心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 36-44.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.00036
收稿日期:
2021-04-28
发布日期:
2022-10-13
出版日期:
2023-01-25
通讯作者:
万华根
E-mail:hgw@zju.edu.cn
HUANG Xinjie1,2, ZHANG Chi1, WAN Huagen1(), ZHANG Lingcong2
Received:
2021-04-28
Online:
2022-10-13
Published:
2023-01-25
Contact:
WAN Huagen
E-mail:hgw@zju.edu.cn
摘要:
时间捆绑效应指的是主观上主动动作和动作结果的时间点相互靠近的现象。其中, 时间捆绑效应可分为动作捆绑和结果捆绑, 分别对应主动动作和动作结果的时间点变化。本研究通过一个混合设计实验考察了情绪效价可预测性对时间捆绑效应的影响。情绪效价可预测性(可预测、不可预测)为被试内因素, 刺激模态(听觉刺激、视觉刺激)为被试间因素。结果发现, 情绪效价为可预测时, 结果捆绑在主动按键后产生听觉刺激或视觉刺激都出现了增强, 而动作捆绑仅在产生视觉刺激时才出现增强。结果表明, 情绪效价为可预测时会增强时间捆绑效应, 但该作用在动作捆绑和结果捆绑中存在差异。由于时间捆绑效应是反映主动控制感的主要指标, 本研究结果对先进驾驶辅助系统的交互设计具有一定的参考意义。
中图分类号:
黄昕杰, 张弛, 万华根, 张灵聪. (2023). 情绪效价可预测性对时间捆绑效应的影响. 心理学报, 55(1), 36-44.
HUANG Xinjie, ZHANG Chi, WAN Huagen, ZHANG Lingcong. (2023). Effect of predictability of emotional valence on temporal binding. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(1), 36-44.
实验材料 | 情绪效价评分(M ± SD) | F检验显著性 | 事后比较 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
消极 | 中性 | 积极 | |||
听觉刺激 | 2.00 ± 1.20 | 3.49 ± 1.07 | 5.37 ± 2.17 | p < 0.001 | 消极<中性** |
消极<积极*** | |||||
中性<积极*** | |||||
视觉刺激 | 1.39 ± 0.42 | 4.86 ± 0.93 | 6.73 ± 0.95 | p < 0.001 | 消极<中性*** |
消极<积极*** | |||||
中性<积极*** |
表1 听觉刺激和视觉刺激情绪效价评分的方差分析结果
实验材料 | 情绪效价评分(M ± SD) | F检验显著性 | 事后比较 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
消极 | 中性 | 积极 | |||
听觉刺激 | 2.00 ± 1.20 | 3.49 ± 1.07 | 5.37 ± 2.17 | p < 0.001 | 消极<中性** |
消极<积极*** | |||||
中性<积极*** | |||||
视觉刺激 | 1.39 ± 0.42 | 4.86 ± 0.93 | 6.73 ± 0.95 | p < 0.001 | 消极<中性*** |
消极<积极*** | |||||
中性<积极*** |
刺激呈现时长 | 样本量 | 时间判断误差(ms) | |
---|---|---|---|
M | SD | ||
听觉刺激 | |||
100 ms, Haggard等人( | 9 | 15 | 72 |
100 ms, Antusch等人( | 36 | 19.46 | 58.37 |
840 ms, 本研究 | 30 | 40.53 | 99.05 |
视觉刺激 | |||
150 ms, Ruess等人( | 48 | 21 | 65.47 |
300 ms, 本研究 | 30 | 36.01 | 98.81 |
附表1 不同刺激呈现时长下刺激的时间判断误差及其标准差
刺激呈现时长 | 样本量 | 时间判断误差(ms) | |
---|---|---|---|
M | SD | ||
听觉刺激 | |||
100 ms, Haggard等人( | 9 | 15 | 72 |
100 ms, Antusch等人( | 36 | 19.46 | 58.37 |
840 ms, 本研究 | 30 | 40.53 | 99.05 |
视觉刺激 | |||
150 ms, Ruess等人( | 48 | 21 | 65.47 |
300 ms, 本研究 | 30 | 36.01 | 98.81 |
[1] |
Aarts H., Bijleveld E., Custers R., Dogge M., Deelder M., Schutter D., & van Haren N. E. (2012). Positive priming and intentional binding: Eye-blink rate predicts reward information effects on the sense of agency. Social Neuroscience, 7(1), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.590602
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.590602 URL pmid: 21936738 |
[2] | An C. L., Li L. H., Tian H. Y., Li F., Jin D., Bu Y. B., & Cao L. S. (2021). The development of the two-step account of sense of agency. Journal of Psychological Science, 44(5), 1273-1279. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20210533 |
[安灿翎, 李力红, 田昊月, 李飞, 金丹, 布宇博, 曹玲珊. (2021). 施动感双层结构的发展. 心理科学, 44(5), 1273-1279 ] | |
[3] |
Antusch S., Aarts H., & Custers R. (2019). The role of intentional strength in shaping the sense of agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01124
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01124 URL pmid: 31231265 |
[4] |
Barlas Z., Hockley W. E., & Obhi S. S. (2018). Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: Evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control. Experimental Brain Research, 236(1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3
doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3 URL pmid: 29080100 |
[5] | Berberian B. (2019). Man-machine teaming: A problem of agency. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 51(34), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.049 |
[6] |
Christensen J. F., Yoshie M., Di Costa S., & Haggard P. (2016). Emotional valence, sense of agency and responsibility: A study using intentional binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.016
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.016 URL pmid: 27174794 |
[7] |
Desantis A., Hughes G., & Waszak F. (2012). Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction. PLoS One, 7(1), e29557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029557
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029557 URL |
[8] | Dittrich M., & Mathew N. (2021). Emotional feedback to mitigate aggressive driving:A real-world driving study. In R. Ali., B. Lugrin., & F. Charles. (Eds.), International conference on persuasive technology (pp. 88-101). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_8 |
[9] |
Gallagher S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5
URL pmid: 10637618 |
[10] |
Gentsch A., & Synofzik M. (2014). Affective coding: The emotional dimension of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608 URL pmid: 25161616 |
[11] |
Haering C., & Kiesel A. (2014). Intentional binding is independent of the validity of the action effect's identity. Acta Psychologica, 152, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.015
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.015 URL pmid: 25208843 |
[12] |
Haggard P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(4), 196-207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14 URL pmid: 28251993 |
[13] |
Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn827
URL pmid: 11896397 |
[14] |
Hughes G., Desantis A., & Waszak F. (2013). Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: The role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028566
doi: 10.1037/a0028566 URL pmid: 22612280 |
[15] |
Humphreys G. R., & Buehner M. J. (2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1542-1549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014492
doi: 10.1037/a0014492 URL |
[16] |
Kaiser J., Buciuman M., Gigl S., Gentsch A., & Schütz-Bosbach S. (2021). The interplay between affective processing and sense of agency during action regulation: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 716220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716220
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716220 URL |
[17] |
Limerick H., Coyle D., & Moore J. W. (2014). The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643 URL pmid: 25191256 |
[18] |
Madary M. (2022). The illusion of agency in human-computer interaction. Neuroethics, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1
doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09488-w URL |
[19] |
Moore J., & Haggard P. (2008). Awareness of action: Inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004
URL pmid: 17306565 |
[20] |
Moore J. W. (2016). What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272 URL pmid: 27621713 |
[21] |
Moore J. W., Lagnado D., Deal D. C., & Haggard P. (2009). Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action. Cognition, 110(2), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.006
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.006 URL pmid: 19110240 |
[22] |
Moore J. W., & Obhi S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002 URL pmid: 22240158 |
[23] |
Moreton J., Callan M. J., & Hughes G. (2017). How much does emotional valence of action outcomes affect temporal binding? Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.008
doi: S1053-8100(16)30356-7 URL pmid: 28107726 |
[24] |
Ruess M., Thomaschke R., & Kiesel A. (2017). The time course of intentional binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(4), 1123-1131. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1292-y
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1292-y URL |
[25] |
Ruess M., Thomaschke R., & Kiesel A. (2018). Intentional binding of visual effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(3), 713-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1479-2
doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1479-2 URL |
[26] |
Sarma D., & Srinivasan N. (2021). Intended emotions influence intentional binding with emotional faces: Larger binding for intended negative emotions. Consciousness and Cognition, 92, 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103136
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103136 URL |
[27] |
Sauter D. A., Eisner F., Calder A. J., & Scott S. K. (2010). Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2251-2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003721642
doi: 10.1080/17470211003721642 URL |
[28] |
Seinfeld S., Feuchtner T., Maselli A., & Müller J. (2021). User representations in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 36(5-6), 400-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1724790
doi: 10.1080/07370024.2020.1724790 URL |
[29] |
Tanaka T., & Kawabata H. (2021). Sense of agency is modulated by interactions between action choice, outcome valence, and predictability. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1795-1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0121-3
doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-0121-3 URL |
[30] | Tanaka T., Matsumoto T., Hayashi S., Takagi S., & Kawabata H. (2019). What makes action and outcome temporally close to each other: A systematic review and meta-analysis of temporal binding. Timing & Time Perception, 7(3), 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-20191150 |
[31] |
Tian H. Y., Li L. H., Xu Z., Li F., Jin D., & An C. L. (2018). Sense of agency in the minimal self. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(5), 872-885. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00872
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00872 URL |
[田昊月, 李力红, 徐喆, 李飞, 金丹, 安灿翎. (2018). 最小自我中的施动感. 心理科学进展, 26(5), 872-885 ] | |
[32] |
Tonn S., Pfister R., Klaffehn A. L., Weller L., & Schwarz K. A. (2021). Two faces of temporal binding: Action- and effect-binding are not correlated. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103219
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103219 URL |
[33] |
Waszak F., Cardoso-Leite P., & Hughes G. (2012). Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 943-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.004 URL pmid: 22108008 |
[34] |
Wen W. (2019). Does delay in feedback diminish sense of agency? A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 73, 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.007
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.007 URL |
[35] |
Wen W., & Imamizu H. (2022). The sense of agency in perception, behaviour and human-machine interactions. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00030-6
doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00030-6 URL |
[36] |
Wen W., Kuroki Y., & Asama H. (2019). The sense of agency in driving automation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02691
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02691 URL pmid: 31849787 |
[37] |
Wen W., Yamashita A., & Asama H. (2017). The influence of performance on action-effect integration in sense of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.008
doi: S1053-8100(16)30071-X URL pmid: 28651095 |
[38] |
Wolpe N., Haggard P., Siebner H. R., & Rowe J. B. (2013). Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3419-2
doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3419-2 URL pmid: 23371752 |
[39] |
Wu D., Gu J. J., Li M., Zhang M., Zhang M., Zhao K., & Fu X. L. (2019). Sense of agency based on action and causation: The mechanism of intentional binding effect for voluntary action. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(5), 804-810. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1042.2019.00804
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00804 URL |
[吴迪, 顾晶金, 李明, 张淼, 张明, 赵科, 傅小兰. (2019). 动作的主动控制感与因果关系的主动控制感: 主动动作时间压缩效应的产生机制. 心理科学进展, 27(5), 804-810 ] | |
[40] |
Yoshie M., & Haggard P. (2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23(20), 2028-2032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034 URL pmid: 24094850 |
[41] |
Yoshie M., & Haggard P. (2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 8733. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3 URL pmid: 28821755 |
[42] |
Zhang M., Wu D., Li M., Ling Y. B., Zhang M., & Zhao K. (2018). The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(10), 1787-1793. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1042.2018.01787
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01787 URL |
[张淼, 吴迪, 李明, 凌懿白, 张明, 赵科. (2018). 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 26(10), 1787-1793 ] |
[1] | 钟毅平, 牛娜娜, 范伟, 任梦梦, 李梅. 动作自主性与社会距离对主动控制感的影响:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(12): 1932-1948. |
[2] | 邓成龙, 耿鹏, 蒯曙光. 三维虚拟空间中转头选中远离和靠近运动目标的操作特性差异[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 9-21. |
[3] | 李金波,许百华,田学红. 人机交互中认知负荷变化预测模型的构建[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(05): 559-568. |
[4] | 李金波,许百华. 人机交互过程中认知负荷的综合测评方法[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(01): 35-43. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||