When AI learns to empathize: Topics, scenarios, and optimization of empathy computing from a psychological perspective

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00845

Abstract

Abstract:

Empathy computing is an emerging research field that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) and big data technology to predict, identify, simulate, and generate human empathy. This field builds upon psychological studies in terms of concepts, measurements, neural foundations, and applications of empathy, and employs innovative computing approaches for analyzing and simulating empathy. This article critically reviews current research on empathy computing and discusses its future directions from a psychological perspective, with the aim of facilitating foundational research and practical applications in this field.

The current research on empathy computing can be categorized into four themes based on different purposes and methods. On one hand, empathy computing primarily aims to analyze and comprehend empathy using computers. This endeavor can be further divided into two categories: (1) individual empathy assessment, which focuses on analyzing individual empathetic traits, and (2) empathetic content classification, which focuses on analyzing empathetic features in texts rather than individuals. On the other hand, research also focuses on simulating and expressing empathy through computing, which includes (3) the design of empathetic response systems and (4) the development of generative empathetic dialogue systems. The former provides users with a limited number of predefined rule-based responses and feedback to express empathy, while the latter utilizes AI to automatically generate a wide range of empathetic dialogues without relying on predefined rules. These four research streams are relatively independent yet complementary. Moreover, as research progresses, new directions will continue to emerge, such as improving the empathic capabilities of computers through brain-computer interface technology.

Although research on empathy computing is still in its early stages, it has shown potential for innovative applications in scenarios such as mental health, education, business services, and public management. With the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence, these fields, which involve substantial interpersonal interactions, are positioned to become the primary domains for human-computer interaction. As a result, they emerge as the key application scenarios for empathy computing. In the realm of mental health, empathy computing can assist in automatically evaluating and enhancing therapists' empathetic abilities. Additionally, it can provide personalized empathetic support and guidance through AI-driven chatbots. In the field of education, empathy computing can facilitate the learning process by employing empathetic AI tutors. Within the business sector, it enables organizations to deliver tailored customer experiences, thereby enhancing satisfaction and fostering loyalty through the generation of empathic dialogues. In public management, empathy computing can be used to generate empathetic discourse to counteract negative speech. Additionally, it facilitates policymakers to respond empathetically to citizens' needs and inquiries, thereby fostering trust between the government and the public. These four scenarios illustrate the vast potential applications of empathy computing. However, due to concerns related to safety and ethics, complete reliance on computers to perform empathetic tasks is currently not feasible. Instead, a collaboration between humans and computers is necessary.

Empathy computing represents a transformative frontier, not only providing methods to measure and analyze empathy automatically on a larger scale but also enriching the theoretical landscape of empathy research. It extends traditional studies on empathy in interpersonal relationships to explore its emerging manifestations in human-AI relationships. This expansion raises novel questions about the universality of empathy and its potential evolution in human-computer interaction. Empathy computing holds the promise of serving as a cornerstone for a unified theory of empathy that encompasses diverse relationship dynamics, ranging from human-human to human-machine interactions and beyond. It is beneficial for comprehensively understanding empathy and effectively promoting it in the context of an intelligent society.

Future research should focus on developing integrated theoretical models of empathy computing, establishing reliable psychological and behavioral datasets of empathy-related characteristics, and validating and refining empathy computing research through a human-centered approach. Psychologists play indispensable roles in leading, evaluating, and optimizing research and practice in this field. The collaboration of scholars in psychology and computer science is imperative to ensure that AI learns empathy effectively and ethically, thereby fostering people’s wellbeing in the forthcoming intelligent society.

Key words: empathy, empathy computing, computational psychology, artificial intelligence, human-computer interaction

CLC Number:

B849

HOU Hanchao, NI Shiguang, LIN Shuya, WANG Pusheng. When AI learns to empathize: Topics, scenarios, and optimization of empathy computing from a psychological perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 845-858.

