ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2156-2167.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.2156 cstr: 32111.14.2025.2156

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

幻觉的神经和计算机制

苑墨桐1,2, 蔡雨霏2,3, 孙宏伟1, 李妍妍2,3(), 王亮2,3()   

  1. 1山东第二医科大学心理学院, 潍坊 261053
    2中国科学院心理研究所认知科学与心理健康国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
    3中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-27 出版日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2025-10-27
  • 通讯作者: 李妍妍, E-mail: liyanyan@psych.ac.cn;
    王亮, E-mail: lwang@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32471110)

Neurological and computational mechanisms of hallucinations

YUAN Motong1,2, CAI Yufei2,3, SUN Hongwei1, LI Yanyan2,3(), WANG Liang2,3()   

  1. 1School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang 261053, China
    2State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-03-27 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-10-27

摘要:

幻觉是一种在没有外界真实刺激情况下产生的感知体验, 常见于多种精神和神经系统疾病, 其严重程度与病情进展相关。研究表明, 幻觉与前额叶皮层、岛叶、纹状体、海马等脑区功能异常密切相关。幻觉源于感觉信号与先验预期失衡, 导致预测误差信号异常整合, 内部信号被误认为外部刺激。本文系统梳理了幻觉的研究范式, 探讨幻觉发生的神经环路并阐释预测误差整合异常的发生机制。最后从建立跨模态标准化评估体系、探索闭环神经反馈和靶向神经调控技术的个体化幻觉症状干预框架等方面对未来研究进行了展望。

关键词: 幻觉, 条件性幻觉, 神经环路, 预测编码, 神经调控

Abstract:

Hallucinations, defined as perceptual experiences occurring in the absence of external stimuli, remain a central challenge in psychiatry and neuroscience. They are prevalent across multiple disorders, including schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease, and affective psychoses, and often predict poor prognosis and treatment resistance. While significant progress has been made in identifying brain regions and networks associated with hallucinatory states, the precise neural and computational mechanisms underlying their emergence are still not fully understood. This review synthesizes recent empirical findings and theoretical developments to provide an integrated account of the neurobiological circuits, computational models, and therapeutic interventions related to hallucinations, while highlighting critical challenges and directions for future research.

At the neural systems level, accumulating evidence implicates a distributed network rather than isolated regions in the genesis of hallucinations. Key structures such as the prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, insula, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus have been consistently linked to hallucinatory phenomena. However, the precise contribution of each region and the nature of their dynamic interactions remain unclear. A major theme emerging from current research is that hallucinations are likely the product of aberrant communication within large-scale cortical-subcortical networks, rather than dysfunction in a single locus. This distributed view calls for multimodal neuroimaging approaches that integrate structural, functional, and temporal information to characterize how interactions among regions give rise to hallucinatory experiences.

Computational psychiatry has provided valuable tools for conceptualizing hallucinations in terms of predictive coding and Bayesian inference. Within this framework, perception is modeled as the integration of bottom-up sensory evidence with top-down priors. Hallucinations may result from an imbalance in this process, characterized by overweighted priors or diminished sensory precision, leading to misattribution of internally generated signals as external perceptions. Empirical studies support this account, showing that individuals prone to hallucinations exhibit abnormally high reliance on prior beliefs during perceptual decision-making. Neurochemical findings further indicate that striatal dopamine plays a central role in modulating the weighting of prediction errors, with hyperdopaminergic states biasing the system toward prior-driven inferences. The development of hierarchical Gaussian filter models has expanded these insights by allowing simultaneous modeling of priors, learning rates, and belief stability, offering a more fine-grained computational account of hallucinatory states. Importantly, this modeling framework may help distinguish between subtypes of hallucinations, providing a basis for more individualized clinical interventions.

Non-pharmacological interventions have also become a focus of translational research. Cognitive-behavioral therapy can help patients reinterpret and manage hallucinatory experiences, while electroconvulsive therapy has demonstrated efficacy in some treatment-resistant cases. Among neuromodulatory methods, transcranial magnetic stimulation has shown promise, particularly when applied to the temporoparietal junction. However, clinical outcomes remain inconsistent, reflecting heterogeneity in patient subgroups, stimulation protocols, and neural targets. Recent work highlights the importance of individualized targeting using neuroimaging-guided navigation and computational modeling to optimize stimulation parameters. Such approaches underscore a growing recognition that hallucinations are not homogeneous phenomena and that effective intervention must account for differences in neural circuitry and symptom profiles across patients.

Looking ahead, several challenges define the next stage of research. The first concerns the need to move beyond region-specific accounts toward a network-based understanding of hallucinations, leveraging multimodal imaging and computational modeling to characterize distributed interactions. Another challenge lies in the lack of standardized paradigms for cross-modal comparison, which hinders efforts to identify shared versus modality-specific mechanisms across auditory, visual, and somatic hallucinations. Progress will require the development of unified experimental frameworks and the incorporation of cross-diagnostic samples to disentangle disease-specific and modality-specific contributions. Finally, establishing causal evidence remains a pressing need. Most current findings are correlational, and future research must employ causal intervention strategies—such as intracranial stimulation combined with behavioral paradigms and computational modeling—to determine the necessity and sufficiency of specific circuits in hallucinatory states.

In summary, hallucinations emerge from the interplay of distributed neural networks, altered neurochemical modulation, and computational distortions in predictive processing. By integrating empirical neuroscience, computational modeling, and clinical intervention research, this review demonstrates the value of moving toward a more mechanistic and individualized understanding of hallucinatory phenomena. Advances in this direction have the potential not only to refine theoretical models but also to inform the development of targeted therapeutic strategies, ultimately improving outcomes for patients and reducing the societal burden associated with these profoundly disruptive symptoms.

Key words: hallucinations, conditioned hallucinations, neural circuits, predictive coding, neuromodulation

中图分类号: