场景知觉过程中的动作意图识别

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01617

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

场景即我们生活于其中的真实环境, 社会场景是其重要组成部分。在社会场景知觉的研究中, 动作意图的识别既受场景背景信息的影响, 也与动作的客观对象有关。因此, 研究者可以根据背景-刺激物、刺激物-刺激物关系, 探索动作识别的影响机制; 另一方面, 也可以根据场景的语义约束和物理限制, 依据合理动作原则及其伴随的生理指标检测并识别动作意图。在机器视觉研究领域, 计算机识别模型为社会场景中动作意图的检测和识别提供了新的视角。在未来的研究中, 研究者需要考虑真实场景中动作意图识别能力的发展、动作意图识别的个体差异和文化差异等问题。

关键词: 社会场景, 动作意图, 场景知觉, 计算机识别模型

Abstract:

A social scene plays a crucial part in the real physical world that people live in. In social scene perception studies, recognition of actions and associated intentions can be influenced not only by the background information of the scene, but can also be related to the object of an action. Therefore, researchers could follow the relationships between the background and an object, or among various objects for analyzing the mechanism of action recognition. However, to detect and recognize an action and its associated intention, researchers could also employ semantics restriction and physical baffle of scene, and incorporate the principle of rational action for studying the biological signs following an action. In the field of machine vision, new research is emerging on models of computer recognition that are based on human-object interaction. In the future, researchers can consider the development of action and intention identification capacity, and can study the differences among individuals of various cultures for improving the studies conducted in this field of research.

Key words: social scene, action and intention, scene perception, model of computer recognition.

中图分类号:

B842

康廷虎, 薛西. (2018). 场景知觉过程中的动作意图识别. 心理科学进展 , 26(9), 1617-1623.

Tinghu KANG, Xi XUE. (2018). Recognition of action and intention in real-world scene perception. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1617-1623.

参考文献

1	白学军, 康廷虎, 闫国利 . ( 2008). 真实情景中刺激物识别的理论模型与研究回顾. 心理科学进展, 16( 5), 679-686.
2	陈亚萍, 李晓东 . ( 2013). 婴儿动作理解的研究回顾与展望. 心理科学进展, 21( 4), 671-678.
3	杜有田, 陈峰, 徐文立, 李永彬 . ( 2007). 基于视觉的人的运动识别综述. 电子学报, 35( 1), 84-90.
4	康廷虎, 白学军 . ( 2008). 真实情景知觉中注视控制的研究进展. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 45( 4), 107-111.
5	李红, 何磊 . ( 2003). 儿童早期的动作发展对认知发展的作用. 心理科学进展, 11( 3), 315-320.
6	黎洪松, 李达 . ( 2009). 人体运动分析研究的若干新进展. 模式识别与人工智能, 22( 1), 70-78.
7	王福兴, 田宏杰, 申继亮 . ( 2009). 场景知觉及其研究范式. 心理科学进展, 17( 2), 268-277.
8	徐光祐, 曹媛媛 . ( 2009). 动作识别与行为理解综述. 中国图象图形学报, 14( 2), 189-195.
9	Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. ( 2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5( 4), 171-178.
10	Bonchek-Dokow, E., & Kaminka, G. A. ( 2014). Towards computational models of intention detection and intention prediction. Cognitive Systems Research, 28, 44-79.
11	Cacippo J. T., Berntson G. G., & Decety J. ( 2010). Social neuroscience and its relationship to social psychology. Social Cognition, 28( 6), 675-685.
12	Carpenter M., Akhtar N., & Tomasello M. ( 1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior & Development, 21( 2), 315-330.
13	Catmur, C. ( 2015). Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 426-433.
14	Cerf M., Harel J., Einhäuser W., & Koch C. ( 2007). Predicting human gaze using low-level saliency combined with face detection. In Proceedings of the 20th International conference on neural information processing systems( pp. 241-248). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Curran Associates Inc.
15	Choi, D. ( 2013). Design and implementation of context awareness system for abnormal behavior detection. Unpublished results. Dept of Computer Science, Gachon University.
16	Delaitre V., Sivic J., & Laptev I. ( 2011). Learning person-object interactions for action recognition in still images. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on neural information processing systems( pp. 1503-1511). Granada, Spain: Curran Associates Inc.
17	den Ouden, H. E. M., Frith.U., Frith C., & Blakemore S. J. ( 2005). Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage, 28( 4), 787-796.
18	Desai C., Ramanan D., & Fowlkes C. ( 2010). Discriminative models for static human-object interactions. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 9-16.
19	Divvala S. K., Hoiem D., Hays J. H., & Efros A. A. ( 2009). An empirical study of context in object detection. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition ( pp. 1271-1278). Miami, Florida, USA: IEEE.
20	Friedman, A. ( 1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108( 3), 316-355.
21	Gibson, B. S., & Kingston, A. ( 2006). Visual attention and the semantics of space. Psychological Science, 17( 7), 622-627.
22	Gibson, J. J. ( 1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
23	Gupta A., Kembhavi A., & Davis L. S. ( 2009). Observing human-object interactions: Using spatial and functional compatibility for recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31( 10), 1775-1789.
24	Henderson, J. M. ( 2005). Introduction to real-world scene perception. Visual Cognition, 12( 6), 849-851.
25	Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. ( 1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50( 1), 243-271.
26	Jang Y. M., Lee S., Mallipeddi R., Kwak, H. W, & Lee, M. ( 2013). Intent probing monitoring system based on eye movement analysis and probability. The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers, 36( 1), 1518-1521.
27	Kingstone A., Smilek D., Ristic J., Friesen C. K., & Eastwood J. D. ( 2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12( 5), 176-180.
28	Király I., Jovanovic B., Prinz W., Aschersleben G., & Gergely G. ( 2003). The early origins of goal attribution in infancy. Consciousness and Cognition, 12( 4), 752-769.
29	Klaser A., Marszek M., Laptev I., & Schmid C. ( 2010). Will person detection help bag-of-features action recognition? European Journal of Neuroscience, 23( 2), 365-373.
30	Koppula H. S., Gupta R., & Saxena A. ( 2013). Learning human activities and object affordances from RGB-D videos. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32( 8), 951-970.
31	Marszalek M., Laptev I., & Schmid C. ( 2009). Actions in context. In IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition( pp. 2929-2936). Miami, FL: IEEE.
32	Meltzoff, A. N. ( 2007). The “like me” framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica, 124( 1), 26-43.
33	Muehlhaus J., Heim S., Altenbach F., Chatterjee A., Habel U., & Sass K. ( 2014). Deeper insights into semantic relations: An fMRI study of part-whole and functional associations. Brain & Language, 129, 30-42.
34	Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. ( 2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 12), 520-527.
35	Park H., Lee S., Lee M., Chang M. S., & Kwak H. W. ( 2016). Using eye movement data to infer human behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 796-804.
36	Rabinovich A., Vedaldi A., Galleguillos C., Wiewiora E., & Belongie S. ( 2007). Objects in context. In IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision( pp. 1-8). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IEEE.
37	Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. ( 2010). When competition merges people’s behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 6), 1130-1133.
38	Sartori L., Becchio C., & Castiello U. ( 2011). Cues to intention: The role of movement information. Cognition, 119( 2), 242-252.
39	Satpute A. B., Fenker D. B., Waldmann M. R., Tabibnia G., Holyoak K. J., & Lieberman M. D. ( 2005). An fMRI study of causal judgments. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22( 5), 1233-1238.
40	Sebanz N., Bekkering H., & Knoblich G. ( 2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10( 2), 70-76.
41	Sukthankar G., Geib C., Bui H. H., Pynadath D., & Goldman R. P. ( 2014). Plan, activity, and intent recognition: Theory and practice (pp. 19-20). London: Morgan Kaufmann.
42	Wang Y. W., Lin C. D., Yuan B., Huang L., Zhang W. X., & Shen D. L. ( 2010). Person perception precedes theory of mind: An event related potential analysis. Neuroscience, 170( 1), 238-246.
43	Wang Y. W., Zheng Y. W., Lin C. D., Wu J., & Shen D. L. ( 2011). Electrophysiological correlates of reading the single- and interactive-mind. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00064
44	Watson, J. S. ( 2005). The elementary nature of purposive behavior: Evolving minimal neural structures that display intrinsic intentionality. Evolutionary Psychology, 3( 1), 24-48.
45	Yao, B. P., & Fei-Fei, L. ( 2010). Modeling mutual context of object and human pose in human-object interaction activities. In Proceedings of the 23th IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition( pp. 17-24). San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE.
46	Yao, B. P., & Fei-Fei, L. ( 2012). Recognizing human-object interactions in still images by modeling the mutual context of objects and human poses. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and machine Intelligence, 34( 9), 1691-1703.
47	Ziaeefard, M., & Bergevin, R. ( 2015). Semantic human activity recognition: A literature review. Pattern Recognition, 48( 8), 2329-2345.

[1]	陈亚萍;李晓东. 婴儿动作理解的研究回顾与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.
[2]	王福兴;田宏杰;申继亮. 场景知觉及其研究范式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 268-277.