从疫情控制看中庸行动我的应急灵活性

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00355

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文撰写的目的是, 藉助分析COVID-19疫情控制的应急心理机制, 提出一个思考中国人“自我”的新架构, 希望未来它能成为研究这一热门研究领域的新进路。沿用中国传统流传下来、但却一直被沿用至今的中庸思维, 以及其内涵的“阴阳思维”及“全息思维”作为立论基础, 提出“中庸行动我”的构念。它是指个体在选择及执行解决问题之具体行动方案时, 依现实“情境需求”, 灵活地“协调”出一个最恰当的“行动我”, 以配合集体战疫的需要及功效。“中庸行动我”这一构念的提出, 不仅只是为了解释战疫的成效, 更重要的是它欲反映出中国人思维“灵活性”的根源, 从而可以作为研究“中国人自我”的另类进路, 不再只是以跨文化研究进路所关注的“本质自我”为主要立论基础, 从而丰富了该领域现有的知识内涵。

关键词: 我, 行动我, 中庸行动我, 中庸实践思维, 阴阳思维, 全息思维

Abstract:

This paper adopts an indigenous approach to explain why China can contain the COVID-19 Crisis swiftly and efficiently. For this purpose, it proposes a new conceptualization for studying the Chinese self—the Zhong- yong action self.

The action self refers to the self, activated by the situation an individual is facing, based on which the actor thinks about and decides the proper action to take. During the COVID-19 Crisis, beside the individuated self (the small self), many other more inclusive selves (the large selves), such as the family self, the community self, and the country self, are being mobilized at the same time, all of which demand the actor to exercise self-control and to help others to achieve the common goal—defeating the virus. This concerted effort thereby creates strength and flexibility in managing the crisis.

In every-day life situation, the many selves activated may demand conflicting actions from the actor. An adoption of the Zhong-yong deliberation process negotiate the most appropriate action, to help maintain inner peace and outer harmony with others and the flux environment. The author hopes that this new formulation will lead to new directions to the study of “the Chinese self.”

Key words: Chinese self, action self, Zhong-yong action self, Zhong-yong action deliberation, Ying-yang thinking, holistic thinking.

中图分类号:

B848

杨中芳. (2023). 从疫情控制看中庸行动我的应急灵活性. 心理学报, 55(3), 355-373.

YANG Chung Fang. (2023). Zhong-yong action self as a contributing factor to COVID-19 crisis management. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(3), 355-373.

参考文献 98

[1]	Bi C. (2016). Norms and self-confidence:Perceived tightness- looseness and the doctrine of mean. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 42(1), 106-113.
	[ 毕重增. (2016). 有规则才有自信:松紧度感知与中庸思维的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 42(1), 106-113.]
[2]	Bruner J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[3]	Campbell D. T. (1979). Qualitative knowing in action research. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner(Eds.), The social context of method(pp. 184-209). London: Croom Helm.
[4]	Chang J. H. (2010). Focusing zhongyong conceptualization on psychological space and big-self system. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34(1), 145-157.
	[ 张仁和. (2010). 聚焦中庸实践思维体系于心理空间与大我系统. 本土心理学研究, 34(1), 145-157.]
[5]	Chang J. H. (2021). Balance and harmony: Unpacking the features and mechanisms of self-equanimity. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 56, 177-243.
	[ 张仁和. (2021). 平衡与和谐: 初探自我宁静系统之特性与机制. 本土心理学研究, 56, 177-243.]
[6]	Chang S. C., Chang J. H. Y., Low M. Y., Chen T. C., & Kuo S. H. (2020). Self-regulation of the newlyweds in Taiwan: Goals and strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(8-9), 2674-2690. doi: 10.1177/0265407520929762 URL
[7]	Chaturvedi A., Chiu C., & Viswanathan M. (2009). Literacy, negotiable fate, and thinking style among low income women in India. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(5), 880-893. doi: 10.1177/0022022109339391 URL
[8]	Cheng C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814-833. pmid: 11374752
[9]	Cheng C. (2009). Dialectical thinking and coping flexibility: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 471-493. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00555.x pmid: 19220723
[10]	Choi K. (2000, April). Between western dualism and Chinese erh-chi (dual-element): Comparisons on categorization and thinking style. Paper presented at the first conference of Social Sciences Concepts: Indigenous and Western, Taipei.
	[ 蔡锦昌. (2000, April). 二元与二气之间: 分类与思考方式的比较. 东西思想文化传统中的”自我”与”他者”学术研讨会. 台北.]
[11]	Du J., Qiu Y., & Yin J. (2018). Does zhongyong hamper creativity? An empirical multi-level study. Studies in Science of Science, 36(2), 378-384.
	[ 杜旌, 裘依伊, 尹晶. (2018). 中庸抑制创新吗?——一项多层次实证研究. 科学学研究, 36(2), 378-384.]
[12]	Du J., & Yao J. (2015). Zhongyong: The connotation and its relationship with collectivism. Chinese Journal of Management, 12(5), 638-646.
	[ 杜旌, 姚菊花. (2015). 中庸结构内涵及其与集体主义关系. 管理学报, 12(5), 638-646.]
[13]	Duan J., & Ling B. (2011). A Chinese indigenous study of the construct of employee voice behavior and the influence of Zhongyong on it. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(10), 1185-1197.
	[ 段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43(10), 1185-1197.]
[14]	Dweck C. S., Hong Y. Y., & Chiu C. Y. (1993). Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(5), 644-656. doi: 10.1177/0146167293195015 URL
[15]	Fei X. (1947). From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Shanghai: Shanghai Observation Press.
	[ 费孝通. (1947). 乡土中国. 上海: 上海观察社.
[16]	Feng Y. (1940). New treatise on the way of life. Shanghai: Kaiming Bookstore.
	[ 冯友兰. (1940). 新世训. 上海: 开明书店.]
[17]	Gao Z., Cai H., Tang G., & Xu L. (2013). The relationship between Zhong-yong thinking and depression symptoms. China Journal of Health Psychology, 21(9), 1298-1300.
	[ 高瞻, 蔡华玲, 唐淦琦, 许律琴. (2013). 中庸思维与抑郁症状之关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(9), 1298-1300.]
[18]	Gao Z., & Li B. (2014). Exploring the relationship between zhongyong thinking and depression symptoms. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 205-220.
	[ 高瞻, 李炳洁. (2014). 中庸信念/价值与自评抑郁症状之关系的深入探讨. 中国社会心理学评论. 7, 205-220 ]
[19]	Gao Z., Yang Z., & Li B. (2014). A comparative study of depression outpatients and nonclinical people on zhongyong belief/value. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 192-204.
	[ 高瞻, 阳中华, 李炳洁. (2014). 正常人与抑郁症病人在中庸信念/价值的比较. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 192-204.]
[20]	Gelfand M. J., Jackson J. C., Pan X, Nau D., Pieper D., Denison E., Dagher M., van Lange P. A. M., Chiu C., & Wang M. (2021). The relationship between cultural tightness- looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: A global analysis. The Lancet, 5(3), 135-144.
[21]	Guo Y., Li X., Huang X., & Zhong C. (2016). Moderating role of coping efficacy on the relation between depressions' zhongyong thinking-style and mental health. Sichuan Mental Health, 29(1), 23-25.
	[ 郭轶, 李雪晶, 黄新英, 钟婵. (2016). 抑郁症患者应对效能在中庸思维和心理健康间的中介作用. 四川精神卫生, 29(1), 23-25.]
[22]	Hofstede G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[23]	Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2^nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[24]	Hsu F. L. K. (1971). Psychosocial homeostasis and Jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73(1), 23-44. doi: 10.1525/aa.1971.73.1.02a00030 URL
[25]	Hsu F. L. K. (1981). Americans and the Chinese: Passage to differences. Honolulu: The University of Hawaii.
[26]	Hsu F. L. K. (1983). Rugged individualism reconsidered: Essays in psychological anthropology. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
[27]	Hsu K. Y. (2007). Chinese implicit theory of personality- behavior association and its impact on interpersonal interaction. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 27, 3-79.
	[ 许功余. (2007). 华人性格与行为关连性的内隐理论及其对人际互动的影响. 本土心理学研究, 27, 3-79.]
[28]	Huang C. L., Lin Y. C., & Yang C. F. (2012). Revision of the Yang & Zhao’s Zhongyong Belief-Value Scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3-14.
	[ 黄金兰, 林以正, 杨中芳. (2012). 中庸处世信念/价值量表的修订. 本土心理学研究, 38, 3-14.]
[29]	Huang C. L., Chong Y. J., & Lin Y. C. (2014). Seeing tree or forest?The relationship between global perceptual processing and Zhongyong thinking style. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 49-65.
	[ 黄金兰, 锺育君, 林以正. (2014). 见林或见树?——整体处理与中庸的关联性. 中国社会心理学评论, 8, 49-65.]
[30]	Huang L. L., Cheng W. J., & Hwang K. K. (2008). Pathways toward voicing: Ren (forbearance) and self-transformation in the context of vertical relations. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 29, 3-76.
	[ 黄囇莉, 郑琬蓉, 黄光国. (2008). 忍的历程与自我之转化. 本土心理学研究, 29, 3-76.]
[31]	Huang M., Tang G., Yi X., & Sun S. (2014). Zhongyong thinking facilitates social adaptation: The mediating effect of emotion regulation flexibility. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 88-112.
	[ 黄敏儿, 唐淦琦, 易晓敏, 孙莎莎. (2014). 中庸致和: 情绪调节灵活性的作用. 中国社会心理学评论, 8, 88-112.]
[32]	Ji L.-J., Zhang Z., Usborne E., & Guan Y. (2004). Optimism across cultures: In response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 25-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2004.00132.x URL
[33]	Jullien F. (2018). From being to living: A Euro-Chinese lexicon of thought (L. Zhuo, Trans.). Shanghai: Orient Publishing Center. (Original work published 2015)
	[ 朱利安, F. (2018). 从存有到生活: 欧洲思想与中国思想的间距 (卓立, 译). 上海: 东方出版中心.]
[34]	Kitayama S., Duffy S., Kawamura T., & Larsen J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201-206. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.02432 pmid: 12741741
[35]	Lee Y. C. (2009). Theory and measurement of peace of mind(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Taiwan University.
	[ 李怡真. (2009). 安适幸福感的构念发展与情绪调控机制之探讨 (博士学位论文). 台湾大学.]
[36]	Li S., Liu H., Bai X., Ren X., Zheng R., Li J., Rao L., & Wang Z. (2009). Psychological typhoon eye in 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of May 12. Science & Technology Review, 27(3), 87-89.
	[ 李纾, 刘欢, 白新文, 任孝鹏, 郑蕊, 李金珍, 饶俪琳, 汪祚军. (2009). 汶川“5.12”地震中的“心理台风眼”效应. 科技导报, 27(3), 87-89.]
[37]	Li Y. (2014a). The influence of job stressors on work-family balance: The moderating effect of Zhongyong thinking. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 177-191.
	[ 李原. (2014a). 工作压力因素对工作-家庭平衡的影响: 中庸的调节作用. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 177-191. ]
[38]	Li Y. (2014b). The influence of stressful life events on subjective well-being: The moderating effect of Zhongyong thinking. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 184-194.
	[ 李原. (2014b). 压力性生活事件对在职者主观幸福感的作用: 中庸思维的调节作用. 中国社会心理学评论, 8, 184-194. ]
[39]	Lin S. (2005). Seeking the Zhongyong self (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou.
	[ 林升栋. (2005). 寻找中庸自我的研究 (博士学位论文). 中山大学, 广州.]
[40]	Lin S. (2014). An exploration of the relationship between yin-yang convertibility thinking and person perception. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 78-88.
	[ 林升栋. (2014). 阴阳转换思维与看人感知的关系初探. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 78-88.]
[41]	Lin W. F. (2008). The effects of tradition-modern segregation or integration on psychological adjustment (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Taiwan University.
	[ 林玮芳. (2008). 传统性与现代性的区隔与整合对心理适应之影响 (博士学位论文). 台湾大学.]
[42]	Lin W. F. (2022). Forbearance in Chinese culture. In C. F. Yang & J. H. Zhang (Eds.), Selected papers on Chinese indigenous psychological studies, 30 Years After, (Vol. II, Chapter 19). Wu-Nan Publishing Co, Taipei.
	[ 林玮芳. (2022). 华人文化下的忍. 见杨中芳, 张仁和(编). 华人本土心理学30年 (中册, 第19章). 五南出版社, 台北.]
[43]	Lin W. F., Deng C. H., Lin Y. C., & Huang C. L. (2013). Stepping backward or moving forward: The moderating effect of Zhongyong on the relationship between Na-Nie and psychological adjustment. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 40, 45-84.
	[ 林玮芳, 邓传忠, 林以正, 黄金兰. (2013). 进退有据: 中庸对拿捏行为与心理适应之关系的调节作用. 本土心理学研究, 40, 45-84.]
[44]	Lin W. F., Huang C. L., & Lin Y. C. (2014). Timing makes a difference: An interaction effect between Zhongyong belief/ value and yin-yang convertibility belief on psychological well-being. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 89-107.
	[ 林玮芳, 黄金兰, 林以正. (2014). 来得好不如来得巧: 中庸与阴阳转折的时机. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 89-107.]
[45]	Lin Y. C. (2010, April). Between forward and backward: A Zhongyong way of settling self and others. Paper presented at the international conference on Culture and Psychiatry: Multiplicity and Change of Chinese Culture, Shanghai.
	[ 林以正. (2010, April). 进退之间: 中庸之道与人我的安顿. 国际文化精神医学会议: 中国文化的多样性及社会变迁, 上海.]
[46]	Lin Y. C. (2014). Coupling hardness with softness: Autonomous compromises in Zhongyong. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 221-235.
	[ 林以正. (2014). 外柔内刚的中庸之道: 实践具自主性的折中原则. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 221-235.]
[47]	Lin Y. C., Huang C. L., & Lee Y. C. (2011). Stepping backward or forward: Flexibility of situated forbearance and psychological adjustment. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 35, 57-100.
	[ 林以正, 黄金兰, 李怡真. (2011). 进退之间的拿捏: 忍的情境变异性与心理适应. 本土心理学研究, 35, 57-100.]
[48]	Liu S. C. (2000, April). The “self” concept in east and west philosophies. Paper presented at the first conference of Social Sciences Concepts: Indigenous and Western, Taipei.
	[ 刘述先. (2000, April). 东西哲学中的自我概念. 东西思想文化传统中的“自我”与“他者”学术研讨会, 台北.]
[49]	Ma P., & Cai S. (2018). A cross-level analysis of motivation internalization of the effect of paternalistic leadership on voice behavior-the moderating effect of Zhong-yong thinking. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 235, 88-96.
	[ 马鹏, 蔡双立. (2018). 家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析. 财经论丛, 235, 88-96.]
[50]	Markus H. R., & Kitayama S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224 URL
[51]	Peng K. P., Ames D. R., & Knowles E. D. (2001). Culture and human inference:Perspectives from three traditions. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.),The handbook of culture and psychology (pp.245-264). New York: Oxford University Press.
