ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

• •    

知觉与概念信息在无意识恐惧泛化中的加工特征:ERP研究

周亦佳, 梅颖, 王金霞, 雷怡   

  1. 四川师范大学, 610066
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-07 修回日期:2026-01-19 接受日期:2026-03-31
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金

Influence of Perceptual and Conceptual Information on Unconscious Fear Generalization: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Study

Yi   

  1. , 610066,
  • Received:2025-07-07 Revised:2026-01-19 Accepted:2026-03-31
  • Supported by:
    32271142

摘要: 恐惧泛化是焦虑障碍的核心机制之一,其加工过程可能受到知觉和概念信息的共同调节,且加工水平可能依赖个体的意识状态。本研究采用恐惧条件反射范式结合后向掩蔽技术,探讨在意识与无意识条件下,个体如何加工知觉与概念维度的恐惧线索。本研究采用2(意识水平:意识 vs. 无意识)×2(知觉线索:P+ vs. P–)×2(概念线索:C+ vs. C–)的区组设计,并通过ERP技术记录神经活动。行为结果发现,意识条件下个体的电击预期评分整体高于无意识条件。脑电结果表明,在N1成分上,无意识条件诱发了更负的前额N1波幅,提示个体即使在缺乏显性觉察的情况下,仍对威胁相关刺激保持较高早期注意警觉;此外,在N400成分上,意识条件下C+诱发更大的负波,反映个体对概念威胁信息的认知评估过程;而无意识条件下则是C–诱发更大的负波,提示无意识状态下恐惧记忆对相关概念的过度激活,使得大脑在语义加工时将原本安全的线索也视为潜在威胁。本研究支持恐惧泛化的双通路模型,揭示了意识状态下知觉与概念信息对恐惧加工的差异性作用,为理解恐惧泛化机制及临床干预策略提供了理论依据。

关键词: 恐惧泛化, 无意识, 知觉, 概念, N1, N400

Abstract: This study investigated the cognitive neural mechanisms underlying perceptual and conceptual fear generalization under conscious and non-conscious conditions. Sixty-one healthy participants were recruited and randomly assigned to conscious or non-conscious groups after completing a classical fear conditioning paradigm. The experimental design incorporated three independent variables: two within-subject factors (1) conceptual generalization stimulus type (C+ vs. C-); (2) perceptual generalization stimulus type (P+ vs. P-) and one between-subjects factor ,consciousness condition (conscious vs. non-conscious). The experimental protocol consisted of three phases. Participants first underwent a habituation phase to familiarize all stimuli. During conscious acquisition phase, perceptual stimuli (navy blue and olive green colors) and conceptual stimuli (animal and furniture words) served as conditioned stimuli (CSs), with one type designated as CS+ (e.g., navy blue as P+ and animal words as C+) and the other as CS-. Electric shock was used as the unconditioned stimulus (US). During generalization phase, four types of generalization stimuli(GSs) were implemented: navy blue animal words (C+P+), olive green animal words (C+P-), olive green furniture words (C-P-), and navy blue furniture words (C-P+). Critical temporal parameters differed between groups. For the conscious condition group, GSs were presented for 30ms followed by a 200ms blank screen and 100ms mask. The unconscious condition group received 30ms GSs followed by immediate 100ms masking before the 200ms blank screen. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses were recorded throughout the experiment. Behavioral data revealed significantly higher US expectancy ratings for CS+ compared to CS- during acquisition. Electrophysiological results demonstrated two critical patterns, 1,The unconscious group exhibited more negative frontal N1 amplitudes in response to GS than the conscious group. 2, C- elicited more negative N400 amplitudes compared to C+ in the unconscious condition group, while the reverse pattern emerged in the conscious condition group. These findings suggest three main conclusions, First, perceptual stimuli demonstrate superior threat detection learning compared to conceptual stimuli. Second, unconscious GSs induce enhanced early attentional vigilance, as reflected in N1 modulation. Third, distinct neural signatures were observed in conceptual processing - conscious conditions facilitated threat recognition through N400 modulation for threat-related concepts, whereas unconscious conditions revealed fear overgeneralization to semantically safe concepts .The differential mechanisms in perceptual threat detection and conceptual fear generalization under non-conscious conditions may provide novel insights into the pathological mechanisms of anxiety disorders. The dissociation between early attentional processes (N1) and later semantic processing (N400) highlights stage-specific neural correlates of fear generalization across consciousness states.