心理科学进展 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1680-1696.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01680
陈斯允1, 徐惠琪1, 李诗颖1, 牛小曼1, 许丽颖2
收稿日期:
2023-11-20
出版日期:
2024-10-15
发布日期:
2024-08-13
通讯作者:
许丽颖, E-mail: liyingxu@whu.edu.cn; 陈斯允, E-mail: siyunchen@jnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
CHEN Siyun1, XU Huiqi1, LI Shiying1, NIU Xiaoman1, XU Liying2
Received:
2023-11-20
Online:
2024-10-15
Published:
2024-08-13
摘要: 随着社会物质经济的发展, 节俭不断被赋予新的时代意蕴。作为中华民族的传统美德之一, 节俭素来享誉“美名”。然而, 节俭所导致的结果是否总合乎道德?本文试图系统地回答这一问题, 分别从积极面和消极面揭示了节俭对亲社会行为的双刃剑效应。上述效应的发生可基于资源保存理论、自我控制理论、生命史理论、自我决定理论、社会交换理论、机会成本理论和有限注意理论等视角进行解释。未来研究可进一步厘清和开发节俭的道德内涵, 开展节俭相关后效的跨文化研究, 识别不同类型亲社会行为中节俭的共同作用, 探寻统一双刃剑效应的理论框架和边界情境, 以及验证道德情绪作为心理机制的解释作用, 进而推动节俭心理学和亲社会行为研究的融合与发展。
陈斯允, 徐惠琪, 李诗颖, 牛小曼, 许丽颖. (2024). 俭以养德?节俭对亲社会行为的双刃剑效应及其理论解释. 心理科学进展 , 32(10), 1680-1696.
CHEN Siyun, XU Huiqi, LI Shiying, NIU Xiaoman, XU Liying. (2024). Can frugality nurture virtue? The dual-edged sword effect of frugality on prosocial behavior and its theoretical interpretations. Advances in Psychological Science, 32(10), 1680-1696.
[1] 陈斯允, 卫海英, 熊继伟, 冉雅璇. (2021). 大道至“简”:极简主义消费内涵解构与理论阐释. [2] 何建华. (2021). 节俭消费伦理的时代意蕴. [3] 黄梓航, 敬一鸣, 喻丰, 古若雷, 周欣悦, 张建新, 蔡华俭. (2018). 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化. [4] 李爱梅, 彭元, 李斌, 凌文辁. (2014). 金钱概念启动对亲社会行为的影响及其决策机制. [5] 李林, 黄希庭. (2014). 俭: 心理学的研究视角. [6] 彭芸爽, 王雪, 吴嵩, 金盛华, 孙荣芳. (2016). 生命史理论概述及其与社会心理学的结合——以道德行为为例. [7] 任杰. (2023). 节俭的重新定义:文化话语与“抠组”青年消费实践. [8] 武瑞娟, 王承璐, 杜立婷. (2012). 沉没成本,节俭消费观和控制动机对积极消费行为影响效应研究. [9] 薛秋, 尹可丽. (2023). 集体仪式的替代品: 世俗中的同步动作及其机制. [10] 张庆鹏, 寇彧. (2011). 青少年亲社会行为测评维度的建立与验证. [11] 赵越, 胡小勇, 马佳馨. (2023). 敬畏的亲社会效应: 小我与真我的作用. [12] Aschemann-Witzel J., Asioli D., Banovic M., Perito M. A., & Peschel A. O. (2022). Communicating upcycled foods: Frugality framing supports acceptance of sustainable product innovations. [13] Bardhi, F., & Arnould, E. J. (2005). Thrift shopping: Combining utilitarian thrift and hedonic treat benefits. [14] Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. [15] Berman, J. Z., & Silver, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good? [16] Beshears, J., & Kosowsky, H. (2020). Nudging: Progress to date and future directions. [17] Blocker C. P., Ruth J. A., Sridharan S., Beckwith C., Ekici A., Goudie-Hutton M.,. Varman R. (2013). Understanding poverty and promoting poverty alleviation through transformative consumer research. [18] Burningham, K., & Venn, S. (2020). Are lifecourse transitions opportunities for moving to more sustainable consumption? [19] Cappellini, B., & Parsons, E. (2012). Practising thrift at dinnertime: Mealtime leftovers, sacrifice and family membership. [20] Chancellor, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Happiness and thrift: When (spending) less is (hedonically) more. [21] Chartrand T. L., Huber J., Shiv B., & Tanner R. J. (2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. [22] Chen S., Kou S., & Lv, L. (2024). Stand out or fit in: Understanding consumer minimalism from a social comparison perspective. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114307. [23] Chen, S., & Ran, Y. (2023). A silver lining of the epidemic: How contagious disease salience leads to minimalistic consumption. [24] Chen, S., & Wei, H. (2023). Linking temporal landmarks to voluntary simplicity: The mediating roles of self-transcendence and self-enhancement. [25] Cho E., Gupta S., & Kim Y. K. (2015). Style consumption: Its drivers and role in sustainable apparel consumption. [26] Choi W. J., Sun H., Liu Y. (Lucy), & Chen H. (Allan). (2020). Guess who buys cheap? The effect of consumers’ goal orientation on product preference. [27] Cloarec J., Meyer-Waarden L., & Munzel A. (2022). The personalization-privacy paradox at the nexus of social exchange and construal level theories. [28] Corral-Verdugo V., González-Lomelí D., Rascón-Cruz M., & Corral-Frías V. O. (2016). Intrinsic motives of autonomy, self-efficacy, and satisfaction associated with two instances of sustainable behavior: Frugality and equity. [29] Corral-Verdugo V., Mireles-Acosta J. F., Tapia-Fonllem C., & Fraijo-Sing B. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. [30] Cui P., Shen Y., Hommey C., & Ma J. (2023). The dark side of the pursuit of happiness comes from the pursuit of hedonia: The mediation of materialism and the moderation of self-control. [31] Dias R. S., Sharma E., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2022). Spending and happiness: The role of perceived financial constraints. [32] Ellis B. J., Figueredo A. J., Brumbach B. H., & Schlomer G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. [33] Evans, D. (2011). Thrifty, green or frugal: Reflections on sustainable consumption in a changing economic climate. [34] Evers U., Gruner R. L., Sneddon J., & Lee J. A. (2018). Exploring materialism and frugality in determining product end‐use consumption behaviors. [35] Figueredo A. J., Andrzejczak D. J., Jones D. N., Smith-Castro V., & Montero E. (2011). Reproductive strategy and ethnic conflict: Slow life history as a protective factor against negative ethnocentrism in two contemporary societies. [36] Furnham, A., & Okamura, R. (1999). Your money or your life: Behavioral and emotional predictors of money pathology. [37] Gasiorowska A., Chaplin L. N., Zaleskiewicz T., Wygrab S., & Vohs K. D. (2016). Money cues increase agency and decrease prosociality among children: Early signs of market- mode behaviors. [38] Gil-Giménez D., Rolo-González G., Suárez E., & Muinos G. (2021). The influence of environmental self-identity on the relationship between consumer identities and frugal behavior. [39] Givi J., Birg L., Lowrey T. M., & Galak J. (2023). An integrative review of gift-giving research in consumer behavior and marketing. [40] Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (2015). The etiology of frugal spending: A partial replication and extension. [41] Goldsmith R. E., Flynn L. R., & Clark R. A. (2014). The etiology of the frugal consumer. [42] Halbesleben J. R., Neveu J. P., Paustian-Underdahl S. C., & Westman M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. [43] Hampson D. P., Ma S., Wang Y., & Han M. S. (2021). Consumer confidence and conspicuous consumption: A conservation of resources perspective. [44] Henkel A. P., Boegershausen J., Hoegg J., Aquino K., & Lemmink J. (2018). Discounting humanity: When consumers are price conscious, employees appear less human. [45] Holmes, H. (2019). Unpicking contemporary thrift: Getting on and getting by in everyday life. [46] Jagannathan S., Bawa A., & Rai R. (2020). Narrative worlds of frugal consumers: Unmasking romanticized spirituality to reveal responsibilization and de-politicization. [47] Jain R., Jain K., Behl A., Pereira V., Del Giudice M., & Vrontis D. (2022). Mainstreaming fashion rental consumption: A systematic and thematic review of literature. [48] Kapitan S., Mittal S., Sundie J. M., & Beal D. J. (2021). What a great deal … I need that! Updating need drives frugal consumers’ responses to deep discounts. [49] Kasser, T. (2011). Can thrift bring well‐being? A review of the research and a tentative theory. [50] Klontz B., Britt S. L., & Archuleta K. L. (2012). Disordered money behaviors: Development of the Klontz money behavior inventory. [51] Kruger, D. J., & Kruger, J. S. (2018). What do economically costly signals signal? A life history framework for interpreting conspicuous consumption. [52] Lang, C., & Zhang, R. (2019). Second-hand clothing acquisition: The motivations and barriers to clothing swaps for Chinese consumers. [53] Lastovicka, J. L. (1982). On the validation of lifestyle traits: A review and illustration. [54] Lastovicka J. L., Bettencourt L. A., Hughner R. S., & Kuntze R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. [55] Lee, H. J., & Cha, M. K. (2022). The relationship between anti‐consumption lifestyle and the trust triangle in a ride‐sharing platform: A cross‐cultural study of U.S. and Indian consumers. [56] Lee, K. J., & Setoh, P. (2023). Early prosociality is conditional on opportunity cost and familiarity with the target.Evolution and Human Behavior, 44(1), 39-49. [57] Lee, S. H. M. (2016). When are frugal consumers not frugal? The influence of personal networks. [58] Lichtenstein D. R., Ridgway N. M., & Netemeyer R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. [59] Lin L., Xi D., & Lueptow R. M. (2013). Public face and private thrift in Chinese consumer behaviour. [60] Lohmann P. M., Gsottbauer E., You J., & Kontoleon A. (2023). Anti-social behaviour and economic decision- making: Panel experimental evidence in the wake of COVID-19. [61] Ma, J., & Roese, N. J. (2014). The maximizing mind-set. [62] McDonald, T., & Dan, L. (2022). “Pulling the sheep’s wool”: The labour of online thrift in a Chinese factory. [63] McQueen R. H., McNeill L. S., Kozlowski A., & Jain A. (2022). Frugality, style longevity and garment repair-environmental attitudes and consumption behaviour amongst young Canadian fashion consumers. [64] Mead, N. L., & Williams, L. E. (2023). The pursuit of meaning and the preference for less expensive options. [65] Meyer, S. (2019). The moral economy of thrift: The production of the indebted self in the reality series getting out of debt and life or debt. [66] Muradian, R. (2019). Frugality as a choice vs. frugality as a social condition. Is de-growth doomed to be a Eurocentric project? [67] Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2017). When materialists intend to resist consumption: The moderating role of self-control and long-term orientation. [68] Nguyen T. D., Dadzie C. A., Chaudhuri H. R., & Tanner T. (2019). Self-control and sustainability consumption: Findings from a cross cultural study. [69] Pan L. S., Pezzuti T., Lu W., & Pechmann C. C. (2019). Hyperopia and frugality: Different motivational drivers and yet similar effects on consumer spending. [70] Parguel B., Lunardo R., & Benoit-Moreau F. (2017). Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. [71] Park H., Kwon T. A., Zaman M. M., & Song S. Y. (2020). Thrift shopping for clothes: To treat self or others? [72] Pepper M., Jackson T., & Uzzell D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. [73] Pfattheicher S., Nielsen Y. A., & Thielmann I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. [74] Philp, M., & Nepomuceno, M. V. (2020). When the frugal become wasteful: An examination into how impression management can initiate the end‐stages of consumption for frugal consumers. [75] Podkalicka, A., & Potts, J. (2014). Towards a general theory of thrift. [76] Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta‐analysis. [77] Prendergast, G. P., & Tsang, A. S. (2019). Explaining socially responsible consumption. [78] Ratchford J. L., Schnitker S. A., & Reppas P. (2021). The virtue of thrift: A person-centered conceptualization and measure development. [79] Rayburn S. W., McGeorge A., Anderson S., & Sierra J. J. (2022). Crisis-induced behavior: From fear and frugality to the familiar. [80] Rieser, L., & Furneaux, B. (2022). Share of attention: Exploring the allocation of user attention to consumer applications. [81] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. [82] Sadom M. N. Z., Quoquab F., Mohammad J., & Hussin N. (2022). Less is more: The role of frugality in the Malaysian hotel industry. [83] Salonen, A. S. (2023). ‘If I could afford an avocado every day’: Income differences and ethical food consumption in a world of abundance. [84] Say A. L., Guo R. S. A., & Chen C. (2021). Altruism and social utility in consumer sharing behavior. [85] Schmidt-Barad, T., & Uziel, L. (2020). When (state and trait) powers collide: Effects of power-incongruence and self-control on prosocial behavior. [86] Schnurr, B., & Halkias, G. (2023). Made by her vs. him: Gender influences in product preferences and the role of individual action efficacy in restoring social equalities. [87] Schwartz B., Ward A., Monterosso J., Lyubomirsky S., White K., & Lehman D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. [88] Shi T., Huang R., & Sarigöllü E. (2022). A qualitative study on internal motivations and consequences of consumer upcycling. [89] Shoham, A., & Brenčič, M. M. (2004). Value, price consciousness, and consumption frugality: An empirical study. [90] Shoham A., Gavish Y., & Akron S. (2017). Hoarding and frugality tendencies and their impact on consumer behaviors. [91] Simpson D., Power D., Riach K., & Tsarenko Y. (2019). Consumer motivation for product disposal and its role in acquiring products for reuse. [92] Small D. A., Loewenstein G., & Slovic P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. [93] Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2015). Stability and change in consumer traits: Evidence from a 12-year longitudinal study, 2002-2013. [94] Tang H., Li L., & Su S. (2022). Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage. [95] Tilov I., Farsi M., & Volland B. (2020). From frugal Jane to wasteful John: A quantile regression analysis of Swiss households’ electricity demand. [96] Todd, S., & Lawson, R. (2003). Towards an understanding of frugal consumers. [97] Turunen, L. L. M., & Pöyry, E. (2019). Shopping with the resale value in mind: A study on second-hand luxury consumers. [98] Vieites Y., Goldszmidt R., & Andrade E. B. (2022). Social class shapes donation allocation preferences. [99] Vohs K. D., Mead N. L., & Goode M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. [100] Vosgerau J., Scopelliti I., & Huh Y. E. (2020). Exerting self-control ≠ sacrificing pleasure. [101] Wang H., Ma B., Bai R., & Zhang L. (2021). The unexpected effect of frugality on green purchase intention. [102] Weiss, L., & Kivetz, R. (2019). Opportunity cost overestimation. [103] Wenner C. J., Bianchi J., Figueredo A. J., Rushton J. P., & Jacobs W. J. (2013). Life history theory and social deviance: The mediating role of executive function. [104] Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2021). Maximizing what? The effect of maximizing mindset on the evaluation of product bundles. [105] Xiao S. X., Hashi E. C., Korous K. M., & Eisenberg N. (2019). Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the prosocial tendency measure-revised (PTM-R). [106] Zlatev, J. J., & Miller, D. T. (2016). Selfishly benevolent or benevolently selfish: When self-interest undermines versus promotes prosocial behavior. |
[1] | 苏涛, 曾浩文, 钟晓琳, 马文聪, 陈修德. 祸福相依:自恋型领导对下属效能双面效应的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(9): 1463-1487. |
[2] | 李俊朋, 周临舒, 江俊, 王丹妮, 蒋存梅. 音乐对亲社会行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1179-1194. |
[3] | 王涛, 占小军, 余薇. AI感知对员工心理和行为的影响及理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(7): 1195-1208. |
[4] | 严鸣, 郑石. 区分还是融合?虚拟化团队工作模式下的员工工作−家庭平衡策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(5): 754-770. |
[5] | 李艳妮, 王舒丹, 刘羿. 损失情境下创业者资源保存启发式与资源演化机理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(4): 568-578. |
[6] | 张顺民, 李柯蒨. 自我控制减少拖延行为的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1560-1568. |
[7] | 许销冰, 程兰萍, 孙洪杰. 时间拟人化倾向及其对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1569-1582. |
[8] | 龚思羽, 盛光华. 产品绿色属性信息对消费者决策的双刃剑效应:形成机理与边界机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(9): 1611-1625. |
[9] | 陈雪飞, 利振华, 聂衍刚. 不只是努力抑制——自我控制策略及其使用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(8): 1528-1540. |
[10] | 王颂, 张了丹, 栾琨. 员工网络建构行为的概念内涵及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 840-853. |
[11] | 郭理, 加锁锁, 李圭泉, 李蔓林. 高处不胜寒?领导工作场所孤独感的多层次双刃剑效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 582-596. |
[12] | 郭英, 田鑫, 胡东, 白书琳, 周蜀溪. 羞愧对亲社会行为影响的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 371-385. |
[13] | 张姝玥, 黄骏青, 赵峰, 徐科朋. 社会排斥影响跨期决策的心理机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 486-498. |
[14] | 王琼. 职业可续视角下的工作重塑行为研究:动力、路径及干预机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 499-510. |
[15] | 张琳琳, 魏坤琳, 李晶. 儿童的人际运动同步[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 623-634. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||