心理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 244-258.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00244
收稿日期:
2020-06-09
发布日期:
2021-01-27
出版日期:
2021-03-25
通讯作者:
杨波
E-mail:zsdybo@sina.com
基金资助:
LIU Yuping1, LI Shanshan2, HE Yun2, WANG Doudou2, YANG Bo2()
Received:
2020-06-09
Online:
2021-01-27
Published:
2021-03-25
Contact:
YANG Bo
E-mail:zsdybo@sina.com
摘要:
通过2个研究探索了自恋与暴力犯攻击行为的关系及机制。研究1通过问卷法(N = 498)发现, 自恋与攻击存在正相关, 特质愤怒在自恋与预谋性和冲动性攻击间的中介作用成立, 心理特权的中介作用只对预谋性攻击成立。研究2对90名暴力犯进行了行为学实验, 结果表明威胁感和负性情绪在自恋与攻击间起中介作用, 挑衅调节了上述中介作用。显性自恋者只在挑衅条件下表现出更强的攻击性, 隐性自恋者则在挑衅和无挑衅条件下均有较强的攻击性。研究厘清了不同亚型下自恋与攻击的关系, 突出了隐性自恋的“黑暗性”, 并为罪犯矫治管理及犯罪预防提供了参考。
中图分类号:
刘宇平, 李姗珊, 何赟, 王豆豆, 杨波. (2021). 消除威胁或无能狂怒?自恋对暴力犯攻击的影响机制. 心理学报, 53(3), 244-258.
LIU Yuping, LI Shanshan, HE Yun, WANG Doudou, YANG Bo. (2021). Eliminating threat or venting rage?The relationship between narcissism and aggression in violent offenders. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(3), 244-258.
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1隐性自恋 | 27.40 | 5.83 | — | |||||
2显性自恋 | 3.18 | 2.40 | 0.24** | — | ||||
3特质愤怒 | 20.13 | 5.35 | 0.39** | 0.30** | — | |||
4心理特权 | 30.62 | 9.54 | 0.24** | 0.24** | 0.31** | — | ||
5冲动性攻击 | 15.91 | 4.87 | 0.38** | 0.19** | 0.62** | 0.27** | — | |
6预谋性攻击 | 22.09 | 7.71 | 0.42** | 0.31** | 0.60** | 0.35** | 0.72** | — |
表1 描述性统计和相关矩阵(N = 498)
变量 | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1隐性自恋 | 27.40 | 5.83 | — | |||||
2显性自恋 | 3.18 | 2.40 | 0.24** | — | ||||
3特质愤怒 | 20.13 | 5.35 | 0.39** | 0.30** | — | |||
4心理特权 | 30.62 | 9.54 | 0.24** | 0.24** | 0.31** | — | ||
5冲动性攻击 | 15.91 | 4.87 | 0.38** | 0.19** | 0.62** | 0.27** | — | |
6预谋性攻击 | 22.09 | 7.71 | 0.42** | 0.31** | 0.60** | 0.35** | 0.72** | — |
模型 | c2 | df | c2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | GFI | IFI | NFI | TLI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 223.24 | 105 | 2.13 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
M2 | 226.64 | 107 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
表2 多重中介模型拟合度指标
模型 | c2 | df | c2/df | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | GFI | IFI | NFI | TLI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 223.24 | 105 | 2.13 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
M2 | 226.64 | 107 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.96 |
编号 | 路径 | 标准化效应量 | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
中介效应1 | 隐性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击 | 0.30 | 0.05 | [0.195, 0.400] |
中介效应2 | 隐性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击 | 0.24 | 0.05 | [0.151, 0.335] |
中介效应3 | 隐性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击 | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.013, 0.052] |
中介效应4 | 隐性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击 | 0.04 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.075] |
中介效应5 | 显性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击 | 0.18 | 0.06 | [0.077, 0.302] |
中介效应6 | 显性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击 | 0.15 | 0.04 | [0.065, 0.232] |
中介效应7 | 显性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击 | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.010, 0.048] |
中介效应8 | 显性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击 | 0.03 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.062] |
直接效应1 | 隐性自恋→冲动攻击 | 0.18 | 0.08 | [0.035, 0.327] |
直接效应2 | 隐性自恋→预谋攻击 | 0.22 | 0.07 | [0.091, 0.349] |
直接效应3 | 显性自恋→冲动攻击 | -0.08 | 0.07 | [-0.227, 0.063] |
直接效应4 | 显性自恋→预谋攻击 | 0.06 | 0.07 | [-0.070, 0.196] |
表3 主要效应量显著性的bootstrap检验
编号 | 路径 | 标准化效应量 | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
中介效应1 | 隐性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击 | 0.30 | 0.05 | [0.195, 0.400] |
中介效应2 | 隐性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击 | 0.24 | 0.05 | [0.151, 0.335] |
中介效应3 | 隐性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击 | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.013, 0.052] |
中介效应4 | 隐性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击 | 0.04 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.075] |
中介效应5 | 显性自恋→特质愤怒→冲动攻击 | 0.18 | 0.06 | [0.077, 0.302] |
中介效应6 | 显性自恋→特质愤怒→预谋攻击 | 0.15 | 0.04 | [0.065, 0.232] |
中介效应7 | 显性自恋→心理特权→冲动攻击 | 0.02 | 0.02 | [-0.010, 0.048] |
中介效应8 | 显性自恋→心理特权→预谋攻击 | 0.03 | 0.02 | [0.006, 0.062] |
直接效应1 | 隐性自恋→冲动攻击 | 0.18 | 0.08 | [0.035, 0.327] |
直接效应2 | 隐性自恋→预谋攻击 | 0.22 | 0.07 | [0.091, 0.349] |
直接效应3 | 显性自恋→冲动攻击 | -0.08 | 0.07 | [-0.227, 0.063] |
直接效应4 | 显性自恋→预谋攻击 | 0.06 | 0.07 | [-0.070, 0.196] |
总效应 | 包含路径 | 标准化效应量 | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
1隐性自恋预测冲动性攻击 | 中介效应1+中介效应3+直接效应1 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.344, 0.630] |
2隐性自恋预测预谋性攻击 | 中介效应2+中介效应4+直接效应2 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.352, 0.618] |
3显性自恋预测冲动性攻击 | 中介效应5+中介效应7+直接效应3 | 0.12 | 0.08 | [-0.035, 0.265] |
4显性自恋预测预谋性攻击 | 中介效应6+中介效应8+直接效应4 | 0.23 | 0.07 | [0.092, 0.378] |
表4 总效应量及差异显著性检验
总效应 | 包含路径 | 标准化效应量 | SD | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
1隐性自恋预测冲动性攻击 | 中介效应1+中介效应3+直接效应1 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.344, 0.630] |
2隐性自恋预测预谋性攻击 | 中介效应2+中介效应4+直接效应2 | 0.49 | 0.07 | [0.352, 0.618] |
3显性自恋预测冲动性攻击 | 中介效应5+中介效应7+直接效应3 | 0.12 | 0.08 | [-0.035, 0.265] |
4显性自恋预测预谋性攻击 | 中介效应6+中介效应8+直接效应4 | 0.23 | 0.07 | [0.092, 0.378] |
变量 | 挑衅组 | 对照组 | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | 36.02 ± 5.57 | 35.59 ± 6.18 | 0.35 | 0.729 |
学历水平 | 1.83 ± 0.80 | 1.91 ± 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.604 |
原判刑期(年) | 19.17 ± 7.65 | 19.02 ± 8.14 | 0.09 | 0.929 |
服刑时间(年) | 5.84 ± 3.36 | 5.39 ± 3.92 | 0.57 | 0.567 |
显性自恋 | 1.93 ± 1.71 | 1.84 ± 1.71 | 0.26 | 0.795 |
隐性自恋 | 26.89 ± 5.31 | 25.45 ± 6.59 | 1.14 | 0.259 |
表5 挑衅组与对照组基本信息与自恋人格得分(M ± SD)
变量 | 挑衅组 | 对照组 | t | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | 36.02 ± 5.57 | 35.59 ± 6.18 | 0.35 | 0.729 |
学历水平 | 1.83 ± 0.80 | 1.91 ± 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.604 |
原判刑期(年) | 19.17 ± 7.65 | 19.02 ± 8.14 | 0.09 | 0.929 |
服刑时间(年) | 5.84 ± 3.36 | 5.39 ± 3.92 | 0.57 | 0.567 |
显性自恋 | 1.93 ± 1.71 | 1.84 ± 1.71 | 0.26 | 0.795 |
隐性自恋 | 26.89 ± 5.31 | 25.45 ± 6.59 | 1.14 | 0.259 |
变量 | 挑衅组 | 对照组 | t | p | Cohen’d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
敌意认知 | 14.93 ± 4.89 | 12.45 ± 4.48 | 2.50 | 0.014 | 0.53 |
负性情绪 | 19.00 ± 6.39 | 16.14 ± 4.81 | 2.39 | 0.019 | 0.51 |
威胁感 | 10.41 ± 4.45 | 8.30 ± 3.37 | 2.54 | 0.013 | 0.53 |
攻击行为 | 0.12 ± 2.01 | -0.71 ± 1.25 | 2.33 | 0.022 | 0.50 |
表6 描述性统计及操纵检验(M ± SD)
变量 | 挑衅组 | 对照组 | t | p | Cohen’d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
敌意认知 | 14.93 ± 4.89 | 12.45 ± 4.48 | 2.50 | 0.014 | 0.53 |
负性情绪 | 19.00 ± 6.39 | 16.14 ± 4.81 | 2.39 | 0.019 | 0.51 |
威胁感 | 10.41 ± 4.45 | 8.30 ± 3.37 | 2.54 | 0.013 | 0.53 |
攻击行为 | 0.12 ± 2.01 | -0.71 ± 1.25 | 2.33 | 0.022 | 0.50 |
[1] | American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. |
[2] | Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51. |
[3] | Bai, Y., & Wang, J. N. (2018). Reliability and validity of psychological entitlement scale in Chinese college students. Psychology: Techniques and Applications, 6(12), 752-759 |
[ 白杨, 王佳宁. (2018). 心理特权量表在中国大学生群体中的信效度. 心理技术与应用, 6(12), 752-759.] | |
[4] |
Barry, T. D., Thompson, A., Barry, C. T., Lochman, J. E., & Hill, K. (2007). The importance of narcissism in predicting proactive and reactive aggression in moderately to highly aggressive children. Aggressive Behavior, 33(3), 185-197.
doi: 10.1002/ab.20198 URL pmid: 17444525 |
[5] | Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: A study with adults. Personality & Individual Differences, 52(5), 571-575. |
[6] |
Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2201-2209.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613490749 URL pmid: 24022650 |
[7] |
Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219-229.
URL pmid: 9686460 |
[8] |
Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Thomaes, S., Ryu, E., & West, S. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 427-446.
URL pmid: 19192074 |
[9] | Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29-45. |
[10] | Chabrol, H., van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality & Individual Differences, 47(7), 734-739. |
[11] | Chen, G. M. (2015). Losing face on social media: Threats to positive face lead to an indirect effect on retaliatory aggression through negative affect. Communication Research, 42(6), 819-838. |
[12] | Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2019). Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor aggression paradigm. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 620-631. |
[13] |
Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Eisenberg, N., & Maffei, C. (2010). Relations of proactive and reactive dimensions of aggression to overt and covert narcissism in nonclinical adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 21-27.
URL pmid: 19918915 |
[14] | Garofalo, C., & Velotti, P. (2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9-16. |
[15] |
Gentile, B., Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1120-1136.
doi: 10.1037/a0033192 URL pmid: 23815119 |
[16] |
Giacomin, M., & Jordan, C. H. (2014). Down-regulating narcissistic tendencies: Communal focus reduces state narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(4), 488-500.
doi: 10.1177/0146167213516635 URL pmid: 24345714 |
[17] | Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Burton, K. A., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissism and self-presentation: Profiling grandiose and vulnerable narcissists' self-presentation tactic use. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 48-57. |
[18] | Hart, W., Adams, J. M., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissistic responses to provocation: An examination of the rage and threatened-egotism accounts. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 152-156. |
[19] | Hayes, A. F.(2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, USA: Guilford Press. |
[20] | Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588-599. |
[21] | Hou, L. L., Jiang, Q., Wang, H. Z., & Li, C. R. (2017). The relationship between trait anger and aggressive behavior: Based on the perspective of the integrative cognitive model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(12), 1548-1558. |
[ 侯璐璐, 江琦, 王焕贞, 李长燃. (2017). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 基于综合认知模型的视角. 心理学报, 49(12), 1548-1558.] | |
[22] | Huang, L., Yang, T. Z., & Ji, Z. M. (2003). Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 56-58. |
[ 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民. (2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志17(1), 56-58.] | |
[23] | Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), 12-18. |
[24] |
Krizan, Z., & Johar, O. (2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 784-801.
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000013 URL pmid: 25545840 |
[25] |
Lambe, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., Garner, E., & Walker, J. (2018). The role of narcissism in aggression and violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(2), 209-230.
doi: 10.1177/1524838016650190 URL pmid: 27222500 |
[26] |
Li, J.-B., Nie, Y.-G., Boardley, I. D., Dou, K., & Situ, Q.M. (2015). When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 544-555.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21594 URL pmid: 26075351 |
[27] |
Li, C., Sun, Y., Ho, M. Y., You, J., Shaver, P. R., & Wang, Z. (2016). State narcissism and aggression: The mediating roles of anger and hostile attributional bias. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 333-345.
doi: 10.1002/ab.21629 URL pmid: 27283271 |
[28] | Liu, Y. P., Zhao, H., Li, S. S., Zhang, Z., & Yang, B. (2019). The neurobiological evidence of antisocial personality disorder and its judicial implications. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(10), 1726-1742. |
[ 刘宇平, 赵辉, 李姗珊, 张卓, 杨波. (2019). 反社会人格障碍的神经生物学基础及其司法启示. 心理科学进展27(10), 1726-1742.] | |
[29] | Luo, Y. L., & Zhang, D. J. (2011). Experimental study of attentional bias to negative emotion facial expressions in high trait anger individuals. Journal of Psychological Science, 34(2):322-327. |
[ 罗亚莉, 张大均. (2011). 高特质愤怒个体对负性情绪面孔注意偏向的实验研究. 心理科学, 34(2), 322-327.] | |
[30] |
Maples, J. L., Lamkin, J., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: The Dirty Dozen and Short Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 326-331.
doi: 10.1037/a0035084 URL pmid: 24274044 |
[31] |
Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013-1042.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x URL pmid: 21204843 |
[32] | Miller, J. D., & Maples, J. (2012). Trait personality models of narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism, and vulnerable narcissism. The Handbook of Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[33] | Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556-563. |
[34] | Qiao, Y., Xie, B., & Zhang, M. D. (2009). The Chinese version of impulsive-premeditated aggression scale in adolescents with aggression: Its reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical and Brain Science, 18(04), 366-368. |
[ 乔屹, 谢斌, 张明岛. (2009). 冲动-预谋性攻击行为量表中文版的信效度检验. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 18(4), 366-368.] | |
[35] | Qin, F., & Xu, F. (2013). Review on the studies of the dark triad. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(7), 1248-1261. |
[ 秦峰, 许芳. (2013). 黑暗人格三合一研究述评. 心理科学进展, 21(7), 1248-1261.] | |
[36] |
Rasmussen, K.(2016). Entitled vengeance: A meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 362-379.
URL pmid: 26522921 |
[37] | Rauthmann, J.f. (2012). The dark triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3(4), 487-496. |
[38] |
Reidy, D. E., Foster, J. D., & Zeichner, A. (2010). Narcissism and unprovoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 36(6), 414-422.
URL pmid: 20623495 |
[39] | Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A., Foster, J. D., & Martinez, M. A. (2008). Effects of narcissistic entitlement and exploitativeness on human physical aggression. Personality & Individual Differences, 44(4), 865-875. |
[40] |
Schoenleber, M., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Parallel syndromes: Two dimensions of narcissism and the facets of psychopathic personality in criminally involved individuals. Personality Disorders, 2(2), 113-127.
URL pmid: 22448731 |
[41] | Spielberger, C. D. (1988). State-trait anger expression inventory (STAXI) (Research edition). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. |
[42] |
Stanford, M. S., Houston, R. J., Mathias, C. W., Villemarette- Pittman, N. R., Helfritz, L. E., & Conklin, S. M. (2003). Characterizing aggressive behavior. Assessment, 10(2), 183-190.
doi: 10.1177/1073191103010002009 URL pmid: 12801190 |
[43] | van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Claassen, L., & van Dijk, W. W. (2007). Inmate emotion coping and psychological and physical well-being: The use of crying over spilled milk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(5), 697-708. |
[44] | Wang, X. Y. (2008). A study on the influence of college students' narcissistic personality on self-esteem and subjective well-being.(Unpublished master's thesis). Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China. |
[ 王晓燕. (2008). 大学生自恋人格对自尊和主观幸福感的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.] | |
[45] |
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 URL pmid: 3397865 |
[46] |
Wink, P.(1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61(4), 590-597.
URL pmid: 1960651 |
[47] | Wu, Y., & Wen, Z. L.(2011). Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(12):1859-1867. |
[ 吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1859-1867.] | |
[48] | Yang, C. C., Li, C. N., Wang, Z. H., & Bian, Y. F. (2016). The mediational roles of perceived threat, anger, and hostile attribution bias between state narcissism and aggression. Psychological Development and Education, 32(02), 236-245. |
[ 杨晨晨, 李彩娜, 王振宏, 边玉芳. (2016). 状态自恋与攻击行为——知觉到的威胁、愤怒情绪和敌意归因偏差的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(02), 236-245.] | |
[49] | Yu, Z. K., Liu, Y. Z., Luo, Y., & Cai, H. J. (2019). Adaptive narcissism and maladaptive narcissism: Diverse evidences for the distinction. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(1), 96-105. |
[ 余震坤, 刘云芝, 罗宇, 蔡华俭. (2019). 区分适应性自恋和非适应性自恋: 多视角的证据. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 96-105.] | |
[50] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6):942-950. |
[ 周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.] |
[1] | 梅颖, 刘郡彤, 刘红红, 傅洋, 罗熙, 雷怡. 自悯写作对恐惧消退的促进作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(8): 1317-1329. |
[2] | 郭晓栋, 郑泓, 阮盾, 胡丁鼎, 王毅, 王艳郁, 陈楚侨. 认知和情感共情与负性情绪:情绪调节的作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 892-904. |
[3] | 林小楠, 曹衍淼, 张文新, 纪林芹. 多巴胺系统多基因与青少年攻击行为的U型关系:母亲消极教养的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(4): 588-599. |
[4] | 王小琴, 谈雅菲, 蒙杰, 刘源, 位东涛, 杨文静, 邱江. 情绪调节灵活性对负性情绪的影响:来自经验取样的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(2): 192-209. |
[5] | 靳娟娟, 邵蕾, 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 社会排斥与攻击的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1979-1996. |
[6] | 刘宇平, 周冰涛, 杨波. 情绪如何引发暴力犯的攻击?基于情绪调节理论的解释[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(3): 270-280. |
[7] | 刘文兴, 祝养浩, 柏阳, 王海江, 韩翼. 孤芳自赏还是乐于助人?员工自恋对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(3): 300-312. |
[8] | 王丽丽, 董梦璐. “美男诱惑”真的奏效吗:男性代言女性产品对女性消费者产品评价的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(2): 192-204. |
[9] | 程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 847-860. |
[10] | 李芮, 夏凌翔. 攻击动机对特质愤怒与反应性攻击关系的中介作用:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 788-797. |
[11] | 宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468. |
[12] | 侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义. 手机成瘾与抑郁:社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 362-373. |
[13] | 张丽华, 朱贺. 自恋与攻击性关系的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(11): 1228-1243. |
[14] | 苗晓燕, 孙欣, 匡仪, 汪祚军. 共患难, 更同盟:共同经历相同负性情绪事件促进合作行为[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 81-94. |
[15] | 任志洪, 赵子仪, 余香莲, 赵春晓, 张琳, 林羽中, 张微. 睾酮素与反社会倾向未成年犯的攻击行为:敌意注意偏向的中介和皮质醇的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(11): 1288-1300. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||