ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

创意细化阶段的人智协同顺序效应:“人类先行”的潜在风险(“智管专栏”)

刘智强, 黄思博, 王子婧, 张光磊   

  1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 中国
    武汉理工大学管理学院, 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-15 修回日期:2026-05-14 接受日期:2026-05-21
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(72432003); 国家自然科学基金(72432008); 中国博士后科学基金(2025M780665); 湖北省自然科学基金(2026AFB112)

The Hidden Cost of Human-First Collaboration: Human-AI Collaboration Sequence and Creativity in the Idea Elaboration Phase

LIU Zhiqiang, HUANG Sibo, WANG Zijing, ZHANG Guanglei   

  1. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , China
    School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology , China
  • Received:2025-12-15 Revised:2026-05-14 Accepted:2026-05-21
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China(2026AFB112)

摘要: 随着人工智能(AI)在创意工作中的广泛应用,如何通过有效的人智协同提升创造力,已成为企业管理中的关键议题。既有研究普遍认为,“人类先行”的人智协同顺序更具优势,但鉴于创意过程具有多阶段特征,上述结论是否具有跨阶段的普适性,仍有待进一步检验。本研究通过三项实验,系统考察了创意细化阶段中不同人智协同顺序对创造力的影响机制及其边界条件。研究结果表明,在强调结构整合与逻辑表达的创意细化任务中,相较于“AI先行”,“人类先行”更容易使创作者对初始构思形成较强的心理所有权,从而抑制创意精细度的提升并削弱创造力。人智信任在上述关系中发挥了调节作用:在“人类先行”顺序下,较高水平的人智信任有助于缓解心理所有权引发的认知锚定效应,促进创作者更充分地采纳AI建议,从而改善创意细化过程中的优化效果。总体而言,本研究拓展了对AI参与创意工作的作用机制的理解,为企业在创意过程的不同阶段设计更有效的人智协同模式提供了理论依据与实践启示。

关键词: 人智协同, 人智协同顺序, 创造力, 锚定效应, 心理所有权

Abstract: As organizations increasingly integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into creative work, a critical managerial question arises: how should human-AI collaboration be structured to maximize creativity? Prior research has generally favored a human-first collaboration sequence. However, given the multi-stage nature of the creative process, it remains unclear whether this advantage generalizes across different stages. Drawing on idea journey theory and the anchoring effect, we argue that a human-first collaboration sequence in the idea elaboration phase heightens psychological ownership, leading creators to resist subsequent AI-generated structural suggestions. This resistance hinders improvements in idea articulateness, thereby constraining overall creativity. We further propose that trust in AI moderates this process by shaping individuals’ receptiveness to AI input. We tested these arguments across three complementary experiments (N = 741) involving diverse creative tasks and samples. Study 1 recruited 230 full-time employees to complete a product design elaboration task. Study 2 was a field experiment involving 271 participants developing marketing plans for newly launched coffee products, including a no-AI control condition. Study 3 recruited 240 full-time employees to extend these findings by identifying psychological ownership as a key mechanism and by testing trust in AI as a boundary condition that mitigates the disadvantage of a human-first sequence. Across the three studies, we find consistent support for our hypotheses. In idea elaboration tasks, a human-first collaboration sequence can be detrimental to creativity. Specifically, compared to an AI-first collaboration sequence, a human-first sequence is more likely to induce stronger psychological ownership of initial ideas, which in turn inhibits improvements in idea articulateness and ultimately reduces overall creativity. Further analyses show that trust in AI moderates this process. Under a human-first sequence, higher levels of trust in AI alleviate cognitive anchoring and increase individuals’ willingness to incorporate AI-generated suggestions, thereby improving the effectiveness of idea elaboration. This research makes three contributions to the literatures on human-AI collaboration and creativity. First, it challenges the assumption that a human-first sequence is universally advantageous by demonstrating that its effectiveness is contingent on the creative phase. Second, it uncovers a cognitive mechanism explaining why collaboration may remain suboptimal even when AI is used: a human-first sequence strengthens self-anchoring and psychological ownership, prompting creators to discount or overlook AI’s structural input. Third, by shifting attention from whether to use AI to how and when to use it, this research provides new insights into how organizations can better harness the joint potential of humans and AI in creative problem solving.

Key words: Human-AI collaboration, Human-AI collaboration sequence, Creativity, Anchoring effect, Psychological ownership