自主任务转换中的重构和干扰

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01624

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

任务转换是研究执行功能的常用范式。任务转换通常伴随着转换代价：执行转换任务比重复任务的反应时更长、错误率更高。转换代价可能反映了任务设置重构(重构理论), 也可能表明任务之间存在干扰(干扰理论)。与任务线索范式相比, 自主任务转换范式更具生态效度, 而且不仅能获得转换代价这个传统结果, 还引入了任务选择比例、任务转换率等新指标, 其结果倾向于支持重构理论。此外, 新近研究指出自主任务转换可能也包含干扰的作用。未来, 应通过进一步改进实验范式等方法, 实现两大理论的融合。

关键词: 执行功能, 任务转换, 重构, 干扰, 自主任务转换范式

Abstract:

Task switching is often used for studying executive functions. Task switching is usually associated with switch costs: longer reaction times and higher error rates on task-switch trials compared to task-repeat trials. Switch costs are attributed to task-set reconfiguration (reconfiguration view), or interference between different tasks (interference view). Compared with task cuing paradigm, the voluntary task switching paradigm is considered to be more ecologically valid. With this new paradigm, researchers could achieve not only traditional indicators like switch costs, but also new measures such as proportions of task selection and task switching rates. Studies of voluntary task switching are in favor of reconfiguration view. However, some recent reports found that interference may also play a role in voluntary task switching. In the future, modifications of the experimental paradigm should be made for a possible theoretical integration.

Key words: executive function, task switching, reconfiguration, interference, voluntary task switching paradigm

中图分类号:

B842

蒋浩. (2018). 自主任务转换中的重构和干扰. 心理科学进展 , 26(9), 1624-1631.

JIANG Hao. (2018). Reconfiguration and interference in voluntary task switching. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1624-1631.

参考文献

1	刘丽婷 . ( 2016). 恐惧和愤怒对认知控制的影响. 心理学探新, 36, 31-35.
2	孙天义, 肖鑫, 郭春彦 . ( 2007). 转换加工研究回顾. 心理科学进展, 15, 761-767.
3	王振宏, 刘亚, 蒋长好 . ( 2013). 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响. 心理学报, 45, 546-555.
4	Allport A., Styles E. A., & Hsieh, S.( 1994). Shifting attentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C Umiltà & M Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5	Allport A., & Wylie, G. ( 2000) . Task switching, stimulus- response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 36-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6	Altmann, E. M. ( 2004). The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153-163.
7	Arrington, C. M. ( 2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 991-997.
8	Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. ( 2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
9	Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. ( 2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 683-702.
10	Arrington C. M., Logan G. D., & Schneider D. W. ( 2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484-502.
11	Arrington, C. M., & Reiman, K. M. ( 2015). Task frequency influences stimulus-driven effects on task selection during voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1089-1095.
12	Arrington, C. M., & Weaver, S. M. ( 2015). Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 664-679.
13	Arrington C. M., Weaver S. M., & Pauker R. L. ( 2010). Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1060-1067.
14	Arrington, C. M., & Yates, M. M. ( 2009). The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 660-665.
15	Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. ( 2015). Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology, 66( 1), 83-113.
16	Braem, S. ( 2017). Conditioning task switching behavior. Cognition, 166, 272-276.
17	Braun, D. A., & Arrington, C. M. ( 2018). Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 82, 54-64.
18	Chen, P. Y., & Hsieh, S. ( 2013). When the voluntary mind meets the irresistible event: Stimulus-response correspondence effects on task selection during voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1195-1205.
19	Demanet, J., & Liefooghe, B. ( 2014). Component processes in voluntary task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 843-860.
20	Demanet J., Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 387-393.
21	Dignath D., Kiesel A., & Eder A. B. ( 2015). Flexible conflict management: Conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 975-988.
22	Dunn T. L., Lutes D. J. C., & Risko E. F. ( 2016). Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1372-1387.
23	Forstmann B. U., Brass M., Koch I., & von Cramon, D. Y. ( 2006). Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 388-398.
24	Forstmann B. U., Ridderinkhof K. R., Kaiser J., & Bledowski C. ( 2007). At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex. C ognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 286-296.
25	Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. ( 2016). How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 285-295.
26	Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. ( 2017). Keep flexible-Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Cognition, 162, 48-53.
27	Gollan T. H., Kleinman D., & Wierenga C. E. ( 2014). What’s easier: Doing what you want, or being told what to do? Cued versus voluntary language and task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2167-2195.
28	Hardy, M., & Gillan, D. J. ( 2012, September). Voluntary task switching patterns in everyday tasks of different motivational levels. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 2128-2132). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
29	Hübner, R., & Druey, M. D. ( 2006). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response- related repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research, 70, 245-261.
30	Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A. M., & Koch I. ( 2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
31	Kleinsorge, T., & Scheil, J. ( 2015). Effects of reducing the number of candidate tasks in voluntary task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1555.
32	Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., & Philipp A. M. ( 2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17( 1), 1-14.
33	Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. ( 2014). A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 131-141.
34	Liefooghe, B. ( 2017). The contribution of task-choice response selection to the switch cost in voluntary task switching. Acta Psychologica, 178, 32-40.
35	Liefooghe B., Demanet J., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2009). Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 850-857.
36	Liefooghe B., Demanet J., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Persisting activation in voluntary task switching: It all depends on the instructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 381-386.
37	Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. ( 2008). Inhibition of task set: Converging evidence from task choice in the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1111-1116.
38	Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. ( 2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
39	Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. ( 2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832-840.
40	Masson, M. E. J., & Carruthers, S. ( 2014). Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1944-1958.
41	Mayr, U., & Bell, T. ( 2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17, 774-780.
42	Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. ( 2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
43	Meiran, N. ( 1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
44	Meiran N., Kessler Y., & Adi-Japha E. ( 2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473-500.
45	Mittelstädt V., Dignath D., Schmidt-Ott M., & Kiesel A. ( 2018). Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Psychological Research, 82( 1), 78-91.
46	Monsell, S. ( 2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7( 3), 134-140.
47	Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. ( 2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493-516.
48	Orr, J. M., & Weissman, D. H. ( 2011). Succumbing to bottom-up biases on task choice predicts increased switch costs in the voluntary task switching paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 31.
49	Perlman A., Pothos E. M., Edwards D. J., & Tzelgov J. ( 2010). Task-relevant chunking in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 649-661.
50	Rangelov D., Töllner T., Müller H. J., & Zehetleitner M. ( 2013). What are task-sets: A single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 524.
51	Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2006). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 623-640.
52	Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2007). Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 370-378.
53	Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2015). Chunking away task-switch costs: A test of the chunk-point hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 884-889.
54	Umemoto, A., & Holroyd, C. B. ( 2015). Task-specific effects of reward on task switching. Psychological Research, 79, 698-707.
55	van Loy B., Liefooghe B., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: Cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1916-1935.
56	Vandierendonck A., Demanet J., Liefooghe B., & Verbruggen F. ( 2012). A chain-retrieval model for voluntary task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 241-283.
57	Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., & Verbruggen F. ( 2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626.
58	Weaver S. M., Foxe J. J., Shpaner M., & Wylie G. R. ( 2014). You can't always get what you want: The influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2247-2259.
59	Yeung, N. ( 2010). Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 348-362.

[1]	余婕, 陈有国. 时空干扰效应：基于贝叶斯模型的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 597-607.
[2]	管蕾, 罗文佩, 韩佳慧. 多感觉整合范式中潜在的跨通道转换效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(5): 1018-1027.
[3]	麻雅洁, 赵鑫, 贺相春, 任丽萍. 社交媒体使用对执行功能的影响：有益还是有害?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 406-413.
[4]	程诚, 郭培杨, 杨丽, 王梦雅. 基于三元精神病态模型的精神病态认知-情感加工框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1628-1646.
[5]	赵宏明, 董燕萍. 口译员的认知转换优势[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 625-634.
[6]	梁静, 阮倩男, 李贺, 马梦晴, 颜文靖. 认知负荷取向下基于记忆-反应冲突的欺骗检测[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1619-1630.
[7]	宫栋宇, 张峻皓, 孙沛. 干扰刺激的强度对注意捕获的影响：基于额外奇异刺激范式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 26-26.
[8]	陈娟, 张烨. 视觉掩蔽对汉字识别影响的脑成像探究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 117-117.
[9]	龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[10]	张斌, 刘莹. 急性有氧运动对认知表现的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1058-1071.
[11]	王梓宇, 孔子叶, 朱荣娟, 游旭群. 任务转换训练和执行功能可塑性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1667-1676.
[12]	康丹, 曾莉. 早期儿童数学学习与执行功能的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1661-1669.
[13]	王晨茜, 陈天勇, 韩布新. 前额叶在老年阶段的可塑性及相关机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 2003-2012.
[14]	李明英, 吴惠宁, 蒯曙光, 张畅芯. 虚拟现实技术在执行功能评估中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 933-942.
[15]	陈杰, 刘雷, 王蓉, 沈海洲. 音乐训练对执行功能的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1854-1864.