergence. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3( 1), 363-388.
url: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040743
[17] Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61( 2), 171-190.
pmid: 20161117 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X0900045X
[18] Buz E., Tanenhaus M. K., & Jaeger T. F . ( 2016). Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers’ subsequent pronunciations. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 68-86.
pmid: 4927008 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X15001631
[19] Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B . ( 1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58( 2), 332-373.
url: https://muse.jhu.edu/content/crossref/journals/language/v058/58.2.clark.html
[20] Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A . ( 2004) Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50( 1), 62-81.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X03001098
[21] Clark H. H. , & Marshall, C. R.( 1981) . Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, I. A. Sag, & B. L. Webber (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (10- 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
url: http://dx.doi.org/inite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, I. A. Sag,
[22] Davies, C. N . ( 2011). Over-informativeness in referential communication (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Cambridge.
[23] De Marco D., De Stefani E., & Gentilucci M . ( 2015). Gesture and word analysis: the same or different processes?. NeuroImage, 117, 375-385.
pmid: 26044859 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S105381191500470X
[24] De Ruiter J. P., Bangerter A., & Dings P . ( 2012). The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: Investigating the tradeoff hypothesis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4( 2), 232-248.
pmid: 22389109 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/tops.2012.4.issue-2
[25] Duff M. C., Hengst J., Tranel D., & Cohen N. J . ( 2006). Development of shared information in communication despite hippocampal amnesia. Nature Neuroscience, 9( 1), 140-146.
pmid: 16341214 url: http://www.nature.com/articles/nn1601
[26] Edelman, S. (2017). Language and other complex behaviors: Unifying characteristics, computational models, neural mechanisms. Language Sciences, 62, 91-123.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0388000117300128
[27] Epley N., Keysar B., van Boven L., & Gilovich T . ( 2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
[28] Fay N., Garrod S., & Carletta J . ( 2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size. Psychological Science, 11, 481-486.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9280.00292
[29] Ferreira, V. S., & Dell, G. S . ( 2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296-340.
pmid: 10888342 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010028599907302
[30] Galati, A., & Avraamides, M. N . ( 2013). Collaborating in spatial tasks: How partners coordinate their spatial memories and descriptions. Cognitive Processing, 14( 2), 193-195.
pmid: 23413001 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10339-013-0541-9
[31] Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E . ( 2010). Attenuating information in spoken communication: For the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 35-51.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X09000874
[32] Galati A., Michael C., Mello C., Greenauer N. M., & Avraamides M. N . ( 2013). The conversational partner’s perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 140-159.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X12001040
[33] Graham S. A., Sedivy J., & Khu M . ( 2014). That’s not what you said earlier: Preschoolers expect partners to be referentially consistent. Journal of Child Language, 41, 34-50.
pmid: 23398907 url: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0305000912000530
[34] Graziano, M., & Gullberg, M. (2013). Gesture production and speech fluency in competent speakers and language learners. In Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGeR) 2013. Tilburg University.
url: http://lup.lub.lu.se/search/record/3955045
[35] Green T., Wilhelmsen T., Wilmots E., Dodd B., & Quinn S . ( 2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206-213.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S074756321530337X
[36] Greenaway K. H., Wright R. G., Willingham J., Reynolds K. J., & Haslam S. A . ( 2015). Shared identity is key to effective communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41( 2), 171-182.
pmid: 25416042 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167214559709
[37] Grice H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ and conversation. In P. Cole
[38] Haywood S. L., Pickering M. J., & Branigan H. P . ( 2005). Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue? Psychological Science, 16, 362-366.
pmid: 15869694 url: http://pss.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01541.x
[39] Hellbernd, N., & Sammler, D. (2016). Prosody conveys speaker’s intentions: Acoustic cues for speech act perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70-86.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X16000024
[40] Horton, W. S . ( 2007). The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22( 7), 1114-1139.
pmid: 2440709 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01690960701402933
[41] Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J . ( 2002). Speaker’s experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 589-606.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X02000190
[42] Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J . ( 2005). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40, 1-35.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15326950dp4001_1
[43] Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91-117.
pmid: 8857472 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0010027796814181
[44] Jacquette, D. (2014). Collective referential intentionality in the semantics of dialogue. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36( 1), 143-159.
url: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/slgr.2014.36.issue-1/slgr-2014-0007/slgr-2014-0007.xml
[45] Keysar B., Barr D. J., Balin J. A., & Brauner J. S . ( 2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11( 1), 32-38.
pmid: 11228840 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9280.00211
[46] Keysar B., Barr D. J., & Horton W. S . ( 1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7( 2), 46-49.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175613
[47] Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J . ( 2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from- preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436-455.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X06000581
[48] Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J . ( 2015) Referential precedents in spoken language comprehension: A review and meta- analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 1-19.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X15000418
[49] Kronmüller E., Noveck I., Rivera N., Jaume-Guazzini F., & Barr D . ( 2017). The positive side of a negative reference: The delay between linguistic processing and common ground. Royal Society Open Science, 4( 2), 160827.
pmid: 28386440 url: http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rsos.160827
[50] Levinson, S. C . ( 2016). Turn-taking in human communication-origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20( 1), 6-14.
pmid: 26651245 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661315002764
[51] Markman, A. B., & Makin, V. S . ( 1998). Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127( 4), 331-354.
pmid: 9857492 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.331
[52] Matovic D., Koch A. S., & Forgas J. P . ( 2014). Can negative mood improve language understanding? Affective influences on the ability to detect ambiguous communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 44-49.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103113002084
[53] Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E . ( 2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 201-213.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2003-99616-003
[54] Nappa, R., & Arnold, J. E . ( 2014). The road to understanding is paved with the speaker’s intentions: Cues to the speaker’s attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 70, 58-81.
pmid: 24534295 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001002851300073X
[55] Novak-Marcincin J., Nicolescu A., & Teodorescu M . ( 2015). Neutrosophic circuits of communication: A review. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 43, 174-186.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/308790046_Neutrosophic_circuits_of_communication_A_review
[56] Nückles M., Wittwer J., & Renkl A . ( 2005). Information about a layperson’s knowledge supports experts in giving effective and efficient online advice to laypersons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 219-236.
pmid: 16393032 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.219
[57] O’Carroll S., Nicoladis E., & Smithson L . ( 2015). The effect of extroversion on communication: Evidence from an interlocutor visibility manipulation. Speech Communication, 69, 1-8.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167639315000060
[58] Perniss P., ?zyürek A., & Morgan G . ( 2015). The Influence of the visual modality on language structure and conventionalization: Insights from sign language and gesture. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7( 1), 2-11.
pmid: 25565249 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/tops.12127
[59] Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-190.
pmid: 15595235 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15595235
[60] Regier T., Kemp C., & Kay P . ( 2015). Word meanings across languages support efficient communication. In The handbook of language emergence( pp. 237-263). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118346136.ch11/pdf
[61] Roberts G., Langstein B., & Galantucci B . ( 2016). ( In)sensitivity to incoherence in human communication. Language & Communication, 47, 15-22.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530915000920
[62] Rogers S. L., Fay N., & Maybery M . ( 2013). Audience design through social interaction during group discussion. PLoS One, 8( 2), e57211.
pmid: 3578794 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057211
[63] Tolins J., Zeamer C., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2017). Overhearing dialogues and monologues: How does entrainment lead to more comprehensible referring expressions?. Discourse Processes, 1-21, doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1279516.
doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2017.1279516 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1279516
[64] Vanlangendonck F., Willems R., Menenti L., & Hagoort P . ( 2013). The role of common ground in audience design: Beyond an all or nothing story. In The workshop on the production of referring expressions: Bridging the gap between computational and empirical approaches to reference the (PRE-CogSci 2013).
url: http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/faces/viewItemFullPage.jsp?itemId=escidoc%3A1849027%3A2
[65] Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G . ( 2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25( 7-9), 905-945.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01690961003589492
[66] Yoon S. O., Koh S., & Brown-Schmidt S . ( 2012). Influence of perspective and goals on reference production in conversation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 699-707.
pmid: 22572985 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22572985
[67] Yu C., Schermerhorn P., & Scheutz M . ( 2012). Adaptive eye gaze patterns in interactions with human and artificial agents. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 1(2), Article No.13.
url: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2070726
[1] WEI Hua, DUAN Haicen, ZHOU Zongkui.  Consumer behavior from the perspective of embodiment cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[2] REN Xiaoqian, FANG Xian, SUI Xue, WU Yan.  Characteristics and neural mechanisms of handwritten character recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1174-1185.
[3] Heng LI. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[4] Xin CUI, Mengmeng SU, Hua SHU. Application of sulcal morphometry analysis in cognitive neuroscience of language[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 994-1003.
[5] LIN Wenyi, ZHANG Jing, LI Guanzheng.  Text-belief consistent effect and the way of avoidance[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 789-795.
[6] ZHANG Hengchao. Cognitive Characteristics of Communicative Gestures[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 796-809.
[7] LU Hong, ZHANG Xinyuan, WEI Wenqi, LIU Yi.  The influence of spatial physical order on psychology and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[8] LI Wenqi, ZHANG Mengyuan, KOU Yu.  Political orientation and its changing mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 549-559.
[9] SU Yi (ESTHER).  Acquisition of core Chinese grammar in preschool children with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 391-399.
[10] YU Wenyuan, LIU Ye, FU Xiaolan.  Two kinds of action representation in manipulable object recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 229-240.
[11] YU Mingyang, LI Fuhong, CAO Bihua.  The advantage in recognition of happy faces and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 254-261.
[12] HUANG Chen, ZHAO Jing.  Visual-spatial attention processing in developmental dyslexia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 72-80.
[13] FU Yue.  Research on the impact mechanism of TMT cognition on organizational ambidexterity: From organizational character perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 14-25.
[14] Kai ZhiZhong.  Face Shapes on Chinese Traditional Physiognomy and Relevant Personality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 40-40.
[15] HE Wen-Guang.  The cognitive mechanism and neural basis of aging in language processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1479-1491.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech