ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 523-541.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00523

• 主编特邀 •    下一篇

行为的文化差异:几头大象还是一群蚂蚁?

晏 松1,2; Ype H. POORTINGA3   

  1. (1德国雅各布大学) (2云南师范大学, 昆明) (3荷兰蒂尔堡大学)
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-28 出版日期:2017-04-15 发布日期:2017-04-15
  • 通讯作者: Song YAN
  • 基金资助:

    The Author received the Editor-In-Chief invitation and prepared the manuscript during a visiting/guest professorship at Yunnan Normal University.

Cultural differences in behavior: A few big elephants or an army of ants?

Song YAN1,2;  Ype H. POORTINGA3   

  1. (1 Jacobs University Bremen, Germany) (2 Yunnan Normal University, China) (3 Tilburg University, Netherlands)
  • Received:2016-11-28 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2017-04-15
  • Contact: Song YAN

摘要:

本文综述了关于行为与文化之间关系的研究。综述分为如下几个部分: 第一部分介绍了跨文化/文化心理学自20世纪中叶创立以来, 在人类行为的共同性、差异性以及心理功能在多大程度上存在文化特异性的问题上的持续争论。第二部分探讨文化差异的魅力, 论证为什么迄今的研究往往偏向于寻找行为的差异而不是跨文化的不变性。第三部分简要概述跨文化比较研究中的文化偏误、缺乏等价性等问题及其对数据解释的影响。第四部分重点阐述本文题目中的主题, 即跨文化差异的心理组织。这部分内容对目前文化心理学研究中存在的倾向, 即从宽泛的维度或笼统的心理功能角度来组织和解释行为差异提出了挑战。第五部分则通过跨文化心理学的历史回顾, 以几个重要的传统研究领域为代表来具体说明这种过度泛化的倾向及近期的研究发展, 其中也包括了中国研究人员贡献越来越大的文化神经科学领域。最后对跨文化心理学的前景与展望进行了讨论。

关键词: (跨)文化心理学, 跨文化不变性, 文化差异, 心理组织, 过度泛化

Abstract:

This overview of research on the relationship between behavior and culture is organized as follows. The first section relates how cross-cultural psychology, or cultural psychology, since it emerged in the mid 20th century has reflected a continuous tension between how and how much humans are the same psychologically and to what extent there is cultural specificity in psychological functioning. The second section on the charm of differences argues that research is often biased towards finding differences rather than cross-cultural invariance. The third section briefly outlines problems of cultural bias, or lack of equivalence, in assessment across cultural populations and its implications for interpretation of data. The fourth section makes explicit a theme that is embedded in other sections and reflected in the title, namely the psychological organization of cross-cultural differences. The section challenges the tendency to conceive of such differences as being organized in broad dimensions or psychological functions. This tendency to over-generalize is illustrated in the fifth section for various traditions of research, including the recent tradition of cultural neuroscience where the increasing contributions of Chinese researchers are particularly evident. An outlook and some conclusions are presented in the final section.

Key words: (cross)-cultural psychology, cross-cultural invariance, cultural difference, psychological organization, overgeneralization