Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
情绪性注意瞬脱的认知机制:来自行为与ERP的证据
贾磊1;张常洁1;张庆林2
(1浙江工业大学心理系, 杭州 310014) (2西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715)
Cognitive mechanisms of the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from behavior and ERPs
JIA Lei1; ZHANG Chang-Jie1; ZHANG Qing-lin2
(1 Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China)
(2 Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
全文: PDF(818 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

从过度投入理论与激活反弹理论对瓶颈理论的质疑出发, 采用ERP技术检验了情绪性注意瞬脱的加工过程及其神经机制。行为结果显示, 以恐惧面孔为T1, 中性场景图片为T2, 则恐惧面孔T1相对中性面孔T1显著降低了中性T2的识别正确率, 进而诱发了情绪性注意瞬脱。ERP结果进一步显示, 相较于中性面孔T1, 恐惧面孔T1诱发的情绪加工影响了代表中枢加工资源的两阶段P3波幅, 使得其始终高于代表标准注意瞬脱的中性面孔T1条件和代表非注意瞬脱的单任务基线条件。以上结果证明, 情绪性注意瞬脱形成自情绪性T1加工所诱发的中枢资源过度投入, 而非源自中枢资源瓶颈。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
贾磊
张常洁
张庆林
关键词 情绪性注意注意瞬脱事件相关电位    
Abstract
The emotional attentional blink (EAB) refers to a specific limitationreduced ability to report the second of two targets (T2) in a stream of distractors if it appears within 200-500 msec following the first target (T1). This effect is known as attentional blink (AB). However, when emotional/ affective stimulus is used as T1 and T2 is neutral, the AB effect can be strengthened. This specific effect of attentional blink is emotional attentional blink (EAB). Compared with the standard AB effect, the EAB has its unique characteristics. For example, the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between T1 and T2 in EAB could be less than that in standard attentional blink (e.g., ≤134 msec; Stein et al., 2009). Nevertheless, the task of T1 recognition should be aimed at the dimension of emotional process. of humans' attention system that consciously perception ability of target stimuli distributed across time is reduced by emotional/affective processes. Under conditions of rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), participants usually display a significant
Although recent behavior studies have provided much evidence about the process of EAB, details about the cognitive neural mechanisms of EAB are still unknown. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the cognitive neural processing mechanisms of the EAB and verify the divergences between views of the Bottleneck Theory (Martens & Wyble, 2010; Zhang & Wang, 2009) and the Overinvestment theory (as well as the Boost and Bounce Theory; Olivers & Meeter, 2008; Olivers & Nieuwenhuis, 2006).
To achieve this purpose, the present study employed a modified dual-task RSVP paradigm referred from the Study 1 of Stein et al. (2009). Moreover, the technology of event related potentials (ERPs) was used to examine the fast neural process of the EAB. In this RSVP stream, emotional faces (three conditions: fear faces, neutral faces, and face absent) were used as T1, and pictures of house scene (neutral: outdoor vs. indoor) were used as T2 stimuli. Participants were instructed to recognize T1 and T2 when the visual stream was presented. Once the visual stream disappeared, participants had to make judgment of T1 and T2 based on their categories or features. Meanwhile, EEG/ERPs from the facial recognition of T1 to the scene recognition of T2 were recorded and off-line analyzed.

The results of the final behavioral data analysis revealed that the condition of emotion T1 (fear faces) led to a significant reduction in the efficiency of T2 recognition, which was much lower than that in the conditions of neutral T1 (neutral faces) and T1 missing. These behavioral results indicated a typical EAB effect. In addition, the ERPs results provided the first evidence for the process of the EAB. In this research, we focused on the P3 components of the two processing stages of T1 and T2, respectively. Because these P3 components indexed the resource of attention in central processing. The final results showed that compared with other stimuli conditions (neutral T1 and T1 absent), the P3 amplitudes evoked by emotion T1 and T2 presentation were both enhanced. This effect should deny the resource bottleneck between the T1 and T2 competition but support the emotional/affective overinvestment in EAB. Based on these results, the neural mechanisms of EAB were discussed.

Key wordsemotional attention    attentional blink    event related potentials (ERPs)
收稿日期: 2015-01-20      出版日期: 2016-02-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金青年项目(31400900)与浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题一般项目(14NDJC171YB)资助。

通讯作者: 张庆林, E-mail: zhangql@swu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
贾磊;张常洁;张庆林. 情绪性注意瞬脱的认知机制:来自行为与ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00174.
JIA Lei; ZHANG Chang-Jie; ZHANG Qing-lin. Cognitive mechanisms of the emotional attentional blink: Evidence from behavior and ERPs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 174-184.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00174      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I2/174
[1] 程家萍;罗跃嘉;崔芳. 认知负荷对疼痛共情的影响:来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 622-630.
[2] 宋娟; 郭丰波; 张振; 原胜; 金花; 王益文. 人际距离影响疼痛共情:朋友启动效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 833-844.
[3] 徐菊;胡媛艳;王双; 李艾苏;张明;张阳. 返回抑制训练效应的认知神经机制 ——来自ERP研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 658-670.
[4] 李婧; 陈安涛;陈杰;龙长权. 词语型类别属性归纳中分类与属性推理过程的时间特征[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1410-1422.
[5] 张丹丹;赵婷;柳昀哲;陈玉明. 恐惧情绪面孔和身体姿势加工的比较:事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 963-970.
[6] 杨亚平;徐强;张林;邓培状;梁宁建. 场景的不同空间频率信息对面部表情加工的影响:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1433-1444.
[7] 王瑛瑛;梁九清;郭春彦. 单字法定向遗忘中情绪指示符对记忆编码过程的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 740-753.
[8] 孙楠;郑希付. 条件性的关联学习和消退过程的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 507-515.
[9] 魏萍;康冠兰;丁锦红;郭春彦. 奖赏预期对面孔情绪加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 437-449.
[10] 司继伟;徐艳丽;封洪敏;许晓华;周超. 不同数学焦虑成人的算术策略运用差异:ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1835-1849.
[11] 窦凯;聂衍刚;王玉洁;黎建斌;沈汪兵. 自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1564-1579.
[12] 胡哲;张钦;梁九清;郭春彦. 不同情绪背景下来源记忆的ERPs研究[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(7): 725-739.
[13] 邢强;张忠炉;王梦偌;张金莲;王菁;姚艳芬;占丹玲. 汉字字谜任务中限制解除的电生理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 508-516.
[14] 赵庆柏;张小菲;隋丹妮;周治金;陈其才;周宗奎. 局部表象产生中行为性别差异的神经基础[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 438-445.
[15] 郑志伟;黄贤军;张钦. 情绪韵律调节情绪词识别的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 427-437.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn