Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (1) : 1-10     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00001
Conceptual Framework |
The influence of curiosity on inspiration: Phenomenon and mechanism based on cognitive and affect processes
CHEN Xiaoxi1(),CHEN Fengling1,LI Bin1,2(),LIU Yaozhong1
1 Department of Management, Jinan University
2 IThe Institute of Enterprise Development, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Download: PDF(634 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The Chinese market economic system is led by the government to a great extent, which has impeded the transformation of the Chinese economy from a factor driven economy to an innovation driven one. The question of how to maintain and promote innovation has caused wide concern of the researchers and enterprises. Researchers have found that the curiosity and inspiration belong to subprocess and component of creativity and innovation. Moreover, inspiration has a dependent psychological construct and varied process, which can be influenced by conscious emotions. Based on these findings, this project started from the perspective of dual-process theory (cognitive and affect processes) to reveal the phenomenon of inspiration triggered by curiosity. The project intends to testify processing mechanism of inspiration on both behavioral science and cognitive neuroscience levels. This project can not only contribute to the development of inspiration theory, but also help to foster the creativity and innovation of entrepreneur and employees.

Keywords curiosity      inspiration      cognitive      affect      social connectedness     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 23 November 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xiaoxi CHEN
Fengling CHEN
Bin LI
Yaozhong LIU
Cite this article:   
Xiaoxi CHEN,Fengling CHEN,Bin LI, et al. The influence of curiosity on inspiration: Phenomenon and mechanism based on cognitive and affect processes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 1-10.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00001     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2019/V27/I1/1
作者 阶段
Wallas, 2014 准备 preparation 酝酿 incubation 明朗 illumination 验证 verification
Mainemelis, 2010 准备 酝酿 明朗 评价 加工
Amabile, 2012 提出问题 准备和酝酿 产生反应 验证反应 评价结果
Busse & Mans-
field, 1980
选择问题 投入努力 设置约束条件 改变约束条件和
重新建构问题
验证和阐述所提出的解决方案
  
  
1 李天然, 俞国良 . (2015). 人类为什么会好奇?人际好奇的概念,功能及理论解释. 心理科学进展, 23(1),132-141.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201501014
2 刘亚, 周长江, 杨哈韬 . (2012). 灵感的概念,结构与功能. 心理科学进展,20(11),1834-1842.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201211014
3 沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林 . (2017). 仁慈领导与员工创新行为: 内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导-部属交换关系差异化的调节作用. 心理学报,49(8), 1100-1112.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201708011
4 王怀勇, 刘永芳 . (2014). 决策过程中的调节匹配效应及其机制. 心理科学,37(1), 182-189.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/8647453
5 袁媛, 沈汪兵, 施春华, 刘畅, 刘取芝, 刘昌 . (2016). 顿悟体验的心理与神经机制. 心理科学进展,24(9), 1329-1338.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201609001
6 张亚坤, 陈龙安, 张兴利, 施建农 . (2018). 融合视角下的西方创造力系统观. 心理科学进展,26(5), 810-830.
url: http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xlxdt201805006
7 张勇, 龙立荣 . (2013). 绩效薪酬对雇员创造力的影响: 人-工作匹配和创造力自我效能的作用. 心理学报,45(3), 363-376.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201303011
8 Agarwal ,R., & Karahanna E. , (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
url: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2017129
9 , Amabile T.M . (2012). Componential theory of creativity.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
10 Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., & Staw B. M . (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-08744-002
11 Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., & Herron M . (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-01963-002
12 Anderson N., Poto?nik K., & Zhou J . (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-23154-003
13 , Baumeister R.F., & Leary M.R . (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
pmid: 7777651 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/PMED?id=7777651
14 Baumeister R. F., Zhang L. Q., & Vohs K. D . (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.111
15 Belzak W. C. M., Thrash T. M., Sim Y. Y., & Wadsworth L. M . (2017). Beyond hedonic and eudaimonic well- being: Inspiration and the self-transcendence tradition. In M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being(pp. 117-138). Cham: Springer.
url: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-58763-9_7.pdf
16 Berlyne D.E . (1960). McGraw-Hill series in psychology. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York:. McGraw-Hill.
17 , Berlyne D.E . (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17(3), 274-290.
pmid: 14048839 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14048839
18 Bledow R., Rosing K., & Frese M . (2013). A Dynamic perspective on affect and creativity, Academy and Management Journal, 56(2), 432-450.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-19365-006
19 Boyd D.& Goldenberg J. , (2013). Inside the box: A proven system of creativity for breakthrough results. New York: Simon &. Schuster.
20 Busse T.V., &Mansfield R.S . (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(2), 91-132.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1980.tb00232.x/full
21 Carr N. . (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton &Company.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ork: W. W. Norton
22 Csikszentmihalyi M. . (1997). Flow and creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60-97.
23 Day H.I . (1971). The measurement of specific curiosity.In H. I. Day, D. E. Berlyne, & D. E. Hunt (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ork: Holt, Rinehart
24 Day H.I., & Langevin R. (1969). Curiosity and intelligence: Two necessary conditions for a high level of creativity. The Journal of Special Education, 3(3), 263-268.
url: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej015092
25 Farley S.D . (2011). Is gossip power? The inverse relationship between gossip, power, and likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 574-579.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.821/full
26 Gong Y., Wu J., Song L. J., & Zhang Z . (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829-844.
url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28150986
27 Gottlieb J., Oudeyer P-Y., Lopes M., & Baranes A . (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585-593.
pmid: 4193662 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661313002052
28 Han C., Li P., Warren C., Feng T., Litman J., & Li H . (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the importance of interpersonal curiosity. Brain Research, 1500, 45-54.
pmid: 23333374 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899313000607
29 Hardy III J. H., Ness A. M., & Mecca J . (2017). Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 230-237.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188691630900X
30 Hartung F-M. . (2010). Social curiosity and its functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universit?t Konstanz
31 Hartung F-M. & Renner B. (2011). Social curiosity and interpersonal perception: A judge × trait interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 796-814.
pmid: 21398584 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21398584
32 Hennessey B.A., &Amabile T.M . (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569-598.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
33 Higgins E.T . (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
34 Higgins E.T . (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260108603810
35 Hirst G., Van Knippenberg D., & Zhou J . (2009). A cross- level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2009-06336-004
36 Kang M. J., Hsu M., Krajbich I. M., Loewenstein G., McClure S. M., Wang J. T. Y., & Camerer C. F . (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973.
pmid: 19619181 url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40575128
37 Kashdan T. B., McKnight P. E., Fincham F. D., & Rose P . (2011). When curiosity breeds intimacy: Taking advantage of intimacy opportunities and transforming boring conversations. Journal of Personality, 79(6), 1369-1402.
pmid: 3356784 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00697.x/full
38 Kashdan T. B., Rose P., & Fincham F. D . (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.
pmid: 15151805 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05
39 Kashdan T. B. & Silvia, P. J. , (2009).Curiosity and interest:The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge In C R Snyder & S J Lopez (Eds), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp 367-374) USA: Oxford University Press The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 367-374) . USA: Oxford University Press.
url: http://dx.doi.org/sity and interest:The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge In C R Snyder
40 , Keltner D. &Shiota M.N . (2003). New displays and new emotions: A commentary on Rozin and Cohen (2003). Emotion, 3(1), 86-91.
pmid: 12899320 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM12899320
41 Kidd C. &Hayden B.Y . (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449-460.
pmid: 26539887 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627315007679
42 Koo D-M. & Choi Y-Y. , (2010). Knowledge search and people with high epistemic curiosity. C omputers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 12-22.
url: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1652178
43 Kumashiro M. & Sedikides C. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16(9), 732-739.
pmid: 16137260 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16137260?dopt=Abstract
44 Lee R.M., &Robbins S.B . (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338-345.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/cou/45/3/338/
45 Lerner J. S., Li Y., Valdesolo P., & Kassam K. S . (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799-823.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
46 Levitt H. M., Williams D. C., Uruk A. C., Kannan D., Obana M., Smith B. L., .. Biss W. J . (2009). The experience of depth curiosity: The pursuit of congruence despite the danger of engulfment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 22(3), 187-212.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10720530902915093
47 Li Q., Maggitti P. G., Smith K. G., Tesluk P. E., & Katila R . (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893-916.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0844
48 Litman J.A . (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585-1595.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886908000275
49 Litman J. A., Collins R. P., & Spielberger C. D . (2005). The nature and measurement of sensory curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1123-1133.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886905001522
50 Litman J.A., &Jimerson T.L . (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147-157.
pmid: 15041521 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_3
51 Litman J.A., &Pezzo M.V . (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1448-1459.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=14368977
52 Loewenstein G. . (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/bul/116/1/75/
53 Lubart T.I . (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-00075-005
54 Mainemelis C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558-578.
url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29765005
55 Menon S. & Soman D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1-14.
56 Oleynick V. C., Thrash T. M., LeFew M. C., Moldovan E. G., & Kieffaber P. D . (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 436.
pmid: 4070479 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4070479/
57 Peters K., Jetten J., Radova D., & Austin K . (2017). Gossiping about deviance: Evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1610-1619.
pmid: 28898164 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28898164
58 Reio T.G., &Callahan J.L . (2004). Affect, curiosity, and socialization-related learning: A path analysis of antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 3-22.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=15884713
59 Roche S.M., &McConkey K.M . (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91-101.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/59/1/91/
60 Runco M. A. , & Dow, G.(1999). Problem finding. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds. ), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 433-435). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61 Sadler-smith E. . (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277
62 Stephan E., Sedikides C., Wildschut T., Cheung W.-Y., Routledge C., & Arndt J . (2015). Nostalgia-evoked inspiration: Mediating mechanisms and motivational implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1395-1410.
pmid: 26228477 url: http://old.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/viewHTMLEn/PeriodicalPaper_PM26228477.aspx
63 Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871-889.
pmid: 12703654 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM12703654
64 Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957-973.
pmid: 15598117 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM15598117
65 Thrash T. M., Maruskin L. A., Cassidy S. E., Fryer J. W., & Ryan R. M . (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469-487.
pmid: 20175625 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM20175625
66 van Dijk E., & Marcel Z. (2007). When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision- making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 656-662.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103106000990
67 Van Wulfen G. (2016). Creating innovative products and services: The FORTH innovation method (pp. 103-105). London:. Routledge.
68 Wallas G..(2014). The art of thought. London: Solis Press.
69 Wang C. . (2014). What satisfies a curious mind? Curiosity prompts novel reward seeking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of British Columbia.
70 Wang C. & Huang Y. (2018). “I Want to Know the Answer! Give Me Fish’ n’ Chips!”: The impact of curiosity on indulgent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1052-1067.
71 Welsh G. S. , & Barron, F.(1959). Barron-Welsh art scale. Consulting Psychologists Press.
72 Wu C.-H., Parker S. K ., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2011). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-39312-002
73 Zeng L., Proctor R. W., & Salvendy G . (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-02640-003
74 Zhou J., Wang X. M., Song L. J., & Wu J . (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180-202.
pmid: 27893257 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893257
[1] LI Haihong, DENG Zhou, HE Xin, SHEN Shaojing, ZOU Yawen, ZHU Minfan, WANG Yun, XIE Xiaofei. Normality rather than anomaly: The theory and application of endowment effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 394-405.
[2] ZHANG Aizhen, WANG Yao, LI Jing. The cognitive aging effect of route knowledge acquisition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 242-250.
[3] CHEN Lin,TIAN Xiaoming,DUAN Jinyun. The cognitive mechanism of advice taking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[4] ZHAN Ze,WU Baopei. Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 128-140.
[5] Tao SUO,Yan YANG,Zeng FAN,Mengmeng WANG,Guoxiang ZHAO. The near-miss effect in gambling games[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1689-1699.
[6] Wenjing PAN,Fangfang WEN,Bin ZUO. Aging stereotype threat and it’s manipulations in psychological research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1670-1679.
[7] Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[8] Heping XIE,Ji PENG,Zongkui ZHOU. Attention guidance and cognitive processing: The educational effects of eye movement modeling examples[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1404-1416.
[9] LI Heng. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[10] LI Zhenghan, YANG Guochun, NAN Weizhi, LI Qi, LIU Xun. Attentional regulation mechanisms of cognitive control in conflict resolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 966-974.
[11] LIU Bingqian, LI Xuebing.  Cognitive bias modification of interpretation for social anxiety: A “bottom-up” intervention?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 859-871.
[12] HUO Lijuan, ZHENG Zhiwei, LI Jin, LI Juan.  The plasticity of aging brain: Evidence from cognitive training[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 846-858.
[13] LIU Zimin, SHI Kan, WAN Jin, CHEN Chen.  Analysis and outlook of need for cognitive closure research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 688-697.
[14] ZHANG Xinyue, YU Lin.  The early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Subjective cognitive impairment?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 488-495.
[15] TENG Jing, SHEN Wangbing, HAO Ning.  The role of cognitive control in divergent thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 411-422.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech