心理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1131-1140.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01131
• 研究前沿 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2016-11-16
出版日期:
2018-06-10
发布日期:
2018-04-28
通讯作者:
翁清雄
E-mail:wqx886@ustc.edu.cn
Received:
2016-11-16
Online:
2018-06-10
Published:
2018-04-28
Contact:
WENG Qingxiong
E-mail:wqx886@ustc.edu.cn
摘要:
多源评价在国外企业中的运用已日益成熟, 但在我国还停留在探索与发展阶段。基于已有的研究发现, 围绕评价过程、评价源及被评价者三方面对多源评价的特点及内在机制进行了探讨与分析。从评价过程看, 其评价目的具有多重性, 评价形式注重匿名性, 且评价结果的合理应用非常重要; 从评价源看, 不同评价源间的评价一致性较低, 且易造成晕轮效应和宽大效应; 从被评价者来看, 个体对多源评价结果的反应, 受到个性特征、反馈信号及自我-他人评价间差距等因素影响。研究也发现, 多源评价所带来的绩效改进结果具有不稳定性。基于此, 如何提高多源评价过程的有效性与准确性, 改善评价者对评价结果的反应, 以及如何对多源评价结果进行有效汇总等是未来值得研究的重要内容。
中图分类号:
张赟, 翁清雄. (2018). 多源评价的特点与内在机制. 心理科学进展 , 26(6), 1131-1140.
ZHANG Yun, WENG Qingxiong. (2018). The analysis of characteristics and internal mechanisms of multisource feedback. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(6), 1131-1140.
[1] |
刘凤瑜 . ( 2000). 一种有效的效绩评价模式: 360度反馈的基本原理与过程. 南开管理评论, ( 1), 71-74.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2000.01.017 URL |
[2] |
陆昌勤, 方俐洛, 凌文辁 . ( 2001). 360度反馈及其在人力资源管理中的效用. 中国管理科学, 9( 3), 74-80.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-207X.2001.03.012 URL |
[3] | 许庆瑞, 王勇, 陈劲 . ( 2002). 绩效评价源与多源评价. 科研管理, 23( 3), 84-89. |
[4] |
Amundsen, S.,& Martinsen, Ø. L . ( 2014). Self-other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates' job satisfaction and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 4), 784-800.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.007 URL |
[5] |
Antonioni, D.,& Park, H.(2001). The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management, 27( 4), 479-495.
doi: 10.1177/014920630102700405 URL |
[6] |
Atwater,L. E., & Brett, J. F . ( 2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66( 3), 532-548.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.003 URL |
[7] |
Atwater,L. E., & Brett, J. F . ( 2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group & Organization Management, 31( 5), 578-600.
doi: 10.1177/1059601106286887 URL |
[8] |
Atwater,L. E, Brett, J. F., & Charles, A. C . ( 2007). Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice. Human Resource Management, 46( 2), 285-307.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.20161 URL |
[9] |
Atwater L. E., Wang M., Smither J. W., & Fleenor J. W . ( 2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94( 4), 876-886.
doi: 10.1037/a0014561 URL pmid: 19594231 |
[10] |
Beenen G., Pichler S., & Levy P. E . ( 2017). Self-determined feedback seeking: The role of perceived supervisor autonomy support. Human Resource Management, 56( 4), 555-569.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21787 URL |
[11] |
Bernardin H. J., Tyler C. L., & Villanova P . ( 2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 17( 3), 300-310.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00472.x URL |
[12] |
Bernardin H. J., Konopaske R., & Hagan C. M . ( 2012). A comparison of adverse impact levels based on top-down, multisource, and assessment center data: Promoting diversity and reducing legal challenges. Human Resource Management, 51( 3), 313-341.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21472 URL |
[13] |
Bernardin H. J., Thomason S., Buckley M. R., & Kane J. S . ( 2016). Rater rating-level bias and accuracy in performance appraisals: The impact of rater personality, performance management competence, and rater accountability. Human Resource Management, 55( 2), 321-340.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21678 URL |
[14] |
Beus J. M., Jarrett S. M., Bergman M. E., & Payne S. C . ( 2012). Perceptual equivalence of psychological climates within groups: When agreement indices do not agree. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85( 3), 454-471.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02049.x URL |
[15] |
Bono,J. E, & Colbert, A. E . ( 2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58( 1), 171-203.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00633.x URL |
[16] |
Bono J. E., Hooper A. C., & Yoon D. J . ( 2012). Impact of rater personality on transformational and transactional leadership ratings. The Leadership Quarterly, 23( 1), 132-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.011 URL |
[17] |
Braddy P. W., Gooty J., Fleenor J. W., & Yammarino F. J . ( 2014). Leader behaviors and career derailment potential: A multi-analytic method examination of rating source and self-other agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 2), 373-390.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.001 URL |
[18] |
Brett,J. F., & Atwater, L. E . ( 2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 5), 930-942.
doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.930 URL |
[19] |
Brown, M.,& Benson, J.(2003). Rated to exhaustion? Reactions to performance appraisal processes. Industrial Relations Journal, 34( 1), 67-81.
doi: 10.1111/1468-2338.00259 URL |
[20] |
Brown A., Inceoglu I., & Lin Y . ( 2017). Preventing rater biases in 360-degree feedback by forcing choice. Organizational Research Methods, 20( 1), 121-148.
doi: 10.1177/1094428116668036 URL |
[21] |
Brutus, S.,& Derayeh, M.(2002). Multisource assessment programs in organizations: An insider's perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13( 2), 187-202.
doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1023 URL |
[22] |
Carson, M.(2006). Saying it like it isn't: The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback. Business Horizons, 49( 5), 395-402.
doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.01.004 URL |
[23] | Chappelow,C. T . ( 2004). 360-degree feedback. In C. D. McCauley & E. van Velsor (Eds.), The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 58-84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[24] |
Conway J. M., Lombardo K., & Sanders K. C . ( 2001). A meta-analysis of incremental validity and nomological networks for subordinate and peer rating. Human Performance, 14( 4), 267-303.
doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1404_1 URL |
[25] |
Culbertson S. S., Henning J. B., & Payne S. C . ( 2013). Performance appraisal satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12( 4), 189-195.
doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000096 URL |
[26] |
Eckert R., Ekelund B. Z., Gentry W. A., & Dawson J. F . ( 2010). I don't see me like you see me, but is that a problem? Cultural influences on rating discrepancy in 360-degree feedback instruments. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19( 3), 259-278.
doi: 10.1080/13594320802678414 URL |
[27] |
Facteau,J. D., & Craig, S. B . ( 2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 2), 215-227.
doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.215 URL pmid: 11393435 |
[28] |
Farndale, E.,& Kelliher, C.(2013). Implementing performance appraisal: Exploring the employee experience. Human Resource Management, 52( 6), 879-897.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21575 URL |
[29] |
Fleenor J. W., Smither J. W., Atwater L. E., Braddy P. W., & Sturm R. E . ( 2010). Self-other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21( 6), 1005-1034.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.006 URL |
[30] |
Harbi S. A., Thursfield D., & Bright D . ( 2017). Culture, Wasta and perceptions of performance appraisal in Saudi Arabia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28( 19), 2792-2810.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1138987 URL |
[31] |
Hassan, S.,& Rohrbaugh, J.(2009). Incongruity in 360-degree feedback ratings and competing managerial values: Evidence from a public agency setting. International Public Management Journal, 12( 4), 421-449.
doi: 10.1080/10967490903103375 URL |
[32] |
Heslin,P. A., & Latham, G. P . ( 2004). The effect of upward feedback on managerial behavior. Applied Psychology, 53( 1), 23-37.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00159.x URL |
[33] |
Hoffman B., Lance C. E., Bynum B., & Gentry W. A . ( 2010). Rater source effects are alive and well after all. Personnel Psychology, 63( 1), 119-151.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01164.x URL |
[34] |
Ikramullah M., Van Prooijen J. W., Lqbal M. Z., & Ul-Hassan F. S . ( 2016). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Developing a conceptual framework using competing values approach. Personnel Review, 45( 2), 334-352.
doi: 10.1108/PR-07-2014-0164 URL |
[35] |
Iqbal M. Z., Akbar S., & Budhwar P . ( 2015). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: An integrated framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17( 4), 510-533.
doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12050 URL |
[36] |
Judge,T. A., & Bono, J. E . ( 2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 1), 80-92.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80 URL |
[37] |
Kampkötter, P.(2017). Performance appraisals and job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28( 5), 750-774.
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2469875 URL |
[38] |
Karkoulian S., Assaker G., & Hallak R . ( 2016). An empirical study of 360-degree feedback, organizational justice, and firm sustainability . Journal of Business Research, 69( 5), 1862-1867.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.070 URL |
[39] |
Kim K. Y., Atwater L., Patel P. C., & Smither J. W . ( 2016). Multisource feedback, human capital, and the financial performance of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101( 11), 1569-1584.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000125 URL pmid: 27504657 |
[40] |
Kopperud K. H., Martinsen Ø., & Humborstad, S. I. W.(2014). Engaging leaders in the eyes of the beholder: On the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, service climate, and self-other agreement. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21( 1), 29-42.
doi: 10.1177/1548051813475666 URL |
[41] |
Kossek E. E., Huang J. L., Piszczek M. M., Fleenor J. W., & Ruderman M . ( 2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56( 1), 151-172.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21763 URL |
[42] |
Krasman, J.(2010). The feedback-seeking personality: Big five and feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17( 1), 18-32.
doi: 10.1177/1548051809350895 URL |
[43] |
London, M.,& Smither, J. W . ( 1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48( 4), 803-839.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01782.x URL |
[44] | London, M.(2001). The great debate: Should multisource feedback be used for administration or development only? In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes(pp. 368-385). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
[45] |
London, M.,& Smither, J. W . ( 2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12( 1), 81-100.
doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2 URL |
[46] |
Luffarelli J., Gonçalves D., & Stamatogiannakis A . ( 2016). When feedback interventions backfire: Why higher performance feedback may result in lower self-perceived competence and satisfaction with performance. Human Resource Management, 55( 4), 591-614.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21739 URL |
[47] |
Luthans, F.,& Peterson, S. J . ( 2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42( 3), 243-256.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.10083 URL |
[48] |
Markham S. E., Smith J. W., Markham I. S., & Braekkan K. F . ( 2014). A new approach to analyzing the Achilles' heel of multisource feedback programs: Can we really trust ratings of leaders at the group level of analysis? The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 6), 1120-1142.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.10.003 URL |
[49] |
Markham S. E., Markham I. S., & Smith J. W . ( 2015). At the crux of dyadic leadership: Self-other agreement of leaders and direct reports—Analyzing 360-degree feedback. The Leadership Quarterly, 26( 6), 958-977.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.001 URL |
[50] |
Markham S. E., Markham I. S., & Smith J. W . ( 2017). A review, analysis, and extension of peer-leader feedback agreement: Contrasting group aggregate agreement vs. self-other agreement using entity analytics and visualization. The Leadership Quarterly, 28( 1), 153-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.001 URL |
[51] |
Maylett, T.(2009). 360-degree feedback revisited: The transition from development to appraisal. Compensation & Benefits Review, 41( 5), 52-59.
doi: 10.1177/0886368709337922 URL |
[52] |
McCarthy,A. M., & Garavan, T. N . ( 2007). Understanding acceptance of multisource feedback for management development. Personnel Review, 36( 6), 903-917.
doi: 10.1108/00483480710822427 URL |
[53] |
Mero N. P., Guidice R. M., & Brownlee A. L . ( 2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33( 2), 223-252.
doi: 10.1177/0149206306297633 URL |
[54] |
Mishra, V.,& Roch, S. G . ( 2013). Cultural values and performance appraisal: Assessing the effects of rater self- construal on performance ratings. The Journal of Psychology, 147( 4), 325-344.
doi: 10.1080/00223980.2012.694377 URL pmid: 23885636 |
[55] |
Ng K. Y., Koh C., Ang S., Kennedy J. C., & Chan K.-Y . ( 2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96( 5), 1033-1044.
doi: 10.1037/a0023368 URL pmid: 21480684 |
[56] |
O’Neill T. A., Goffin R. D., & Gellatly I. R . ( 2012). The use of random coefficient modeling for understanding and predicting job performance ratings: An application with field data. Organizational Research Methods, 15( 3), 436-462.
doi: 10.1177/1094428112438699 URL |
[57] |
Pichler, S.(2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51( 5), 709-732.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21499 URL |
[58] |
Pulakos,E. D., & O’Leary, R. S . ( 2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4( 2), 146-164.
doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01315.x URL |
[59] |
Randall, R.,& Sharples, D.(2012). The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85( 1), 42-59.
doi: 10.1348/2044-8325.002002 URL |
[60] | Rogers E., Rogers C. W., & Metlay W . ( 2002). Improving the payoff from 360-degree feedback. Human Resource Planning, 25( 3), 44-54. |
[61] |
Rosen C. C., Kacmar K. M., Harris K. J., Gavin M. B., & Hochwarter W. A . ( 2017). Workplace politics and performance appraisal: A two-study, multilevel field investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24( 1), 20-38.
doi: 10.1177/1548051816661480 URL |
[62] |
Russo S. D., Miraglia M., & Borgogni L . ( 2017). Reducing organizational politics in performance appraisal: The role of coaching leaders for age-diverse employees. Human Resource Management, 56( 5), 769-783.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21799 URL |
[63] |
Semeijn J. H., Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M.,& Van Der Lee, A.(2014). Multisource ratings of managerial competencies and their predictive value for managerial and organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 53( 5), 773-794.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21592 URL |
[64] |
Shipper F., Hoffman R. C., & Rotondo D. M . ( 2007). Does the 360 feedback process create actionable knowledge equally across cultures? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6( 1), 33-50.
doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.24401701 URL |
[65] |
Smither,J. W., & Walker, A. G . ( 2004). Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89( 3), 575-581.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.575 URL pmid: 15161414 |
[66] |
Smither,J. W, London, M., & Reilly, R. R . ( 2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58( 1), 33-66.
doi: 10.1111/peps.2005.58.issue-1 URL |
[67] |
Smither J. W., Brett J. F., & Atwater L. E . ( 2008). What do leaders recall about their multisource feedback? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14( 3), 202-218.
doi: 10.1177/1071791907308463 URL |
[68] |
Spence,J. R., & Keeping, L. M . ( 2010). The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31( 4), 587-608.
doi: 10.1002/job.648 URL |
[69] |
Sumelius J., Björkman I., Ehrnrooth M., Mäkelä K., & Smale A . ( 2014). What determines employee perceptions of HRM process features? The case of performance appraisal in MNC subsidiaries. Human Resource Management, 53( 4), 569-592.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21604 URL |
[70] |
Vecchio,P. R., &Anderson, R. J . ( 2009). Agreement in self-other ratings of leader effectiveness: The role of demographics and personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17( 2), 165-179.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00460.x URL |
[71] |
Verbos,A. K., Miller, J. S, & Goswami, A.(2014). Employee social cognition and performance evaluation process reactions. Personnel Review, 43( 4), 515-535.
doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2011-0011 URL |
[72] |
Woehr D. J., Sheehan M. K., & Bennett J. W . ( 2005). Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A Multitrait-Multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90( 3), 592-600.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.592 URL pmid: 15910153 |
[73] |
Wong,K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y . ( 2007). Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92( 2), 577-585.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.577 URL pmid: 17371102 |
[74] |
Wood D., Harms P., & Vazire S . ( 2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99( 1), 174-190.
doi: 10.1037/a0019390 URL pmid: 20565194 |
[75] |
Xie J. L., Chen Z. G., & Roy J. P . ( 2006). Cultural and personality determinants of leniency in self-rating among Chinese people. Management & Organization Review, 2( 2), 181-207.
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00043.x URL |
[76] |
Yamazaki, Y.,& Yoon, J.(2016). A cross-national study of fairness in Asia: How perceptions of a lack-of-group bias and transparency in the performance evaluation system relate to job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 55( 6), 1059-1077.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21707 URL |
[1] | 程垦, 王艺霏, 林英晖, 王菁. 观察者对亲组织不道德行为的反应及其反馈效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 1944-1954. |
[2] | 陈晓, 谢彬, 彭坚, 聂琦. 职场孤独感的形成原因与作用机理:基于调节匹配理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1463-1481. |
[3] | 李朋波, 陈黎梅, 褚福磊, 孙雨晴, 周莹. 我是高材生:资质过剩感及其对员工的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1313-1330. |
[4] | 汤一鹏, 任芷宇, 蒲小萍, 韩韦. 人际真诚在同事互动及团队工作中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 597-609. |
[5] | 吴伟炯, 冯镜铭, 林怿洵, 赵霞. 通勤恢复活动对工作激情的动态影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 610-624. |
[6] | 董小炜, 秦昕, 陈晨, 黄鸣鹏, 邓惠如, 周汉森, 宋博迪. 组织行为学中的时间相关研究与未来方向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 747-760. |
[7] | 严秋斯, 隋杨, 郝雪晶. 亲组织不道德行为的解释机制与理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 338-352. |
[8] | 尹奎, 张凯丽, 赵景, 巩振兴. 员工授权期望的效应及其理论机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 353-364. |
[9] | 赵锴, 向姝婷. 如何解决团队创新悖论?基于成员认知风格“组型”与“构型”视角的探究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 1-18. |
[10] | 李朋波, 周莹, 王震, 孙雨晴. 借花献佛: 顾客导向偏离行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2150-2159. |
[11] | 陈丝璐, 张光磊, 刘文兴. 伦理导向人力资源管理实践的跨层次作用机制:基于社会情境与社会认知理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1800-1813. |
[12] | 向姝婷, 赵锴, 宁南. “赋能”还是“负担”?领导者授权行为对员工工作行为影响的双刃剑效应探究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1814-1835. |
[13] | 李方君, 钟旭朋. 促进型和抑制型建言的差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1939-1952. |
[14] | 李馨, 刘培, 肖晨洁, 王笑天, 李爱梅. 组织中权力如何促进亲社会行为?责任感知的中介作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598. |
[15] | 李铭泽, 叶慧莉, 张光磊. 自恋型领导对团队创造力形成过程的多视角研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1437-1453. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||