内外部分组线索对数量感知分组化策略的影响: 来自fMRI证据

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.0323

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究采用数量估计任务结合fMRI技术, 深入探究内部和外部分组线索分别对数量感知分组化策略的影响, 揭示数量感知分组化策略的神经机制。结果发现,分组条件比未分组条件在左侧顶内沟、角回和额上回等与计算相关的脑区有更显著激活; 外部分组线索比内部分组线索在额中回和颞下回等与拓扑性质相关的脑区表现出更显著激活。结果表明,被试分组条件下更倾向于使用计算相关策略进行数量感知, 且外部分组线索具有拓扑性质, 支持了拓扑知觉理论。

关键词: 数量感知, 分组化策略, 分组线索, 拓扑知觉理论, 功能磁共振成像

Abstract:

Numerosity perception refers to the human cognitive ability to extract numerical information from various stimuli. It serves as a fundamental basis for understanding the world and processing information, thereby guiding and influencing human behavior and decision-making. Grouping strategies, also known as "groupitizing," involve organizing objects into sets or categories during numerosity perception processes. This facilitates a rapid and effective numerosity estimation, particularly in situations with short presentation times and numerous quantities. Groupitizing combines the advantages of subitizing and counting, thereby influencing individual arithmetic abilities. Previous studies have predominantly focused on investigating the groupitizing of numerosity perception based on intrinsic grouping cues. However, the influence of both intrinsic and extrinsic cues of perceptual grouping on numerosity perception during groupitizing remains underexplored. Previous studies spanning the visual and numerosity perception domains have consistently indicated that extrinsic grouping cues exhibit stronger grouping advantages than intrinsic ones. Therefore, this study employed a numerosity estimation task to separately examine the effects of intrinsic (such as color similarity and proximity) and extrinsic grouping cues (including common region and connectedness) on numerosity perception during groupitizing. This study aimed to uncover the neural mechanisms underlying groupitizing.

A total of 21 university students were recruited for this study. A block design was employed for the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task. Stimulus presentation and generation were performed using MATLAB's PsychToolbox (version R2016b). The stimuli comprised four factors: grouping condition (grouping, no-grouping), grouping cues (extrinsic, intrinsic), and numerosity (6, 9, 12, 16). MRI scans for the numerosity estimation task were conducted using Siemens 3.0 T technology, synchronously collecting functional brain data. The participants were instructed to select the corresponding number of points they estimated based on the stimuli presented on the screen. We compared functional activation between grouping and no-grouping conditions, as well as between extrinsic and intrinsic grouping cues. Additionally, we employed the Pearson product-moment correlation method to assess the relationships between these variables.

The results revealed that first, bilateral intraparietal sulcus (IPS) plays a critical role in numerosity perception, particularly showing significant activation during the quantity processing stage. Specifically, activation was observed in the IPS during numerosity perception tasks, indicating its involvement in processing numerical information. Second, both grouped and ungrouped conditions activated cortical regions associated with quantity estimation, such as the precentral gyrus and inferior temporal gyrus. Under the grouped condition, additional activation was observed in brain regions related to computation; this includes the superior frontal gyrus, IPS, and angular gyrus, exhibiting a left-hemisphere lateralization advantage. Thus, participants tended to utilize computational and retrieval strategies in the grouped condition compared to that in the ungrouped condition, suggesting a more efficient processing mechanism. Lastly, extrinsic grouping cues, relative to intrinsic grouping cues, activate additional brain regions associated with topological properties, such as the middle frontal and inferior temporal gyrus. This reveals the topological invariance characteristic of extrinsic grouping cues in the intrinsic mechanism of numerosity perception grouping strategies, highlighting the influence of extrinsic cues on neural processing mechanisms.

This study’s findings suggest that participants tended to rely more on mental arithmetic and factual retrieval when employing grouping strategies to enhance numerosity perception efficiency. This sheds further light on why grouping strategies are comparatively more efficient than other approaches. Moreover, the mechanism of extrinsic grouping cues in numerosity perception strategies demonstrates topological invariance, which presents a unique advantage in perceptual processing. This discovery provides direct neural evidence of the significance of topological properties in numerosity perception, thereby deepening our understanding of numerosity perception and its neural underpinnings.

Key words: numerosity perception, groupitizing, grouping cues, topological perception theory, fMRI

中图分类号:

B842

潘运, 杨环瑜, 贾良智, 朱俊, 余方文, 张頔, 杨平. (2026). 内外部分组线索对数量感知分组化策略的影响: 来自fMRI证据. 心理学报, 58(2), 323-335.

PAN Yun, YANG Huanyu, JIA Liangzhi, ZHU Jun, YU Fangwen, ZHANG Di, YANG Ping. (2026). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues on numerosity perception of groupitizing: Evidence from fMRI. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 58(2), 323-335.