[52]	Peng K. P., Spencer-Rodgers J., & Zhong N. (2006). Naïve dialecticism and the Tao of Chinese thought. In U. Kim, K. S. Yang, & K. K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 247-262). Springer.
[53]	Peng M., Lai P., Bao G., Yang Z., & Chen X. (2016). The Zhongyong thinking characters of clients for family therapy and it's relationships with family functioning. China Journal of Health Psychology, 24(2), 263-267.
	[ 彭敏, 赖平妹, 鲍广林, 阳中华, 陈向一. (2016). 家庭治疗求治者中庸思维特点及其与家庭功能的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24(2), 263-267.]
[54]	Ren X., Bai X., Zheng R., & Zhang K. (2009). Structure and measurement of psychological harmony. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 7, 85-106.
	[ 任孝鹏, 白新文, 郑蕊, 张侃. (2009). 心理和谐的结构与测量. 华人心理学报, 10(1), 85-106. ]
[55]	Sampson E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 40(11), 1203-1211. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.40.11.1203 URL
[56]	Sampson E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15-22. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.15 URL
[57]	Schwartz S. H., & Sagiv L. (1995). Identifying culture- specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92-116. doi: 10.1177/0022022195261007 URL
[58]	Schwartz S. H., Cieciuch J., Vecchione M., Davidov E., Fischer R., Beierlein C., … Konty M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663-688. doi: 10.1037/a0029393 pmid: 22823292
[59]	Spencer-Rodgers J., Boucher H. C., Mori S. C., Wang L., & Peng K. P. (2009). The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 29-44. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325772 pmid: 19106076
[60]	Sternberg R. J. (1999). Thinking styles. London: Cambridge University Press.
[61]	Sun C. R. (2014). Yin-yang reversals and extremity judgments: A preliminary study of the dynamic nature of Yin-Yang thinking mode. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 108-130.
	[ 孙蒨如. (2014). 阴阳思维与极端判断: 阴阳思维动态本质的初探. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 108-130.]
[62]	Triandis H. C. (1987). Collectivism v. individualism:A reconceptualisation of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In C. Bagley & G. K. Verma(Eds.), Personality, cognition and values: Cross-cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence (pp. 57-89). London: MacMillan.
[63]	Triandis H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506 URL
[64]	Wang D. (2012). Sinicization of psychological research: Theory and strategy. Beijing: China Light Industry Press.
	[ 王登峰. (2012). 心理学研究的中国化: 理论与策略. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社.]
[65]	Wang D., & Cui H. (2006). Chinese openness:Western openness personality dimension and Chinese personality. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition). 32(6), 1-10.
	[ 王登峰, 崔红. (2006). 中国人的“开放性”—西方“开放性”人格维度与中国人的人格. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 32(6), 1-10.]
[66]	Wang H., & Zhang L. (2018, January). Need for zhongyong balance and its influence on dormitory interpersonal relationship. Paper presented at the 5th Zhongyong Psychology Conference, Xiamen, China.
	[ 王慧, 张灵聪. (2018, January). 平衡需求: 中庸的一种表达方式——平衡需求与大学生宿舍关系研究. 第五届中庸心理学研讨会, 厦门.]
[67]	Wang M. Y., Lin S. J., & Yeh Y. Y. (2014). Emotions unexpressed: The influence of Zhongyong thinking on attentional and memory processing of emotional stimuli. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 18-48.
	[ 汪曼颖, 林淑菁, 叶怡玉. (2014). 喜怒哀乐之未发: 情绪性刺激注意力与记忆的中庸思维体现. 中国社会心理学评论, 8, 18-48.]
[68]	Wang Y. (2020). The identity modulation theory: The development of an indigenous self-esteem theory. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 8(3), 185-192.
	[ 王轶楠. (2020). 身份调和器理论: 一个新的本土化自尊理论的提出. 心理技术与应用, 8(3), 185-192.]
