ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

Most Down Articles

    Published in last 1 year| In last 2 years| In last 3 years| All| Most Downloaded in Recent Month | Most Downloaded in Recent Year|

    Published in last 1 year
    Please wait a minute...
    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails
    When AI “possesses” personality: Roles of good and evil personalities influence moral judgment in large language models
    JIAO Liying, LI Chang-Jin, CHEN Zhen, XU Hengbin, XU Yan
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (6): 929-946.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0929
    Abstract6137)   HTML478)    PDF (1204KB)(11987)      

    The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding the moral decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs). One intriguing aspect is the potential for LLMs to exhibit characteristics akin to human personalities, which may influence the LLMs’ moral judgment. Understanding how personality traits, especially the moral traits, influence these decisions is crucial for developing AI systems that align with human ethical standards. Therefore, this study aims to explore how the roles of good and evil personalities shape the moral decision-making of LLMs, providing insights that are essential for the ethical development of AI.

    This study investigated the roles of good and evil personalities in shaping the moral decision-making of the ERNIE 4.0 and GPT-4. Good personality was characterized by traits such as conscientiousness and integrity, altruism and dedication, benevolence and amicability, and tolerance and magnanimity. Evil personality encompassed traits such as atrociousness and mercilessness, mendacity and hypocrisy, calumniation and circumvention, and faithlessness and treacherousness. Study 1 analyzed 4000 observations. Specific prompts corresponding to different personality dimensions were designed. After specifying the type of personality, ERNIE 4.0 completed a self-report scale for good and evil personalities, evaluated whether the descriptions matched the current personality traits and provided a numerical rating indicating the degree of agreement. Study 2 recruited 370 human participants and utilized 832 LLM observations, investigated the roles of good and evil personalities in shaping the moral decision-making of the LLMs and compared with human results.

    Significant score differences were observed across all eight personality dimensions, with high-level manipulations significantly higher than low-level manipulations. These results demonstrate LLMs’ ability to express levels of good and evil personality traits. A comparative analysis was conducted between human participants and LLMs to evaluate the impact of these traits on CAN model in Study 2. Results showed that the patterns of personality’s influence on moral judgment exhibited both similarities and differences between LLMs and humans. GPT-4's good personality manipulation aligns closely with human results, while ERNIE 4.0 scored higher than humans on sensitivity to consequences (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), overall action/inaction preferences (A) parameters, and utilitarianism (U). GPT-4 demonstrated better moral alignment compared to ERNIE 4.0. Furthermore, a theoretical model of good and evil personality traits in LLMs was constructed within the domain of moral judgment.

    This study demonstrated that LLMs effectively simulated varying levels of good and evil personality traits through personality prompts, which significantly influenced their moral judgments. GPT-4’s moral judgments aligned more closely with humans under good personality prompts, while ERNIE 4.0 consistently scored higher than humans across moral judgment indicators. Under evil personality prompts, GPT-4 exhibited lower moral norm sensitivity and higher action tendency and utilitarianism. Additionally, the influence of personality on GPT-4’s moral judgment was stronger than on ERNIE 4.0. The impact of good and evil personalities on moral judgment showed hierarchical differences, with good personality traits, particularly conscientiousness, playing a more critical role in achieving human-AI alignment in moral judgments. This research provided valuable insights into enhancing AI ethical decision-making by integrating nuanced personality traits, guiding the development of more socially responsible AI systems.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The effects of rumination on social anxiety: The role of negative self-beliefs
    GENG Li, FENG Qiuyang, LI Yu, QIU Jiang
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (5): 792-804.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0792
    Abstract6676)   HTML795)    PDF (755KB)(11764)      

    People sometimes recall social interactions, speculating on others' evaluations and opinions of themselves. When such thinking exceeds normal limits or is persistently accompanied by negative emotions, it becomes distressing, manifesting as rumination. Cognitive theories of social anxiety identify rumination as a pivotal factor in its onset and maintenance. Individuals engaged in rumination often form negative and pessimistic evaluations about themselves, with cognitive elements playing a crucial role. Sometimes, people develop distorted, counterfactual beliefs about themselves and others, termed negative self-beliefs, which are a type of adverse cognition and a core feature of social anxiety. Although the relationships among rumination, social anxiety, and negative self-beliefs have been theoretically discussed, empirical studies confirming their interaction mechanisms are lacking. Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore the significant role of negative self-beliefs in the relationship between rumination and social anxiety.
    The study conducted two experiments designed to provoke social anxiety and prompt participants to engage in state rumination, with the aim of monitoring and analyzing their subsequent emotional responses. Experiment 1 included 83 participants (26 males, 57 females; mean age 21.05 ± 2.15 years). The participants first underwent baseline measurements, followed by a 3-minute timed speech task to induce social anxiety. After this task, the participants were randomly divided into two groups to engage in either rumination or distraction imaging, with changes in negative self-beliefs and levels of social anxiety recorded before and after the tasks. Experiment 2 involved 51 participants (20 males, 31 females; mean age 20.14 ± 1.76 years). The experiment was conducted over two lab visits. In the first visit, the participants learned about and mastered the concepts of social anxiety and negative self-beliefs, recalled, and wrote down four previous social anxiety events and the negative self-beliefs associated with each event. During the second visit, the participants completed a keyboard response task, during which real-time emotional changes were recorded. They dealt with their negative self-beliefs according to the guidance provided under different psychological states of rumination or distraction and used various coping strategies (reacting, observing, and reevaluating) to address the presented negative self-beliefs.
    The results of the data analysis are as follows: Experiment 1 utilized repeated-measures ANOVA and mediation models based on change scores, revealing (1) significant positive correlations among rumination, social anxiety, and negative self-beliefs and (2) that rumination affects social anxiety by sustaining negative self-beliefs. Experiment 2, which used repeated-measures ANOVA, revealed that (1) rumination on social anxiety events triggered more negative emotions; (2) using distraction strategies to alleviate social anxiety resulted in a rebound of negative emotions; and (3) interventions targeting negative self-beliefs proved to be more effective in alleviating social anxiety. Both experiments validated and complemented each other, collectively elucidating the critical role of negative self-beliefs in the impact of rumination on social anxiety.
    In summary, this study explored the impact of rumination and negative self-beliefs on social anxiety, not only validating and enriching the cognitive theories of social anxiety at a theoretical level but also filling empirical gaps in the previous research. First, the experimental results clarify the mediating role of negative self-beliefs in the relationship between rumination and social anxiety, offering a new perspective for understanding the mechanisms underlying the onset and maintenance of social anxiety. This finding deepens our understanding of the interaction between rumination and social anxiety, enhancing theoretical models of social phobia and broadening cognitive models of the onset and maintenance of social anxiety disorders. Second, the research results provide a basis for developing new intervention measures. Given the significant role of negative self-beliefs in maintaining social anxiety, future interventions could focus on directly targeting these self-beliefs, offering new strategies for the clinical treatment of social anxiety.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The linguistic strength and weakness of artificial intelligence: A comparison between Large Language Model(s) and real students in the Chinese context
    GAO Chenghai, DANG Baobao, WANG Bingjie, WU Michael Shengtao
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (6): 947-966.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0947
    Abstract2601)   HTML121)    PDF (1029KB)(10114)      

    Previous research on generative artificial intelligence (AI) has been primarily conducted in the English context, but it remains unclear about linguistic strength and weakness of generative AI in the Chinese context. This study focuses on the accuracy and normativity, affectivity, and creativity of AI in generating language knowledge, and explores its cultural adaptability and ability to generate humanized and personalized content. Evaluating and analyzing these key indicators helps us gain a deeper understanding of the linguistic strengths and weaknesses of AI, as well as cultivating the unique advantages of humans in education.

    By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, we evaluated the differences in knowledge accuracy, normativity, affectivity, and creativity between large language models and real students. Specifically, using an explanatory sequential design in the mixed-methods framework, we first tested group differences in each indicator among GPT-4 and ERNIE-4 versus real students on knowledge accuracy, normativity, affectivity, and creativity to test the. Next, through content analyses, we explored the specific performance of large language models on each indicator and the mechanism of their linguistic strengths and weaknesses.

    Study 1 found that compared to real students, GPT-4 exhibited higher accuracy in modern text knowledge (especially conceptual knowledge), but lower accuracy in ancient poetry and language usage. The knowledge normativity of GPT-4 were comparable to those of real students, while its affectivity and creativity were lower than those of real students. Moreover, the highest individual scores of GPT-4 in normativity and emotionality were on comparable with the highest scores of real students. Study 2, based on ERNIE-4, confirmed the aforementioned results, and the accuracy in ancient poetry was still lower than that of real students. The results exhibited the advantages of artificial intelligence in the areas of modern knowledge and norms, its shortcomings in ancient poetry knowledge, and its potential in affective and creative expressions.

    Taken together, the current findings demonstrate the linguistic strength of generative AI in the knowledge accuracy of modern Chinese literary, and the weakness regarding ancient Chinese poetry and affective and creative writings, as well as generative AI’s potential in normative and affective expressions. This sheds light on the field of the cultural adaptability, affective and creative expressions of generative AI, and has valuable implications for the AI-assistant teaching practice in the Chinese context.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The relationship between awe and prosocial behavior: Three-level meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling
    LIN Rongmao, YU Qiaohua, HU Tianxiang, ZHANG Jiumei, YE Yushan, LIAN Rong
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (4): 631-651.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0631
    Abstract2614)   HTML380)    PDF (1655KB)(9516)      

    Awe and prosocial behavior are two crucial indicators of human social development. Their association has garnered widespread attention from researchers. The prosocial effects of awe are supported by the social functionalist theory of emotion as well as the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Numerous empirical studies have found a positive relationship between awe and prosocial behavior, demonstrating that awe can promote prosocial behavior. However, some contradictory evidence suggest that awe may not always enhance individuals’ willingness to help, donate, or forgive others and may even diminish their prosocial tendencies. Such inconsistency may relate to factors such as the characteristics of awe, the attributes of prosocial behavior, cultural background, etc. Study 1 aimed to explore the correlation and causality between awe and prosocial behavior, along with their potential moderating variables. Furthermore, current studies primarily focus on either self-diminishment or self-transcendence, which can easily lead to the specious mediators problem. Study 2 built upon existing research to explore the mediating roles of self-diminishment and self-transcendence in the relationship between awe and prosocial behavior.

    A systematic literature review was conducted using multiple databases, including Web of Science, ProQuest, Science Direct, Google Scholar, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), CSTJD (China Science and Technology Journal Database), WFD (Wan Fang Data), and PsyArXiv (preprint platform). Data analyses were performed using the meta, metafor, and metaSEM packages in R 4.4.1. Three-level meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the effect sizes and conduct moderator analyses in Study 1. In Study 2, meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) was employed to synthesize previous mediation studies to explore the theoretical mechanisms underlying the prosocial effects of awe. Publication bias was assessed using Funnel Plots, Egger-MLMA regression tests, Trim and Fill, and Fail-Safe Number. Outlier and influence diagnostics were performed using SDR (studentized deleted residual), CD (Cook’s distance), and DFBETAS.

    Through literature search and screening, a total of 110 articles were included in Study 1, comprising 221 studies and 620 effect sizes, with a total sample size of 2, 961, 227 participants. Study 2 identified 33 articles, which included 42 studies and 42 correlation matrices, involving 30, 045 participants. The results of two three-level meta-analyses indicated the correlation between awe and prosocial behavior was significantly positive (r = 0.37, 95% CI [0.33, 0.41]), and awe could positively predict prosocial behavior (g = 0.59, 95% CI [0.48, 0.69]). Moderator analyses revealed that awe has greater prosocial effect when the cultural background was collectivist, the valence was positive, the eliciting factor was social, and the type of prosocial behavior was not restricted to individuals. Meanwhile, the association between awe and prosocial behavior was not moderated by induction methods(e.g., recall, video, music, image, text, and real situations) and prosocial costs. The results of the meta-analytic structural equation modeling showed that awe leads to prosocial behavior via self-diminishment and self-transcendence (with mediation effects of 0.060 and 0.070, respectively, accounting for 18.2% and 21.2% of the total effect, respectively). However, the chained mediating effect was not significant.

    The study systematically examines the prosocial effects of awe and the conditions that facilitate it. It provides a theoretical foundation for enhancing prosocial behavior through an emotional lens and contributing to the vision of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind. Additionally, the findings support the psychological mechanisms of self-diminishment and self-transcendence, offering a systematic and integrated theoretical explanation for the prosocial effects of awe.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Parental emotional warmth, self-control and adolescent prosocial behavior: The moderating role of multilocus genetic and parental gender differences
    NIE Yangang, CHEN Pei, WANG Linxin, YU Chengfu, LI Zhenhua
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (4): 599-613.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0599
    Abstract4487)   HTML486)    PDF (1063KB)(8583)      

    Previous quantitative genetic studies have demonstrated that adolescent self-control is influenced by parenting and genetics. In most existing studies, researchers have explored only the impact of the interaction between a single gene and parental factors on adolescent prosocial behaviour, but exploration of the endophenotype mechanism underlying the impact of the interaction between genes and the environment on prosocial behaviour is lacking. According to social cognitive models of prosocial behaviors, sociocognitive and socioemotive traits may be important mediators of environmental and genetic interactions on individual behaviors. In recent years, the single-polymorphism G×E design has been criticized for unreliable findings and difficult replication. As a potential solution, researchers have constructed multilocus genetic profile scores (MGPSs) to explore how environmental factors interact with genetic factors to predict adolescent development. Therefore, this study examined self-control as a mediator of the link between parental emotional warmth and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Furthermore, this study developed an MGPS composed of five functional SNPs (COMT gene rs6269, HTR2A gene rs6313, OXTR gene rs53576, OXTR gene rs2254295, and OXTR gene rs2254298) and examined whether the MGPS moderates the mediating effect of self-control.

    Using a 2-time longitudinal design (6 months apart), this study recruited 880 adolescents by cluster sampling at T1 in Guangzhou, China. All adolescents completed questionnaires about parental emotional warmth, prosocial behavior, and demographic characteristics and provided saliva samples for DNA extraction. At T2, 723 adolescents remained in the study and reported their prosocial behavior and self-control. All polymorphisms were genotyped using SNaPshot analysis (Applied Biosystems).

    After controlling for the baseline levels of prosocial behavior, parental emotional warmth positively and significantly predicted adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Self-control mediated the link between parental emotional warmth and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Furthermore, the MGPS moderated the mediating mechanism but not the direct impact of parental emotional warmth on adolescents’ prosocial behavior, and the model coefficients were invariant for mothers and fathers. Specifically, the MGPS moderated the effect of parental emotional warmth on self-control such that the effect was stronger in adolescents with higher MGPS than in those with lower MGPS. For adolescents with higher MGPS, parental emotional warmth was related to higher levels of self-control, which in turn increased prosocial behavior. However, this mediating effect was not observed among adolescents with lower MGPS.

    The results highlight the importance of examining multiple genes and endophenotypic mechanisms to explore the relationship between gene−environmental interactions and adolescents’ prosocial behavior and provide new evidence for the “environment×polygene−endophenotypic−behavior” research framework.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The influence of social reward and punishment on deception
    YUAN Bo, ZHAO Jingshi, QI Dan, ZHAO Tong, HU Jiaqi
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (9): 1622-1637.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1622
    Abstract3701)   HTML1095)    PDF (11991KB)(8082)      

    Deception is a complex behavior involving the dissemination of misleading information or the intentional omission of relevant details, conveyed both verbally and nonverbally. While extensive research has explored strategies to mitigate deception, rewards and punishments have emerged as key deterrents. Prior studies have predominantly focused on tangible incentives, such as monetary or token-based rewards and punishments. However, given that deception frequently occurs in interpersonal contexts, social rewards and punishments— eliciting positive or negative emotional responses—may also influence deceptive behavior. Despite this, their precise impact remains unclear.

    To address this gap, the present study employed three experiments to examine the interplay between social rewards, social punishments, and deception, while also investigating the underlying mediating and moderating mechanisms. Experiment 1 engaged 30 participants in a signaling game (also known as the sender-receiver game) to assess whether social rewards and punishments influence deception in a manner similar to monetary incentives. Experiment 2, involving 60 participants, extended this investigation by incorporating an adapted reputation concern scale to explore reputation concern as a potential mediator. Experiment 3 examined the moderating role of social value orientation (SVO). Participants with different SVOs, identified using the SVO slider measure, were recruited to determine whether social value orientation moderates the effects of social rewards and punishments on deception.

    Findings from Experiment 1 demonstrated that social rewards and punishments, akin to monetary incentives, reduce deceptive behaviors, with social punishments being more effective than social rewards. Drift-diffusion modeling (DDM) analysis revealed that under conditions of social and monetary rewards and punishments, the drift rate (ν) was significantly lower compared to the condition without incentives, indicating that both forms of incentives promote evidence accumulation favoring non-deceptive behavior. Experiment 2 established reputation concern as a mediator in the relationship between social incentives and deception. Specifically, social incentives heightened reputation concerns, leading to reduced deception, whereas monetary incentives did not have this effect. Experiment 3 identified social value orientation as a moderator: Individuals with a pro-social orientation exhibited heightened reputation concerns in response to social incentives, thereby reducing deception, while this effect was absent among pro-self individuals.

    Overall, this study confirms that social rewards and punishments effectively reduce deceptive behavior. By elucidating the psychological mechanisms involved and broadening the empirical understanding of social incentives, these findings offer valuable insights into mitigating deception in interpersonal interactions. Future research could further explore the moderating effects of different social contexts or individual differences to more comprehensively understand the boundary conditions under which social rewards and punishments influence deceptive behavior.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The multi-cue influence mechanism of spatial communication across different perspectives
    JIAN Jinhan, ZHANG Junheng, YAN Bihua, JI Ming
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (6): 1013-1040.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1013
    Abstract3139)   HTML441)    PDF (18257KB)(6628)      

    Spatial communication refers to the process of exchanging spatial information among collaborators in spatial cooperation tasks. Previous research has shown that social-spatial cues, environmental cues, and layout cues can influence spatial communication. However, the exploration of their multi-cue impact mechanisms has been insufficient. Additionally, factors like perspective and field cognitive style are worthy of investigation as they may affect spatial communication through their influence on spatial perspective-taking processes and spatial cue extraction. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of consistency in multiple spatial cues, spatial perspective-taking ability, and field cognitive style on spatial communication under different perspectives.

    Building upon the classical paradigm of spatial communication, this study investigated the multi-cue impact mechanisms by constructing more realistic small-scale indoor virtual environments. Study 1 examined the multi-cue effects on the expression process from the first-person perspective (Experiment 1) and the third-person perspective (Experiment 2). Study 2 explored the multi-cue effects on the reception process from the first-person perspective (Experiment 3) and the third-person perspective (Experiment 4). Study 1 employed a three-factor mixed design, with the core within-subject independent variable being the consistency of spatial cues, derived from social-spatial, environmental, and layout cues. The remaining between-subject variables were spatial perspective-taking ability and field cognitive style. Dependent variables included the ratio of choosing self or other-centric reference frames, duration of language organization and expression. Study 2 utilized a four-factor mixed design, introducing an additional within-subject independent variable, the reference frame of expression statement. Dependent variables comprised accuracy and time taken for understanding expression statements.

    All data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. Findings revealed that, in the first-person perspective, greater support for spatial reference frames led to a higher likelihood of expresser using them for spatial information, shorter language organization duration, and faster comprehension and higher comprehension correctness of corresponding spatial statements by receiver. Moreover, layout cues had a greater support effect than environmental cues. The higher the spatial perspective-taking ability, the more inclined the expresser is to choose to express spatial language using other-centric reference frame, and the more correct and time-consuming it is for the receiver to understand the spatial utterance. Field-independent expresser showed a more pronounced effect of spatial cue support in choosing reference frames compared to field-dependent expresser. In spatial communication from a third-person perspective, layout cues continued to have a support effect, while environmental cues did not. In both perspectives, receiver comprehended spatial language expressed using receiver-centric frame more quickly. However, overall, no significant difference was found in interaction performance between the two perspectives.

    The results indicate that: First, in the first-person perspective, there is a presence of spatial cue support effects, with the support effect of layout cues significantly outweighing that of environmental cues; regarding reference frame selection, the consistency of spatial cues has a greater impact on field-independent expresser; the higher the spatial perspective-tasking ability, the more the expresser tends to take on a higher cognitive load and the higher the efficiency of the receiver’s comprehension. Second, the third-person perspective diminishes the supportive effects of spatial cues and the influence of spatial perspective-taking ability on communication, increases the likelihood of using a self-centric reference frame to describe spatial information, and complicates the process of representation to varying degrees for the two types of field cognitive style expressers. But the use of a receiver’s frame of reference for linguistic representation is the optimal method for improving comprehension efficiency regardless of perspective.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Collectivism promotes prosocial justice sensitivity: The role of communal responsibility
    WU Michael Shengtao, GAO Chenghai, HU Wanying, WANG Ning, PENG Kaiping
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (4): 700-719.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0700
    Abstract4047)   HTML582)    PDF (1835KB)(6437)      

    The previous research on justice was deeply influenced by individualism, which overemphasized the calculation of individual rights and personal interests, while genuine justice dispositions reflect prosocial concerns for others’ suffering rather than self-centered concerns for one’s own interests. As a response to this cultural bias of justice research, the present research focused on the prosocial facets of justice sensitivity (JS) from the observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator perspectives, and examined whether and how prosocial JS was shaped by collectivism related to concern for others, and the moderation effect of reaction perspective and the mediation effect of communal responsibility.

    Three studies were conducted using a questionnaire survey of cultural traits and an experiment of cultural priming upon human participants, as well as a role play of cultural products like Large Language Models (e.g., GLM-4). Firstly, a survey was conducted to measure collectivist/individualistic traits, prosocial JS, and communal responsibility as well as norm conformity (n = 182, Study 1). Next, collectivism (vs. individualism) was primed via scrambled sentence tasks (n = 155, Study 2) and role playing in GLM-4 (n = 200, Study 3), and then situational collectivism, prosocial JS, communal responsibility, and norm conformity were measured. Regarding the relationship between collectivism and prosocial JS, a repeated-measured MANOVA was used to further test the moderation effect of reaction perspective (observer vs. beneficiary vs. perpetrator), and a simple mediation model was used to test the possible mediation effects of communal responsibility and norm conformity.

    In Study 1, the results showed that collectivism (but not individualism) was positively related to prosocial JS and its three facets, and this effect was mediated by communal responsibility (but not norm conformity). In Study 2, priming collectivism (vs. individualism) led to greater prosocial JS. Study 3 revealed that GLM-4 playing as the collectivist role, generated higher scores on prosocial JS, compared to those playing as the individualistic role. Moreover, a 2 (culture: collectivism vs. individualism) x 3 (perspective: observer vs. beneficiary vs. perpetrator) repeated-measure MANOVA revealed a significant moderation effect of perspective on collectivism and prosocial JS. In particular, compared to the observer perspective, the effects of collectivism on prosocial JS were stronger in beneficiary and perpetrator perspectives (Studies 2~3).

    Based on a range of methodological approaches, the current findings demonstrate that prosocial JS is shaped by collectivism, and this effect was mediated by communal responsibility (but not norm conformity) and moderated by reaction perspective, which represents a critical development in the shift of justice research paradigms from a focus on individual rights to communal responsibilities. This research offers insights into strategies for nurturing other-oriented prosocial justice within the complex dynamics of a post-individualism society and the burgeoning era of artificial intelligence.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The double-edged sword effect of proactive helping behavior on coworker relationships
    CHEN Liangyong, CAO Zhonghuai, WAN Wenhai, ZHANG Weiting
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (6): 1083-1097.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1083
    Abstract3297)   HTML455)    PDF (559KB)(6309)      

    As a common form of interpersonal interaction in organizational settings, proactive helping behavior has a substantial influence on coworker relationships. Investigating this impact is essential with regard to efforts to establish a positive team environment and facilitate healthy organizational development. Researchers have not yet reached a consensus regarding the effects of proactive helping behavior on the relationship between the helper and the recipient, and most studies on this topic have focused exclusively on either positive or negative outcomes. We propose to adopt a dialectical perspective to comprehensively explore the multifaceted effects of proactive helping behavior on coworker relationships. On the basis of affective events theory and the affect theory of social exchange, we consider the interaction effect of proactive helping behaviors and recipients' humility levels on coworker relationships. By identifying recipients' emotional responses, specifically gratitude and ability-based Mianzi stress, as potential mechanisms in this context, we provide a new perspective on the impact of proactive helping behavior on recipients' coworker relationships.

    We conducted two studies to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, we employed an experience sampling method to conduct a questionnaire survey among employees of several companies in China. The questionnaire survey process included an initial, one-time entry survey as well as daily surveys over a period of two weeks. The final sample included 507 usable observations that were collected from 53 employees. In Study 2, to enhance our ability to draw causal inferences, we conducted a scenario-based experiment. In this study, we recruited 216 full-time workers from companies in southern China. These respondents were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (proactive helping behavior, n = 107) and the control group (no proactive helping behavior, n = 109).

    The above studies supported our hypotheses. The results showed that the relationship between proactive helping behavior and recipient gratitude was positive when recipients exhibit a high level of humility. Furthermore, for recipients with high levels of humility, proactive helping behavior promoted their coworker relationships by activating their gratitude. However, for recipients with low levels of humility, this indirect effect was not significant. We also found that the relationship between proactive helping behavior and ability-based Mianzi stress was positive when recipients exhibit low levels of humility. In addition, for recipients with low levels of humility, proactive helping behavior inhibited their coworker relationships by eliciting their ability-based Mianzi stress. However, for recipients with high levels of humility, this indirect effect was not significant.

    The theoretical contributions of this study are as follows. First, this study highlights the 'double-edged sword' effect of proactive helping behavior on coworker relationships, thereby helping researchers understand the effects of proactive helping behavior in a more comprehensive and balanced manner. Second, from the perspective of the affective events theory, this study clarifies the differential emotional reactions of recipients with different humility levels when facing proactive helping behaviors. This enhances our understanding of how proactive helping behaviors influence the process of coworker relationships. Third, we identified the humility trait of recipients as a new “key” to disentangle the differentiated impacts of proactive helping behaviors.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The influence of positive emotion with varying intensities of approach motivation on false memory and its neural mechanisms: A study based on semantic-related false memory
    ZHANG Huan, QIN Xiquan, LIU Yu, LIN Lin, WU Jie
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (3): 349-362.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0349
    Abstract4065)   HTML907)    PDF (6269KB)(6065)      

    Emotions can influence false memories, with previous studies showing that positive emotions particularly affect the formation of false memories related to semantic relevance. Most researchers agree that false memories are more likely under positive emotions. However, existing studies have focused mainly on valence and arousal dimensions, often neglecting the role of intrinsic motivation independent of arousal and valence. Consequently, research on how motivation influences false memory from an emotional perspective has been limited.

    This study employed the expression-posture method to induce different levels of approach motivation in positive emotions. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured brain activity as participants were randomly exposed to high, medium, and low motivation conditions to avoid sequential effects. The dependent variables were: (1) the false memory rate of critical lures, calculated as the ratio of recalled critical lures to the total number; and (2) the relative variation in oxyhemoglobin (HbO) levels during the learning phase across different experimental conditions. The goal was to explore changes in oxygenated hemoglobin in the cerebral cortex and their effect on false memory related to semantic relevance, as participants encountered DRM vocabulary under different levels of positive emotion motivation.

    Results showed that participants exhibited false memories under positive emotional motivation, with the highest false memory rate occurring in the high motivation condition. The false memory rate was significantly higher in the high and medium motivation conditions compared to the low motivation condition. Brain imaging revealed significant activation in the left frontal and temporal lobes across all conditions, with the greatest activation observed under high motivation. Correlation analysis showed that activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus and temporal lobe was positively correlated with false memory rates under high motivation. In contrast, under low motivation, activation in the left inferior temporal gyrus was negatively correlated with false memory. Linear regression further highlighted the critical role of this region in generating false memories.

    In summary, these findings suggest that positive emotions with varying levels of approach motivation differently influence false memory. The results offer valuable insights into the psychological and neural mechanisms underlying how positive emotions with different levels of motivation affect false memory, highlighting the importance of semantic relevance.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The impacts of music training and music sophistication on empathy
    HUA Shan, JIANG Xintong, GAO Yangzhenyu, MU Yan, DU Yi
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (4): 544-558.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0544
    Abstract4715)   HTML744)    PDF (1948KB)(6050)      

    Music has long been recognized for fostering social bonds, with potential benefits for prosocial behaviors and empathy. Empathy, a key predictor of prosocial behaviors, encompasses both cognitive and affective components, involving the mentalizing and sharing of others’ emotional states. While musical training has been linked to increased empathy and prosocial behaviors, the influence of musical sophistication—a comprehensive measure of musical experience—on empathy is less well understood. Moreover, the specific components and pathways through which musical experience influences empathy remain unclear, with existing research relying largely on subjective measures and lacking objective behavioral evidence.

    To address these gaps, we conducted two studies using musical training and musical sophistication as indicators of musical experience to explore their impact on trait and state empathy through questionnaires and a behavioral experiment.

    In Study 1, we examined the relationship between musical training, musical sophistication and empathy in 130 musicians and 121 non-musicians, using standardized measures including the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). Musicians scored significantly higher than non-musicians in cognitive empathy components (Perspective Taking and Fantasy). After controlling for gender, musical sophistication was positively correlated with cognitive empathy components (Perspective Taking and Fantasy) and an affective empathy component (Empathic Concern). Furthermore, after controlling for gender, openness, psychological states (depression, anxiety, alexithymia), and subjective social status, path analysis revealed that musical sophistication directly influenced cognitive empathy (Fantasy), while musical training indirectly influenced it via the mediating effect of music sophistication.

    Study 2 employed a pain empathy paradigm to assess empathic responses in 59 musicians and 61 non-musicians. Musicians demonstrated a higher alignment between ratings of their own and others' pain when observing others in pain, indicating greater empathy. The musicians' empathic response to pain was serially mediated by music sophistication and Fantasy in cognitive empathy. However, musical sophistication alone did not significantly affect pain empathy when the influence of musical training on musical sophistication was controlled.

    In summary, both long-term musical training and musical sophistication positively impact cognitive empathy. Specifically, musical training indirectly enhances the cognitive component (Fantasy) of trait empathy by improving musical sophistication, thereby fostering greater empathy for others' pain. In contrast, musical sophistication has a direct and stable relationship with cognitive empathy. These findings support the “social bonding” hypothesis, highlighting music’s role in developing empathy and interpersonal skills.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Acting unethical in the guise of family: The effects and mechanisms of unethical pro-family behavior
    NONG Meilan, ZHU Yu, WANG Yanfei
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (7): 1262-1280.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1262
    Abstract2730)   HTML147)    PDF (620KB)(5815)      

    In the context of the ongoing societal emphasis on anti-corruption and ethical integrity, unethical pro-family behaviors have garnered increasing attention. These behaviors constitute a significant yet largely unexamined facet of workplace dynamics, with prior research predominantly concentrating on their antecedents, while their potential consequences have been relatively overlooked. Gaining insights into the implications of such unethical pro-family behavior is essential for the effective management of organizational behavior. The present study addresses this gap by examining the impacts of unethical pro-family behavior on employees’ work and family lives, as well as the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions.

    Drawing upon the uncertainty-identity theory, we have developed a comprehensive model to explore the consequences of unethical pro-family behavior. Utilizing a multifaceted approach that includes an experimental study, a multi-wave and multi-source field study, and a longitudinal study, we found that unethical pro-family behavior enhances employees’ family identification. Moreover, family identification mediates the relationship between unethical pro-family behavior and both organizational citizenship behavior and family incivility. Additionally, moral identity centrality serves as a boundary condition. When employees possess a high degree of moral identity centrality, the positive influence of unethical pro-family behavior on family identification, and its subsequent indirect effects on organizational citizenship behavior and family incivility, are mitigated. Furthermore, our longitudinal study indicates that the positive outcomes of unethical pro-family behavior are transient. Specifically, the indirect effect of unethical pro-family behavior in reducing family incivility through family identification dissipates after six weeks and may even indirectly foster family incivility after eight weeks. These findings offer novel insights into the complex and nuanced nature of the consequences of unethical pro-family behavior, which are more intricate than previously recognized.

    The aforementioned findings make several significant theoretical contributions. Firstly, by shifting the focus from antecedents to consequences, we advance the understanding of unethical pro-family behavior. Secondly, by examining the mediating role of family identification, we elucidate the mechanisms through which unethical pro-family behavior affects employees’ work and family lives, thereby extending our comprehension of the underlying processes. Thirdly, the investigation of the moderating role of moral identity centrality provides crucial insights into the conditions under which unethical pro-family behavior is likely to exert its effects, thereby enriching the theoretical framework of this research area and offering valuable implications for organizational interventions. Fourthly, by exploring the time-window effects of unethical pro-family behavior, we foster a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of its dynamics, providing a new direction for future research in related fields. Finally, we reveal the ambivalent nature of unethical pro-family behavior, contributing to the field of work-family interface research by applying the uncertainty-identity theory.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The power of confiding: Negative emotional self-disclosure facilitates peer prosocial behavior
    WANG Shuqi, CHENG Feng, GUO Bing, WANG Qiao, CHENG Xiaojun
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (10): 1762-1776.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1762
    Abstract3200)   HTML642)    PDF (1457KB)(5807)      

    In response to emotional distress, individuals often turn to confiding—the act of disclosing negative emotions to others—to seek social support and alleviate internal burdens. While confiding offers emotional relief, it may also carry interpersonal benefits, such as enhancing empathy and fostering social bonds. However, little is known about how negative emotional self-disclosure influences prosocial behavior between peers, or what psychosocial mechanisms underlie this effect. Additionally, linguistic cues such as the use of first-person (“I”) versus third-person pronouns (“He/She”) may influence the impact of emotional disclosure by altering how disclosure is perceived and processed. The present study examines whether disclosing or listening to negative emotions promotes prosocial behavior in peer contexts, and how personal pronoun framing moderates this effect. Addressing these questions contributes to a deeper understanding of the social value of emotional expression, particularly in moments of vulnerability that invite connection and support.

    Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 examined the discloser’s perspective, using a 2 (emotional disclosure: negative vs. neutral; within-subject) × 2 (personal pronoun: first-person vs. third-person; between-subject) mixed design. Participants took on the role of the discloser, narrating either negative or neutral emotional experiences in the first-person or third-person to a peer (played by an experimenter). They then reported their prosocial intentions, empathy, and liking toward their peers, and engagement with the disclosure process. Experiment 2 shifted to the listener’s perspective, using a fully within-subject 2 (emotional disclosure: negative vs. neutral) × 2 (personal pronoun: first-person vs. third-person) design. Participants watched videos of peers narrating their emotional (negative or neutral) experiences framed with either first- or third-person pronouns, and then reported their prosocial intentions, empathy, and liking toward the discloser. Both experiments were conducted in controlled laboratory settings with adult participants, using validated self-report measures to assess prosociality.

    Experiment 1 showed that participants reported significantly greater engagement when sharing negative emotions compared to neutral ones. Importantly, disclosing negative emotions led to increased prosocial behavior, but only in the first-person pronoun condition. The increased prosocial behavior was closely related to the enhanced interpersonal liking and a stronger sense of meaning during the disclosure. No such effect emerged in the third-person condition, indicating that linguistic self-involvement strengthens the social impact of confiding. Experiment 2 found that participants expressed higher levels of prosocial behavior, empathy, and liking after hearing negative (vs. neutral) emotional disclosures, regardless of pronoun type. Crucially, the prosocial gains were closely associated with elevated empathy and liking, suggesting these variables as potential mediators. While the effect of pronoun reference was not significant for listeners, the emotional valence of the disclosure played a decisive role. Together, these findings suggest that confiding—either as discloser or listener—can foster peer prosociality, but the underlying mechanisms may differ: disclosers benefit from personalization (via first-person framing), while listeners respond primarily to emotional authenticity.

    This study reveals the positive social consequences of negative emotional self-disclosure. For disclosers, using first-person pronouns enhances this effect by increasing the sense of meaning, and interpersonal liking. For listeners, the content of the emotional experience—rather than linguistic framing—drives prosocial responses, which are closely linked to feelings of empathy and liking. These findings contribute to understanding the interpersonal value of emotional expression and offer practical insights into how linguistic and emotional cues can be harnessed to build social support, especially in emotionally challenging situations.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The convergence of reciprocity motivation through observational learning: Individual differences and the role of social authority
    NAN Yu, SUN Donglin, ZHOU Xiaolin, GAO Xiaoxue
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (12): 2083-2099.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.2083
    Abstract3371)   HTML261)    PDF (1005KB)(5743)      

    Previous studies have shown that the reciprocal behaviors of beneficiaries stem from the trade-off between two emotional motivations: gratitude and guilt as communal motivations (internal motivations) that promote reciprocity, while the sense of obligation as an obligation motivation (external motivation) that promotes reciprocity. However, an excessive preference for either obligation motivation (obligation-motivated individuals) or communal motivation (communal-motivated individuals) during reciprocity may lead to negative social effects. What factors can modulate the reciprocal preferences of obligation-motivated and communal-motivated individuals? Whether these factors differentially affect the reciprocity behaviors and underlying emotional motivations of the two types of individuals? Addressing these questions not only helps to deepen our understanding of the dynamic process of human reciprocal behavior but also provides the theoretical bases for individual social decision-making, the formulation of relevant social policies, and the interventions in related issues. To answer these questions, we conducted two behavioral experiments by incorporating an observational learning stage into the previously established interpersonal task of favor-receiving and reciprocity, and applying computational modeling to quantitatively capture individual reciprocal preferences (the relative weight of how obligation and communal motivations contribute to reciprocity).
    Experiment 1 employed a 2 (testing phase: before vs. after observational learning) × 2 (participant’s emotional motivation preference: communal-motivated vs. obligation-motivated) mixed experimental design, aiming to preliminarily explore the impact of observational learning on the reciprocity behavior and underlying emotional motivations of obligation-motivated and communal-motivated individuals. The results showed that for both types of individuals, observational learning significantly promoted their reciprocal preferences to converge with those of the observed individuals, with a stronger observational learning effect observed in obligation-motivated individuals.
    Experiment 2 employed a 2 (testing phase: before vs. after observational learning) × 2 (participant’s emotional motivation preference: communal-motivated vs. obligation-motivated) × 2 (the authority of the observed individual: authoritative vs. non-authoritative) mixed experimental design, aiming to further validate the findings of Experiment 1 and explore the boundary conditions of the differences in observational learning effects between the two groups by manipulating the authority of the observed individual. The results replicated the findings and further showed that the observational learning effects on the reciprocal preferences of the two types of individuals were moderated by the authority of the observed individual, with a stronger moderating effect observed in communal-motivated individuals.
    In summary, for both obligation-motivated and communal-motivated individuals, observational learning can promote their reciprocity behavior and emotional motivations to converge with those of the observed individuals. The sensitivity of the two types of individuals to observational learning differs and is moderated by the authority of the observed individual: obligation-motivated individuals exhibit a stronger observational learning effect and are less moderated by the authority of the observed individual, while communal-motivated individuals show a weaker observational learning effect but are significantly moderated by the authority of the observed individual. This study provides new evidence for understanding the dynamics of reciprocity behavior and provides implications for individual social decision-making, the formulation of relevant social policies, and the interventions in related issues.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The joint role of childhood emotional abuse and bullying victimization in the development of adolescent depressive symptoms: Sequential mediation or enhanced moderation?
    LI Xi, ZHANG Chang, YU Ruize, YIN Yijia, ZHOU Tong, LIU Wei, CHEN Ning
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (6): 1056-1069.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1056
    Abstract3001)   HTML353)    PDF (644KB)(5459)      

    Adolescence is a distinctive developmental phase bridging childhood and adulthood, characterized by both opportunities and challenges across mental health and interpersonal domains. Depressive symptoms and bullying victimization are prevalent in adolescence. Meanwhile, the negative developmental consequences of childhood emotional abuse also tend to emerge during this period. The interpersonal risk model highlights the risk of developing depressive symptoms from interpersonal victimization, yet several details still require empirical validation: (1) Does childhood emotional abuse positively predict the developmental trajectories of bullying victimization and depressive symptoms in adolescence? (2) Is there a time-dependent correlation between bullying victimization and the developmental trajectory of depressive symptoms in adolescence? (3) Does childhood emotional abuse moderate the longitudinal relationship between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms in adolescence? (4) Does the developmental trajectory of bullying victimization mediate the longitudinal relationship between childhood emotional abuse and adolescent depressive symptoms? Given the negative impacts of childhood emotional abuse, bullying victimization, and depression on adolescent development, exploring their trajectories and interrelationships over time has important theoretical and practical implications.

    A total of 521 high school students from China (Mage = 13.83 years, SDage = 1.40, 59.31% boys) were recruited to participate in a three-wave longitudinal survey study over a two-year period. The latent growth curve model (LGCM) and its variants were used to examine the mediating role of bullying victimization in the association between childhood emotional abuse and adolescent depressive symptoms, as well as the moderating effect of childhood emotional abuse on the relationship between bullying victimization and depressive symptoms. Parameter estimation was conducted using the Bayesian method. Convergence of the Markov Chain was indicated by the Potential Scale Reduction (PSR) below 1.025. Model fit was considered acceptable if the 95% credible interval of the Posterior Predictive Checking (PPC) includes zero.

    The results revealed that: (1) childhood emotional abuse significantly and positively predicted both adolescent bullying victimization and depressive symptoms, as shown by both the initial intercept and the growth slope. (2) Bullying victimization significantly and positively predicted adolescent depressive symptoms in terms of both initial intercept and growth slope. (3) Bullying victimization served as a mediator in the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and adolescent depressive symptoms, influencing both the initial intercept and the growth slope. (4) Childhood emotional abuse weakened the effect of the initial intercept of bullying victimization on the initial intercept of depressive symptoms, but did not significant moderate the growth slope of depressive symptoms.

    Findings indicate that childhood emotional abuse and adolescent bullying victimization both independently and jointly predict the development of depressive symptoms in adolescence. The joint effect was within a longitudinal sequential mediation model rather than an enhanced moderation model. Such results integrate the interpersonal risk model and the cumulative risk model into a cumulative interpersonal risk model, demonstrating how interpersonal risk factors operate sequentially across developmental stages and relational systems to influence the development of adolescent depressive symptoms. Practically, these findings highlight the need for a timely and multilayered approach in the prevention of bullying victimization and depression. Given the negative effect of childhood emotional abuse on individual’s ability to cope with subsequent interpersonal risks, timely implemented of interventions is crucial for mitigating the cumulative effect of risks over time, which may prevent the onset of severe mental health issues.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Reciprocal associations between identity confusion and adolescent NSSI: The longitudinal mediation effect of alienation
    GU Honglei, YU Weiming, CHENG Yufang
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (2): 247-259.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0247
    Abstract4755)   HTML708)    PDF (537KB)(5412)      

    Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is defined as the deliberate, direct, and socially unacceptable destruction of one’s own body tissue without a conscious suicidal intent. This behavior has become a major public health problem among adolescents. The initial occurrence of NSSI and its subsequent peak periods often coincide with the identity crisis stage of adolescents. Identity confusion represents a sense of feeling “mixed up, ” that is, being unable to enact and maintain lasting commitments to life alternatives and lacking a clear sense of purpose and direction. Considerable evidence has linked identity confusion to NSSI. According to the identity-NSSI interplay model, NSSI may serve as a means of developing a sense of identity (i.e., “I am a self-injurer”), which goes against the common values and attitudes in society. The destabilization of a self-injurer may lead individuals to a further increased sense of identity diffusion. Based on this theory, the present study tested the bidirectional association between identity confusion and adolescents’ NSSI as well as the mediating role of alienation and the moderating role of gender in this association.

    A sample of 1258 Chinese middle school students (50.1% girls; Mage at Wave 1 = 13.81 years) completed self-report questionnaires regarding identity confusion, alienation, and NSSI at three time points (called T1, T2, and T3), with 6-month intervals. The random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) was employed to separate between- and within-person effects, and to test the mediation role of alienation in the reciprocal relations between identity confusion and adolescent NSSI. Moreover, the multi-group RI-CLPM was used to test the gender differences in the associations among identity confusion, alienation, and NSSI.

    Results showed that identity confusion and NSSI were mutually reinforcing at the within-person level when controlling for between-person effects. Specifically, initial NSSI significantly and positively predicted T2 identity confusion, which in turn significantly positively predicted T3 NSSI. T2 NSSI also positively predicted T3 identity confusion. More importantly, T2 alienation longitudinally mediated the association between T1 NSSI and T3 identity confusion. These associations among identity confusion, alienation, and NSSI did not differ between genders.

    This study found that alienation played a unidirectional mediating role in the association between NSSI and identity confusion, and this pattern is consistent across genders. This finding indicates that identity in Chinese culture has a “relational” quality, and identity confusion among Chinese adolescents does not necessarily lead to maladaptive behaviors (e.g., NSSI). Furthermore, this study highlights the importance of developing a healthy identity in the prevention and intervention of NSSI. Specifically, schools are encouraged to organize more activities or courses related to personal development, which provide adolescents with ample time and opportunities for self-exploration. This approach, thereby, may help them achieve a greater sense of continuity and integrity in their identities.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    The impact of narrative information on parochial cooperative and its mechanisms
    HE Ning, WANG Ziyi, LIN Jiahao, LI Meng, YOU Xuqun
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (4): 513-525.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0513
    Abstract4570)   HTML707)    PDF (595KB)(5247)      

    Recently, the trend of parochialism is on the rise worldwide. Some countries, regions and organizations engage in parochial cooperation to seek their own short-term gains at the cost of long-term interests of other groups and even all humankind. How to reduce parochial cooperation has become a significant concern both in academia and in policy-making. Narrative information is defined as descriptions of a series of related events or experiences in words through a narrative. Numerous studies have found that narrative information can effectively mitigate parochial empathy and parochial altruism. Thus, this study predicts that narrative information would attenuate parochial cooperation, and further explores its mechanism in terms of perceived similarity. In addition, because groups are typically embedded within more complex relational networks, the context of intergroup relation is introduced to examine its possible moderating effects.

    In three studies utilizing behavioral experiments and questionnaire surveys based on the minimal group paradigm, narrative information was categorized as viewpoint-related narrative information, which depicts the mental state of the main character of the story, and event-related narrative information, which depicts the objective situations in which the event occurs. Study 1 (N = 37) examined the effects of narrative information on parochial cooperation behavior through the Public Goods Game (PGG). Study 2 (N = 40) adopted the Intergroup Parochial and Universal Cooperation game (IPUC) to investigate the effects of narrative information on three types of cooperation behavior: strong parochial cooperation, weak parochial cooperation and universal cooperation, and examined the mediating role of perceived similarity between narrative information and parochial cooperation behavior. Study 3 (N = 80) manipulated intergroup relation as cooperation versus competition to explore its moderating effect on the link between narrative information and parochial cooperation behavior.

    The results of the studies supported the following conclusions. (1) Viewpoint-related narrative information significantly reduces parochial cooperative behavior more than event-related narrative information. (2) Perceived similarity full mediated the link between narrative information and strong parochial cooperative behavior. Specifically, compared to event-related narrative information, viewpoint-related narrative information elicited a higher level of perceived similarity in participants, which consequently inhibited strong parochial cooperative behavior. (3) Intergroup relation played a moderating role in the causal link between narrative information and parochial cooperative behavior, and also played a moderating role between narrative information and strong parochial cooperative behavior. In particular, in the context of cooperation, narrative information exhibited no significant effect on parochial cooperation and strong parochial cooperation, whereas in competitive context, viewpoint-related narrative information conversely increased the level of strong parochial cooperation.

    This study is the first to explore paths to reduce parochial cooperation between groups from the perspective of daily social information exchanges. It provides a new theoretical approach to understanding and enriching the mechanism of parochial cooperation behavior. Moreover, against the backdrop of increasing intergroup conflicts and deglobalization, this study has important implications for promoting intergroup cooperation and boosting the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    When design meets AI: The impact of AI design products on consumers’ response patterns
    LI Bin, RUI Jianxi, YU Weinan, LI Aimei, YE Maolin
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (11): 1914-1932.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1914
    Abstract2192)   HTML168)    PDF (6604KB)(4944)      

    In recent years, the prevalence and popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services have increased significantly. While the advantages of utilizing AI applications, including cost-effectiveness, standardization, and efficiency, are widely recognized, customer attitudes towards AI involvement are polarized. Prior research has suggested that consumer resistance or acceptance of AI can be influenced by various factors, such as medical services, product recommendations, computer services, and more. However, limited studies have examined AI's impact on creative tasks, such as product design. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate consumer preferences for the designer role in different product categories and to identify potential mechanisms and boundary conditions that may vary.

    To attain the objectives of this research, we conducted one pre-study and six studies that focused on commonplace products in daily life. Study 1A (N = 181) adopted a 2 (product type: nostalgia vs. innovation) × 2 (designer role: human design vs. AI design) design and measured participants' attitudes towards the products. Study 1B (N = 258) utilized a between-subject design of 2 (product type: nostalgia vs. innovation) × 3 (designer role: human vs. AI vs. human-AI collaborative design). In Study 2A, we considered the potential for human-machine collaboration, which expands the design resources and examined the mediating impact of processing fluency. Specifically, Study 2A (N = 304) adopted a between-subject design of 2 (product type: nostalgia vs. innovation) × 4 (designer role: human design vs. human-led/AI-assisted design vs. AI-led/human-assisted design vs. AI design). Study 2B (N = 167) conducted a mixed design of 2 (product type: nostalgia vs. innovation) × 3 (designer role: human vs. AI design). Studies 3 (N = 218) and 4 (N = 290) investigated the moderating effects of AI characteristics (AI anthropomorphism) and consumer characteristics (self-constructed types), respectively. Specifically, Study 3 manipulated the degree of AI anthropomorphism of the designer, while Study 4 manipulated the type of self-construction of the participants.

    Our hypotheses were confirmed, as this study reveals a significant interaction between product types and designer roles. Specifically, we found a congruence effect between “human design-nostalgic products” and “AI design-innovative products”. The robustness of our findings is demonstrated by the diversity of stimuli and samples employed in this research. Additionally, we discovered that processing fluency acts as a mediating mechanism that explains how the interaction between product type and designer role influences consumer responses. In other words, consumers express more negative reactions towards nostalgic products designed by AI due to their perception of lower processing fluency. Finally, our results emphasize the moderating effects of AI-human collaborative design scenarios, AI anthropomorphic characteristics, and consumer self-construction types.

    From a social psychological perspective, this study contributes to the literature on AI aversion and product design by examining people's behavioral tendencies towards AI design. Specifically, we focused on consumer attitudes towards the designer role behind different product types. This investigation helps to enhance our understanding of how people's aversion to algorithms applies to the design field. Our findings align with prior research on the human psychological perception of artificial intelligence, revealing the mechanism behind the matching effect of processing fluency. Furthermore, our study offers additional evidence that AI personification and the type of consumer self-construction significantly impact consumer responses.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Fertility dependence or fertility autonomy? The impact of husbands’ traditional gender role conceptions on wives’ fertility intentions
    CHEN Sijing, WANG Zhen, YANG Shasha, ZHENG Peng, HE Quan
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (9): 1661-1676.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1661
    Abstract3405)   HTML474)    PDF (905KB)(4877)      

    Existing literature has extensively examined the relationship between gender role conceptions and fertility intentions, reaching a relatively stable conclusion that more traditional gender role conceptions are associated with stronger fertility intentions. A notable limitation in this body of research, however, is its predominant focus on individuals’ own gender role conceptions, while largely neglecting the influence of their spouses’ beliefs and attitudes. Overlooking this relational aspect may lead to incomplete conclusions. Diverging from previous studies, this paper investigates the relationship between spouses’ gender role conceptions and individuals’ fertility intentions, with particular emphasis on the influence of husbands’ gender role conceptions on wives’ fertility intentions, given that women are primarily engaged in fertility behaviors. The central question of this study is whether fertility dependency exists among married women in China. Specifically, it examines whether husbands’ gender role conceptions exert a stronger influence on their wives’ fertility intentions than the wives’ own conceptions. If this is the case, the study further explores the factors contributing to this dependency and seeks to provide a theoretical explanation for these dynamics.

    This study utilized data from the 2014 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). After data cleaning, a total of 7, 089 valid participants remained. Core variables were constructed as follows: the outcome variable, representing the wife’s fertility intention, was measured by the desired family size (an integer between 0 and 10). The primary predictor variable, representing the couple’s gender role conceptions, was assessed through four items, such as “Men are career-oriented, and women are family-oriented.” The mean score of these four items served as an indicator of gender role conceptions, with higher scores reflecting more traditional perspectives. Results indicate that fertility dependency is significant, and this finding remains consistent regardless of the different measurement approaches and regression models we employed. Specifically, husbands’ gender role conceptions exert a stronger influence on their wives’ fertility intentions than the wives’ own conceptions; notably, this effect does not occur in the opposite direction. Using data from the CFPS 2022 (N = 555), we further investigated the relationship between husbands’ and wives’ gender role conceptions in 2014 and wives’ near-term fertility plan in 2022. The findings indicate that fertility dependency persists; specifically, husbands’ gender role conceptions in 2014 exhibit a stronger correlation with their wives’ fertility plan in 2022 than the wives’ own gender role conceptions.

    Furthermore, we examined fertility dependency across different distributions of household decision-making power. The results indicate that fertility dependency is more pronounced among married women whose husbands hold greater authority in five key domains: household expenditures, savings and investments, real estate purchases, child discipline, and major acquisitions. In contrast, when wives have greater decision-making power, fertility dependency diminishes or shifts toward fertility autonomy, highlighting the critical role of household decision-making power in shaping fertility outcomes. Moreover, fertility dependency is not uniformly distributed across time and space. It is particularly evident among women from earlier generations, those with lower educational attainment, rural hukou holders, and residents of central and western China. By contrast, women from later generations, with higher education, non-rural hukou, and living in eastern China exhibit weaker fertility dependency or even fertility autonomy.

    The findings of this study carry significant theoretical and practical implications. First, the results indicate that a substantial number of married women in China are influenced by their husbands’ gender role conceptions in fertility decision-making. Neglecting the role of husbands’ beliefs may lead to an incomplete understanding of wives’ fertility decisions. Second, this study offers a psychological perspective on gender equality based on gender role conceptions. It suggests that gender inequality is not only reflected in the unequal distribution of economic resources but also in the asymmetric psychological dependence between spouses. Enhancing women’s decision-making power in household affairs can mitigate fertility dependency and promote fertility autonomy. This, in turn, may contribute to broader social progress and support the development of a more harmonious and sustainable society.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics
    Human-AI cooperation makes individuals more risk seeking: The mediating role of perceived agentic responsibility
    GENG Xiaowei, LIU Chao, SU Li, HAN Bingxue, ZHANG Qiaoming, WU Mingzheng
    Acta Psychologica Sinica    2025, 57 (11): 1885-1900.   DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1885
    Abstract3333)   HTML279)    PDF (766KB)(4848)      

    Risk decision-making involves choices made by individuals when they are uncertain about future outcomes. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), AI can now assist humans in making decisions. For instance, human drivers and AI drivers cooperate to carry out driving tasks, human doctors and AI doctors can collaborate on medical decisions. Currently, it is unclear how AI affects individuals’ risk decision-making during such collaborations, which is crucial for enhancing the quality of human-AI decision-making. Therefore, studying the impact of human-AI cooperation on individuals’ risk decision-making is essential.

    In Experiment 1a, a total of 100 participants were recruited from one university. Employing a within-subject design, the independent variable was the partner type (i.e., human-human cooperation, human-AI cooperation, or no partner), while the dependent variable measured individuals’ risk decision-making using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). In Experiment 1b, a total of 151 participants were recruited from another university and randomly assigned to two conditions: human-human cooperation and human-AI cooperation. As in Experiment 1a, the dependent variable remained the same. To investigate the mediating role of individual agentic responsibility, Experiment 2 recruited 199 participants from a university. This experiment utilized a between-subjects design, with the independent variable being the partner type (i.e., human-human cooperation or human-robot cooperation). Individual agentic responsibility was assessed by measuring the extent to which participants assumed responsibility for their tasks, and the dependent variable was individuals’ risk levels as measured by the BART. Experiment 3 further explored the moderating effect of outcome feedback. Participants received feedback based on their BART performance in Experiment 2, categorized as success or failure, and then assessed their perceived agentic responsibility before completing the BART again.

    The results of Experiment 1a and 1b showed that participants in the control group (i.e., without cooperation) exhibited the highest risk-taking behavior, while those engaged in human-AI cooperation took greater risks than those in human-human cooperation. Results from Experiment 2 demonstrated that individual agentic responsibility partially mediated the effect of human-AI cooperation on individuals’ risk decision-making. Specifically, participants reported a higher sense of agentic responsibility in human-AI cooperation compared to human-human cooperation, which contributed to increased risk-taking. Experiment 3 revealed that outcome feedback significantly moderates the mediating role of individual agentic responsibility regarding the influence of human-AI cooperation (versus human-human cooperation) on individuals’ risk decision-making. Notably, under success conditions, participants attributed greater responsibility to themselves in human-AI collaboration compared to human-human collaboration. Conversely, under failure conditions, there was no significant difference in responsibility attribution between the two types of collaboration.

    This research demonstrates that collaboration with AI can enhance an individual's propensity for risk-taking. Moreover, the influence of human-AI cooperation, compared to human-human cooperation, on individuals’ risk decision-making is mediated by a sense of individual agentic responsibility and moderated by outcome feedback. These findings offer significant theoretical insights. Furthermore, this study holds substantial practical implications by aiding individuals in understanding how collaboration with AI impacts their risk-taking behaviors.

    Table and Figures | Reference | Related Articles | Metrics