经颅电刺激与视功能调控

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01632

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

经颅电刺激(Transcranial Electrical Stimulation, TES)通过电极将特定模式的低强度电流作用于大脑头皮以调控皮层活动, 是一种非侵入、无创的神经刺激方法。根据刺激电流的模式的不同, TES分为经颅直流电刺激(tDCS), 经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和经颅随机电刺激(tRNS)。TES能对视功能诸如光幻视阈值、视野、对比敏感度、视知觉运动等进行一定程度上的调控, 并且能够与传统的视觉知觉学习训练相结合以调控视觉功能。对于不同的视觉功能, 不同的TES参数和模式的调控效果有所不同。

关键词: 视功能, 经颅直流电刺激, 经颅交流电刺激, 经颅随机电刺激, 知觉学习

Abstract:

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (TES) is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation, which delivers a specific low intensity current on the scalp to modulate the activity of cortical cortex. TES is usually divided into three main types: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). In the current paper, we summarized the modulating effects of TES on visual phosphene threshold, visual field, contrast sensitivity, motion perception, and perceptual learning. The modulation effect varies with the type of visual functions, TES parameters, and stimulating patterns.

Key words: visual functions, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation, transcranial random noise stimulation, perceptual learning

中图分类号:

B845
B842

林博荣, 何勍, 赵金, 杨佳, 石迎珍, 闫芳芳, 席洁, 黄昌兵. (2018). 经颅电刺激与视功能调控. 心理科学进展 , 26(9), 1632-1641.

Borong LIN, Qing HE, Jin ZHAO, YANG Jia, SHI Yingzhen, YAN Fangfang, XI Jie, HUANG Changbing. (2018). Transcranial electrical stimulation and visual function modulation. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(9), 1632-1641.

参考文献

1	Alber R., Moser H., Gall C., & Sabel B. A. ( 2017). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and vision restoration training in subacute stroke rehabilitation: A pilot study. PM&R, 9, 787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.003
2	Alekseichuk I., Diers K., Paulus W., & Antal A. ( 2016). Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES-fMRI approach. NeuroImage, 140, 110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.034
3	Antal A., Boros K., Poreisz C., Chaieb L., Terney D., & Paulus W. ( 2008). Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation, 1( 2), 97-105.
4	Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., Bartfai O., & Paulus W. ( 2004). Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 45( 2), 702-707. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0688
5	Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2003 a). Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Experimental Brain Research, 150( 3), 375-378. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1459-8
6	Antal A., Kincses T. Z., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2003 b). Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human. Neuropsychologia, 41( 13), 1802-1807. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00181-7
7	Antal A., Nitsche M. A., Kincses T. Z., Kruse W., Hoffmann K. P., & Paulus W. ( 2004 a). Facilitation of visuo- motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19( 10), 2888-2892. doi: 10. 1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03367.x
8	Antal A., Nitsche M. A., Kruse W., Kincses T. Z., Hoffmann K. P., & Paulus W. ( 2004 b). Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16( 4), 521-527. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057263
9	Antal A., Nitsche M. A., & Paulus W. ( 2001). External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport, 12( 16), 3553-3555. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00036
10	Battaglini L., Noventa S., & Casco C. ( 2017). Anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation over V5 improves motion perception by signal enhancement and noise reduction. Brain Stimulation, 10( 4), 773-779. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.128
11	Boroojerdi B., Prager A., Muellbacher W., & Cohen L. G. ( 2000). Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology, 54( 7), 1529-1531.
12	Chaieb L., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2015). Transcranial random noise stimulation-induced plasticity is NMDA- receptor independent but sodium-channel blocker and benzodiazepines sensitive. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 125. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00125
13	Costa T. L., Gualtieri M., Barboni M. T. S., Katayama R. K., Boggio P. S., & Ventura D. F. ( 2015 a). Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 5), 1391-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4213-0
14	Costa T. L., Hamer R. D., Nagy B. V., Barboni M. T. S., Gualtieri M., Boggio P. S., & Ventura D. F. ( 2015 b). Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 4), 1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7
15	Ding Z. F., Li J. R., Spiegel D. P., Chen Z. D., Chan L., Luo G. W., .. Thompson B. ( 2016). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity and visual evoked potential amplitude in adults with amblyopia. Scientific Reports, 6, 19280. doi: 10.1038/srep19280
16	Fedorov A., Jobke S., Bersnev V., Chibisova A., Chibisova Y., Gall C., & Sabel B. A. ( 2011). Restoration of vision after optic nerve lesions with noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation: A clinical observational study. Brain Stimulation, 4( 4), 189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.007
17	Fertonani A., Pirulli C., & Miniussi C. ( 2011). Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 43), 15416-15423. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011
18	Gall C., Bola M., Fedorov A., Schmidt S., Michalik R., Brandt S., & Sabel B. ( 2013 a). P 118. A two-center sham-controlled clinical trial of non-invasive alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy: Sinus pulses are less effective than square. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e120-e121. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.196
19	Gall C., Federov A., Antal A., Schittkowski M., Kropf S., Mante A., .. Sabel B. ( 2013 b). IS 5. Clinical efficacy of non-invasive transorbital alternating current stimulation in optic neuropathy: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled multi-center study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e40-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.024
20	Gall C., Schmidt S., Schittkowski M. P., Antal A., Ambrus G. G., Paulus W., .. Sabel B. A. ( 2016). Alternating current stimulation for vision restoration after optic nerve damage: A randomized clinical trial. PLoS One, 11( 6), e0156134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156134
21	Gall C., Sgorzaly S., Schmidt S., Brandt S., Fedorov A., & Sabel B. A. ( 2011). Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathy. Brain Stimulation, 4( 4), 175-188. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.003
22	Gibson, E. J. ( 1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14( 1), 29-56.
23	Herrmann C. S., Strüber D., Helfrich R. F., & Engel A. K. ( 2016). EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 103, 12-21.
24	Kanai R., Paulus W., & Walsh V. ( 2010). Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121( 9), 1551-1554.
25	Kasten E., Poggel D. A., Müller-Oehring E., Gothe J., Schulte T., & Sabel B. A. ( 1999). Restoration of vision II: Residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15( 2-3), 273-287.
26	Liebetanz D., Klinker F., Hering D., Koch R., Nitsche M. A., Potschka H., .. Tergau F. ( 2006). Anticonvulsant effects of transcranial direct‐current stimulation (tDCS) in the rat cortical ramp model of focal epilepsy. Epilepsia, 47( 7), 1216-1224.
27	Liebetanz D., Nitsche M. A., Tergau F., & Paulus W. ( 2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125, 2238-2247.
28	Matsumoto, H., & Ugawa, Y. ( 2017). Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 19-25.
29	Medeiros L. F., de Souza I. C., Vidor L. P., de Souza A., Deitos A., Volz M. S., … Torres I. L ( 2012). Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: A review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 3, 110.
30	Merton, P., & Morton, H. ( 1980). Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature, 285( 5762), 227.
31	Meyer B. U., Diehl R., Steinmetz H., Britton T. C., & Benecke R. ( 1991). Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: Influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement, 43, 121-134.
32	Moliadze V., Atalay D., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2012). Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimulation, 5( 4), 505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004
33	Neuling T., Rach S., & Herrmann C. ( 2013). P 12. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances endogenous alpha for 30 min only for moderate alpha levels. Clinical Neurophysiology, 124( 10), e69-e70.
34	Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. ( 2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527( 3), 633-639. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x
35	Olma M. C., Dargie R. A., Behrens J. R., Kraft A., Irlbacher K., Fahle M., & Brandt S. A. ( 2013). Long-term effects of serial anodal tDCS on motion perception in subjects with occipital stroke measured in the unaffected visual hemifield. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 314. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00314
36	Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., & Merabet L. B. ( 2012). Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26( 6), 616-626. doi: 10.1177/1545968311431963
37	Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Halko M. A., Kenkel S., Jackson M. L., Pascual-Leone A., & Merabet L. B. ( 2011). Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: A comparative case study. PM&R, 3( 9), 825-835. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.026
38	Plow E. B., Obretenova S. N., Jackson M. L., & Merabet L. B. ( 2012). Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation, 15( 4), 367-373. doi: 10.1111/j.1525- 1403.2012.00440.x
39	Reinhart R. M., Xiao W. X., McClenahan L. J., & Woodman G. F. ( 2016). Electrical stimulation of visual cortex can immediately improve spatial vision. Current Biology, 26( 14), 1867-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.019
40	Richard B., Johnson A. P., Thompson B., & Hansen B. C. ( 2015). The effects of tDCS across the spatial frequencies and orientations that comprise the contrast sensitivity function. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1784. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2015.01784
41	Sabel B. A., Fedorov A. B., Naue N., Borrmann A., Herrmann C., & Gall C. ( 2011). Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29( 6), 493-505. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0624
42	Sczesny-Kaiser M., Beckhaus K., Dinse H. R., Schwenkreis P., Tegenthoff M., & Höffken O. ( 2016). Repetitive transcranial direct current stimulation induced excitability changes of primary visual cortex and visual learning effects-A pilot study. Frontiers in Behaviral Neuroscience, 10, 116. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00116
43	Sherman, S. M., & Spear, P. D. ( 1982). Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. Physiological Reviews, 62( 2), 738-855.
44	Smythies, J. ( 1996). A note on the concept of the visual field in neurology, psychology, and visual neuroscience. Perception, 25( 3), 369-371.
45	Spiegel D. P., Byblow W. D., Hess R. F., & Thompson B. ( 2013). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27( 8), 760-769. doi: 10.1177/1545968313491006
46	Stagg, C. J., & Nitsche, M. A. ( 2011). Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist, 17( 1), 37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614
47	Stonkus R., Braun V., Kerlin J. R., Volberg G., & Hanslmayr S. ( 2016). Probing the causal role of prestimulus interregional synchrony for perceptual integration via tACS. Scientific Reports, 6, 32065.
48	Terney D., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Antal A., & Paulus W. ( 2008). Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28( 52), 14147-14155. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4248-08.2008
49	Villamar M. F., Volz M. S., Bikson M., Datta A., DaSilva A. F., & Fregni F. ( 2013). Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Journal of Visualized Experiments, ( 77), 50309.
50	Zaehle T., Rach S., & Herrmann C. S. ( 2010). Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One, 5( 11), e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766

[1]	郭志华, 卢宏亮, 黄鹏, 朱霞. 经颅直流电刺激对健康人群反应抑制的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2034-2052.
[2]	张思源, 李雪冰. 不同频率经颅交流电刺激在精神疾病中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 2053-2066.
[3]	王鑫麟, 邱晓悦, 翁旭初, 杨平. 工作记忆的神经振荡调控：基于神经振荡夹带现象[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 802-816.
[4]	王葛彤, 席洁, 陈霓虹, 黄昌兵. 双眼视差的神经机制与知觉学习效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 56-69.
[5]	成梅, 杨燕, 尹华站. 经颅直流电刺激在注意缺陷多动障碍治疗中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(4): 657-666.
[6]	龚曦紫, 方方. 连续经颅直流电刺激对游标任务学习的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 70-70.
[7]	张恩吕姣姣李武. 外源性注意的重映射导致知觉学习的相对位置特异性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 76-76.
[8]	赵金, 何勍, 邱怀雨, 黄昌兵. 缺损视野的自然评估与恢复[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 95-95.
[9]	王思思; 库逸轩. 右后顶叶经颅直流电刺激提升高负荷下视觉空间工作记忆容量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 43-.
[10]	张琪; 李晟. 真假反馈对运动方向辨别知觉学习的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 83-.
[11]	何勍; 周佳玮; 黄昌兵; Robert Hess. 同刺激不同任务知觉学习特性研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 98-.
[12]	郭恒;何莉;周仁来. 经颅直流电刺激提高记忆功能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 356-366.
[13]	张大山;史慧颖;刘威;邱江;范丰慧. 经颅直流电刺激在抑郁症治疗中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1789-1798.
[14]	陈建;袁杰;汪海玲;王妍;傅世敏. C1调制效应的理论评述及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(3): 407-417.
[15]	马小丽;杨彬;钟翔;宋艳. 知觉学习的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(4): 653-658.