ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2008, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 973-980.

• 主编特邀 • 上一篇    下一篇

罗夏墨迹技术的近期发展与争论

郭庆科;王炜丽;戚菲;陈雪霞   

  1. 辽宁师范大学心理系，大连 116029
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-15 发布日期:2008-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭庆科

Recent Development and Controversies of Rorschach Ink-Blot Method

GUO Qing-Ke;WANG Wei-Li;QI Fei;CHEN Xue-Xia   

  1. Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
  • Received:2007-10-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-11-15 Published:2008-11-15
  • Contact: GUO Qing-Ke

PDF (PC)

1606

被引次数

17

摘要： 综合系统在罗夏墨迹技术（RIM）的标准化、客观化方面取得了很大的成功，但仍有一些批评者对它的信度、效度、常模与标准化等问题提出了质疑，作者们对这些争论的焦点问题进行了系统的回顾。总结有关的元分析和实验研究，发现RIM的多数核心变量都有较好的评分者信度和跨时间稳定性，只有心理状态变量的信度较低。以往的整体元分析和局部元分析都发现RIM不逊于其他测验。这些结果表明RIM在临床疾病诊断，外显行为预测方面都是有价值的。与其他 测验一样，RIM也有其优势与不足，在应用中应与其他测验互补

关键词: 罗夏墨迹技术, 效度, 信度, 常模与标准化

Abstract: The Comprehensive System has obtained successes in standardization and objectification of Rorschach Ink-Blot Method, but many critics of RIM suspect its reliability, validity, norm and standardization, while advocates of RIM provide testimony to support its properties. Authors of this paper systematically reviewed focuses of the controversies about RIM and summarized relevant Meta-Analyses and experimental researches. The results showed that core variables of RIM have high level of rater’s reliability and temporal stability, only conditional variables manifested low level reliability; Focused and Global Meta-Analyses found that the RIM scores have higher validity than other tests variables. Based on above reviews we concluded that RIM has values in clinical diagnosis and overt behavior prediction. The same as other tests, RIM also has its strengths and weaknesses, It should integrate with other tests in application

Key words: orschach Ink-Blot Method, validity, reliability, norm and standardization

中图分类号: