心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 552-569.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.00552
收稿日期:
2022-05-31
出版日期:
2023-04-15
发布日期:
2022-12-30
通讯作者:
傅海伦
E-mail:f_hailun@163.com
基金资助:
WU Jiahui1, FU Hailun1(), ZHANG Yuhuan2
Received:
2022-05-31
Online:
2023-04-15
Published:
2022-12-30
Contact:
FU Hailun
E-mail:f_hailun@163.com
摘要:
学业成就是衡量学生学习认知能力和检测其学习效果的重要指标, 受到感知社会支持和学习投入等因素的显著影响, 先前的研究已经考察了这两个因素对学业成就的共同作用机制, 但感知社会支持与学业成就的关系强度不明, 且尚不完全清楚中介效应、调节效应对二者关系的影响。因此当前研究采用元分析方法检验效应量的可靠性、学习投入的中介效应以及一系列调节效应。研究共纳入符合要求的原始文献41篇, 含78个研究。结果发现:(1)感知社会支持及子类型与学业成就呈现显著的正相关, 但效应值偏小, 即二者之间存在的是弱相关。此外, 感知社会支持及子类型显著正向预测学习投入, 且对学习投入的效应量高于对学业成就的效应量。(2)学段仅对感知教师支持的调节效应显著, 学业成就指标调节了感知社会支持及子类型与学业成就之间的关系, 而经济水平和文化背景的调节效应不显著。(3)学习投入在感知社会支持及子类型对学业成就的影响中起到部分中介作用, 且中介效应只存在于初中群体, 在高中群体中介效应不显著。
中图分类号:
吴佳桧, 傅海伦, 张玉环. (2023). 感知社会支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:学习投入的中介作用. 心理科学进展 , 31(4), 552-569.
WU Jiahui, FU Hailun, ZHANG Yuhuan. (2023). A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived social support and student academic achievement: The mediating role of student engagement. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(4), 552-569.
编号 | 第一作者及年份 | 样本量 | 学段 | 经济水平和文化背景 | 文献来源 | 变量关系 | 学业成就 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Archambault, | 1145 | 小学 | 发达/西方(加拿大) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
2 | Bryce, | 1031 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
3 | Calero, | 89 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 博士 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
4 | Chan, | 526 | 小学、初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | 综合 |
5 | Chen, | 270 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
6 | Chen, | 80 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | GPA |
7 | de Bruyn, | 749 | 初中 | 发达/西方(荷兰) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
8 | Dotterer, | 1014 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
9 | Dupont, | 226 | 大学 | 发达/西方(比利时) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
10 | Federici, | 309 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(挪威) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
11 | Ganotice, | 1694 | 高中 | 发达/东方(菲律宾) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 化 |
12 | Hernandez, | 676 | 初中 | 发达/西方(法国) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | 综合 |
13 | Jelas, | 2359 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(马来西亚) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
14 | Jen, | 3901 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 数 |
15 | Jungert, | 288 | 高中 | 发达/西方(瑞典) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
16 | King, | 1026 | 高中 | 发达/东方(菲律宾) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
17 | Lam, | 3420 | 初中 | 混合国家(12个) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
18 | Maurizi, | 202 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
19 | Mo, | 1971 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | GPA |
20 | Murray, | 104 | 小学、初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
21 | Patrick, | 602 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
22 | Perry, | 285 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
23 | Sia, | 120 | 小学、大学 | 发展中/东方(印度) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | GPA |
24 | Siu, | 451 | 小学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | 综合 |
25 | Smithikrai, | 802 | 大学 | 发展中/东方(泰国) | 期刊 | FS & SE & AP | GPA |
26 | Sohn, | 398 | 高中 | 发达/东方(韩国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
27 | van Ryzin, | 423 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 数 |
28 | Wang, | 1157 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE &AP | GPA |
29 | Wang, | 1046 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | GPA |
30 | Wang, | 2458 | 大学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | GPA |
31 | Whaley, | 362 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 博士 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
32 | Yıldırım, | 4855 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(土耳其) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
33 | Zimmer-Gembeck, | 324 | 高中 | 发达/西方(澳大利亚) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE &AP | 综合 |
34 | 陈思亲, | 850 | 高中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS/TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 英 |
35 | 姜书睿, | 540 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 硕士 | SS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
36 | 李维, | 313 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
37 | 梁兴丽, | 4973 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS/TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
38 | 路海东, | 600 | 小学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE &AP | 综合 |
39 | 王承清, | 443 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
40 | 张凤莲, | 297 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
41 | 张丽杰, | 671 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | 数 |
表1 纳入元分析的文献及基本信息
编号 | 第一作者及年份 | 样本量 | 学段 | 经济水平和文化背景 | 文献来源 | 变量关系 | 学业成就 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Archambault, | 1145 | 小学 | 发达/西方(加拿大) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
2 | Bryce, | 1031 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
3 | Calero, | 89 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 博士 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
4 | Chan, | 526 | 小学、初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | 综合 |
5 | Chen, | 270 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
6 | Chen, | 80 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | GPA |
7 | de Bruyn, | 749 | 初中 | 发达/西方(荷兰) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
8 | Dotterer, | 1014 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
9 | Dupont, | 226 | 大学 | 发达/西方(比利时) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
10 | Federici, | 309 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(挪威) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
11 | Ganotice, | 1694 | 高中 | 发达/东方(菲律宾) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 化 |
12 | Hernandez, | 676 | 初中 | 发达/西方(法国) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | 综合 |
13 | Jelas, | 2359 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(马来西亚) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
14 | Jen, | 3901 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 数 |
15 | Jungert, | 288 | 高中 | 发达/西方(瑞典) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
16 | King, | 1026 | 高中 | 发达/东方(菲律宾) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
17 | Lam, | 3420 | 初中 | 混合国家(12个) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
18 | Maurizi, | 202 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 综合 |
19 | Mo, | 1971 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | GPA |
20 | Murray, | 104 | 小学、初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
21 | Patrick, | 602 | 小学 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
22 | Perry, | 285 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | GPA |
23 | Sia, | 120 | 小学、大学 | 发展中/东方(印度) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | GPA |
24 | Siu, | 451 | 小学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS & SE & AP | 综合 |
25 | Smithikrai, | 802 | 大学 | 发展中/东方(泰国) | 期刊 | FS & SE & AP | GPA |
26 | Sohn, | 398 | 高中 | 发达/东方(韩国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE & AP | 语/数 |
27 | van Ryzin, | 423 | 初中、高中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE & AP | 数 |
28 | Wang, | 1157 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE &AP | GPA |
29 | Wang, | 1046 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | GPA |
30 | Wang, | 2458 | 大学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | GPA |
31 | Whaley, | 362 | 初中 | 发达/西方(美国) | 博士 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
32 | Yıldırım, | 4855 | 初中、高中 | 发展中/东方(土耳其) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 数 |
33 | Zimmer-Gembeck, | 324 | 高中 | 发达/西方(澳大利亚) | 期刊 | TS/FS & SE &AP | 综合 |
34 | 陈思亲, | 850 | 高中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS/TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 英 |
35 | 姜书睿, | 540 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 硕士 | SS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
36 | 李维, | 313 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
37 | 梁兴丽, | 4973 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | SS/TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | GPA |
38 | 路海东, | 600 | 小学 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS & SE &AP | 综合 |
39 | 王承清, | 443 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
40 | 张凤莲, | 297 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | TS/PS/FS & SE & AP | 语/数/英 |
41 | 张丽杰, | 671 | 初中 | 发展中/东方(中国) | 期刊 | PS & SE & AP | 数 |
变量关系 | K | r | 95% CI | Z | Qw | p | I2 | T2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS & AP | 14 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 10.622 | 152.148*** | 0.000 | 91.456 | 0.006 |
TS & AP | 32 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 10.435 | 310.523*** | 0.000 | 90.017 | 0.009 |
PS & AP | 20 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 6.288 | 250.518*** | 0.000 | 92.815 | 0.007 |
FS & AP | 12 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 5.934 | 62.990*** | 0.000 | 82.537 | 0.005 |
表2 同质性检验和基于随机效应模型的平均效应
变量关系 | K | r | 95% CI | Z | Qw | p | I2 | T2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS & AP | 14 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 10.622 | 152.148*** | 0.000 | 91.456 | 0.006 |
TS & AP | 32 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 10.435 | 310.523*** | 0.000 | 90.017 | 0.009 |
PS & AP | 20 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 6.288 | 250.518*** | 0.000 | 92.815 | 0.007 |
FS & AP | 12 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 5.934 | 62.990*** | 0.000 | 82.537 | 0.005 |
变量关系 | K | N | r | 95% CI | 异质性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qw | df | p | |||||||
SS & SE | 14 | 17651 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 97.764 | 581.464*** | 13 | < 0.001 |
TS & SE | 32 | 37213 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 93.007 | 443.298*** | 31 | < 0.001 |
PS & SE | 20 | 21803 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 96.335 | 518.354*** | 19 | < 0.001 |
FS & SE | 12 | 13273 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 91.714 | 232.751*** | 11 | < 0.001 |
表3 感知社会支持与学习投入的元分析结果
变量关系 | K | N | r | 95% CI | 异质性 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qw | df | p | |||||||
SS & SE | 14 | 17651 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 97.764 | 581.464*** | 13 | < 0.001 |
TS & SE | 32 | 37213 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 93.007 | 443.298*** | 31 | < 0.001 |
PS & SE | 20 | 21803 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 96.335 | 518.354*** | 19 | < 0.001 |
FS & SE | 12 | 13273 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 91.714 | 232.751*** | 11 | < 0.001 |
学段 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | |||
SS | 1 | 2.979 | 3 | 0.395 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.110 | 0.000 |
2 | 8 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 13.167 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 5 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 7.851 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 5.433 | 0.000 | ||||
TS | 1 | 7.649* | 3 | 0.044 | 7 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 7.906 | 0.000 |
2 | 18 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 7.725 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 12 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 4.922 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 2.256 | 0.010 | ||||
PS | 1 | 2.895 | 3 | 0.408 | 4 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 5.468 | 0.000 |
2 | 11 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 2.863 | 0.004 | ||||
3 | 8 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.35 | 3.293 | 0.001 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 2.489 | 0.013 | ||||
FS | 1 | 2.330 | 2 | 0.312 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | 7 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 6.558 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 6 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 4.381 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 2.786 | 0.005 |
表4 学段调节作用元分析结果
学段 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | |||
SS | 1 | 2.979 | 3 | 0.395 | 2 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 6.110 | 0.000 |
2 | 8 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 13.167 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 5 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.37 | 7.851 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 5.433 | 0.000 | ||||
TS | 1 | 7.649* | 3 | 0.044 | 7 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 7.906 | 0.000 |
2 | 18 | 0.20 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 7.725 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 12 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 4.922 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 2 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 2.256 | 0.010 | ||||
PS | 1 | 2.895 | 3 | 0.408 | 4 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 5.468 | 0.000 |
2 | 11 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 2.863 | 0.004 | ||||
3 | 8 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.35 | 3.293 | 0.001 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 2.489 | 0.013 | ||||
FS | 1 | 2.330 | 2 | 0.312 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
2 | 7 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 6.558 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 6 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 4.381 | 0.000 | ||||
4 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 2.786 | 0.005 |
经济和文化 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | ||||
SS | 经济 | 1 | 0.027 | 1 | 0.869 | 5 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 8.321 | 0.000 |
2 | 8 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 11.920 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 3.480 | 1 | 0.162 | 10 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 16.996 | 0.000 | |
4 | 3 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 7.789 | 0.000 | |||||
TS | 经济 | 1 | 0.042 | 1 | 0.837 | 20 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 7.782 | 0.000 |
2 | 11 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 6.219 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 0.346 | 1 | 0.557 | 14 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 6.786 | 0.000 | |
4 | 17 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 7.620 | 0.000 | |||||
PS | 经济 | 1 | 0.282 | 1 | 0.596 | 13 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 3.891 | 0.000 |
2 | 6 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 4.510 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 0.639 | 1 | 0.424 | 9 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 3.930 | 0.000 | |
4 | 10 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 4.785 | 0.000 | |||||
FS | 经济 | 1 | 2.067 | 1 | 0.151 | 5 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 2.324 | 0.008 |
2 | 6 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 4.365 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 2.692 | 1 | 0.101 | 7 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 5.333 | 0.000 | |
4 | 4 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 2.706 | 0.006 |
表5 经济和文化调节作用元分析结果
经济和文化 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | ||||
SS | 经济 | 1 | 0.027 | 1 | 0.869 | 5 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 8.321 | 0.000 |
2 | 8 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 11.920 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 3.480 | 1 | 0.162 | 10 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 16.996 | 0.000 | |
4 | 3 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 7.789 | 0.000 | |||||
TS | 经济 | 1 | 0.042 | 1 | 0.837 | 20 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 7.782 | 0.000 |
2 | 11 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 6.219 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 0.346 | 1 | 0.557 | 14 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 6.786 | 0.000 | |
4 | 17 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 7.620 | 0.000 | |||||
PS | 经济 | 1 | 0.282 | 1 | 0.596 | 13 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 3.891 | 0.000 |
2 | 6 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 4.510 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 0.639 | 1 | 0.424 | 9 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 3.930 | 0.000 | |
4 | 10 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 4.785 | 0.000 | |||||
FS | 经济 | 1 | 2.067 | 1 | 0.151 | 5 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 2.324 | 0.008 |
2 | 6 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 4.365 | 0.000 | |||||
文化 | 3 | 2.692 | 1 | 0.101 | 7 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 5.333 | 0.000 | |
4 | 4 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 2.706 | 0.006 |
学业成就 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | |||
SS | 1 | 6.737* | 2 | 0.034 | 8 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 10.411 | 0.000 |
2 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 8.507 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 3 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 14.781 | 0.000 | ||||
TS | 1 | 7.681** | 2 | 0.008 | 20 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 8.200 | 0.000 |
2 | 10 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 5.314 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 3.187 | 0.001 | ||||
PS | 1 | 3.103* | 2 | 0.021 | 13 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 5.903 | 0.000 |
2 | 4 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 6.399 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 7.869 | 0.009 | ||||
FS | 1 | 5.365* | 2 | 0.048 | 8 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 7.200 | 0.000 |
2 | 3 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 5.184 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 4.686 | 0.009 |
表6 学业成就调节作用元分析结果
学业成就 | 异质性分析 | 效应值及95%的置信区间 | 双尾检验 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QB | df | p | K | r | 95% | Z | p | |||
SS | 1 | 6.737* | 2 | 0.034 | 8 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 10.411 | 0.000 |
2 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 8.507 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 3 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 14.781 | 0.000 | ||||
TS | 1 | 7.681** | 2 | 0.008 | 20 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 8.200 | 0.000 |
2 | 10 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 5.314 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 2 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 3.187 | 0.001 | ||||
PS | 1 | 3.103* | 2 | 0.021 | 13 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 5.903 | 0.000 |
2 | 4 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.38 | 6.399 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 7.869 | 0.009 | ||||
FS | 1 | 5.365* | 2 | 0.048 | 8 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 7.200 | 0.000 |
2 | 3 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 5.184 | 0.000 | ||||
3 | 1 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 4.686 | 0.009 |
变量 | SS | SESS | TS | SETS | PS | SEPS | FS | SEFS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SESS | 0.385*** | — | ||||||
APSS | 0.339*** | 0.348*** | — | |||||
SETS | — | — | 0.352*** | — | ||||
APTS | — | — | 0.190*** | 0.269*** | — | |||
SEPS | — | — | — | — | 0.278*** | — | ||
APPS | — | — | — | — | 0.180*** | 0.269*** | — | |
SEFS | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.247*** | — |
APFS | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.136*** | 0.287*** |
表7 感知社会支持、学习投入、学业成就的相关矩阵
变量 | SS | SESS | TS | SETS | PS | SEPS | FS | SEFS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SESS | 0.385*** | — | ||||||
APSS | 0.339*** | 0.348*** | — | |||||
SETS | — | — | 0.352*** | — | ||||
APTS | — | — | 0.190*** | 0.269*** | — | |||
SEPS | — | — | — | — | 0.278*** | — | ||
APPS | — | — | — | — | 0.180*** | 0.269*** | — | |
SEFS | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.247*** | — |
APFS | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.136*** | 0.287*** |
中介变量 | K | a | CIa | b | CIb | ab | CIab | c' | CIc' | c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS-SE-AP | 14 | 0.39 | 0.26, 0.51 | 0.26 | 0.13, 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.05, 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.18, 0.35 | 0.34 |
TS-SE-AP | 32 | 0.35 | 0.30, 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.18, 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.06, 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.06, 0.15 | 0.19 |
PS-SE-AP | 20 | 0.28 | 0.21, 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.17, 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.04, 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.05, 0.18 | 0.18 |
FS-SE-AP | 12 | 0.25 | 0.16, 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.19, 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.04, 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.01, 0.12 | 0.14 |
表8 学习投入中介效应路径分析
中介变量 | K | a | CIa | b | CIb | ab | CIab | c' | CIc' | c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS-SE-AP | 14 | 0.39 | 0.26, 0.51 | 0.26 | 0.13, 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.05, 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.18, 0.35 | 0.34 |
TS-SE-AP | 32 | 0.35 | 0.30, 0.40 | 0.23 | 0.18, 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.06, 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.06, 0.15 | 0.19 |
PS-SE-AP | 20 | 0.28 | 0.21, 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.17, 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.04, 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.05, 0.18 | 0.18 |
FS-SE-AP | 12 | 0.25 | 0.16, 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.19, 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.04, 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.01, 0.12 | 0.14 |
路径系数 | 初中组 | 高中组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | ab | c' | a | b | ab | c' | |
SS-SE-AP | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.24 |
PS-SE-AP | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
FS-SE-AP | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
表9 学习投入中介模型的学段比较
路径系数 | 初中组 | 高中组 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | b | ab | c' | a | b | ab | c' | |
SS-SE-AP | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.24 |
PS-SE-AP | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
FS-SE-AP | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
(*为纳入元分析的文献) | |
[1] | * 陈思亲, 陈慧娟. (2021). 青少年知觉的社会支持和英文科学业成就之关系:恒毅力与学习投入之序列中介效果分析. 教育心理学报, 52(4), 857-883. |
[2] | 邓小平, 罗秀文, 邬雨臻. (2016). 父母卷入在家庭社会经济地位与学业成就间的中介作用:元分析结构方程模型. 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1844-1853. |
[3] | 范兴华, 周楠, 贺倩, 佘丽珍, 朱丹, 孟红. (2018). 农村留守儿童心理资本与学业成绩:有调节的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 551-556. |
[4] | * 姜书睿. (2020). 初中生感知社会支持与学业成就的关系 (硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南. |
[5] | * 李维, 白颖颖. (2018). 初二学生感知的教师支持如何影响学业成绩?——基于学业自我效能感与学习投入的多重中介效应分析. 教育与经济, 34(6), 86-92. |
[6] | * 梁兴丽, 何津, 周佶俊, 刘萍萍. (2020). 认知能力对学业成绩的影响: 有中介的调节模型. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 449-461. |
[7] | 廖红, 陈会昌. (2000). 中学生对同伴群体和家庭影响力的判断. 心理发展与教育, 16(4), 51-55. |
[8] | 林崇德. (主编). (2009). 发展心理学. 北京: 人民教育出版社. |
[9] | 刘莹, 郭瑞, 李文平. (2021). 什么影响了弱势职业阶层子女的学业成就——基于中国教育追踪调查基线数据的分析. 复旦教育论坛, 19(3), 54-60. |
[10] | * 路海东, 张慧秀, 袁坤锋, 陈婷, 张冬梅. (2016). 父母和教师支持与小学生学业成绩的关系:自我调节学习的中介作用. 牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (6), 127-131. |
[11] | 马芳芳. (2019). 初中生社会支持, 归因方式和学业成绩的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 西北师范大学, 兰州. |
[12] | 石学云. (2005). 学习障碍学生社会支持, 学习动机与学业成绩的关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (9), 55-59. |
[13] | 田方, 郭力平, 黄瑾. (2020). 家庭社会经济地位与儿童数学成就之间的关系——基于36项实证研究的元分析. 学前教育研究, (7), 50-63. |
[14] | * 王承清. (2021). 初中生学业坚毅, 学习投入, 教师支持与学业成绩的关系. 中小学心理健康教育, (31), 13-17. |
[15] | 王国霞, 赵扬. (2022). 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(3), 380-390. |
[16] | 肖水源, 杨德森. (1987). 社会支持对身心健康的影响. 中国心理卫生杂志, (4), 183-187. |
[17] | 曾琦, 芦咏莉, 邹泓, 董奇, 陈欣银. (1997). 父母教育方式与儿童的学校适应. 心理发展与教育, 13(2), 46-51. |
[18] | * 张凤莲, 李桢. (2019). 谁的支持对提升初中生学业成绩更有效. 现代基础教育研究, 34(2), 138-145. |
[19] | * 张丽杰, 莫宗赵, 周莹. (2021). 父母自主支持对初中生数学学业成绩的影响——一个有调节的中介模型. 教育测量与评价, (8), 54-62. |
[20] |
Ahmed W., Minnaert A., van der Werf G., & Kuyper H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents' achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9367-7
doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9367-7 URL pmid: 20091215 |
[21] |
* Archambault I., Pagani L. S., & Fitzpatrick C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003 URL |
[22] |
Barrera M. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 413-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922627
doi: 10.1007/BF00922627 URL |
[23] |
Benner A. D., & Mistry R. S. (2007). Congruence of mother and teacher educational expectations and low-income youth's academic competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.140
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.140 URL |
[24] | Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., & Rothstein H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, Britain: John Wiley & Sons. |
[25] |
Bronfenbrenner U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723 URL |
[26] |
* Bryce C. I., Bradley R. H., Abry T., Swanson J., & Thompson M. S. (2019). Parents’ and teachers’ academic influences, behavioral engagement, and first-and fifth- grade achievement. School Psychology, 34(5), 492-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000297
doi: 10.1037/spq0000297 URL |
[27] | * Calero F. R. (2012). Fifth-grade English language learner academic self-concept, student-teacher relationships, self- regulated learning, parental academic support, native language support, interest, usage, proficiency and academic achievement (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Dowling College, Brookhaven. |
[28] |
* Chan C. S., Rhodes J. E., Howard W. J., Lowe S. R., Schwartz S. E., & Herrera C. (2013). Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring: The mediating role of parent and teacher relationships. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.10.001 URL pmid: 23375177 |
[29] |
Chen C. -T., Chen C. -F., Hu J. -L., & Wang C. -C. (2013). A study on the influence of self-concept, social support and academic achievement on occupational choice intention. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0153-2
doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0153-2 URL |
[30] |
* Chen J. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents' academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77-127. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127
doi: 10.3200/MONO.131.2.77-127 URL |
[31] |
* Chen W. B., & Gregory A. (2009). Parental involvement as a protective factor during the transition to high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231250
doi: 10.1080/00220670903231250 URL |
[32] | Cheung M. W. L. (2015b). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Chichester, Britain: John Wiley & Sons. |
[33] |
Cheung M. W. L., & Cheung S. F. (2016). Random‐effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Review, issues, and illustrations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1166
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1166 URL |
[34] |
Chu P. S., Saucier D. A., & Hafner E. (2010). Meta-analysis of the relationships between social support and well-being in children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(6), 624-645. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624
doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.6.624 URL |
[35] | Cirik I. (2015). Relationships between social support, motivation, and science achievement: Structural equation modeling. Anthropologist, 20(1-2), 232-242. |
[36] |
Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 URL pmid: 19565683 |
[37] | Connell J. P., & Wellborn J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness:A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R.Gunnar, & L. A.Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Vol. 23: Self processes and development (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
[38] | Crawley M. (2014). An analysis of the impact of social support and selected demographics on physical activity, dietary behavior and academic achievement among middle and high school students (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Kent State University. |
[39] |
* de Bruyn E. H. (2005). Role strain, engagement and academic achievement in early adolescence. Educational Studies, 31(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569042000310930
doi: 10.1080/0305569042000310930 URL |
[40] |
* Dotterer A. M., & Lowe K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649-1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5
doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5 URL pmid: 21400208 |
[41] | * Dupont S., Galand B., & Nils F. (2015). The impact of different sources of social support on academic performance: Intervening factors and mediated pathways in the case of master's thesis. European Review of Applied Psychology, 65(5), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.08.003 |
[42] |
Fan X., & Chen M. (2001). Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385
doi: 10.1023/A:1009048817385 URL |
[43] | * Federici R. A., & Skaalvik E. M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n1p21 |
[44] |
Fredricks J. A., Blumenfeld P. C., & Paris A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059 URL |
[45] |
* Ganotice F. A., & King R. B. (2013). Social influences on students’ academic engagement and science achievement. Psychological Studies, 59(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-013-0215-9
doi: 10.1007/s12646-013-0215-9 URL |
[46] |
Gutiérrez M., & Tomás J. M. (2019). The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 729-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519 URL |
[47] | Hagger M., Chatzisarantis N. L., Hein V., Soos I., Karsai I., Lintunen T., & Leemans S. (2009). Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure- time physical activity: A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations. Psychology & Health, 24(6), 689-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440801956192 |
[48] |
* Hernandez L., Oubrayrie-Roussel N., & Prêteur Y. (2015). Educational goals and motives as possible mediators in the relationship between social support and academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0252-y
doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0252-y URL |
[49] |
Jak S., & Cheung M. W. -L. (2020). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters. Psychological Methods, 25(4), 430-455. https:// doi.org/10.1037/met0000245
doi: 10.1037/met0000245 URL pmid: 31670537 |
[50] |
* Jelas Z. M., Azman N., Zulnaidi H., & Ahmad N. A. (2016). Learning support and academic achievement among Malaysian adolescents: The mediating role of student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9202-5
doi: 10.1007/s10984-015-9202-5 URL |
[51] |
* Jen T. -H., Lee C. -D., Chien C. -L., Hsu Y. -S., & Chen K. -M. (2013). Perceived social relationships and science learning outcomes for Taiwanese eighth graders: Structural equation modeling with a complex sampling consideration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 575-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9355-y
doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9355-y URL |
[52] |
Jeynes W. H. (2003). A meta-analysis: The effects of parental involvement on minority children’s academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124502239392
doi: 10.1177/0013124502239392 URL |
[53] |
* Jungert T., & Koestner R. (2015). Science adjustment, parental and teacher autonomy support and the cognitive orientation of science students. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.828826
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.828826 URL |
[54] |
* King R. B., & Ganotice F. A. (2014). The social underpinnings of motivation and achievement: Investigating the role of parents, teachers, and peers on academic outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0148-z
doi: 10.1007/s40299-013-0148-z URL |
[55] |
* Lam S. F., Jimerson S., Kikas E., Cefai C., Veiga F. H., Nelson B., … Zollneritsch J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.004 URL |
[56] |
Levitt M. J., Guacci-Franco N., & Levitt J. L. (1994). Social support and achievement in childhood and early adolescene: A multi-cultural study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(94)90013-2
doi: 10.1016/0193-3973(94)90013-2 URL |
[57] |
Ma L., Liu J., & Li B. (2022). The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement: The moderating effect of parental involvement. Psychology in the Schools, 59(2), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22608
doi: 10.1002/pits.v59.2 URL |
[58] |
Malecki C. K., & Demaray M. K. (2006). Social support as a buffer in the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(4), 375-395.
doi: 10.1037/h0084129 URL |
[59] |
* Maurizi L. K., Ceballo R., Epstein-Ngo Q., & Cortina K. S. (2013). Does neighborhood belonging matter? Examining school and neighborhood belonging as protective factors for Latino adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(2-3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajop.12017
doi: 10.1111/ajop.12017 URL |
[60] | * Mo Y., & Singh K. (2008). Parents’ relationships and involvement: Effects on students’ school engagement and performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(10), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2008.11462053 |
[61] |
* Murray C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608322940
doi: 10.1177/0272431608322940 URL |
[62] | Nwokedi P. C. (2020). The relationship between students math test scores and their reported at-home parental academic support (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Northcentral University, La Jolla. |
[63] |
* Patrick H., Ryan A. M., & Kaplan A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83 URL |
[64] |
* Perry J. C., Liu X., & Pabian Y. (2010). School engagement as a mediator of academic performance among urban youth: The role of career preparation, parental career support, and teacher support. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(2), 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009349272
doi: 10.1177/0011000009349272 URL |
[65] |
Robbins S. B., Lauver K., Le H., Davis D., Langley R., & Carlstrom A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 URL pmid: 14979772 |
[66] |
Roorda D. L., Koomen H. M. Y., Spilt J. L., & Oort F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
doi: 10.3102/0034654311421793 URL |
[67] | Rosenthal R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London, Britain: Sage Publications. |
[68] | Rubin K. H., Bukowski W. M., & Parker J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N.Eisenberg, W.Damon, & R. M.Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 571-645). Hoboken, America: John Wiley & Sons. |
[69] |
Russell J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
doi: 10.1037/h0077714 URL |
[70] |
Ruzek E. A., Hafen C. A., Allen J. P., Gregory A., Mikami A. Y., & Pianta R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004 URL pmid: 28190936 |
[71] |
Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 URL pmid: 11392867 |
[72] |
Sarason I. G., Levine H. M., Basham R. B., & Sarason B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.127 URL |
[73] | * Sia N. (2014). Perceived social support, achievement motivation and academic achievement of rural adolescents. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(4), 452-456. |
[74] | * Siu O. L., Lo B. C. Y., Ng T. K., & Wang H. (2021). Social support and student outcomes: The mediating roles of psychological capital, study engagement, and problem- focused coping. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01621-x |
[75] | * Smithikrai C., Homklin T., Pusapanich P., Wongpinpech V., & Kreausukon P. (2018). Factors influencing students’ academic success: The mediating role of study engagement. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(1), 1-14. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/100674 |
[76] |
* Sohn W. S., & Bae J. H. (2014). Relationships of mothers’ versus teachers’ autonomy support with student’s academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 19(3), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2014.19.3.004
doi: 10.18205/kpa URL |
[77] |
Tao Y., Meng Y., Gao Z., & Yang X. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168
doi: 10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168 URL |
[78] | Tayfur C., & Ulupinar S. (2016). The effect of perceived social support on academic achievement in health college students. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5505/phd.2016.52523 |
[79] |
Tennant J. E., Demaray M. K., Malecki C. K., Terry M. N., Clary M., & Elzinga N. (2015). Students' ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well- being. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4), 494-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000106
doi: 10.1037/spq0000106 URL pmid: 25528592 |
[80] |
* van Ryzin M. J. (2011). Protective factors at school: Reciprocal effects among adolescents’ perceptions of the school environment, engagement in learning, and hope. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1568-1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9637-7
doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9637-7 URL pmid: 21298474 |
[81] |
Vargas-Madriz L. F., & Konishi C. (2021). The relationship between social support and student academic involvement: The mediating role of school belonging. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 36(4), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211034713
doi: 10.1177/08295735211034713 URL pmid: 34690419 |
[82] |
Vasquez A. C., Patall E. A., Fong C. J., Corrigan A. S., & Pine L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 605-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z
doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z URL |
[83] |
Viechtbauer W., & Cheung M. W. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.11 URL pmid: 26061377 |
[84] |
Wang M. T., & Eccles J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
doi: 10.1111/cdev.2012.83.issue-3 URL |
[85] |
* Wang M. T., & Eccles J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002 URL |
[86] |
* Wang M. T., & Holcombe R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
doi: 10.3102/0002831209361209 URL |
[87] | * Wang S., & Zhang D. (2020). Perceived teacher feedback and academic performance: The mediating effect of learning engagement and moderating effect of assessment characteristics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 973-987. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1718599 |
[88] | * Whaley K. A. (2012). The relationship between teachers' autonomy support and students' intrinsic motivation and academic achievement in middle grades mathematics: A self-determination theory perspective (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Mercer University, Atlanta. |
[89] |
Wilder S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
doi: 10.1080/00131911.2013.780009 URL |
[90] |
* Yıldırım S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596855
doi: 10.1080/00220973.2011.596855 URL |
[91] |
Zimet G. D., Dahlem N. W., Zimet S. G., & Farley G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 URL |
[92] |
* Zimmer-Gembeck M. J., Chipuer H. M., Hanisch M., Creed P. A., & Mc Gregor L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 911-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008
URL pmid: 16750848 |
[1] | 李莹, 赵鸿瑜, 张木军, 范子璇, 王悦. 执行控制的双语优势效应及其调节变量:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(6): 970-987. |
[2] | 张婷, 张珂霖, 周仁来. 经前期综合征女性的HPA轴功能失调:一项基于皮质醇水平的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(6): 988-1001. |
[3] | 李亚丹, 杜颖, 谢聪, 刘春宇, 杨毅隆, 李阳萍, 邱江. 语义距离与创造性思维关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 519-534. |
[4] | 曾润喜, 李游. 自我效能感与网络健康信息搜寻关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 535-551. |
[5] | 郭英, 田鑫, 胡东, 白书琳, 周蜀溪. 羞愧对亲社会行为影响的三水平元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(3): 371-385. |
[6] | 陈必忠, 孙晓军. 中国内地大学生时间管理倾向的时代变迁:1999~2020[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 1968-1980. |
[7] | 杜宇飞, 欧阳辉月, 余林. 隔代抚养与老年人抑郁水平:一项基于东西方文化背景的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 1981-1992. |
[8] | 赵宁, 刘鑫, 李纾, 郑蕊. 默认选项设置的助推效果:来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(6): 1230-1241. |
[9] | 黄潇潇, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地小学生心理健康问题检出率的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 953-964. |
[10] | 张亚利, 靳娟娟, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地初中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 965-977. |
[11] | 于晓琪, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地高中生心理健康问题检出率的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 978-990. |
[12] | 陈雨濛, 张亚利, 俞国良. 2010~2020中国内地大学生心理健康问题检出率的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 991-1004. |
[13] | 王佳燕, 蓝媛美, 李超平. 二元工作压力与员工创新关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 761-780. |
[14] | 林新奇, 栾宇翔, 赵锴, 赵国龙. 领导风格与员工创新绩效关系的元分析:基于自我决定视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 781-801. |
[15] | 刘俊材, 冉光明, 张琪. 不同情绪载体的神经活动及其异同——脑成像研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 536-555. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||