Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (1) : 1-10     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00001
Conceptual Framework |
The influence of curiosity on inspiration: Phenomenon and mechanism based on cognitive and affect processes
CHEN Xiaoxi1(),CHEN Fengling1,LI Bin1,2(),LIU Yaozhong1
1 Department of Management, Jinan University
2 IThe Institute of Enterprise Development, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Download: PDF(634 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

The Chinese market economic system is led by the government to a great extent, which has impeded the transformation of the Chinese economy from a factor driven economy to an innovation driven one. The question of how to maintain and promote innovation has caused wide concern of the researchers and enterprises. Researchers have found that the curiosity and inspiration belong to subprocess and component of creativity and innovation. Moreover, inspiration has a dependent psychological construct and varied process, which can be influenced by conscious emotions. Based on these findings, this project started from the perspective of dual-process theory (cognitive and affect processes) to reveal the phenomenon of inspiration triggered by curiosity. The project intends to testify processing mechanism of inspiration on both behavioral science and cognitive neuroscience levels. This project can not only contribute to the development of inspiration theory, but also help to foster the creativity and innovation of entrepreneur and employees.

Keywords curiosity      inspiration      cognitive      affect      social connectedness     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 23 November 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Xiaoxi CHEN
Fengling CHEN
Bin LI
Yaozhong LIU
Cite this article:   
Xiaoxi CHEN,Fengling CHEN,Bin LI, et al. The influence of curiosity on inspiration: Phenomenon and mechanism based on cognitive and affect processes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 1-10.
URL:     OR
作者 阶段
Wallas, 2014 准备 preparation 酝酿 incubation 明朗 illumination 验证 verification
Mainemelis, 2010 准备 酝酿 明朗 评价 加工
Amabile, 2012 提出问题 准备和酝酿 产生反应 验证反应 评价结果
Busse & Mans-
field, 1980
选择问题 投入努力 设置约束条件 改变约束条件和
1 李天然, 俞国良 . (2015). 人类为什么会好奇?人际好奇的概念,功能及理论解释. 心理科学进展, 23(1),132-141.
2 刘亚, 周长江, 杨哈韬 . (2012). 灵感的概念,结构与功能. 心理科学进展,20(11),1834-1842.
3 沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林 . (2017). 仁慈领导与员工创新行为: 内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导-部属交换关系差异化的调节作用. 心理学报,49(8), 1100-1112.
4 王怀勇, 刘永芳 . (2014). 决策过程中的调节匹配效应及其机制. 心理科学,37(1), 182-189.
5 袁媛, 沈汪兵, 施春华, 刘畅, 刘取芝, 刘昌 . (2016). 顿悟体验的心理与神经机制. 心理科学进展,24(9), 1329-1338.
6 张亚坤, 陈龙安, 张兴利, 施建农 . (2018). 融合视角下的西方创造力系统观. 心理科学进展,26(5), 810-830.
7 张勇, 龙立荣 . (2013). 绩效薪酬对雇员创造力的影响: 人-工作匹配和创造力自我效能的作用. 心理学报,45(3), 363-376.
8 Agarwal ,R., & Karahanna E. , (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
9 , Amabile T.M . (2012). Componential theory of creativity.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
10 Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., & Staw B. M . (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
11 Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., & Herron M . (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
12 Anderson N., Poto?nik K., & Zhou J . (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
13 , Baumeister R.F., & Leary M.R . (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
pmid: 7777651 url:
14 Baumeister R. F., Zhang L. Q., & Vohs K. D . (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121.
15 Belzak W. C. M., Thrash T. M., Sim Y. Y., & Wadsworth L. M . (2017). Beyond hedonic and eudaimonic well- being: Inspiration and the self-transcendence tradition. In M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being(pp. 117-138). Cham: Springer.
16 Berlyne D.E . (1960). McGraw-Hill series in psychology. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York:. McGraw-Hill.
17 , Berlyne D.E . (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17(3), 274-290.
pmid: 14048839 url:
18 Bledow R., Rosing K., & Frese M . (2013). A Dynamic perspective on affect and creativity, Academy and Management Journal, 56(2), 432-450.
19 Boyd D.& Goldenberg J. , (2013). Inside the box: A proven system of creativity for breakthrough results. New York: Simon &. Schuster.
20 Busse T.V., &Mansfield R.S . (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(2), 91-132.
21 Carr N. . (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton &Company.
url: W. W. Norton
22 Csikszentmihalyi M. . (1997). Flow and creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60-97.
23 Day H.I . (1971). The measurement of specific curiosity.In H. I. Day, D. E. Berlyne, & D. E. Hunt (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
url: Holt, Rinehart
24 Day H.I., & Langevin R. (1969). Curiosity and intelligence: Two necessary conditions for a high level of creativity. The Journal of Special Education, 3(3), 263-268.
25 Farley S.D . (2011). Is gossip power? The inverse relationship between gossip, power, and likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 574-579.
26 Gong Y., Wu J., Song L. J., & Zhang Z . (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829-844.
27 Gottlieb J., Oudeyer P-Y., Lopes M., & Baranes A . (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585-593.
pmid: 4193662 url:
28 Han C., Li P., Warren C., Feng T., Litman J., & Li H . (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the importance of interpersonal curiosity. Brain Research, 1500, 45-54.
pmid: 23333374 url:
29 Hardy III J. H., Ness A. M., & Mecca J . (2017). Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 230-237.
30 Hartung F-M. . (2010). Social curiosity and its functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universit?t Konstanz
31 Hartung F-M. & Renner B. (2011). Social curiosity and interpersonal perception: A judge × trait interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 796-814.
pmid: 21398584 url:
32 Hennessey B.A., &Amabile T.M . (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569-598.
33 Higgins E.T . (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
34 Higgins E.T . (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46.
35 Hirst G., Van Knippenberg D., & Zhou J . (2009). A cross- level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293.
36 Kang M. J., Hsu M., Krajbich I. M., Loewenstein G., McClure S. M., Wang J. T. Y., & Camerer C. F . (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973.
pmid: 19619181 url:
37 Kashdan T. B., McKnight P. E., Fincham F. D., & Rose P . (2011). When curiosity breeds intimacy: Taking advantage of intimacy opportunities and transforming boring conversations. Journal of Personality, 79(6), 1369-1402.
pmid: 3356784 url:
38 Kashdan T. B., Rose P., & Fincham F. D . (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.
pmid: 15151805 url:
39 Kashdan T. B. & Silvia, P. J. , (2009).Curiosity and interest:The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge In C R Snyder & S J Lopez (Eds), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp 367-374) USA: Oxford University Press The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 367-374) . USA: Oxford University Press.
url: and interest:The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge In C R Snyder
40 , Keltner D. &Shiota M.N . (2003). New displays and new emotions: A commentary on Rozin and Cohen (2003). Emotion, 3(1), 86-91.
pmid: 12899320 url:
41 Kidd C. &Hayden B.Y . (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449-460.
pmid: 26539887 url:
42 Koo D-M. & Choi Y-Y. , (2010). Knowledge search and people with high epistemic curiosity. C omputers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 12-22.
43 Kumashiro M. & Sedikides C. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16(9), 732-739.
pmid: 16137260 url:
44 Lee R.M., &Robbins S.B . (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338-345.
45 Lerner J. S., Li Y., Valdesolo P., & Kassam K. S . (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799-823.
46 Levitt H. M., Williams D. C., Uruk A. C., Kannan D., Obana M., Smith B. L., .. Biss W. J . (2009). The experience of depth curiosity: The pursuit of congruence despite the danger of engulfment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 22(3), 187-212.
47 Li Q., Maggitti P. G., Smith K. G., Tesluk P. E., & Katila R . (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893-916.
48 Litman J.A . (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585-1595.
49 Litman J. A., Collins R. P., & Spielberger C. D . (2005). The nature and measurement of sensory curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1123-1133.
