Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 1787-1793.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01787
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Miao1,2, WU Di1,2, LI Ming3, LING Yibai1,2, ZHANG Ming4,5, ZHAO Ke1,4()
Received:
2017-11-16
Online:
2018-10-15
Published:
2018-08-27
Contact:
ZHAO Ke
E-mail:zhaok@psych.ac.cn
ZHANG Miao, WU Di, LI Ming, LING Yibai, ZHANG Ming, ZHAO Ke. The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1787-1793.
1 | Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D., & Frith C . ( 2000). Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport, 11( 11), R11-R16. |
2 | Blanke O., Ortigue S., Landis T., & Seeck M . ( 2002). Neuropsychology: Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419( 6904), 269-270. |
3 |
Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20( 10), 1221-1228.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x URL pmid: 19732384 |
4 | Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2010). Causal contraction: Spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 21( 1), 44-48. |
5 | Buehner, M. J . ( 2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23( 12), 1490-1497. |
6 |
Caspar E. A., Christensen J. F., Cleeremans A., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26( 5), 585-592.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067 URL pmid: 4791480 |
7 |
Cavazzana A., Begliomini C., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2017). Intentional binding as a marker of agency across the lifespan. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 104-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.016 URL pmid: 28501697 |
8 |
Chambon V., Wenke D., Fleming S. M., Prinz W., & Haggard P . ( 2013). An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cerebral Cortex, 23( 5), 1031-1037.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs059 URL pmid: 22510529 |
9 |
Chambon V., Moore J. W., & Haggard P . ( 2015). TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Structure and Function, 220( 6), 3627-3639.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6 URL pmid: 25134684 |
10 |
Crivelli D., & Balcon, M. ( 2017). The agent brain: A review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies on sensing agency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00229 URL |
11 |
Ebert J. P., & Wegner, D. M . ( 2010). Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19( 1), 481-489.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002 URL pmid: 19896868 |
12 |
Engbert K., & Wohlschläger, A. ( 2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 2), 255-264.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.010 URL pmid: 17113309 |
13 |
Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., & Haggard P . ( 2007). Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1261-1268.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1261 URL pmid: 18085941 |
14 |
Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., & Haggard P . ( 2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107( 2), 693-704.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.021 URL pmid: 17825813 |
15 |
Elsner B., & Hommel, B. ( 2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 138-154.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8 URL pmid: 14685854 |
16 | Farrer C., & Frith, C. D . ( 2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15( 3), 596-603. |
17 |
Fink G. R., Marshall J. C., Halligan P. W., Frith C. D., Driver J., Frackowiak R. S. J., & Dolan R. J . ( 1999). The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain, 122( 3), 497-512.
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.497 URL pmid: 10094258 |
18 | Frith, C. D . ( 2014). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137-142. |
19 |
Gomes G., ( 2002). The interpretation of Libet's results on the timing of conscious events: A commentary. Consciousness and Cognition, 11( 2), 221-230.
doi: 10.1006/ccog.2002.0556 URL |
20 |
Haggard P., ( 2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18( 4), 196-207.
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14 URL pmid: 28251993 |
21 |
Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J . ( 2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5( 4), 382-385.
doi: 10.1038/nn827 URL |
22 | Hascalovitz A. C., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2015). Personality and intentional binding: An exploratory study using the narcissistic personality inventory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00013 |
23 | Helmholtz, H. V . ( 1866). Concerning the perceptions in general. Treatise on physiological optics. |
24 |
Humphreys G. R., & Buehner, M. J . ( 2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1542-1549.
doi: 10.1037/a0014492 URL pmid: 19803655 |
25 | James W., ( 1890). The Principles of. Psychology, 2. |
26 |
Jo H. G., Wittmann M., Hinterberger T., & Schmidt S . ( 2014). The readiness potential reflects intentional binding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 421-421.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00421 URL pmid: 24959135 |
27 |
Kawato M., ( 1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9( 6), 718-727.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8 URL pmid: 10607637 |
28 |
Khalighinejad N., & Haggard, P. ( 2015). Modulating human sense of agency with non-invasive brain stimulation. Cortex, 69, 93-103.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.015 URL pmid: 26004997 |
29 | Khalighinejad N., Di C S., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Endogenous action selection processes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contribute to sense of agency: A meta- analysis of tDCS studies of ‘intentional binding’. Brain Stimulation, 9( 3), 372-379. |
30 | Libet B., Gleason C. A., Wright E. W., & Pearl D. K . ( 1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential) the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106( 3), 623-642. |
31 | Lindner A., Haarmeier T., Erb M., Grodd W., & Thier P . ( 2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 11), 1899-1912. |
32 | MacDonald P. A., & Paus, T. ( 2003). The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 13( 9), 962-967. |
33 |
Moore J. W., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21( 1), 546-561.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002 URL pmid: 22240158 |
34 | Moore J. W., Ruge D., Wenke D., Rothwell J., & Haggard P . ( 2010). Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2503-2509. |
35 |
Shibasaki H., & Hallett, M. ( 2006). What is the Bereitschaftspotential?. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117( 11), 2341-2356.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025 URL pmid: 16876476 |
36 |
Sirigu A., Daprati E., Pradat-Diehl P., Franck N., & Jeannerod M . ( 1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122( 10), 1867-1874.
doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1867 URL pmid: 10506089 |
37 | Sperduti M., Delaveau P., Fossati P., & Nadel J . ( 2011). Different brain structures related to self-and external- agency attribution: A brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216( 2), 151-157. |
38 | Stetson C., Cui X., Montague P. R., & Eagleman D. M . ( 2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51( 5), 651-659. |
39 |
Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . ( 2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 1), 219-239.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010 URL pmid: 17482480 |
40 | Tapal A., Oren E., Dar R., & Eitam B . ( 2017). The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1552. |
41 | Voss M., Chambon V., Wenke D., Kühn S., & Haggard P . ( 2017). In and out of control: brain mechanisms linking fluency of action selection to self-agency in patients with schizophrenia. Brain, 140( 8), 2226-2239. |
42 | Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z., & Jordan M. I . ( 1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269( 5232), 1880-1882. |
43 |
Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23( 20), 2028-2032.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034 URL pmid: 24094850 |
44 |
Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7( 1), 8733.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3 URL pmid: 5562802 |
45 | Zhao K., Chen Y. H., Yan W. J., & Fu X. L . ( 2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PloS One, 8( 5), e64819. |
46 | Zhao K., Gu R. L., Wang L., Xiao P., Chen Y. H., Liang J ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2014). Voluntary pressing and releasing actions induce different senses of time: Evidence from event-related brain responses. Scientific Reports, 4, 6047. |
47 |
Zhao K., Hu L., Qu F. B., Cui Q., Piao Q. H., Xu H ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2016). Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect. Experimental Brain Research, 234( 8), 2283-2292.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4633-5 URL pmid: 27038203 |
48 |
Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., & Frensch P. A . ( 2004). The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 163-175.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6 URL pmid: 14634810 |
[1] | QIN Haofang, HUANG Rong, JIA Shiwei. Feedback-related negativity: A biomarker for depression [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(3): 404-413. |
[2] | ZHAO Ke, GU Jingjin, HUANG Guanhua, ZHENG Shuang, FU Xiaolan. The spatiotemporal markers for the sense of agency in the human brain [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 1901-1910. |
[3] | CHEN Lele, HUANG Rong, JIA Shiwei. Feedback-related negativity and addiction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 959-968. |
[4] | ZHANG Jianping, QIN Chuanyan, LIU Shanshi. Does seek feedback improve performance? A meta-analytic review about feedback-seeking behavior and individual performance [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 549-565. |
[5] | CAI Xiao, ZHANG Qingfang. The integration mechanisms of feedforward and feedback control in speech motor system [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 588-603. |
[6] | WAN Nan, ZHU Shuqing, JIA Shiwei. The effect of feedback interval on feedback processing: A perspective of integrating behavioral and electrophysiological researches [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 230-239. |
[7] | Xiuli Yang, Yanyan Tu, Zhuo Zhang, Huimin Cao, Yanju Ren. Revisiting the components of value-driven attentional capture [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 68-68. |
[8] | LI Qian, GONG Shiyang, LI Chaofan. The impact of team cultural diversity on team innovation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539. |
[9] | WU Di, GU Jingjin, LI Ming, ZHANG Miao, ZHANG Ming, ZHAO Ke, FU Xiaolan. Sense of agency based on action and causation: The mechanism of intentional binding effect for voluntary action [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 804-810. |
[10] | ZHAO Peiqiong, CHEN Wei, ZHANG Jing, PING Xianjie. The rubber hand illusion (RHI): The experimental paradigm of sense of ownership and its application [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 37-50. |
[11] | LI Danyang, LI Peng, LI Hong. The updated theories of feedback-related negativity in the last decade [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1642-1650. |
[12] | ZHANG Jing, CHEN Wei. The investigation of minimal self based on self-illusion: The embodied constructivism position [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1252. |
[13] | ZHANG Ying, YANG Fu. Feedback-seeking behavior: Influencing factors and localization development [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1121-1130. |
[14] | ZHANG Yun, WENG Qingxiong. The analysis of characteristics and internal mechanisms of multisource feedback [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1131-1140. |
[15] | TIAN Haoyue, LI Lihong, XU Zhe, LI Fei, JIN Dan, AN Canling. Sense of agency in the minimal self [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 872-885. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||