心理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 646-664.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00646
收稿日期:
2019-05-31
发布日期:
2022-04-26
出版日期:
2022-06-25
通讯作者:
余宇
E-mail:yuyu@swufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHENG Xiaoming1, YU Yu2(), LIU Xin3
Received:
2019-05-31
Online:
2022-04-26
Published:
2022-06-25
Contact:
YU Yu
E-mail:yuyu@swufe.edu.cn
摘要:
本文关注配偶情绪智力对员工工作投入的跨领域的人际间影响。基于努力-恢复模型视角和情绪智力文献, 本文提出高情绪智力的配偶能够通过提升员工生活幸福感, 从而促进员工工作投入。此外, 通过整合社会性别角色理论, 本文进一步讨论了员工性别的调节作用。通过两个子研究, 本文发现:配偶情绪智力与员工生活幸福感之间呈现正相关关系; 员工生活幸福感与员工工作投入之间呈现正相关关系; 员工生活幸福感中介了配偶情绪智力对员工工作投入的影响; 并且, 员工性别调节了配偶情绪智力和员工生活幸福感之间的关系, 即当员工为男性时, 配偶情绪智力对该员工生活幸福感的正向影响更强; 此外, 员工性别还调节了员工生活幸福感在配偶情绪智力和员工工作投入之间起到的中介作用。本研究首次提出和检验了配偶情绪智力对员工工作投入的跨领域的人际间积极影响, 具有理论和实践上的重要意义。
中图分类号:
郑晓明, 余宇, 刘鑫. (2022). 配偶情绪智力对员工工作投入的影响:员工生活幸福感的中介作用和性别的调节作用. 心理学报, 54(6), 646-664.
ZHENG Xiaoming, YU Yu, LIU Xin. (2022). The effect of spouse emotional intelligence on employee work engagement: The mediating role of employee life well-being and the moderating role of gender. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(6), 646-664.
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1配偶年龄 | 30.10 | 3.03 | |||||||||||
2配偶教育程度 | 2.75 | 0.58 | -0.05(0.574) | ||||||||||
3配偶工龄 | 5.85 | 3.38 | 0.66***(0.000) | -0.01(0.900) | |||||||||
4员工年龄 | 28.94 | 2.96 | 0.79***(0.000) | -0.16(0.074) | 0.64***(0.000) | ||||||||
5员工教育水平 | 2.92 | 0.37 | -0.05(0.578) | 0.17(0.061) | -0.00(0.970) | -0.09(0.345) | |||||||
6员工工龄 | 6.29 | 3.45 | 0.73***(0.000) | -0.22*(0.016) | 0.72***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | -0.11(0.207) | ||||||
7员工情绪智力 | 5.16 | 0.69 | -0.04(0.666) | 0.07(0.449) | 0.01(0.945) | -0.03(0.708) | 0.02(0.823) | -0.01(0.940) | 0.86 | ||||
8员工性别 | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.11(0.241) | -0.03(0.785) | -0.02(0.824) | 0.08(0.397) | -0.03(0.709) | -0.00(0.980) | 0.05(0.567) | ||||
9配偶情绪智力 | 5.62 | 0.56 | 0.14(0.132) | -0.03(0.744) | 0.24**(0.008) | 0.15(0.094) | -0.07(0.457) | 0.21*(0.019) | 0.07(0.444) | -0.08(0.365) | 0.78 | ||
10员工生活幸福感 | 4.97 | 1.06 | 0.14(0.114) | 0.04(0.689) | 0.04(0.678) | 0.07(0.448) | -0.03(0.741) | 0.12(0.176) | 0.12(0.175) | -0.04(0.646) | 0.27**(0.002) | 0.91 | |
11员工工作投入 | 4.83 | 1.04 | 0.09(0.326) | -0.07(0.411) | 0.08(0.371) | 0.08(0.390) | 0.02(0.850) | 0.13(0.148) | 0.20*(0.024) | 0.16(0.071) | 0.08(0.357) | 0.46***(0.000) | 0.89 |
表1 研究1各变量的均值、标准差和相关矩阵
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1配偶年龄 | 30.10 | 3.03 | |||||||||||
2配偶教育程度 | 2.75 | 0.58 | -0.05(0.574) | ||||||||||
3配偶工龄 | 5.85 | 3.38 | 0.66***(0.000) | -0.01(0.900) | |||||||||
4员工年龄 | 28.94 | 2.96 | 0.79***(0.000) | -0.16(0.074) | 0.64***(0.000) | ||||||||
5员工教育水平 | 2.92 | 0.37 | -0.05(0.578) | 0.17(0.061) | -0.00(0.970) | -0.09(0.345) | |||||||
6员工工龄 | 6.29 | 3.45 | 0.73***(0.000) | -0.22*(0.016) | 0.72***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | -0.11(0.207) | ||||||
7员工情绪智力 | 5.16 | 0.69 | -0.04(0.666) | 0.07(0.449) | 0.01(0.945) | -0.03(0.708) | 0.02(0.823) | -0.01(0.940) | 0.86 | ||||
8员工性别 | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.11(0.241) | -0.03(0.785) | -0.02(0.824) | 0.08(0.397) | -0.03(0.709) | -0.00(0.980) | 0.05(0.567) | ||||
9配偶情绪智力 | 5.62 | 0.56 | 0.14(0.132) | -0.03(0.744) | 0.24**(0.008) | 0.15(0.094) | -0.07(0.457) | 0.21*(0.019) | 0.07(0.444) | -0.08(0.365) | 0.78 | ||
10员工生活幸福感 | 4.97 | 1.06 | 0.14(0.114) | 0.04(0.689) | 0.04(0.678) | 0.07(0.448) | -0.03(0.741) | 0.12(0.176) | 0.12(0.175) | -0.04(0.646) | 0.27**(0.002) | 0.91 | |
11员工工作投入 | 4.83 | 1.04 | 0.09(0.326) | -0.07(0.411) | 0.08(0.371) | 0.08(0.390) | 0.02(0.850) | 0.13(0.148) | 0.20*(0.024) | 0.16(0.071) | 0.08(0.357) | 0.46***(0.000) | 0.89 |
变量 | 员工生活幸福感 | 员工工作投入 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | ||||||||
系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | |
截距 | 3.13(1.91) | 0.104 | 0.11(2.12) | 0.958 | 1.57(2.19) | 0.476 | 3.29(1.86) | 0.080 | 2.54(2.11) | 0.229 | 1.93(1.69) | 0.257 | 2.49(1.88) | 0.188 |
配偶年龄 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.138 | 0.09(0.06) | 0.104 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.124 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.710 | 0.05(0.06) | 0.378 | -0.02(0.05) | 0.747 | 0.01(0.05) | 0.879 |
配偶教育程度 | 0.11(0.18) | 0.526 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.511 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.527 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.460 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.442 | -0.18(0.16) | 0.257 | -0.18(0.15) | 0.234 |
配偶工龄 | -0.05(0.04) | 0.237 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.105 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.085 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.875 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.775 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.680 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.614 |
员工年龄 | -0.07(0.06) | 0.300 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.317 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.329 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.604 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.330 | 0.00(0.06) | 0.952 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.563 |
员工教育水平 | -0.06(0.26) | 0.818 | -0.01(0.26) | 0.956 | -0.04(0.25) | 0.858 | 0.11(0.25) | 0.670 | 0.13(0.25) | 0.597 | 0.13(0.23) | 0.557 | 0.14(0.23) | 0.536 |
员工工龄 | 0.07(0.06) | 0.206 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.276 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.247 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.349 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.329 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.683 | 0.03(0.05) | 0.593 |
员工情绪智力 | 0.19(0.14) | 0.172 | 0.16(0.14) | 0.233 | 0.15(0.13) | 0.261 | 0.31*(0.14) | 0.024 | 0.29*(0.14) | 0.033 | 0.23(0.12) | 0.067 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.077 |
员工性别 | 0.03(0.23) | 0.884 | 0.07(0.23) | 0.746 | 0.45*(0.23) | 0.049 | 0.44*(0.20) | 0.033 | ||||||
配偶情绪智力 | 0.51**(0.17) | 0.004 | 0.30(0.20) | 0.121 | 0.12(0.17) | 0.476 | -0.11(0.16) | 0.500 | ||||||
员工生活幸福感 | 0.44***(0.08) | 0.000 | 0.45***(0.08) | 0.000 | ||||||||||
配偶情绪智力×员工性别 | 0.47*(0.21) | 0.031 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.29 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.07* | 0.03* | 0.03 | 0.18***a | 0.19***b |
表2 研究1回归分析结果
变量 | 员工生活幸福感 | 员工工作投入 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | ||||||||
系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | |
截距 | 3.13(1.91) | 0.104 | 0.11(2.12) | 0.958 | 1.57(2.19) | 0.476 | 3.29(1.86) | 0.080 | 2.54(2.11) | 0.229 | 1.93(1.69) | 0.257 | 2.49(1.88) | 0.188 |
配偶年龄 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.138 | 0.09(0.06) | 0.104 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.124 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.710 | 0.05(0.06) | 0.378 | -0.02(0.05) | 0.747 | 0.01(0.05) | 0.879 |
配偶教育程度 | 0.11(0.18) | 0.526 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.511 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.527 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.460 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.442 | -0.18(0.16) | 0.257 | -0.18(0.15) | 0.234 |
配偶工龄 | -0.05(0.04) | 0.237 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.105 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.085 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.875 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.775 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.680 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.614 |
员工年龄 | -0.07(0.06) | 0.300 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.317 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.329 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.604 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.330 | 0.00(0.06) | 0.952 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.563 |
员工教育水平 | -0.06(0.26) | 0.818 | -0.01(0.26) | 0.956 | -0.04(0.25) | 0.858 | 0.11(0.25) | 0.670 | 0.13(0.25) | 0.597 | 0.13(0.23) | 0.557 | 0.14(0.23) | 0.536 |
员工工龄 | 0.07(0.06) | 0.206 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.276 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.247 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.349 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.329 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.683 | 0.03(0.05) | 0.593 |
员工情绪智力 | 0.19(0.14) | 0.172 | 0.16(0.14) | 0.233 | 0.15(0.13) | 0.261 | 0.31*(0.14) | 0.024 | 0.29*(0.14) | 0.033 | 0.23(0.12) | 0.067 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.077 |
员工性别 | 0.03(0.23) | 0.884 | 0.07(0.23) | 0.746 | 0.45*(0.23) | 0.049 | 0.44*(0.20) | 0.033 | ||||||
配偶情绪智力 | 0.51**(0.17) | 0.004 | 0.30(0.20) | 0.121 | 0.12(0.17) | 0.476 | -0.11(0.16) | 0.500 | ||||||
员工生活幸福感 | 0.44***(0.08) | 0.000 | 0.45***(0.08) | 0.000 | ||||||||||
配偶情绪智力×员工性别 | 0.47*(0.21) | 0.031 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.29 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.07* | 0.03* | 0.03 | 0.18***a | 0.19***b |
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1配偶年龄 | 32.73 | 6.07 | |||||||||||||||
2配偶教育 程度 | 3.00 | 1.07 | 0.05(0.652) | ||||||||||||||
3配偶工龄 | 6.51 | 5.15 | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.22(0.068) | |||||||||||||
4员工年龄 | 33.26 | 5.43 | 0.86***(0.000) | -0.07(0.559) | 0.50***(0.000) | ||||||||||||
5员工教育 水平 | 3.01 | 0.94 | 0.21(0.080) | 0.54***(0.000) | 0.13(0.290) | 0.14(0.252) | |||||||||||
6.员工工龄 | 2.24 | 1.33 | 0.38**(0.001) | 0.22(0.066) | 0.12(0.294) | 0.33**(0.005) | 0.38**(0.001) | ||||||||||
7员工工作 要求 | 4.64 | 1.01 | -0.12(0.331) | 0.10(0.396) | 0.06(0.589) | -0.03(0.796) | 0.15(0.206) | 0.04(0.740) | 0.83 | ||||||||
8员工工作 控制 | 4.78 | 1.33 | -0.04(0.740) | 0.13(0.282) | -0.04(0.723) | -0.11(0.342) | 0.00(0.971) | -0.08(0.510) | -0.07(0.569) | 0.94 | |||||||
9领导情绪 智力 | 5.51 | 0.94 | 0.01(0.935) | -0.00(0.977) | 0.10(0.414) | -0.05(0.657) | -0.02(0.888) | -0.12(0.326) | 0.04(0.770) | 0.47***(0.000) | 0.98 | ||||||
10同事情绪 智力 | 5.37 | 0.87 | -0.09(0.446) | -0.05(0.672) | -0.07(0.554) | -0.13(0.293) | 0.04(0.760) | -0.09(0.456) | -0.02(0.888) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | 0.98 | |||||
11员工情绪 智力 | 5.68 | 0.67 | 0.02(0.861) | 0.00(0.976) | -0.17(0.157) | -0.00(0.983) | -0.02(0.891) | 0.02(0.876) | -0.11(0.349) | 0.27*(0.021) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.58***(0.000) | 0.92 | ||||
12员工性别 | 0.73 | 0.45 | -0.12(0.335) | -0.15(0.221) | 0.02(0.874) | 0.17(0.146) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.05(0.650) | 0.12(0.330) | -0.10(0.389) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.14(0.230) | 0.12(0.330) | ||||
13配偶情绪 智力 | 5.59 | 0.72 | 0.08(0.530) | -0.05(0.648) | -0.13(0.270) | 0.03(0.835) | -0.10(0.425) | -0.12(0.320) | -0.10(0.418) | 0.12(0.315) | 0.16(0.166) | 0.18(0.125) | 0.11(0.348) | -0.07(0.541) | 0.94 | ||
14员工生活 幸福感 | 4.73 | 1.04 | -0.05(0.706) | -0.09(0.473) | -0.13(0.265) | -0.13(0.264) | -0.06(0.641) | -0.09(0.450) | 0.06(0.606) | 0.24*(0.039) | 0.32**(0.005) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.21(0.069) | -0.04(0.770) | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.92 | |
15员工工作 投入 | 5.42 | 0.92 | 0.18(0.127) | 0.18(0.124) | 0.06(0.603) | 0.18(0.130) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.18(0.123) | 0.10(0.382) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.41***(0.000) | 0.23(0.055) | 0.09(0.430) | 0.35**(0.002) | 0.96 |
表3 研究2各变量的均值、标准差和相关矩阵
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1配偶年龄 | 32.73 | 6.07 | |||||||||||||||
2配偶教育 程度 | 3.00 | 1.07 | 0.05(0.652) | ||||||||||||||
3配偶工龄 | 6.51 | 5.15 | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.22(0.068) | |||||||||||||
4员工年龄 | 33.26 | 5.43 | 0.86***(0.000) | -0.07(0.559) | 0.50***(0.000) | ||||||||||||
5员工教育 水平 | 3.01 | 0.94 | 0.21(0.080) | 0.54***(0.000) | 0.13(0.290) | 0.14(0.252) | |||||||||||
6.员工工龄 | 2.24 | 1.33 | 0.38**(0.001) | 0.22(0.066) | 0.12(0.294) | 0.33**(0.005) | 0.38**(0.001) | ||||||||||
7员工工作 要求 | 4.64 | 1.01 | -0.12(0.331) | 0.10(0.396) | 0.06(0.589) | -0.03(0.796) | 0.15(0.206) | 0.04(0.740) | 0.83 | ||||||||
8员工工作 控制 | 4.78 | 1.33 | -0.04(0.740) | 0.13(0.282) | -0.04(0.723) | -0.11(0.342) | 0.00(0.971) | -0.08(0.510) | -0.07(0.569) | 0.94 | |||||||
9领导情绪 智力 | 5.51 | 0.94 | 0.01(0.935) | -0.00(0.977) | 0.10(0.414) | -0.05(0.657) | -0.02(0.888) | -0.12(0.326) | 0.04(0.770) | 0.47***(0.000) | 0.98 | ||||||
10同事情绪 智力 | 5.37 | 0.87 | -0.09(0.446) | -0.05(0.672) | -0.07(0.554) | -0.13(0.293) | 0.04(0.760) | -0.09(0.456) | -0.02(0.888) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | 0.98 | |||||
11员工情绪 智力 | 5.68 | 0.67 | 0.02(0.861) | 0.00(0.976) | -0.17(0.157) | -0.00(0.983) | -0.02(0.891) | 0.02(0.876) | -0.11(0.349) | 0.27*(0.021) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.58***(0.000) | 0.92 | ||||
12员工性别 | 0.73 | 0.45 | -0.12(0.335) | -0.15(0.221) | 0.02(0.874) | 0.17(0.146) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.05(0.650) | 0.12(0.330) | -0.10(0.389) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.14(0.230) | 0.12(0.330) | ||||
13配偶情绪 智力 | 5.59 | 0.72 | 0.08(0.530) | -0.05(0.648) | -0.13(0.270) | 0.03(0.835) | -0.10(0.425) | -0.12(0.320) | -0.10(0.418) | 0.12(0.315) | 0.16(0.166) | 0.18(0.125) | 0.11(0.348) | -0.07(0.541) | 0.94 | ||
14员工生活 幸福感 | 4.73 | 1.04 | -0.05(0.706) | -0.09(0.473) | -0.13(0.265) | -0.13(0.264) | -0.06(0.641) | -0.09(0.450) | 0.06(0.606) | 0.24*(0.039) | 0.32**(0.005) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.21(0.069) | -0.04(0.770) | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.92 | |
15员工工作 投入 | 5.42 | 0.92 | 0.18(0.127) | 0.18(0.124) | 0.06(0.603) | 0.18(0.130) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.18(0.123) | 0.10(0.382) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.41***(0.000) | 0.23(0.055) | 0.09(0.430) | 0.35**(0.002) | 0.96 |
变量 | 员工生活幸福感 | 员工工作投入 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | ||||||||
系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | |
截距 | 2.36(1.50) | 0.120 | -0.06(1.55) | 0.968 | 4.93(2.63) | 0.065 | -0.81(1.19) | 0.502 | -0.97(1.28) | 0.452 | -1.38(1.17) | 0.244 | -0.95(1.24) | 0.445 |
配偶年龄 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.136 | 0.07(0.04) | 0.091 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.138 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.684 | 0.04(0.04) | 0.307 | -0.03(0.03) | 0.379 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.578 |
配偶教育程度 | -0.06(0.15) | 0.669 | -0.09(0.13) | 0.499 | -0.12(0.13) | 0.373 | 0.08(0.12) | 0.487 | 0.09(0.11) | 0.433 | 0.10(0.11) | 0.392 | 0.11(0.11) | 0.320 |
配偶工龄 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.645 | 0.01(0.03) | 0.843 | 0.00(0.03) | 0.982 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.586 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.676 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.674 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.626 |
员工年龄 | -0.06(0.05) | 0.205 | -0.10(0.05) | 0.062 | -0.09(0.05) | 0.060 | 0.05(0.04) | 0.207 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.797 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.093 | 0.01(0.04) | 0.790 |
员工教育水平 | -0.08(0.16) | 0.637 | -0.03(0.15) | 0.861 | 0.02(0.15) | 0.884 | 0.17(0.13) | 0.205 | 0.18(0.13) | 0.159 | 0.19(0.13) | 0.144 | 0.18(0.12) | 0.134 |
员工工龄 | -0.03(0.10) | 0.764 | 0.01(0.09) | 0.891 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.646 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.505 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.414 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.431 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.422 |
员工工作要求 | 0.13(0.12) | 0.277 | 0.14(0.11) | 0.218 | 0.12(0.11) | 0.268 | 0.09(0.10) | 0.379 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.477 | 0.05(0.09) | 0.570 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.706 |
员工工作控制 | 0.07(0.10) | 0.486 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.485 | 0.06(0.09) | 0.488 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.447 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.435 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.569 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.545 |
领导情绪智力 | -0.16(0.23) | 0.503 | -0.19(0.21) | 0.365 | -0.17(0.21) | 0.411 | 0.23(0.19) | 0.226 | 0.19(0.18) | 0.289 | 0.26(0.18) | 0.144 | 0.23(0.17) | 0.181 |
同事情绪智力 | 0.62*(0.27) | 0.023 | 0.62*(0.25) | 0.017 | 0.55*(0.25) | 0.030 | 0.09(0.21) | 0.672 | 0.22(0.21) | 0.293 | -0.06(0.21) | 0.779 | 0.08(0.21) | 0.706 |
员工情绪智力 | -0.09(0.22) | 0.703 | -0.13(0.22) | 0.554 | -0.13(0.21) | 0.544 | 0.33(0.18) | 0.073 | 0.18(0.18) | 0.317 | 0.35*(0.17) | 0.048 | 0.21(0.17) | 0.233 |
员工性别 | 0.38(0.30) | 0.207 | 0.30(0.29) | 0.310 | 0.71**(0.25) | 0.006 | 0.63*(0.24) | 0.013 | ||||||
配偶情绪智力 | 0.55**(0.16) | 0.001 | -0.24(0.37) | 0.522 | 0.05(0.13) | 0.687 | -0.07(0.14) | 0.603 | ||||||
员工生活幸福感 | 0.24*(0.10) | 0.017 | 0.23*(0.10) | 0.033 | ||||||||||
配偶情绪智力?员工性别 | 0.96*(0.42) | 0.024 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.49 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.14** | 0.06* | 0.07* | 0.05*a | 0.04*b |
表4 研究2回归分析结果
变量 | 员工生活幸福感 | 员工工作投入 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型1 | 模型2 | 模型3 | 模型4 | 模型5 | 模型6 | 模型7 | ||||||||
系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | 系数(SE) | p | |
截距 | 2.36(1.50) | 0.120 | -0.06(1.55) | 0.968 | 4.93(2.63) | 0.065 | -0.81(1.19) | 0.502 | -0.97(1.28) | 0.452 | -1.38(1.17) | 0.244 | -0.95(1.24) | 0.445 |
配偶年龄 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.136 | 0.07(0.04) | 0.091 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.138 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.684 | 0.04(0.04) | 0.307 | -0.03(0.03) | 0.379 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.578 |
配偶教育程度 | -0.06(0.15) | 0.669 | -0.09(0.13) | 0.499 | -0.12(0.13) | 0.373 | 0.08(0.12) | 0.487 | 0.09(0.11) | 0.433 | 0.10(0.11) | 0.392 | 0.11(0.11) | 0.320 |
配偶工龄 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.645 | 0.01(0.03) | 0.843 | 0.00(0.03) | 0.982 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.586 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.676 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.674 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.626 |
员工年龄 | -0.06(0.05) | 0.205 | -0.10(0.05) | 0.062 | -0.09(0.05) | 0.060 | 0.05(0.04) | 0.207 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.797 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.093 | 0.01(0.04) | 0.790 |
员工教育水平 | -0.08(0.16) | 0.637 | -0.03(0.15) | 0.861 | 0.02(0.15) | 0.884 | 0.17(0.13) | 0.205 | 0.18(0.13) | 0.159 | 0.19(0.13) | 0.144 | 0.18(0.12) | 0.134 |
员工工龄 | -0.03(0.10) | 0.764 | 0.01(0.09) | 0.891 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.646 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.505 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.414 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.431 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.422 |
员工工作要求 | 0.13(0.12) | 0.277 | 0.14(0.11) | 0.218 | 0.12(0.11) | 0.268 | 0.09(0.10) | 0.379 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.477 | 0.05(0.09) | 0.570 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.706 |
员工工作控制 | 0.07(0.10) | 0.486 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.485 | 0.06(0.09) | 0.488 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.447 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.435 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.569 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.545 |
领导情绪智力 | -0.16(0.23) | 0.503 | -0.19(0.21) | 0.365 | -0.17(0.21) | 0.411 | 0.23(0.19) | 0.226 | 0.19(0.18) | 0.289 | 0.26(0.18) | 0.144 | 0.23(0.17) | 0.181 |
同事情绪智力 | 0.62*(0.27) | 0.023 | 0.62*(0.25) | 0.017 | 0.55*(0.25) | 0.030 | 0.09(0.21) | 0.672 | 0.22(0.21) | 0.293 | -0.06(0.21) | 0.779 | 0.08(0.21) | 0.706 |
员工情绪智力 | -0.09(0.22) | 0.703 | -0.13(0.22) | 0.554 | -0.13(0.21) | 0.544 | 0.33(0.18) | 0.073 | 0.18(0.18) | 0.317 | 0.35*(0.17) | 0.048 | 0.21(0.17) | 0.233 |
员工性别 | 0.38(0.30) | 0.207 | 0.30(0.29) | 0.310 | 0.71**(0.25) | 0.006 | 0.63*(0.24) | 0.013 | ||||||
配偶情绪智力 | 0.55**(0.16) | 0.001 | -0.24(0.37) | 0.522 | 0.05(0.13) | 0.687 | -0.07(0.14) | 0.603 | ||||||
员工生活幸福感 | 0.24*(0.10) | 0.017 | 0.23*(0.10) | 0.033 | ||||||||||
配偶情绪智力?员工性别 | 0.96*(0.42) | 0.024 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.49 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.14** | 0.06* | 0.07* | 0.05*a | 0.04*b |
[1] | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[2] | Arthur, A. R. (2000). Employee assistance programmes: The emperor’s new clothes of stress management?. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 28(4), 549-559. |
[3] |
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11.
doi: 10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207 URL |
[4] | Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389-411. |
[5] |
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274 URL |
[6] |
Bastian, V. A., Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1135-1145.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.006 URL |
[7] | Batista, E. D. (2016). How to not fight with your spouse when you get home from work. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version). Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://news.caijingmobile.com/article/detail/263892. |
[ 巴蒂斯塔, E. D, (2016). 回家后, 情绪管理更重要. 哈佛商业评论(中文版). 2022-01-03取自 https://news.caijingmobile.com/article/detail/263892.] | |
[8] |
Bechtoldt, M. N., & Schneider, V. K. (2016). Predicting stress from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings: Emotional intelligence and testosterone jointly predict cortisol reactivity. Emotion, 16(6), 815-825.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000134 pmid: 27064289 |
[9] |
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 780-795.
pmid: 17014299 |
[10] |
Brackett, M. A., Warner, R. M., & Bosco, J. S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 197-212.
doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00111.x URL |
[11] |
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301 URL |
[12] |
Byrne, Z. S., Peters, J. M., & Weston, J. W. (2016). The struggle with employee engagement: Measures and construct clarification using five samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1201-1227.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000124 URL |
[13] | Campbell, M., & Gavett, G. (2021). What Covid-19 has done to our well-being, in 12 charts. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version), 4, 60-73. |
[ 坎贝尔, M., 加维特, G. (2021). 疫情对幸福感的影响. 哈佛商业评论(中文版), 4, 60-73.] | |
[14] |
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x URL |
[15] | Coleman, J., & Coleman, J. (2017). Don’t take work stress home with you. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version). Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://www.hbrchina.org/2017-02-14/4986.html. |
[ 科尔曼, J., 科尔曼, J. (2017). 你下班回家后的样子, 真正决定了幸福的程度. 哈佛商业评论(中文版). 2022-01-03取自 https://news.caijingmobile.com/article/detail/263892.] | |
[16] |
Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(4), 211-227.
doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12061 URL |
[17] | Côté, S. (2014). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 4593-488. |
[18] |
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69-106.
doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x pmid: 26158995 |
[19] | Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum. |
[20] | Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities:A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[21] |
Elfenbein, H. A. (2006). Learning in emotion judgments: Training and the cross-cultural understanding of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 21-36.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-005-0002-y URL |
[22] | Fang, W. (2008). The job demands-resources model and job burnout: Psychological capital as a moderator (Unpublished master’s thesis). Renmin University of China. |
[ 方伟. (2008). 工作要求资源模型与工作倦怠:心理资本调节作用的实证研究 (硕士学位论文). 中国人民大学] | |
[23] | Ghiselli, R. F., La Lopa, J. M., & Bai, B. (2001). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent: Among food-service managers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 28-37. |
[24] |
Gohm, C. L., Corser, G. C., & Dalsky, D. J. (2005). Emotional intelligence under stress: Useful, unnecessary, or irrelevant?. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1017-1028.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.018 URL |
[25] | Goleman, D. (2016). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Beijing: China CITIC Press. |
[ 戈尔曼, D.(2016). 情商:为什么情商比智商更重要. 北京: 中信出版社.] | |
[26] | Grandey, A. A., & Krannitz, M. A. (2016). Emotion regulation at work and at home. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family (pp. 81-94) New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. |
[27] |
Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., & Yan, T. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 261-310.
doi: 10.1037/a0038231 pmid: 25546498 |
[28] |
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237.
pmid: 9457784 |
[29] | Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation:Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3-26) New York, NJ: Guilford Press. |
[30] |
Guilford, J. P. (1929). An experiment in learning to read facial expression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24(2), 191-202.
doi: 10.1037/h0069973 URL |
[31] |
Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334-1364.
doi: 10.1177/0149206314527130 URL |
[32] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NJ: Guilford. |
[33] |
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81-92.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 URL |
[34] |
Huang, Q., Xing, Y., & Gamble, J. (2019). Job demands- resources: A gender perspective on employee well-being and resilience in retail stores in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1323-1341.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1226191 URL |
[35] |
Hunter, E. M., & Wu, C. (2016). Give me a better break: Choosing workday break activities to maximize resource recovery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 302-311.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000045 pmid: 26375961 |
[36] |
Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 453-467.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.453 URL |
[37] |
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., & Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309-341.
doi: 10.5465/annals.2014.0053 URL |
[38] | Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a better predictor of job performance: Job satisfaction or life satisfaction?. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 8(1), 20-42. |
[39] | Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ascough, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence in organizational behavior and industrial-organizational psychology. In G.Matthews, M.Zeidner, M., & RdRoberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence (pp.356-375). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. |
[40] |
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54-78.
doi: 10.1037/a0017286 pmid: 20085406 |
[41] | Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. |
[42] |
Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosogical job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355.
pmid: 9805280 |
[43] | Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G.,... Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman. |
[44] |
Kotsou, I., Nelis, D., Grégoire, J., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 827-839.
doi: 10.1037/a0023047 pmid: 21443316 |
[45] |
Koubova, V., & Buchko, A. A. (2013). Life-work balance: Emotional intelligence as a crucial component of achieving both personal life and work performance. Management Research Review, 36(7), 700-719.
doi: 10.1108/MRR-05-2012-0115 URL |
[46] |
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., Jiang, S., Elechi, O. O., Benjamin, B., Morris, A.,... Dupuy, P. (2010). The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 7-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.002 URL |
[47] |
Leung, A. S. (2003). Feminism in transition: Chinese culture, ideology and the development of the women’s movement in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 359-374.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024049516797 URL |
[48] |
Li, W.-D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P. D., & Gao, X. Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948-965.
doi: 10.1037/a0036169 URL |
[49] |
Li, W.-D., Li, S., Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2019). Reciprocal relationships between dispositional optimism and work experiences: A five-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1471-1486.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000417 URL |
[50] |
Liu, Y., Prati, L. M., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). The relationship between emotional resources and emotional labor: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2410-2439.
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00398.x URL |
[51] | Lively, K. J. (2013). Social and cultural influencers:Gender effects on emotional labor at work and at home. In A. Grandey, J. Diefendorff, & D.E. Rupp (Eds.), Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work (pp. 223-250). New York, NJ: Routledge. |
[52] |
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597 URL |
[53] |
Mandell, B., & Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership style: A gender comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 387-404.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022816409059 URL |
[54] | Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?. Educational Researcher, 1988, 17(2), 13-17. |
[55] |
Matthews, G., Emo, A. K., Funke, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., Costa Jr, P. T., & Schulze, R. (2006). Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 96-107.
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.96 URL |
[56] | Mayer, J. D. (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT): User’s manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Syst. |
[57] |
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536.
pmid: 17937602 |
[58] | Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is Emotional Intelligence? In P. Salovey, & D. Sluyter (Eds), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3-31). New York, NJ: Basic Books. |
[59] | Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology: Work psychology (pp. 5-33). Hove, England: Psychology Press. |
[60] |
Niven, K., Holman, D., & Totterdell, P. (2012). How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Human Relations, 65(6), 777-805.
doi: 10.1177/0018726712439909 URL |
[61] |
Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2012). Organizational work-family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: The process of work- family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28-40.
doi: 10.1037/a0026428 pmid: 22149204 |
[62] |
Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Burnout and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 303-14.
doi: 10.1037/a0036904 pmid: 24885683 |
[63] |
Orth, M., & Volmer, J. (2017). Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 601-612.
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1332042 URL |
[64] |
Paik, Y., Seo, M.-G., & Jin, S. (2019). Affective information processing in self-managing teams: The role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(2), 235-267.
doi: 10.1177/0021886319832013 URL |
[65] | Peng, Z., Lin, X., Zhang, J., & Che, H. (2004). The ability model of emotional intelligence. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 817-823. |
[ 彭正敏, 林绚晖, 张继明, 车宏生. (2004). 情绪智力的能力模型. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 817-823.] | |
[66] | Pierce, J. L. (1996). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. |
[67] |
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 pmid: 14516251 |
[68] |
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 URL |
[69] |
Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 168-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006 URL |
[70] |
Rong, Y., Sui, Y., & Yang, B. (2015). The effect of leader emotional intelligence on group performance and employee attitude: Mediating effect of justice climate and moderating effect of group power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(9), 1152-1161.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01152 URL |
[ 容琰, 隋杨, 杨百寅. (2015). 领导情绪智力对团队绩效和员工态度的影响——公平氛围和权力距离的作用. 心理学报, 47(9), 1152-1161.] | |
[71] |
Rothbard, N. P., & Wilk, S. L. (2011). Waking up on the right or wrong side of the bed: Start-of-workday mood, work events, employee affect, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 959-980.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.0056 URL |
[72] | Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 369-386. |
[73] |
Salguero, J. M., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2012). Emotional intelligence and depression: The moderator role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 29-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.006 URL |
[74] |
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
doi: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG URL |
[75] |
Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2012). The daily spillover and crossover of emotional labor: Faking emotions at work and at home. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 209-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.07.003 URL |
[76] |
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
doi: 10.1002/job.248 URL |
[77] | Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement:Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10-24). New York, NJ: Psychology Press. |
[78] |
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471 URL |
[79] | Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20( 2), 177-196. |
[80] |
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326 URL |
[81] |
Schneider, B., Yost, A. B., Kropp, A., Kind, C., & Lam, H. (2018). Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 462-480.
doi: 10.1002/job.2244 URL |
[82] |
Seo, M.-G., Bartunek, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2010). The role of affective experience in work motivation: Test of a conceptual model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 951-968.
doi: 10.1002/job.655 URL |
[83] |
Seo, M.-G., & Ilies, R. (2009). The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 120-133.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.001 URL |
[84] |
Sheldon, O. J., Dunning, D., & Ames, D. R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 125-137.
doi: 10.1037/a0034138 pmid: 23957689 |
[85] |
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). The long reach of one’s spouse: Spouses’ personality influences occupational success. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2189-2198.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614551370 URL |
[86] |
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518-528.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 pmid: 12814299 |
[87] |
Sun, J., Tian, X., & Li, R. (2019). Negative effects and mechanisms of emotional intelligence. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(8), 1451-1459.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01451 URL |
[ 孙建群, 田晓明, 李锐. (2019). 情绪智力的负面效应及机制. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1451-1459.] | |
[88] |
Sy, T., Tram, S., & O’Hara, L. A. (2006). Relation of employee and manager emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 461-473.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.003 URL |
[89] | Tang, C., & Pan, Y. (2010). The impact of emotional intelligence and organizational identification on organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis. Nankai Business Review, 13(4), 115-124. |
[ 唐春勇, 潘妍. (2010). 领导情绪智力对员工组织认同, 组织公民行为影响的跨层分析. 南开管理评论, 13(4), 115-124.] | |
[90] |
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 445-455.
doi: 10.1037/a0029213 pmid: 22799771 |
[91] |
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Trougakos, J. P. (2014). The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 177-199.
doi: 10.1111/joop.12050 URL |
[92] |
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H. D., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(3), 277-294.
doi: 10.1080/02678370802393672 URL |
[93] |
Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184-188.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x URL |
[94] |
Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 445-461.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.07.002 URL |
[95] | Westman, M., Hobfoll, S. E., Chen, S., Davidson, O. B., & Laski, S. (2005). Organizational stress through the lens of conservation of resources (COR) theory. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (pp. 167-220) Oxford, England: JAI Press/Elsevier Science. |
[96] |
Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543-604.
doi: 10.5465/19416520903065683 URL |
[97] |
Winkel, D. E., Wyland, R. L., Shaffer, M. A., & Clason, P. (2011). A new perspective on psychological resources: Unanticipated consequences of impulsivity and emotional intelligence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 78-94.
doi: 10.1348/2044-8325.002001 URL |
[98] |
Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243-274.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1 URL |
[99] |
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235-244.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003 URL |
[100] |
Yu, Q., & Yuan, D. (2008). The impact of the emotional intelligence of employees and their manager on the job performance of employees. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(1), 74-83.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00074 URL |
[ 余琼, 袁登华. (2008). 员工及其管理者的情绪智力对员工工作绩效的影响. 心理学报, 40(1), 74-83.] | |
[101] |
Zeidner, M., Kloda, I., & Matthews, G. (2013). Does dyadic coping mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and marital quality?. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 795-805.
doi: 10.1037/a0034009 pmid: 24098964 |
[102] | Zhang, H., & Huang, T. (2015). The transmitting mechanisms of emotional intelligence on performance: Sequentially mediated by intra-group trust perception and friendship network centrality. Nankai Business Review, 18, 141-150. |
[ 张辉华, 黄婷婷. (2015). 情绪智力对绩效的作用机制——以团队信任感知和朋友网络中心为连续中介. 南开管理评论, 18, 141-150.] | |
[103] | Zhang, H., & Ling, W. (2008). An empirical research on manager’s behavior emotional intelligence model and its validity. Nankai Business Review, 11, 50-60. |
[ 张辉华, 凌文辁. (2008). 管理者情绪智力行为模型及其有效性的实证研究. 南开管理评论, 11, 50-60.] | |
[104] |
Zhang, H., & Wang, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual emotional intelligence and workplace performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(2), 188-202.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.00188 URL |
[ 张辉华, 王辉. (2011). 个体情绪智力与工作场所绩效关系的元分析. 心理学报, 43(2), 188-202.] | |
[105] |
Zheng, X., & Liu, X. (2016). The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6), 693-709.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00693 URL |
[ 郑晓明, 刘鑫. (2016). 互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用. 心理学报, 48(6), 693-709.] | |
[106] |
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621-644.
doi: 10.1002/job.1990 URL |
[107] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method Biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12, 942-950. |
[ 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制办法. 心理科学进展, 12, 942-950.] | |
[108] |
Zhu, Z., Kuykendall, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). The impact of within‐day work breaks on daily recovery processes: An event‐based pre‐/post‐experience sampling study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 191-211.
doi: 10.1111/joop.12246 |
[1] | 邹艳春, 章惠敏, 彭坚, 聂琦, 王震. 变革还是拖延?员工对不合规任务的差异化应对[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1529-1541. |
[2] | 徐敏亚, 刘贝妮, 徐振宇. 失却锋芒:父母性别偏见对女性职场表现的负面影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1148-1159. |
[3] | 祝养浩, 龙立荣, 刘文兴. 领导感激表达能提高员工的追随行为吗?情绪表达真诚性的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(7): 1160-1175. |
[4] | 马君, 朱梦霆. 命运天定还是逆天改命:探索劣势者成见的“傀儡效应”与“黑马效应”[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 1029-1048. |
[5] | 李丽源, 高祥宇, 郑晓明. 员工积极主动行为的组态效应:基于过程的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 792-811. |
[6] | 蒋旭婷, 吴小玥, 范雪灵, 贺伟. 员工愤怒表达对领导力涌现的影响:温暖和能力感知的中介作用以及愤怒道歉的弥补作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 812-830. |
[7] | 董念念, 尹奎, 邢璐, 孙鑫, 董雅楠. 领导每日消极反馈对员工创造力的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 831-843. |
[8] | 付博, 彭坚, 梁潇杰, 陈丽芳, 于桂兰. 下属亲领导非伦理行为的持续与消退:基于领导反应的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 844-860. |
[9] | 宋琪, 张璐, 高莉芳, 程豹, 陈扬. “行高人非”还是“见贤思齐”?职场上行比较对员工行为的双刃剑效应[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 658-670. |
[10] | 李其容, 李春萱, 杨艳宇. 创业进展与创业努力的多层次关系:创业自我效能的中介与调节定向的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 642-657. |
[11] | 李永瑞, 王铭, 宋佳谕. 群体断层激活及负面效应涌现:熙宁变法缘何从志同道合走向四分五裂?[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 336-352. |
[12] | 龚诗阳, 张义博, 高月涛. 睡眠剥夺与购物后悔:来自大规模个体层面数据的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 286-300. |
[13] | 刘智强, 许玉平, 许建伟, 周蓉, 龙立荣. 创新期望差距与团队突破性创新:自我调节理论视角[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 272-285. |
[14] | 李超平, 孟雪, 胥彦, 蓝媛美. 家庭支持型主管行为对员工的影响与作用机制:基于元分析的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 257-271. |
[15] | 杨焕, 卫旭华. 关系型人力资源管理实践对受益人利他行为的影响:基于道德补偿的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(10): 1248-1261. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||