ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 571-579.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00571

• 决策心理学专栏 •    下一篇

风险决策中的双参照点效应

谢晓非;陆静怡   

  1. 北京大学心理学系, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-28 出版日期:2014-04-15 发布日期:2014-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 谢晓非
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目“社会比较中的决策过程” (71172024)。

Double Reference Points in Risky Decision Making

XIE Xiaofei;LU Jingyi   

  1. Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2013-11-28 Online:2014-04-15 Published:2014-04-15
  • Contact: XIE Xiaofei

摘要:

以预期理论为代表的决策理论认为, 决策者自身的损益状态对风险决策有重要作用, 因此, 将决策者的现状定义为个人参照点。它决定了决策情境是个人获益还是个人损失。个人参照点直接关乎决策者实际的得失, 具有直接性、真实性和绝对性的特征。然而, 社会比较理论认为, 与他人的比较结果同样对风险决策具有不可忽视的意义。因此, 将他人的状态定义为社会参照点。自身的现状与他人状态相比较的结果决定了决策情境是社会获益还是社会损失。社会参照点无关决策者的实际得失, 具有间接性、假设性和相对性的特征。社会参照点通过自我概念、情绪、认知等路径作用于风险决策。更为重要的是, 社会参照点和个人参照点同时存在于风险决策过程中, 决策者对两者的心理感受和行为倾向具有相似性, 因此两者将共同影响决策者的风险选择。基于此, 本文提出风险决策中的双参照点效应。有关双参照点对风险决策过程的影响机制还需进一步的探讨。

关键词: 风险决策, 社会参照点, 个人参照点, 社会比较, 预期理论

Abstract:

According to prospect theory, decision makers’ gain or loss determined by their current states has a profound effect on decisions under risk. In the current paper, the status quo of decision makers is defined as individual reference point, which determines the context as individual gain or loss. Individual reference point is direct, actual, and absolute given that it affects the actual payoffs of decision makers. However, as social comparison theory goes, decision making is also a matter of social comparison. Thus, the status of others is defined as social reference point, which determines social gain or loss. Social reference point is indirect, hypothetical, and relative because it does not influence the actual payoffs of decision makers directly. Risky decision making is affected by social reference point through self-concept, emotion, and cognition. More importantly, both individual and social reference points exist in risky decision making. They have similar impacts on decision makers, both psychologically and behaviorally, thus affecting risky choice jointly. Therefore, the paper proposes the effects of double reference points on risky decision making. However, further research is needed on the mechanisms of double reference points.

Key words: risky decision making, social reference point, individual reference point, social comparison theory, prospect theory