图/表 14

参考文献 56

[1]	Anobile G., Castaldi E., Maldonado Moscoso P. A., Arrighi R., & Burr D. (2021). Groupitizing improves estimation of numerosity of auditory sequences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15, 687321. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.687321 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.687321 URL
[2]	Anobile G., Castaldi E., Moscoso P. A. M., Burr D. C., & Arrighi R. (2020). “Groupitizing”: A strategy for numerosity estimation. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13436. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68.111-1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68111-1 URL
[3]	Arsalidou M., Pawliw-Levac M., Sadeghi M., & Pascual- Leone J. (2018). Brain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 239-250. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.002 doi: S1878-9293(17)30010-5 URL pmid: 28844728
[4]	Burr D., & Ross J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18(6), 425-428. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052 URL pmid: 18342507
[5]	Cai Y., Hofstetter S., Harvey B. M., & Dumoulin S. O. (2022). Attention drives human numerosity-selective responses. Cell Reports, 39(13), 111005. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111005 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111005 URL
[6]	Cai Y., Hofstetter S., van Dijk J., Zuiderbaan W., van der Zwaag W., Harvey B. M., & Dumoulin S. O. (2021). Topographic numerosity maps cover subitizing and estimation ranges. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3374. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23785-7 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23785-7 pmid: 34099735
[7]	Cao M., Wang J., Dai Z., Cao X., Jiang L., Fan F., … He Y. (2014). Topological organization of the human brain functional connectome across the lifespan. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 76-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.11.004
[8]	Caponi C., Maldonado M. P., Castaldi E., Arrighi R., & Grasso P. A. (2023). EEG signature of grouping strategies in numerosity perception. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1190317. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1190317 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1190317 URL
[9]	Chen L. (1982). Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 218, 699-700. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7134969 URL pmid: 7134969
[10]	Chen L. (2017). The three cornerstones of cognitive science. Fundamental Research, 31(3), 209-210.
	[陈霖. (2017). 认知科学的三大基石. 中国科学基金, 31(3), 209-210.]
[11]	Cicchini G. M., Anobile G., Burr D. C., Marchesini P., & Arrighi R. (2023). The role of non-numerical information in the perception of temporal numerosity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1197064. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197064 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197064 URL
[12]	Ciccione L., & Dehaene S. (2020). Grouping mechanisms in numerosity perception. Open Mind, 4, 102-118. http://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00037 doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00037 URL
[13]	Czarnecka M., Raczy K., Szewczyk J., Paplinska M., Jednorog K., Marchewka A., … Szwed M. (2023). Overlapping but separate number representations in the intraparietal sulcus-Probing format- and modality- independence in sighted Braille readers. Cortex, 162, 65-80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.011 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.011 URL pmid: 37003099
[14]	Dehaene S., & Changeux J. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 390-407. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.390 doi: 10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.390 URL pmid: 23964915
[15]	Fornaciai M., & Park J. (2018). Early numerosity encoding in visual cortex is not sufficient for the representation of numerical magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(12), 1788-1802. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01320
[16]	Grasso P. A., Anobile G., Arrighi R., Burr D. C., & Cicchini G. M. (2022). Numerosity perception is tuned to salient environmental features. iScience, 25(4), 104104. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104104 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104104 URL
[17]	Grotheer M., Herrmann K., & Kovács G. (2016). Neuroimaging evidence of a bilateral representation for visually presented numbers. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(1), 88-97. http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2129-15.2016
[18]	Guillaume M., Roy E., Van Rinsveld A., Starkey G., Uncapher M., & Mccandliss B. (2022). Groupitizing reflects conceptual developments in math cognition and inequities in math achievement from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 94(2), 335-347. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13859
[19]	Harvey B. M., Klein B. P., Petridou N., & Dumoulin S. O. (2013). Topographic representation of numerosity in the human parietal cortex. Science, 341(6150), 1123-1126. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239052
[20]	He L., Zhang J., Zhou T., & Chen L. (2009). Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 509-517. http://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.509
[21]	He L., Zhou K., Zhou T., He S., & Chen L. (2015). Topology-defined units in numerosity perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(41), E5647-E5655. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512408112
[22]	He S. (2008). Holes, objects, and the left hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(4), 1103-1104. http://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0710631105
[23]	Kluth T., & Zetzsche C. (2016). Numerosity as a topological invariant. Journal of Vision, 16(3), 30. http://doi.org/10.1167/16.3.30
[24]	Kragel P., Čeko M., Theriault J., Chen D., Satpute A., Wald L., … Wager T. (2021). A human colliculus-pulvinar- amygdala pathway encodes negative emotion. Neuron, 109(15), 2404-2412. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.001
[25]	Lan Z., & Chen L. (1998). An topological perception approach to the study of hemispheric asymmetry. Journal of Psychological Science, (3), .1671-6981.1998.03.004
	[兰哲, 陈霖. (1998). 拓扑性质知觉的大脑半球功能不对称性研究. 心理科学, (3), 205-208.]
[26]	Liu W., Zhang Z., & Zhao Y. (2012). Numerosity adaptation effect on the basis of perceived numerosity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(10), 1297-1308.
	[刘炜, 张智君, 赵亚军. (2012). 基于数量感知的数量适应. 心理学报, 44(10), 1297-1308.]
[27]	Luna D., Villalba-Garcia C., Montoro P. R., & Hinojosa J. A. (2016). Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues. Acta Psychologica, 170, 146-154. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.001
[28]	Luna D., & Montoro P. R. (2011). Interactions between intrinsic principles of similarity and proximity and extrinsic principle of common region in visual perception. Perception, 40(12), 1467-1477. http://doi.org/10.1068/p7086
[29]	Maldonado Moscoso P. A., Castaldi E., Burr D. C., Arrighi R., & Anobile G. (2020). Grouping strategies in number estimation extend the subitizing range. Scientific Reports, 10, 14979. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71871-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71871-5 pmid: 32917941
[30]	Maldonado M. P., Greenlee M. W., Anobile G., Arrighi R., Burr D. C., & Castaldi E. (2021). Groupitizing modifies neural coding of numerosity. Human Brain Mapping, 43, 915-928. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25694 doi: 10.1002/hbm.25694 URL pmid: 34877718
[31]	Malone S. A., Pritchard V. E., Heron-Delaney M., Burgoyne K., Lervåg A., & Hulme C. (2019). The relationship between numerosity discrimination and arithmetic skill reflects the approximate number system and cannot be explained by inhibitory control. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 184, 220-231. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.02.009
[32]	Montoro P. R., Villalba-García C., Luna D., & Hinojosa J. A. (2017). Common region wins the competition between extrinsic grouping cues: Evidence from a task without explicit attention to grouping. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1856-1861. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423- 017-1254-3
[33]	Palmer S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 436- 447.
[34]	Palmer S. E., & Beck D. M. (2007). The repetition discrimination task: An objective method for studying perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(1), 68-78.
[35]	Palmer S., & Rock I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 1, 29-55. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200760
[36]	Pan Y., Yang H., Li M., Zhang J., & Cui L. (2021). Grouping strategies in numerosity perception between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17605. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96944-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96944-x URL pmid: 34475472
[37]	Pennock I. M. L., Schmidt T. T., Zorbek D., & Blankenburg F. (2021). Representation of visual numerosity information during working memory in humans: An fMRI decoding study. Human Brain Mapping, 42(9), 2778-2789. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25402
[38]	Piazza M., Mechelli A., Butterworth B., & Price C. J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? Neuroimage, 15(2), 435-446. http://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0980
[39]	Piazza M., & Izard V. (2009). How humans count: Numerosity and the parietal cortex. Neuroscientist, 15(3), 261-273. http://doi.org/10.1177/1073858409333073
[40]	Polspoel B., Peters L., Vandermosten M., & De Smedt B. (2017). Strategy over operation: Neural activation in subtraction and multiplication during fact retrieval and procedural strategy use in children. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 4657-4670. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23691
[41]	Simon T., & Vaishnavi S. (1996). Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(6), 915-926. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205493
[42]	Skagenholt M., Skagerlund K., & Träff U. (2021). Neurodevelopmental differences in child and adult number processing: An fMRI-based validation of the triple code model. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 48, 100933. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100933 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100933 URL
[43]	Starkey G. S., & McCandliss B. D. (2014). The emergence of “groupitizing” in children’s numerical cognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 120-137. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.03.006
[44]	Tschentscher N., & Hauk O. (2014). How are things adding up? Neural differences between arithmetic operations are due to general problem solving strategies. Neuroimage, 92, 369-380. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.061
[45]	Tsouli A., Harvey B. M., Hofstetter S., Cai Y., van der Smagt M. J., Te P. S., & Dumoulin S. O. (2022). The role of neural tuning in quantity perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(1), 11-24. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.10.004
[46]	Walsh V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
[47]	Wang B., Zhou T. G., Zhuo Y., & Chen L. (2007). Global topological dominance in the left hemisphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(52), 21014-21019. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709664104
[48]	Wang L., Li M., Yang T., Wang L., & Zhou X. (2022). Mathematics meets science in the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 32(1), 123-136. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab198
[49]	Wang W., Zhou T., Chen L., & Huang Y. (2023). A subcortical magnocellular pathway is responsible for the fast processing of topological properties of objects: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Human Brain Mapping, 44(4), 1617-1628. http://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26162
[50]	Wege T., Trezise K., & Inglis M. (2021). Finding the subitizing in groupitizing: Evidence for parallel subitizing of dots and groups in grouped arrays. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02015-7
[51]	Whalen J., Gallistel C. R., & Gelman R. (2016). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10(2), 130-137. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00120
[52]	Wurm M. F., Tagliabue C. F., & Mazza V. (2021). Decoding location-specific and location-invariant stages of numerosity processing in subitizing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 54(3), 4971-4984. http://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15352
[53]	Yeo D., Wilkey E., & Price G. (2017). The search for the number form area: A functional neuroimaging meta- analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 145- 160. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.027
[54]	Zhang D., Zhou L., Yang A., Li S., Chang C., Liu J., & Zhou K. (2023). A connectome-based neuromarker of nonverbal number acuity and arithmetic skills. Cerebral Cortex, 33(3), 881-894. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac108
[55]	Zhou K., Luo H., Zhou T., Zhuo Y., & Chen L. (2010). Topological change disturbs object continuity in attentive tracking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(50), 21920-21924. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010919108
[56]	Zhu Y. (2005). Chen Lin’s theory of topological perception. Journal of Psychological Science, 28(5), 1031-1034. http://10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2005.05.002
	[朱滢. (2005). 陈霖的拓扑性质知觉理论. 心理科学, 28(5), 1031-1034.]

激活脑区	半球	体素数量	MNI坐标			t值
激活脑区	半球	体素数量	x	y	z	t值
分组条件
顶内沟/角回/缘上回	左	707	−30	−55	42	5.76
颞下回/舌回	左	408	−51	−58	−10	5.64
额中回	左	173	−51	8	32	5.50
顶内沟	右	154	21	−58	42	5.76
未分组条件
顶内沟/角回	右	128	30	−61	54	4.53
顶内沟/角回/顶上小叶	左	79	−33	−55	52	4.26
缘上回	左	40	−45	−22	52	5.26
额中回	左	34	−45	5	32	3.98
舌回	右	33	9	−88	−6	4.38
辅助运动区	右	24	−6	5	56	4.18

激活脑区	半球	体素数量	MNI坐标			t值
激活脑区	半球	体素数量	x	y	z	t值
分组条件
顶内沟/角回/缘上回	左	707	−30	−55	42	5.76
颞下回/舌回	左	408	−51	−58	−10	5.64
额中回	左	173	−51	8	32	5.50
顶内沟	右	154	21	−58	42	5.76
未分组条件
顶内沟/角回	右	128	30	−61	54	4.53
顶内沟/角回/顶上小叶	左	79	−33	−55	52	4.26
缘上回	左	40	−45	−22	52	5.26
额中回	左	34	−45	5	32	3.98
舌回	右	33	9	−88	−6	4.38
辅助运动区	右	24	−6	5	56	4.18

激活脑区	半球	体素数量	MNI坐标			t值
激活脑区	半球	体素数量	x	y	z	t值
顶内沟/角回	左	185	−36	−52	54	6.40
颞下回	左	163	−42	−58	−14	6.14
缘上回/角回	右	87	57	−40	30	4.79
缘上回	左	48	−51	−40	40	4.67
舌回	右	38	3	−61	−8	6.03

激活脑区	半球	体素数量	MNI坐标			t值
激活脑区	半球	体素数量	x	y	z	t值
顶内沟/角回	左	185	−36	−52	54	6.40
颞下回	左	163	−42	−58	−14	6.14
缘上回/角回	右	87	57	−40	30	4.79
缘上回	左	48	−51	−40	40	4.67
舌回	右	38	3	−61	−8	6.03

激活脑区	半球	体素数量	MNI坐标			t值
激活脑区	半球	体素数量	x	y	z	t值
外部分组线索
额中回/舌回	右	2297	24	−58	42	6.30
顶内沟/角回/缘上回/颞下回	左	1489	−21	−50	40	6.12
额中回	左	510	−45	5	30	6.05
中央后回	左	247	48	5	32	5.39
辅助运动区	左	192	−6	8	54	5.10
岛叶/顶上小叶	右	124	33	20	6	5.65
内部分组线索
顶内沟/缘上回/角回	左	345	−36	−37	36	5.83
顶内沟/角回/缘上回	右	267	36	−55	50	6.56
岛叶	左	170	−27	14	14	4.80
额中回/缘上回	左	134	−45	−1	32	4.83
辅助运动区	左	120	−6	−1	56	4.79