ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2000, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (增刊): 3-12.

• 汉语和日语的认知研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉字中字表征和部件表征的关系

Marcus Taft1, Xiaoping Zhu1, Guosheng Ding2   

  1. 1.University of New South Wales, Sydney;
    2.Department of Psychology,Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • 发布日期:2021-06-21 出版日期:2000-12-30

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHARACTER AND RADICAL REPRESENTATION IN CHINESE

Marcus Taft1, Xiaoping Zhu1, Guosheng Ding2   

  1. 1. University of New South Wales, Sydney;
    2. Department of Psychology,Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2021-06-21 Published:2000-12-30
  • Supported by:
    a grant awarded to the first author by the Australian Research Council

摘要: 在中文中,许多复杂汉字的部件本身也是汉字(如:“肥”和“明”中的“月”)。该研究所要探讨的问题是某些部件作为整体汉字的一部分的语义表征和作为单独汉字的语义表征之间的关系。是部件表征启动了汉字表征,还是汉字表征启动了部件表征?也许这些表征是相互独立的。该研究前3个实验使用合成字为材料,通过控制字频的字汇判断任务来研究这个问题。这里的字频或者是基于部件作为汉字的一部分,或者是基于部件作为单独汉字出现的次数。结果表明,实验中所有水平的部件频率都对包含这一部件的汉字再认有一定作用。而且,如果某个字是另一个复杂汉字的部件,被试对这个字的反应也会受到影响。这些结果支持了复杂汉字的呈现激活其部件表征的理论。另一研究进一步肯定了这一观点,该研究发现,能够作为部件的非字很难被识别为非字。

关键词: 字识别, 词汇通达, 部件, 阅读

Abstract: Many radicals found in complex Chinese characters are themselves characters in their own right (e.g., the 月 of 肥 and 明 ). The question addressed in the reported research is the relationship between the lexical representation of the radical version of a character and that of its character version. Is the radical representation activated via the character representation, or does the reverse occur? Perhaps the representations are entirely independent. This issue was examined using a character decision task where radical frequency was manipulated. Frequency was based either on the number of times the radical occurs purely as a radical or on its token frequency as a character. The results indicated that all measures of radical frequency had an influence on the recognition of complex characters that contained that radical. In addition, it was shown that responses to simple characters were influenced by their occurrence as a radical in complex characters. These results were taken as support for the idea that activation of the representation of the character version of a radical precedes that of the radical representation. This was further supported by the finding that non-existent characters that can be used as radicals were hard to classify as non-characters.

Key words: Character recognition, lexical access, radicals, reading