[69]	Wang Y., & Liu J. (2021). The fusion of small-ego and large- ego: The positive implications of syncretic self-esteem. Psychological Development and Education, 37(4), 568-575.
	[ 王轶楠, 刘嘉. (2021). 让小我融入大我: 适恰自尊的积极心理学意义. 心理发展与教育, 37(4), 568-575.]
[70]	Wang Z.-D., & Wang F.-Y. (2021). Ternary Taiji Models of the traditional Chinese self: Centered on Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist cultures. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. doi: 10.1177/00221678211016957. doi: 10.1177/00221678211016957
[71]	Webster D. M., & Kruglanski A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. pmid: 7815301
[72]	Wei Q. W., Han Y., Yan Y. T., Guo Z., & Xu R. B. (2019). Looking for the third way: The social psychological research of Zhongyong through a view of "the division of one into three". The conclusion report of the project (14CSH038) supported by National Philosophy and Social Sciences Foundation, China.
	[ 韦庆旺, 韩悦, 鄢玉婷, 郭政, 徐如冰. (2019). 寻找中道: “一分为三”框架下的中庸心理研究. 国家社会科学基金项目(14CSH038)结项研究报告.]
[73]	Wu C. H. (2006). The nature of self-handling: Self-variation and self-certainty. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 7, 259-281.
	[ 吴佳辉. (2006). 自我拿捏的本质: 自我变异与自我确定. 华人心理学报, 7, 259-281.]
[74]	Wu C. H., & Lin Y. C. (2005). Development of a Zhong-yong thinking style scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 24, 247-299.
	[ 吴佳辉, 林以正. (2005). 中庸思维量表的编制. 本土心理学研究, 24, 247-299.]
[75]	Yang C. F. (2001a). Are the Chinese really collectivistic? An essay on the relationship among culture, value, and individual. In C. F. Yang(Ed.), How to understand the Chinese: a collection of papers on culture and individual (pp. 107-150). Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2001a). 中国人真的是集体主义的吗?——试论文化、价值与个体的关系. 见杨中芳(主编). 如何理解中国人—文化与个人论文集 (pp. 107-150). 台北: 远流出版公司.]
[76]	Yang C. F. (2001b). My search for the Chinese self. In C. F. Yang (Ed.), How to understand the Chinese: A collection of papers on culture and individual. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2001b).我的“自我”探索:一个本土研究者的自述. 见杨中芳(主编). 如何理解中国人——文化与个人论文集 (代序). 台北: 远流出版公司.]
[77]	Yang C. F. (2001c). Big-self and small-self:The Chinese view of self-other relationship. In C. F. Yang (Ed.), How to understand the Chinese: A collection of papers on culture and individual (pp. 365-404). Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2001c). 中国人的人己观:“自己”的“大我”与“小我”. 见杨中芳(主编). 如何理解中国人——文化与个人论文集(pp. 365-404). 台北: 远流出版公司.]
[78]	Yang C. F. (2006). The Chinese conception of the self:Towards a person-making perspective of the self. In U.Kim, K. S.Yang, & K. K.Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 327-357). New York: Springer.
[79]	Yang C. F. (2008a). Indigenization within mainstream psychological research. In C. F.Yang (Ed.), Paths to Indigenization of Chinese psychological research (pp. 161-186). Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2008a). 从主流心理学研究程序看本土化的途径. 见杨中芳(主编). 本土心理研究取径论丛 (pp. 161-186). 台北: 远流出版公司.]
[80]	Yang C. F. (2008b). The study of Zhongyong action-oriented thinking mode:Toward building a new system of Chinese psychological knowledge. In C. F.Yang (Ed.), Paths to Indigenization of Chinese psychological research (pp. 435-478). Taipei: Yuan-Liu Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2008b). 中庸实践思维研究——迈向建构一套本土心理学知识体系. 见杨中芳(主编). 本土心理研究取径论丛 (pp. 435-478). 台北: 远流出版公司.]
[81]	Yang C. F. (2008c, April). Maybe, we need to take a new perspective to examine happiness: An introduction to a Zhongyong framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Teaching Committee and the Personality Psychology Committee of CPA, Guangzhou.
	[ 杨中芳. (2008c, April). 我们是不是可以换一个脑袋来构思幸福感?简述中庸思考架构. 中国心理学会心理学教学工作委员会和人格心理学专业委员会学术年会, 广州.]
[82]	Yang C. F. (2010). Multiplicity of Zhongyong studies. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34(1), 3-96.
	[ 杨中芳. (2010). 中庸实践思维体系探讨的初步进展. 本土心理学研究, 34(1), 3-96.]
[83]	Yang C. F. (2022a). Zhongyong psychology:Past, present and future. In C. F.Yang & J. H.Chang (Eds.), Chinese indigenous psychology, 30 years after (Vol. I, Chpater 5). Taipei: Wu-Nan Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2022a). 中庸心理学研究:起源、现状及展望. 见杨中芳, 张仁和(编). 华人本土心理学30年(上册,第5章). 台北: 五南出版社.]
[84]	Yang C. F. (2022b). Maybe, we should try to rethink about how to study the Chinese?In C. F.Yang & J. H.Chang (Eds.), Chinese Indigenous psychology, 30 years after (Vol. I, Chapter 3). Taipei: Wu-Nan Publishing Co.
	[ 杨中芳. (2022b). 要不, 换一个脑袋来想心理学?——中庸思维作为一条本土进路. 见杨中芳, 张仁和(编). 华人本土心理学30年(上册, 第3章). 台北: 五南出版社.]
[85]	Yang C. F., & Lin S. (2014). What does Huang, Lin & Yang’s Zhongyong Belief/Value Scale really measure? Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 159-77.
	[ 杨中芳, 林升栋. (2014). 中庸信念/价值量表到底在测什么?. 中国社会心理学评论, 7, 59-77.]
[86]	Yang C. F., & Chiu C. Y. (1997). A preliminary study of Zhongyong. Paper presented at the Fourth Symposium on “The Psychology and Behavior of the Chinese”, Taipei, May 29-31.
	[ 杨中芳, 赵志裕. (1997). 中庸研究初探. 第四届中国人的心理与行为科际研讨会, 台北.]
[87]	Yang K. S. (2008). Chinese Indigenous psychology and cultural compatibility. Taipei: Wu-Nan Publishing Co.
	[ 杨国枢. (2008). 华人本土心理学与华人本土契合性. 台北: 五南出版社.]
[88]	Yang H. (2019). The effect of Zhongyong thinking on creativity: Facilitating or inhibiting? (Unpublished master’s thesis). Cheng-Gung University, Tainan.
	[ 杨海. (2019). 中庸思维与创造力: 促进或抑制?(硕士学位论文). 成功大学, 台南.]
[89]	Yao X., Yang Q., Dong N., & Wang L. (2010). Moderating effect of Zhong Yong on the relationship between creativity and innovation behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01300.x URL
[90]	Yeh C. C. (2008). The kneading exercise between globalization and indigenization:An essay on indigenization of academic research. In C. F.Yang (Ed.), Paths to indigenization of Chinese psychological research (pp. 53-76). Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co.
	[ 叶启政. (2008). 全球化与本土化的搓揉游戏:论学术研究的“本土化”. 见杨中芳(主编). 本土心理研究取径论丛 (pp. 53-76). 台北: 远流出版中心.]
[91]	Ye X., & Zhang L. (2014). The effects of Zhongyong thinking mode on decision-making in different situations. Chinese Social Psychological Review, 8, 77-87.
	[ 叶晓璐, 张灵聪. (2014). 中庸思维对不同情境决策行为的影响. 中国社会心理学评论, 8, 77-87.]
[92]	Yu S. H., Lin Y. C., Huang C. L., Hwang K. K., & Chang J. H. (2010). The relationship between long-term orientation and psychological adjustment. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 23, 347-375.
	[ 余思贤, 林以正, 黄金兰, 黄光国, 张仁和. (2010). 长期取向思维与心理适应之关联. 中华心理卫生学刊, 23, 347-375.]
[93]	Zhai X. (2018). Confucian-style self and its practice: A study of indigenous psychology. Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 5, 124-134.
	[ 翟学伟. (2018). 儒家式的自我及其实践: 本土心理学的探索. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 5, 124-134.]
[94]	Zhao C.-X, Shen X.-C, Rao L.-L, Zheng R., Liu H., & Li S. (2018). Suffering a loss is good fortune: Myth or reality? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 324-340. doi: 10.1002/bdm.2056 URL
[95]	Zhou M., Li F., Mu W., Fan W., Zhang J., & Cheung F. M. (2021). Round outside and square inside: The latent profile structure and adaptability of Chinese interpersonal relatedness. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 53 (9), 1-16. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00001 URL
	[ 周明洁, 李府桂, 穆蔚琦, 范为桥, 张建新, 张妙清. (2021). 外圆内方: 中国人人际关系性的潜在剖面结构及其适应性. 心理学报, 53(9), 1-16.]
[96]	Zhu Y. (2007). Culture and self. Beijing Normal University Press.
	[ 朱滢. (2007). 文化与自我. 北京师范大学出版社.]
[97]	Zhu Y., & Ng S. H. (2019). In search of the Chinese self. Beijing Normal University Press.
	[ 朱滢, 伍锡洪. (2017). 寻找中国人的自我. 北京师范大学出版社.]
[98]	Zou Z. (2009). The hardiness of the Chinese college students: Its construct and influence (Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation). Peking University.
	[ 邹智敏. (2009). 中国大学生的坚韧性: 结构与作用机制的研究 (博士学位论文). 北京大学.]