ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (10): 1762-1776.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.1762 cstr: 32110.14.2025.1762

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

倾诉的力量:负性情绪自我表露促进同伴亲社会行为

王舒琪, 程峰, 郭冰, 王巧, 成晓君()   

  1. 深圳大学心理学院, 深圳 518060
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-18 发布日期:2025-08-15 出版日期:2025-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 成晓君, E-mail: chengxiaojun@szu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科青年项目(24YJC90006);深圳市稳定支持计划面上项目(20220810171518001)

The power of confiding: Negative emotional self-disclosure facilitates peer prosocial behavior

WANG Shuqi, CHENG Feng, GUO Bing, WANG Qiao, CHENG Xiaojun()   

  1. School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • Received:2023-12-18 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-10-25

摘要:

在经历负性情绪事件后, 人们往往会通过向他人倾诉的方式寻求支持, 以减轻情绪负担。然而, 负性情绪的自我表露对个体后续社会行为的影响和调节要素, 仍未得到充分的探究。本研究通过两个实验考察了负性情绪自我表露对同伴亲社会行为的影响及人称指示语的调节作用。实验1以讲述者为中心, 探究作为表露方的个体在负性情绪自我表露后的亲社会行为表现; 实验2则转向倾听者视角, 考察作为接收方的个体在倾听他人负性情绪表露后的亲社会行为表现。 结果发现,无论表露还是倾听负性情绪均能促进个体对同伴的亲社会行为、共情和好感度水平。对于讲述者而言, 讲述负性情绪经历时投入度更高, 且负性情绪表露对同伴亲社会行为的提升仅存在于使用第一人称指示语(“我”)场景中, 讲述的意义感和对同伴的好感度在其中起重要作用; 倾听他人的负性情绪自我表露所提升的同伴亲社会行为与共情和好感度的提升密切相关。综上, 研究揭示了负性情绪自我表露的积极社会效应, 为引导个体合理表露负性情绪、促进个体和社会的健康发展提供了重要启示。

关键词: 负性情绪自我表露, 同伴亲社会行为, 共情, 好感度

Abstract:

In response to emotional distress, individuals often turn to confiding—the act of disclosing negative emotions to others—to seek social support and alleviate internal burdens. While confiding offers emotional relief, it may also carry interpersonal benefits, such as enhancing empathy and fostering social bonds. However, little is known about how negative emotional self-disclosure influences prosocial behavior between peers, or what psychosocial mechanisms underlie this effect. Additionally, linguistic cues such as the use of first-person (“I”) versus third-person pronouns (“He/She”) may influence the impact of emotional disclosure by altering how disclosure is perceived and processed. The present study examines whether disclosing or listening to negative emotions promotes prosocial behavior in peer contexts, and how personal pronoun framing moderates this effect. Addressing these questions contributes to a deeper understanding of the social value of emotional expression, particularly in moments of vulnerability that invite connection and support.

Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 examined the discloser’s perspective, using a 2 (emotional disclosure: negative vs. neutral; within-subject) × 2 (personal pronoun: first-person vs. third-person; between-subject) mixed design. Participants took on the role of the discloser, narrating either negative or neutral emotional experiences in the first-person or third-person to a peer (played by an experimenter). They then reported their prosocial intentions, empathy, and liking toward their peers, and engagement with the disclosure process. Experiment 2 shifted to the listener’s perspective, using a fully within-subject 2 (emotional disclosure: negative vs. neutral) × 2 (personal pronoun: first-person vs. third-person) design. Participants watched videos of peers narrating their emotional (negative or neutral) experiences framed with either first- or third-person pronouns, and then reported their prosocial intentions, empathy, and liking toward the discloser. Both experiments were conducted in controlled laboratory settings with adult participants, using validated self-report measures to assess prosociality.

Experiment 1 showed that participants reported significantly greater engagement when sharing negative emotions compared to neutral ones. Importantly, disclosing negative emotions led to increased prosocial behavior, but only in the first-person pronoun condition. The increased prosocial behavior was closely related to the enhanced interpersonal liking and a stronger sense of meaning during the disclosure. No such effect emerged in the third-person condition, indicating that linguistic self-involvement strengthens the social impact of confiding. Experiment 2 found that participants expressed higher levels of prosocial behavior, empathy, and liking after hearing negative (vs. neutral) emotional disclosures, regardless of pronoun type. Crucially, the prosocial gains were closely associated with elevated empathy and liking, suggesting these variables as potential mediators. While the effect of pronoun reference was not significant for listeners, the emotional valence of the disclosure played a decisive role. Together, these findings suggest that confiding—either as discloser or listener—can foster peer prosociality, but the underlying mechanisms may differ: disclosers benefit from personalization (via first-person framing), while listeners respond primarily to emotional authenticity.

This study reveals the positive social consequences of negative emotional self-disclosure. For disclosers, using first-person pronouns enhances this effect by increasing the sense of meaning, and interpersonal liking. For listeners, the content of the emotional experience—rather than linguistic framing—drives prosocial responses, which are closely linked to feelings of empathy and liking. These findings contribute to understanding the interpersonal value of emotional expression and offer practical insights into how linguistic and emotional cues can be harnessed to build social support, especially in emotionally challenging situations.

Key words: self-disclosure of negative emotion, peer prosocial behavior, empathy, liking

中图分类号: