ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2008, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 163-168.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

心理学研究方法中“质”与“量”的整合

周明洁;张建新   

  1. 中国科学院心理研究所,北京,100101
  • 收稿日期:2007-03-12 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-15 发布日期:2008-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 张建新

Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
in Psychology Research

Zhou Mingjie;Zhang Jianxin   

  1. 1Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
  • Received:2007-03-12 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-15 Published:2008-01-15
  • Contact: Zhang jianxin

摘要: 心理学研究方法中“质”与“量”的分歧由来已久。虽然“质”与“量”的研究方法各有其优势,但是也不可避免地存在一些弱点。如果将质与量的方法进行整合,使之进行优势互补,从而更大可能地揭示心理现象发生和发展的规律是我们所面临的课题。要对质的研究方法与量的研究方法进行整合,首先必须“去范式”,将研究的重点聚焦于研究问题,而非范式;其次必须将质性的资料与定量的资料放在同一个层面上进行比较。该文通过一个案例,向读者介绍如何进行“质”与“量”的研究方法的整合

关键词: 心理学, 质的研究, 定量的研究, 效果值

Abstract: Discussions of research methodology in psychology tend to be dominated by a contrast, and often conflict, between two approaches, the quantitative and the qualitative. Although they both have their superiority, their disadvantages are also obvious. What we are now thinking about is how to integrate these two methods in order to exert their advantages and avoid their disadvantages. The premise of integrating these two methods is to de-emphasize the terms of quantitative and qualitative research and put these two kinds of data into the same scale while integrating. Here, a heuristic example was shown to illustrate how to apply this mixed-methodological analysis

Key words: psychology, qualitative research, quantitative research, effect size

中图分类号: