ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (12): 2456-2473.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.2456 cstr: 32110.14.2026.2456

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉语语义双关与谐音双关笑话加工的神经机制

靳婷婷1, 钱昱夫2, 范昕茹1, 王倩1, 任桂琴3, 李卫君1   

  1. 1辽宁师范大学心理与脑科学研究院, 大连 116000;
    2复旦大学中文系, 上海 200433;
    3辽宁师范大学心理学院, 大连 116000
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-23 发布日期:2026-10-29 出版日期:2026-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 李卫君, E-mail: liwj@lnnu.edu.cn

Neural mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese semantic-pun and homophonic-pun jokes

JIN Tingting1, QIAN Yufu2, FAN Xinru1, WANG Qian1, REN Guiqin3, LI Weijun1   

  1. 1Institute of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Liaoning Normal University Dalian 116000, China;
    2Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China;
    3College of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116000, China
  • Received:2025-11-23 Online:2026-10-29 Published:2026-12-25

摘要: 双关语笑话是一类依赖词语多义性、语音相似性或音形关联而形成的言语幽默形式, 其理解过程涉及语言歧义加工、语境整合、意义重构以及幽默体验等多个认知环节, 但其时间进程和神经机制仍有待进一步阐明。本研究采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术, 以汉语语义双关笑话和谐音双关笑话为实验材料, 考察汉语母语者在理解不同类型双关语笑话时的动态加工过程及其神经机制。结果显示, 与非笑话条件相比, 双关语笑话依次诱发了更大P200、早期和晚期LPP波幅, 提示双关语笑话加工可能依次涉及早期显著性觉察或不协调检测、后期语义-语境整合与意义重构, 以及与幽默欣赏相关的情绪评价和奖赏加工。进一步比较发现, 语义双关笑话相较谐音双关笑话诱发了更大的早期和晚期LPP波幅, 表明语义双关笑话在不协调解决和意义重构阶段可能需要投入更多认知资源, 同时可能伴随更深入的语义整合和更强的持续性评价加工。总体而言, 本研究结果为笑话加工的多阶段理论提供了ERP证据, 并进一步揭示了汉语语义双关与谐音双关在语言整合和情绪评价机制上的差异, 为理解汉语言语幽默加工的脑机制提供了新的实证依据。

关键词: 语义双关笑话, 谐音双关笑话, 三阶段理论, ERPs

Abstract: Pun jokes are a typical form of verbal humor that relies on ambiguity, contextual reinterpretation, and the resolution of incongruity. In Chinese, semantic puns and homophonic puns are two important types of pun-based humor. Semantic pun jokes mainly depend on the multiple meanings of the same linguistic form and require the reader to shift between different semantic frames, whereas homophonic pun jokes rely on phonological similarity between words and require the activation of an unstated but contextually relevant meaning. Although previous studies have examined joke comprehension and pun processing, relatively little is known about whether Chinese semantic and homophonic pun jokes follow the same temporal dynamics during incongruity detection, meaning reconstruction, and humor appreciation. The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the neural time course of Chinese semantic and homophonic pun joke comprehension.
A 2 × 2 within-subject design was adopted, with material type (semantic pun vs. homophonic pun) and humorousness (joke vs. non-joke) as factors. Native Chinese speakers read four types of sentence materials: semantic pun jokes, semantic pun non-jokes, homophonic pun jokes, and homophonic pun non-jokes. Joke and non-joke sentences within each pun type shared the same critical punchline word, while the preceding context was manipulated to create either a humorous or non-humorous interpretation. Participants were asked to read each sentence and then rate its unexpectedness, comprehensibility, and funniness. EEG signals were recorded while participants processed the critical words. ERP analyses focused on P200, N400, early late positive potential (early LPP), and late late positive potential (late LPP) components, which were used to index early salience detection or preliminary incongruity awareness, semantic integration, meaning reconstruction, and later evaluative or affective processing.
Behavioral results showed that pun jokes were rated as more unexpected and funnier than non-jokes. Comprehension ratings did not differ between jokes and non-jokes, but were higher for semantic-pun than for homophonic-pun materials. ERP results showed that pun jokes elicited larger P200 and early/late LPP amplitudes than non-jokes, suggesting early salience detection, meaning reconstruction, contextual integration, and later affective evaluation. These findings support a multi-stage account of joke comprehension. Further analyses showed that semantic pun jokes elicited larger early and late LPP amplitudes than homophonic pun jokes, indicating greater cognitive demands during meaning reconstruction and contextual integration. This suggests that subjective funniness and late ERP effects may reflect different processes: immediate humor experience versus deeper semantic integration and sustained evaluative processing.
Overall, this study provides ERP evidence for the multi-stage processing of Chinese pun jokes and shows that semantic and homophonic puns differ in late-stage cognitive and affective processing. The findings suggest that Chinese pun joke comprehension involves the interaction of linguistic ambiguity, contextual constraints, semantic reconstruction, and humor appreciation.

Key words: semantic pun jokes, homophonic pun jokes, verbal humor, incongruity resolution, event-related potentials

中图分类号: