心理科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1429-1438.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01429
• 研究构想 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2021-12-03
出版日期:
2022-07-15
发布日期:
2022-05-17
通讯作者:
周国梅
E-mail:zhougm@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHOU Guomei(), ZHENG Ruoying, LIN Jia, LIU Xinge
Received:
2021-12-03
Online:
2022-07-15
Published:
2022-05-17
Contact:
ZHOU Guomei
E-mail:zhougm@mail.sysu.edu.cn
摘要:
面孔作为一种高级的视觉刺激,在人际交往中有着无可替代的作用。其中,面孔吸引力更是影响着日常生活的重要社交决策,如择偶、交友、求职、社会交换等。长久以来,研究者们从面孔特征、社会信息和观察者因素等角度不断探索着人们对静态面孔吸引力的感知,且多从进化角度加以解释。但是,人们如何表征面孔吸引力以及其动态性增强机制仍未可知。本项目通过两个研究,分别从面孔吸引力的整体表征,以及面孔动态性通过影响整体加工、影响对整体信息和特征信息的注意、以及影响社会信息来增强吸引力,从这两个角度尝试回答这一问题。在研究1中,本项目从整体加工的角度探索了面孔吸引力的认知表征。研究1.1通过评分任务和适应范式探索高空间频率(更多局部特征)和低空间频率(更多整体特征)对面孔吸引力的影响,旨在从空间频率探讨面孔吸引力的整体表征。研究1.2通过操纵面孔对称性和面孔常态性探索面孔常态性在面孔对称性和面孔吸引力间的中介作用,探讨面孔吸引力的常态构型表征。研究1.3引入“三庭五眼”这一中国传统面孔审美理论,通过评分任务和适应范式研究“三庭五眼” 构型是否符合中国人对高吸引力中国面孔的表征,以此探讨面孔吸引力的整体表征。研究1.4通过评分任务和适应范式考察局部面孔遮挡是否促进整体面孔吸引力,以及这种促进作用是否由于人们通过局部特征“脑补”出了完整面孔。研究2从整体加工、注意和生命力的角度探讨面孔吸引力的动态性增强机制。研究2.1使用合成效应范式测量动态面孔吸引力的整体加工,探索动静态面孔的吸引力差异是否源于其整体加工程度的不同。研究2.2使用注意分散范式,并结合眼动技术,探讨人们对动静态面孔的注视模式是否存在差异,这种差异是否能解释动态面孔吸引力的增强。研究2.3结合问卷法、实验法和结构方程模型,考察了生命力这一社会因素对动静态面孔吸引力的影响。本项目探讨了面孔吸引力的认知表征以及其动态性增强机制,有助于我们进一步理解人们对面孔吸引力的认知加工以及人类欣赏美这一高级智能。同时,本项目的结果对于日常人际交往和面孔吸引力相关算法的优化等方面也有潜在的应用价值。
中图分类号:
周国梅, 郑若颖, 林佳, 刘心阁. (2022). 面孔吸引力的整体表征及其动态性增强. 心理科学进展 , 30(7), 1429-1438.
ZHOU Guomei, ZHENG Ruoying, LIN Jia, LIU Xinge. (2022). The holistic representation of facial attractiveness and the attractiveness enhancement mechanism of dynamic faces. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(7), 1429-1438.
[1] | 韩尚锋, 李玥, 刘燊, 徐强, 谭群, 张林. (2018). 美在观察者眼中: 陌生面孔吸引力评价中的晕轮效应与泛化效应. 心理学报, 50(4), 363-376. |
[2] | 寇慧, 苏艳华, 张妍, 孔繁昌, 胡媛艳, 王洋, 陈红. (2013). 面孔吸引力的影响因素:观察者假设. 心理科学进展, 21(12), 2144-2153. |
[3] | 李鸥, 陈红. (2010). 面孔吸引力的回顾与前瞻. 心理学报, 18(3), 472-479. |
[4] | 汪亚珉, 王志贤, 黄雅梅, 蒋静, 丁锦红. (2011). 空间频率信息对面孔身份与表情识别的影响. 心理学报, 43(4), 373-383. |
[5] | 王雨晴, 姚鹏飞, 周国梅. (2015). 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47(1), 108-118. |
[6] | 温芳芳, 佐斌. (2011). 注视方向和性别二态线索对面孔吸引力的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(4), 441-444. |
[7] | 张丽丽, 魏斌, 张妍. (2016). 微笑影响面孔吸引力判断的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 36(1), 13-17. |
[8] | 张小将, 刘迎杰, 刘昌. (2015). 面孔审美加工的神经机制及个体差异. 心理科学, 38(3), 574-579. |
[9] | 张馨, 蒋重清. (2015). 面孔知觉中的适应现象. 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1340-1347. |
[10] |
Abbas, Z.-A., & Duchaine, B. (2008). The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 37(8), 1187-1196.
doi: 10.1068/p5984 URL |
[11] |
Baudouin, J.-Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3), 313-332.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002 URL |
[12] |
Bertamini, M., Rampone, G., Makin, A. D. J., & Jessop, A. (2019). Symmetry preference in shapes, faces, flowers and landscapes. PeerJ, 7, e7078.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.7078 URL |
[13] |
Brielmann, A. A., & Pelli, D. G. (2018). Aesthetics. Current Biology, 28(16), R859-R863.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.004 URL |
[14] |
Brody, H. (2015). Beauty. Nature, 526(7572), S1.
doi: 10.1038/526S1a URL |
[15] |
Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J., & Dean, M. (2000). Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 527-551.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.527 URL |
[16] |
Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308-313.
doi: 10.1038/nn1194 pmid: 14966522 |
[17] | Chang, D. H. F., & Troje, N. F. (2008). Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 3. |
[18] |
Collishaw, S. M., & Hole, G. (2000). Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception, 29(8), 893-909.
pmid: 11145082 |
[19] |
DeBruine, L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: Context-specific effects of facial resemblance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1566), 919-922.
pmid: 16024346 |
[20] |
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1420-1430.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1420 URL |
[21] |
Di Dio, C., Massaro, D., Savazzi, F. A., Gallese, V., Garau, T., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2020). Beauty in life: An eye-tracking study on young adults' aesthetic evaluation and vitality judgment of pictorial representations of sleeping and dead subjects. PsyCh Journal, 9(4), 458-471.
doi: 10.1002/pchj.285 URL |
[22] |
Farrera, A., Villanueva, M., Quinto-Sánchez, M., & González-José, R. (2015). The relationship between facial shape asymmetry and attractiveness in Mexican students. American Journal of Human Biology, 27(3), 387-396.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22657 pmid: 25400276 |
[23] |
Fink, B., Bunse, L., Matts, P. J., & D’emiliano, D. (2012). Visible skin colouration predicts perception of male facial age, health and attractiveness. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 34(4), 307-310.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00724.x pmid: 22515406 |
[24] |
Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(1), 92-99.
pmid: 11334223 |
[25] |
Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 154-158.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00190 URL |
[26] |
Franconeri, S. L., & Simons, D. J. (2003). Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(7), 999-1010.
pmid: 14674628 |
[27] |
Frankenhuis, W. E., House, B., Barrett, H. C., & Johnson, S. P. (2013). Infants' perception of chasing. Cognition, 126(2), 224-233.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.001 pmid: 23121710 |
[28] |
Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29(2), 159-170.
pmid: 10820599 |
[29] |
Gateño, J., Jones, T. L., Shen, S. G. F., Chen, K. C., Jajoo, A., Kuang, T.,... Xia, J. J. (2018). Fluctuating asymmetry of the normal facial skeleton. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 47(4), 534-540.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.10.011 URL |
[30] |
Gobell, J., & Carrasco, M. (2005). Attention alters the appearance of spatial frequency and gap size. Psychological Science, 16(8), 644-651.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01588.x URL |
[31] |
Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are "spatial" -- Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 1023-1039.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023 URL |
[32] |
Graham, J. H., & Ozener, B. (2016). Fluctuating asymmetry of human populations: A review. Symmetry, 8(12), 154.
doi: 10.3390/sym8120154 URL |
[33] |
Halit, H., de Haan, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2000). Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces. Neuroreport, 11(9), 1871-1875.
pmid: 10884035 |
[34] |
Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2018). Symmetry in motion: Perception of attractiveness changes with facial movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42(3), 267-283.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-018-0277-4 URL |
[35] |
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33(5), 569-576.
doi: 10.1068/p3463 URL |
[36] |
Koldewyn, K., Hanus, P., & Balas, B. (2014). Visual adaptation of the perception of "life": Animacy is a basic perceptual dimension of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(4), 969-975.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0562-5 pmid: 24323739 |
[37] |
Kościński, K. (2013). Perception of facial attractiveness from static and dynamic stimuli. Perception, 42(2), 163-175.
doi: 10.1068/p7378 URL |
[38] |
Lander, K. (2008). Relating visual and vocal attractiveness for moving and static faces. Animal Behaviour, 75(3), 817-822.
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.001 URL |
[39] |
Leder, H., Goller, J., Forster, M., Schlageter, L., & Paul, M. A. (2017). Face inversion increases attractiveness. Acta Psychologica, 178, 25-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.005 URL |
[40] |
Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). What is good is beautiful: Face preference reflects desired personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(6), 1107-1118.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.015 URL |
[41] |
Little, A. C., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology, 93(4), 451-464.
doi: 10.1348/000712602761381349 URL |
[42] |
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638-1659.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404 URL |
[43] | Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Waitt, C., Tiddeman, B. P., Feinberg, D. R., Perrett, D. I., … Marlowe, F. W. (2008). Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: Data across culture and species. PLoS One, 3(5), e2106. |
[44] |
Liu, C. H., Young, A. W., Li, J., Tian, X., & Chen, W. (2021). Predicting attractiveness from face parts reveals multiple covarying cues. British Journal of Psychology, 113(1), 264-286.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12532 URL |
[45] |
Looser, C. E., Guntupalli, J. S., & Wheatley, T. (2013). Multivoxel patterns in face-sensitive temporal regions reveal an encoding schema based on detecting life in a face. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(7), 799-805.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nss078 URL |
[46] |
Mentus, T., & Markovic, S. (2016). Effects of symmetry and familiarity on the attractiveness of human faces. Psihologija, 49(3), 301-311.
doi: 10.2298/PSI1603301M URL |
[47] |
Morrison, E. R., Clark, A. P., Tiddeman, B. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2010). Manipulating shape cues in dynamic human faces: Sexual dimorphism is preferred in female but not male faces. Ethology, 116(12), 1234-1243.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01839.x URL |
[48] |
Morrison, E. R., Gralewski, L., Campbell, N., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2007). Facial movement varies by sex and is related to attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 186-192.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.01.001 URL |
[49] |
Orghian, D., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2020). Humans judge faces in incomplete photographs as physically more attractive. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 110.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56437-4 pmid: 31924811 |
[50] |
Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 77-107.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504 URL |
[51] |
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chang, H. Y. (2008). Attractiveness judgements of individuals vary across emotional expression and movement conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 89-100.
doi: 10.1556/JEP.2008.1011 URL |
[52] |
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A., & Trivers, R. (2004). Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(6), 355-370.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.002 URL |
[53] |
Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(5), 295-307.
doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00014-8 URL |
[54] | Post, R. B., Haberman, J., Iwaki, L., & Whitney, D. (2012). The Frozen Face Effect: Why static photographs may not do you justice. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 22. |
[55] |
Powers, K. E., Worsham, A. L., Freeman, J. B., Wheatley, T., & Heatherton, T. F. (2014). Social connection modulates perceptions of animacy. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1943-1948.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614547706 URL |
[56] |
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.
pmid: 15582859 |
[57] |
Rennels, J. L., Bronstad, P. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2008). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 884-893.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.884 URL |
[58] |
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 199-226.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208 URL |
[59] |
Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J., & Brajkovich, G. (2001). Generalization of Mere Exposure Effects to averaged composite faces. Social Cognition, 19(1), 57-70.
doi: 10.1521/soco.19.1.57.18961 URL |
[60] |
Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14(6), 558-566.
doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1465.x URL |
[61] |
Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4), 659-669.
doi: 10.3758/BF03208842 URL |
[62] |
Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1281-1302.
doi: 10.1037/a0037004 URL |
[63] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Grassi, M., Lorenzi, E., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2016). Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naive domestic chicks: The case of speed changes. Cognition, 157, 49-60.
doi: S0010-0277(16)30204-9 pmid: 27592411 |
[64] |
Rubenstein, A. J. (2005). Variation in perceived attractiveness: Differences between dynamic and static faces. Psychological Science, 16(10), 759-762.
pmid: 16181436 |
[65] |
Sadr, J., & Krowicki, L. (2019). Face perception loves a challenge: Less information sparks more attraction. Vision Research, 157, 61-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.009 URL |
[66] |
Stein, T., Seymour, K., Hebart, M. N., & Sterzer, P. (2014). Rapid fear detection relies on high spatial frequencies. Psychological Science, 25(2), 566-574.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613512509 pmid: 24379157 |
[67] |
Stephen, I. D., & McKeegan, A. M. (2010). Lip colour affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces. Perception, 39(8), 1104-1110.
pmid: 20942361 |
[68] |
Störmer, V. S., & Alvarez, G. A. (2016). Attention alters perceived attractiveness. Psychological Science, 27(4), 563-571.
doi: 10.1177/0956797616630964 pmid: 26966228 |
[69] |
Swami, V., Henry, A., Peacock, N., Roberts-Dunn, A., & Porter, A. (2013). “Mirror, mirror...." A preliminary investigation of skin tone dissatisfaction and its impact among British adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(4), 468-476.
doi: 10.1037/a0032904 URL |
[70] |
Tan, K. W., Tiddeman, B., & Stephen, I. D. (2018). Skin texture and colour predict perceived health in Asian faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(3), 320-335.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.003 URL |
[71] |
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Human facial beauty. Human Nature, 4(3), 237-269.
doi: 10.1007/BF02692201 URL |
[72] |
Tse, P. U. (2005). Voluntary attention modulates the brightness of overlapping transparent surfaces. Vision Research, 45(9), 1095-1098.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.001 URL |
[73] | Tse, P. U., Whitney, D., Anstis, S., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization. Journal of Vision, 11(3), 12. |
[74] |
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 43(2), 161-204.
doi: 10.1080/14640749108400966 URL |
[75] |
van Dongen, S. (2014). Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women. Annals of Human Biology, 41(3), 205-213.
doi: 10.3109/03014460.2013.847120 URL |
[76] |
Vera Cruz, G. (2018). The impact of face skin tone on perceived facial attractiveness: A study realized with an innovative methodology. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(5), 580-590.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1419161 URL |
[77] | Võ, M. L. H., Smith, T. J., Mital, P. K., & Henderson, J. M. (2012). Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces. Journal of Vision, 12(13), 14. |
[78] |
Wald, C. (2015). Beauty: 4 big questions. Nature, 526(7572), S17.
doi: 10.1038/526S17a URL |
[79] |
Wang, X. J., Liu, S., Han, S. F., Gan, Y. T., Li, W. Y., Xu, Q., & Zhang, L. (2020). Roles of social knowledge and sexual dimorphism in the evaluation of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103963.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103963 URL |
[80] | Williams, J. E., & Morland, J. K. (1976). Race, color, and the young child. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. |
[81] |
Xiao, N., Quinn, P., Wang, Q., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2014). Facial movement optimizes part-based face processing by influencing eye movements. Journal of Vision, 14(10), 565.
doi: 10.1167/14.10.565 URL |
[82] |
Yang, T., Chen, H., Hu, Y., Zheng, Y., & Wang, W. (2015). Preferences for sexual dimorphism on attractiveness levels: An eye-tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 179-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.005 URL |
[83] |
Zaidel, D. W., & Deblieck, C. (2007). Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(4), 423-431.
doi: 10.1080/00207450600581928 URL |
[84] |
Zhao, M., & Bülthoff, I. (2017). Holistic processing of static and moving faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1020-1035.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000368 URL |
[85] |
Zhao, M., & Hayward, W. G. (2010). Holistic processing underlies gender judgments of faces. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 591-596.
doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.591 URL |
[86] |
Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Feng, X., & Zhou, G. (2021). The constancy of the holistic processing of unfamiliar faces: Evidence from the study-test consistency effect and the within-person motion and viewpoint invariance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83(5), 2174-2188.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02255-8 URL |
[1] | 崔楠, 王久菊, 赵婧. 注意缺陷多动障碍-发展性阅读障碍共患儿童的干预效果及其内在机理[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(4): 622-630. |
[2] | 蒋涵. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童教育康复线上模式的构建[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1747-1758. |
[3] | 刘彦秀, 谢桐, 傅世敏. 物体表征强度对基于动态物体的注意的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 591-600. |
[4] | 张超, 卫旭华, 黎英明. 面相识人:基于认知视角的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 308-323. |
[5] | 叶丽群, 谭欣, 姚堃, 丁玉珑. 正常老化对视觉早期注意的影响——来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2746-2763. |
[6] | 张雯, 董亓易如, 龚丽娟, 尚琪, 程琛, 丁雪辰. 运算动量效应的理论解释及其发展性预测因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2777-2788. |
[7] | 殷融. 读心的比较研究:非人灵长类与人类在心理理论上的异同点及其解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2540-2557. |
[8] | 侯文文, 苏怡. 注意和记忆对孤独症儿童词汇发展滞后的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2558-2569. |
[9] | 李婧婷, 东子朝, 刘烨, 王甦菁, 庄东哲. 基于人类注意机制的微表情检测方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2143-2153. |
[10] | 王紫乐, 张琪. 视觉搜索中注意模板促进搜索的内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2206-2218. |
[11] | 吴瑕, 王浚哲, 王赟, 陈瀛, 杨海波. 类别注意控制定势在注意捕获中的加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(10): 2219-2227. |
[12] | 干加裙, 王恩国. 自闭症谱系障碍个体的注意解离[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(1): 129-140. |
[13] | 李爱梅, 车敬上, 刘楠, 孙海龙, 周玮. 海量信息如何影响跨期决策?基于注意资源的理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1521-1533. |
[14] | 何嘉梅, 金磊. 目标概念的辨析及其对决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1410-1419. |
[15] | 侯文霞, 田欣然, 刘立志, 易冰, 欧玉晓, 陈文锋, 尚俊辰. 面孔吸引力同化的连续性效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1210-1215. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||