50 Litman J.A., &Jimerson T.L . (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147-157.
pmid: 15041521 url:
51 Litman J.A., &Pezzo M.V . (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1448-1459.
52 Loewenstein G. . (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.
53 Lubart T.I . (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
54 Mainemelis C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558-578.
55 Menon S. & Soman D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1-14.
56 Oleynick V. C., Thrash T. M., LeFew M. C., Moldovan E. G., & Kieffaber P. D . (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 436.
pmid: 4070479 url:
57 Peters K., Jetten J., Radova D., & Austin K . (2017). Gossiping about deviance: Evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1610-1619.
pmid: 28898164 url:
58 Reio T.G., &Callahan J.L . (2004). Affect, curiosity, and socialization-related learning: A path analysis of antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 3-22.
59 Roche S.M., &McConkey K.M . (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91-101.
60 Runco M. A. , & Dow, G.(1999). Problem finding. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds. ), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 433-435). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61 Sadler-smith E. . (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352.
62 Stephan E., Sedikides C., Wildschut T., Cheung W.-Y., Routledge C., & Arndt J . (2015). Nostalgia-evoked inspiration: Mediating mechanisms and motivational implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1395-1410.
pmid: 26228477 url:
63 Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871-889.
pmid: 12703654 url:
64 Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957-973.
pmid: 15598117 url:
65 Thrash T. M., Maruskin L. A., Cassidy S. E., Fryer J. W., & Ryan R. M . (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469-487.
pmid: 20175625 url:
66 van Dijk E., & Marcel Z. (2007). When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision- making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 656-662.
67 Van Wulfen G. (2016). Creating innovative products and services: The FORTH innovation method (pp. 103-105). London:. Routledge.
68 Wallas G..(2014). The art of thought. London: Solis Press.
69 Wang C. . (2014). What satisfies a curious mind? Curiosity prompts novel reward seeking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of British Columbia.
70 Wang C. & Huang Y. (2018). “I Want to Know the Answer! Give Me Fish’ n’ Chips!”: The impact of curiosity on indulgent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1052-1067.
71 Welsh G. S. , & Barron, F.(1959). Barron-Welsh art scale. Consulting Psychologists Press.
72 Wu C.-H., Parker S. K ., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2011). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534.
73 Zeng L., Proctor R. W., & Salvendy G . (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37.
74 Zhou J., Wang X. M., Song L. J., & Wu J . (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180-202.
pmid: 27893257 url:
[1] LI Haihong, DENG Zhou, HE Xin, SHEN Shaojing, ZOU Yawen, ZHU Minfan, WANG Yun, XIE Xiaofei. Normality rather than anomaly: The theory and application of endowment effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 394-405.
[2] ZHANG Aizhen, WANG Yao, LI Jing. The cognitive aging effect of route knowledge acquisition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 242-250.
[3] CHEN Lin,TIAN Xiaoming,DUAN Jinyun. The cognitive mechanism of advice taking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[4] ZHAN Ze,WU Baopei. Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 128-140.
[5] Tao SUO,Yan YANG,Zeng FAN,Mengmeng WANG,Guoxiang ZHAO. The near-miss effect in gambling games[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1689-1699.
[6] Wenjing PAN,Fangfang WEN,Bin ZUO. Aging stereotype threat and it’s manipulations in psychological research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1670-1679.
[7] Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[8] Heping XIE,Ji PENG,Zongkui ZHOU. Attention guidance and cognitive processing: The educational effects of eye movement modeling examples[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1404-1416.
[9] LI Heng. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[10] LI Zhenghan, YANG Guochun, NAN Weizhi, LI Qi, LIU Xun. Attentional regulation mechanisms of cognitive control in conflict resolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 966-974.
[11] LIU Bingqian, LI Xuebing.  Cognitive bias modification of interpretation for social anxiety: A “bottom-up” intervention?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 859-871.
[12] HUO Lijuan, ZHENG Zhiwei, LI Jin, LI Juan.  The plasticity of aging brain: Evidence from cognitive training[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 846-858.
[13] LIU Zimin, SHI Kan, WAN Jin, CHEN Chen.  Analysis and outlook of need for cognitive closure research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 688-697.
[14] ZHANG Xinyue, YU Lin.  The early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Subjective cognitive impairment?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 488-495.
[15] TENG Jing, SHEN Wangbing, HAO Ning.  The role of cognitive control in divergent thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 411-422.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech