动机视角下的亲组织不道德行为

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01111

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

亲组织不道德行为是近年来组织行为学界广泛关注的研究议题。但是, 关于亲组织不道德行为的概念内涵, 目前还存在一定模糊性。基于动机视角, 从亲组织不道德行为的定义、特征、动机、类型等方面, 对亲组织不道德行为的概念模糊性进行细致解构与深入剖析, 形成相对系统的亲组织不道德行为概念内涵; 并据此概念内涵背后的动机逻辑, 对现有的亲组织不道德行为影响因素进行分类梳理, 阐释其对亲组织不道德行为的影响机制; 最后, 从细分类型、测量工具、研究视角、影响因素、抑制机制、影响效应与本土化等方面为后续研究提供针对性的建议。

关键词: 动机, 亲组织不道德行为, 不道德行为

Abstract:

Unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) is an important research topic which has drawn more and more attention from the organizational behavior field in recent years. Yet, it’s worth noting that the conceptualization of UPB is somewhat vague. Based on the motivational perspective, this paper deeply deconstructs and analyses the conceptual ambiguity of UPB in terms of definition, characteristic, motivation and type, and form a systematic concept connotation of UPB. Further, following the motivation-related logic behind UPB, this paper systematically reviews the influencing factors of UPB, and explains the mechanisms of these influencing factors on UPB. Finally, this paper provides specific suggestions for future research in terms of subtype, measurement, research perspective, influencing factor, inhibition mechanism, influencing mechanism and localization.

Key words: motivation, unethical pro-organizational behavior, unethical behavior

中图分类号:

B849: C93

程垦, 林英晖. (2019). 动机视角下的亲组织不道德行为. 心理科学进展 , 27(6), 1111-1122.

CHENG Ken, LIN Yinghui. (2019). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: A motivational perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(6), 1111-1122.

图/表 3

参考文献 66

1	陈默, 梁建 . ( 2017). 高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为: 基于社会认知理论的视角. 心理学报, 49( 1), 94-105.
2	程垦, 林英晖 . ( 印刷中a). 责任型领导与组织惩罚对亲组织非伦理行为的影响.管理科学.
3	程垦, 林英晖 . ( 印刷中b). 组织认同一定会促进亲组织非伦理行为吗? 社会责任型人力资源管理的作用.心理科学.
4	杜兰英, 段天格, 李铭泽 . ( 2016). 不道德亲组织行为研究述评与展望. 中国人力资源开发, 33( 7), 50-57.
5	郭亿馨, 苏勇, 吉祥熙 . ( 2018). 员工未来关注与不道德亲组织行为: 一个中介-调节模型的构建与检验. 中国人力资源开发, 35( 2), 30-40.
6	李根强 . ( 2016). 伦理型领导、组织认同与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 特质调节焦点的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 37( 12), 125-135.
7	李根强, 杨锐 . ( 2019). 团队内亲组织非伦理行为的产生与传染机制研究. 软科学, 33( 1), 126-129.
8	李志成, 王震, 祝振兵, 占小军 . ( 2018). 基于情绪认知评价的员工绩效压力对亲组织非伦理行为的影响研究. 管理学报, 15( 3), 358-365.
9	林英晖, 程垦 . ( 2016). 领导-部属交换与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 差序格局视角. 管理科学, 29( 5), 57-70.
10	林英晖, 程垦 . ( 2017). 差序式领导与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 圈内人和圈外人视角. 管理科学, 30( 3), 35-50.
11	罗帆, 徐瑞华 . ( 2017). 高承诺人力资源管理实践对亲组织非伦理行为的影响——组织支持感的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用. 中国人力资源开发, 34( 10), 28-39.
12	孙春玲, 姬玉, 许芝卫 . ( 2018). 心理授权对工程项目团队不道德亲组织行为的影响研究——基于组织惯例的调节作用. 中国软科学, ( 4), 155-164.
13	陶厚永, 章娟, 李玲 . ( 2016). 差序式领导对员工利社会行为的影响. 中国工业经济, ( 3), 114-129.
14	王汉瑛, 田虹, 邢红卫 . ( 2018). 内部审计师的亲组织非伦理行为: 基于双重认同视角. 管理科学, 31( 4), 30-44.
15	王晓辰, 高欣洁, 郭攀博, 李清 . ( 2018). 亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型. 心理科学进展, 26( 6), 1111-1120.
16	王晓辰, 高欣洁, 李清 . ( 2018). 亲组织非伦理行为对员工职业发展的影响: 一个跨层的被调节中介. 心理科学, 41( 3), 646-652.
17	王晓辰, 应莺 . ( 2018). 变革型领导如何影响员工亲组织非伦理行为? 一个被调节的中介作用模型. 财经论丛, ( 3), 97-104.
18	吴明证, 邵晓露, 孙晓玲, 李宁 . ( 2017). 服务型领导、道德认同与UPB的关系. 应用心理学, 23( 2), 152-161.
19	吴明证, 沈斌, 孙晓玲 . ( 2016). 组织承诺和亲组织的非伦理行为关系: 道德认同的调节作用. 心理科学, 39( 2), 392-398.
20	徐琳, 王济干, 樊传浩 . ( 2018). 授权型领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响: 一个链式中介模型. 科学学与科学技术管理, 39( 6), 109-121.
21	杨国枢, 黄光国, 杨中芳 . ( 2008). 华人本土心理学. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
22	杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲 . ( 2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18( 4), 671-678.
23	张桂平 . ( 2016). 职场排斥对员工亲组织性非伦理行为的影响机制研究. 管理科学, 29( 4), 104-114.
24	张艳清, 王晓晖, 王海波 . ( 2016). 组织情境下的不道德行为现象: 来自道德推脱理论的解释. 心理科学进展, 24( 7), 1107-1117.
25	张永军, 江晓燕, 赵国祥 . ( 2017). 伦理氛围与亲组织非伦理行为: 道德辩护的中介效应. 心理科学, 40( 5), 1189-1194.
26	张永军, 张鹏程, 赵君 . ( 2017). 家长式领导对员工亲组织非伦理行为的影响: 基于传统性的调节效应. 南开管理评论, 20( 2), 169-179.
27	赵红丹, 周君 . ( 2017). 企业伪善、道德推脱与亲组织非伦理行为: 有调节的中介效应. 外国经济与管理, 39( 1), 15-28.
28	郑伯埙 . ( 1995). 差序格局与华人组织行为. 华人本土心理学, ( 3), 142-219.
29	钟熙, 王甜, 罗淏元, 宋铁波 . ( 2018). 上下级关系与亲组织非伦理行为: 基于组织认同与自我牺牲型领导的作用. 科学学与科学技术管理, 39( 6), 122-135.
30	Aquino, K., & Reed, A . ( 2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83( 6), 1423-1440. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423 URL
31	Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V . ( 2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-52. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2 URL
32	Ashforth B. E., Harrison S. H., & Corley K. G . ( 2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34( 3), 325-374.
33	Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F . ( 1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14( 1), 20-39. doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999 URL
34	Bandura, A. ( 1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
35	Bandura, A. ( 1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3( 3), 193-209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 URL
36	Castille C. M., Buckner J. E., & Thoroughgood C. N . ( 2018). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149( 4), 919-930. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9 URL
37	Chen M., Chen C. C., & Sheldon O. J . ( 2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101( 8), 1082-1096. doi: 10.1037/apl0000111 URL
38	Christie R., & Geis, F. L .( 1970) . Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
39	Effelsberg, D., & Solga, M . ( 2015). Transformational leaders’ in-group versus out-group orientation: Testing the link between leaders’ organizational identification, their willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior, and follower-perceived transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 126( 4), 581-590. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1972-z URL
40	Effelsberg D., Solga M., & Gurt J . ( 2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120( 1), 81-93. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z URL
41	Ghosh, S. K . ( 2017). The direct and interactive effects of job insecurity and job embeddedness on unethical pro- organizational behavior: An empirical examination. Personnel Review, 46( 6), 1182-1198. doi: 10.1108/PR-05-2015-0126 URL
42	Gino F., Ayal S., & Ariely D . ( 2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93, 285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005 URL
43	Graham K. A., Ziegert J. C., & Capitano J . ( 2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126( 3), 423-436. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3 URL
44	Johnson H. H., & Umphress, E. E . (in press). To help my supervisor: Identification, moral identity, and unethical pro-supervisor behavior.Journal of Business Ethics.
45	Kalshoven K., van Dijk H., & Boon C . ( 2016). Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31( 2), 500-515. doi: 10.1108/JMP-10-2014-0314 URL
46	Kohlberg, L. ( 1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive- developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research( pp. 347-380). Chicago: Rand McNally.
47	Kong, D. T . ( 2016). The pathway to unethical pro- organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.035 URL
48	Lawrence, E. R., & Kacmar, K. M . ( 2017). Exploring the impact of job insecurity on employees’ unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27( 1), 39-70. doi: 10.1017/beq.2016.58 URL
49	Lee A., Schwarz G., Newman A., & Legood A . ( 2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154( 1), 109-126. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3456-z
50	Mael. F. A., & Ashforth, B. E . ( 1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13( 2), 103-123. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379 URL
51	Matherne, C. F., & Litchfield, S. R . ( 2012). Investigating the relationship between affective commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The role of moral identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9( 5), 35-46.
52	May D. R., Chang Y. K., & Shao R . ( 2015). Does ethical membership matter? Moral identification and its organizational implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 3), 681-694. doi: 10.1037/a0038344 URL
53	Mesdaghinia S., Rawat A., & Nadavulakere, S . (in press). Why moral followers quit: Examining the role of leader bottom-line mentality and unethical pro-leader behavior.Journal of Business Ethics.
54	Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J . ( 1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1( 1), 61-89. doi: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z URL
55	Miao Q., Newman A., Yu J., & Xu L . ( 2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects?. Journal of Business Ethics, 116( 3), 641-653. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1504-2 URL
56	Moore C., Detert J. R., Treviño L. K., Baker V. L., & Mayer D. M . ( 2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65( 1), 1-48. doi: 10.1111/peps.2012.65.issue-1 URL
57	Reed, A., & Aquino, K. F . ( 2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84( 6), 1270-1286. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270 URL
58	Schutts, J., & Shelley, K . ( 2014). Modeling a values-based- congruence framework to predict organization constructs in fraternities and sororities. Oracle: The Research Journal of the Association of Fraternity/Sorority Advisors, 9( 1), 33-53.
59	Shu, X. ( 2015). Contagion effect of unethical pro-organizational behavior among members within organization. Metallurgical and Mining Industry,( 5), 235-242.
60	Thau S., Derfler-Rozin R., Pitesa M., Mitchell M. S., & Pillutla M. M . ( 2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 1), 98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0036708 URL
61	Tian, Q., & Peterson, D. K . ( 2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25( 2), 159-171. doi: 10.1111/beer.2016.25.issue-2 URL
62	Treviño L. K., den Nieuwenboer N. A., & Kish-Gephart J. J . ( 2014). (Un)Ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635-660. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143745 URL
63	Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B . ( 2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22( 3), 621-640. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0559 URL
64	Umphress E. E., Bingham J. B., & Mitchell M. S . ( 2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95( 4), 769-780. doi: 10.1037/a0019214 URL
65	Wang T., Long L., Zhang Y., & He, W . (in press). A social exchange perspective of employee-organization relationships and employee unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of individual moral identity.Journal of Business Ethics.
66	Zhang S .(in press). Workplace spirituality and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating effect of job satisfaction.Journal of Business Ethics.

行为类型	动机构成			亲组织不道德行为概念范畴	主要动机
行为类型	亲组织动机	亲成员动机	利己动机	亲组织不道德行为概念范畴	亲组织动机	亲成员动机	利己动机
A	√	×	×	√	√	×	×
B	×	√	×	×	×	√	×
C	×	×	√	×	×	×	√
D	√	√	×	√	?	?	×
E	√	×	√	√	?	×	?
F	×	√	√	×	×	?	?
G	√	√	√	√	?	?	?

行为类型	动机构成			亲组织不道德行为概念范畴	主要动机
行为类型	亲组织动机	亲成员动机	利己动机	亲组织不道德行为概念范畴	亲组织动机	亲成员动机	利己动机
A	√	×	×	√	√	×	×
B	×	√	×	×	×	√	×
C	×	×	√	×	×	×	√
D	√	√	×	√	?	?	×
E	√	×	√	√	?	×	?
F	×	√	√	×	×	?	?
G	√	√	√	√	?	?	?

[1]	张莹, 张剑, 张静雅, 巩振兴. 职业冲击的新分类及不同理论视角下的影响效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 854-865.
[2]	刘沛菡, 张火垠, 张旭凯, 李红, 雷怡. 急性疼痛与慢性疼痛对奖赏加工的影响及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 402-415.
[3]	陈念劬. 从好奇发生到满足：好奇反馈循环的神经生理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 256-273.
[4]	张明霞, 李雨欣, 李瑾, 刘勋. 内外动机对青少年记忆的影响及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 1-9.
[5]	寇娟, 杨梦圆, 魏子杰, 雷怡. 自闭症谱系障碍社交动机理论：机制及干预探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 20-32.
[6]	谢才凤, 邬家骅, 许丽颖, 喻丰, 张语嫣, 谢莹莹. 算法决策趋避的过程动机理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 60-77.
[7]	寇东晓, 王晓玉. 权力对人际敏感性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(1): 108-115.
[8]	程垦, 王艺霏, 林英晖, 王菁. 观察者对亲组织不道德行为的反应及其反馈效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 1944-1954.
[9]	陆静怡, 邱天, 陈宇琦, 方晴雯, 尚雪松. 人心难读：冲突中的预测偏差及其心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1439-1447.
[10]	王燕青, 龚少英, 姜甜甜, 吴亚男. 情感代理能否提高多媒体学习的效果?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1524-1535.
[11]	简云龙, 刘源. 动机的结构与效应：基于动机连续体的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1589-1603.
[12]	王修欣, 申怡凡. 何以应对道德自我威胁?道德记忆偏差的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1604-1611.
[13]	郝娜, 崔丽莹. 补偿他人还是保护自己?内疚与羞耻情绪对合作行为的影响差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1626-1636.
[14]	张跃, 丁毅, 杨沈龙, 解晓娜, 郭永玉. 社会不平等如何影响低地位者的系统合理信念[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1637-1650.
[15]	李静, 吴旭瑶, 岳磊, 曾祥丽, 方庆园. 物质主义对绿色消费的影响：促进还是抑制?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1191-1204.