ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 121-132.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00121

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

伦理型领导的概念界定与测量

孙健敏; 陆欣欣   

  1. (中国人民大学劳动与人事学院, 北京 100872)
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-18 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙健敏, E-mail: chinajms@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272158)。

Ethical leadership: Conceptualization and measurement

SUN Jian-Min; LU Xinxin   

  1. (School of Labour and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
  • Received:2016-01-18 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15
  • Contact: SUN Jian-Min, E-mail: chinajms@126.com

摘要:

伦理型领导是近年来得到广泛关注的概念。但是, 关于伦理型领导的概念内涵和测量工具, 目前还存在一定分歧。通过回顾概念起源, 划分了广义和狭义的伦理型领导, 界定了科学取向伦理型领导的内涵和外延, 区分了伦理型领导与相近的概念。在概念界定的基础上, 总结和比较了伦理型领导的测量工具, 指出已有测量存在的问题。针对概念定义和测量中存在的问题, 为未来伦理型领导概念和测量工具的完善及本土化提供了建议。

关键词: 伦理型领导, 概念界定, 测量, 中国情境, 本土化

Abstract:

The construct of ethical leadership has garnered much research attention in recent years. However, researchers have not reached consensus on the conceptualization and measurement of ethical leadership. Based on an extensive review of publications, this paper classifies prescriptive and scientific definitions of ethical leadership, defines connotations and boundary of ethical leadership from a scientific view, and distinguishes ethical leadership from other similar leadership constructs. Then, we summarize and compare scales used in ethical leadership research, and highlight potential deficiencies of these instruments. We further provide recommendations for improving the conceptualization and measurement of ethical leadership, as well as indigenous research in the Chinese context.

Key words: ethical leadership, conceptual clarification, measurement, Chinese context, indigenous research