Figures/Tables 3

References 94

[1]	彭凯平, 刘世群, 倪士光. (2018). 移动互联网时代的社会科学研究工具: 众包的争议与发展. 西北师大学报 (社会科学版) 55(3), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2018.03.015
[2]	苏悦, 刘明明, 赵楠, 刘晓倩, 朱廷劭. (2022). 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法. 心理科学进展 29(4), 571-585. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1042.2021.00571
[3]	王燕青, 龚少英, 姜甜甜, 吴亚男. (2022). 情感代理能否提高多媒体学习的效果? 心理科学进展, 30(7), 1524-1535. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01524 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01524 URL
[4]	岳童, 黄希庭. (2016). 共情特质的神经生物学基础. 心理科学进展 24(9), 1368-1376. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01368 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01368 URL
[5]	Abdul-Mageed, M., Buffone, A., Peng, H., Giorgi, S., Eichstaedt, J., & Ungar, L. (2017). Recognizing pathogenic empathy in social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 448-451. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14942
[6]	Alves-Oliveira, P., Sequeira, P., Melo, F. S., Castellano, G., & Paiva, A. (2019). Empathic robot for group learning. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3300188
[7]	Asada, M. (2015). Towards artificial empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0253-z doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0253-z URL
[8]	Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 URL
[9]	Barriere, V., Tafreshi, S., Sedoc, J., & Alqahtani, S. (2022). WASSA 2022 shared task: Predicting empathy, emotion and personality in reaction to news stories. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment & Social Media Analysis (pp. 214-227). Association for Computational Linguistics.
[10]	Bošnjaković, J., & Radionov, T. (2018). Empathy: Concepts, theories and neuroscientific basis. Alcoholism and Psychiatry Research, 54(2), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.20471/dec.2018.54.02.04 doi: 10.20471/apr URL
[11]	Brett, J. D., Becerra, R., Maybery, M. T., & Preece, D. A. (2023). The psychometric assessment of empathy: Development and validation of the Perth Empathy Scale. Assessment, 30(4), 1140-1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221086987 doi: 10.1177/10731911221086987 URL
[12]	Buechel, S., Buffone, A., Slaff, B., Ungar, L., & Sedoc, J. (2018). Modeling empathy and distress in reaction to news stories. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 4758-4765). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1507
[13]	Cai, Y. (2006). Empathic computing. In Y.Cai, & J.Abascal (Eds.), Ambient intelligence in everyday life (pp. 67-85). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11825890_3
[14]	Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3 doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3 URL
[15]	Cao, S., Fu, D., Yang, X., Wermter, S., Liu, X., & Wu, H. (2021). Can AI detect pain and express pain empathy? Can AI detect pain and express pain empathy? A review from emotion recognition and a human-centered AI perspective. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.04249
[16]	Chakravarthula, S. N., Xiao, B., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., & Georgiou, P. (2015). Assessing empathy using static and dynamic behavior models based on therapist’s language in addiction counseling. In Interspeech-2015 (pp. 668-672). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2015-237
[17]	Chen, G.-D., Lee, J.-H., Wang, C.-Y., Chao, P.-Y., Li, L.-Y., & Li, T.-Y. (2012). An empathic avatar in a computer- aided learning program to encourage and persuade learners. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 62-72. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.62
[18]	Chen, M. Y., Li, S., & Yang, Y. (2022). EmpHi: Generating empathetic responses with human-like intents. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 1063-1074). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.78
[19]	Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563 doi: 10.3102/003465430298563 URL
[20]	Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2014). Empathy: A Review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466 doi: 10.1177/1754073914558466 URL
[21]	Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 URL
[22]	de Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625 URL pmid: 17550343
[23]	de Waal, F. B. M. (2012). The antiquity of empathy. Science, 336(6083), 874-876. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220999 doi: 10.1126/science.1220999 URL pmid: 22605767
[24]	D'mello, S., & Graesser, A.(2013). AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(4), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128
[25]	Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43-49. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0022187 doi: 10.1037/a0022187 pmid: 21401273
[26]	Gaume, J., Hallgren, K. A., Clair, C., Schmid Mast, M., Carrard, V., & Atkins, D. C. (2019). Modeling empathy as synchrony in clinician and patient vocally encoded emotional arousal: A failure to replicate. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(3), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000322 doi: 10.1037/cou0000322 URL pmid: 30702323
[27]	Ge, Y., Li, W., Chen, F., Kayani, S., & Qin, G. (2021). The theories of the development of students: A factor to shape teacher empathy from the perspective of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 736656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736656
[28]	Gibson, J., Can, D., Xiao, B., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., Georgiou, P., & Narayanan, S. (2016). A deep learning approach to modeling empathy in addiction counseling. In Interspeech-2016 (pp. 1447-1451). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-554
[29]	Gibson, J., Malandrakis, N., Romero, F., Atkins, D. C., & Narayanan, S. S. (2015). Predicting therapist empathy in motivational interviews using language features inspired by psycholinguistic norms. In Interspeech-2015 (pp. 1947-1951). https://doi.org/10.21437/interspeech.2016-554
[30]	Groh, M., Ferguson, C., Lewis, R., & Picard, R. W. (2022). Computational empathy counteracts the negative effects of anger on creative problem solving. In 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII55700.2022.9953869
[31]	Grühn, D., Rebucal, K., Diehl, M., Lumley, M., & Labouvie- Vief, G. (2008). Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion, 8(6), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014123 doi: 10.1037/a0014123 URL pmid: 19102586
[32]	Guo, Y. R., & Goh, D. H.-L. (2016). Evaluation of affective embodied agents in an information literacy game. Computers & Education, 103, 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.013 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.013 URL
[33]	Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Empathy present and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442 doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442 URL
[34]	Hangartner, D., Gennaro, G., Alasiri, S., Bahrich, N., Bornhoft, A., Boucher, J., ... Donnay, K. (2021). Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), Article e2116310118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118
[35]	Hill, C. E. (2009). Helping skills: Facilitating, exploration, insight, and action. American Psychological Association.
[36]	Imel, Z. E., Barco, J. S., Brown, H. J., Baucom, B. R., Baer, J. S., Kircher, J. C., & Atkins, D. C. (2014). The association of therapist empathy and synchrony in vocally encoded arousal. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(1), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034943 doi: 10.1037/a0034943 URL pmid: 24274679
[37]	Ishii, R., Otsuka, K., Kumano, S., Higashinaka, R., & Tomita, J. (2018). Analyzing gaze behavior and dialogue act during turn-taking for estimating empathy skill level. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 31-39). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242978
[38]	Jing, A., Gupta, K., McDade, J., Lee, G. A., & Billinghurst, M. (2022). Comparing gaze-supported modalities with empathic mixed reality interfaces in remote collaboration. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 837-846). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar55827.2022.00102
[39]	Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adolescence.2005.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010 URL pmid: 16198409
[40]	Khanpour, H., Caragea, C., & Biyani, P. (2017). Identifying empathetic messages in online health communities. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 2:Short Papers) (pp. 246-251). Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
[41]	Kosinski, M. (2023). Theory of mind may have spontaneously emerged in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.02083
[42]	Kumano, S., Otsuka, K., Mikami, D., & Yamato, J. (2011). Analyzing empathetic interactions based on the probabilistic modeling of the co-occurrence patterns of facial expressions in group meetings. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG) (pp. 43-50). IEEE. https://doi.org/10. 1109/FG.2011.5771440
[43]	Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 71(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005 URL
[44]	Li, C., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhu, K., Hou, W., Lian, J., Luo, F., Yang, Q., & Xie, X. (2023). Large language models understand and can be enhanced by emotional stimuli. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11760
[45]	Li, S., Lu, S., Ni, S., & Peng, K. (2019). Identifying psychological resilience in Chinese migrant youth through multidisciplinary language pattern decoding. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, Article 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104506
[46]	Lin, S., Lin, L., Hou, C., Chen, B., Li, J., & Ni, S. (2023). Empathy-based communication framework for chatbots: A mental health chatbot application and evaluation. 11th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, Gothenburg, Sweden.
[47]	Lin, Z., Madotto, A., Shin, J., Xu, P., & Fung, P. (2019). MoEL: Mixture of empathetic listeners. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP- IJCNLP) (pp. 121-132). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1012
[48]	Litvak, M., Otterbacher, J., Ang, C. S., & Atkins, D. (2016). Social and linguistic behavior and its correlation to trait empathy. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media (PEOPLES) (pp. 128-137). The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee. https://aclanthology.org/W16-4314
[49]	Liu, S., Zheng, C., Demasi, O., Sabour, S., Li, Y., Yu, Z., Jiang, Y., & Huang, M. (2021). Towards emotional support dialog systems. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 3469-3483). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.269
[50]	Lomas, T. (2023). Stranger than we can imagine: The possibility and potential significance of non-human forms of consciousness and wellbeing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(6), 807-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2131608 doi: 10.1080/17439760.2022.2131608 URL
[51]	Loveys, K., Sagar, M., Billinghurst, M., Saffaryazdi, N., & Broadbent, E. (2022). Exploring empathy with digital humans. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) (pp. 233-237). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW55335.2022.00055
[52]	Lv, X., Yang, Y., Qin, D., Cao, X., & Xu, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence service recovery: The role of empathic response in hospitality customers’ continuous usage intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106993
[53]	Ma, F., Li, Y., Ni, S., Huang, S.-L., & Zhang, L. (2022). Data augmentation for audio-visual emotion recognition with an efficient multimodal conditional GAN. Applied Sciences, 12(1), Article 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010527
[54]	Majumder, N., Hong, P., Peng, S., Lu, J., Ghosal, D., Gelbukh, A., Mihalcea, R., & Poria, S. (2020). MIME: MIMicking emotions for empathetic response generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 8968-8979). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.721
[55]	Mathur, L., Spitale, M., Xi, H., Li, J., & Matarić, M. J. (2021). Modeling user empathy elicited by a robot storyteller. In 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII52823.2021.9597416
[56]	Meyers, S., Rowell, K., Wells, M., & Smith, B. C. (2019). Teacher empathy: A model of empathy for teaching for student success. College Teaching, 67(3), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579699 doi: 10.1080/87567555.2019.1579699 URL
[57]	Mooradian, T. A., Davis, M., & Matzler, K. (2011). Dispositional empathy and the hierarchical structure of personality. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0099 doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0099 URL
[58]	Morelli, S. A., Ong, D. C., Makati, R., Jackson, M. O., & Zaki, J. (2017). Empathy and well-being correlate with centrality in different social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(37), 9843-9847. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702155114 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702155114 URL
[59]	Moyers, T. B., & Miller, W. R. (2013). Is low therapist empathy toxic? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 878-884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030274 doi: 10.1037/a0030274 URL pmid: 23025709
[60]	Oker, A., Pecune, F., & Declercq, C. (2020). Virtual tutor and pupil interaction: A study of empathic feedback as extrinsic motivation for learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3643-3658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10123-5 doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10123-5 URL
[61]	Omitaomu, D., Tafreshi, S., Liu, T., Buechel, S., Callison-Burch, C., Eichstaedt, J., Ungar, L., & Sedoc, J. (2022). Empathic conversations: A multi-level dataset of contextualized conversations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.12698
[62]	OpenAI, J. A., Steven, A., Sandhini, A., Lama, A., Ilge, A., Florencia, L. A., ... Barret, Z. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. Retrieved March 01, 2023, from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230308774O
[63]	Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, Article 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855
[64]	Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000018 doi: 10.1017/s0140525x02000018 URL pmid: 12625087
[65]	Qian, Y., Wang, B., Ma, S., Bin, W., Zhang, S., Zhao, D., Huang, K., & Hou, Y. (2023). Think twice: A human-like two-stage conversational agent for emotional response generation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04907
[66]	Rashkin, H., Smith, E. M., Li, M., & Boureau, Y.-L. (2019). Towards empathetic open-domain conversation models:A new benchmark and dataset. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5370-5381). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1534
[67]	Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 URL pmid: 21184334
[68]	Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793 doi: 10.3102/0034654311421793 URL
[69]	Roshdy, A., Kork, S. A., Karar, A., Sabi, A. A., Barakeh, Z. A., ElSayed, F., Beyrouthy, T., & NAIT-ALI, A. (2021). Machine empathy: Digitizing human emotions. In 2021 International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering (pp. 307-311). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459104.3459154
[70]	Sabour, S., Zheng, C., & Huang, M. (2022). CEM:Commonsense-aware empathetic response generation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36(10), 11229-11237. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21373
[71]	Schurz, M., Radua, J., Tholen, M. G., Maliske, L., Margulies, D. S., Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., & Kanske, P. (2021). Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 147(3), 293-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000303 doi: 10.1037/bul0000303 URL pmid: 33151703
[72]	Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2021). Towards facilitating empathic conversations in online mental health support: A reinforcement learning approach. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (pp. 194-205). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450097
[73]	Sharma, A., Lin, I. W., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2023). Human-AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 doi: 10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2 URL
[74]	Sharma, A., Miner, A. S., Atkins, D. C., & Althoff, T. (2020). A computational approach to understanding empathy expressed in text-based mental health support. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 5263-5276). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.425
[75]	Stosic, M. D., Fultz, A. A., Brown, J. A., & Bernieri, F. J. (2022). What is your empathy scale not measuring? The convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of five empathy scales. The Journal of Social Psychology, 162(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1985417 doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1985417 URL
[76]	Sun, H., Lin, Z., Zheng, C., Liu, S., & Huang, M. (2021). PsyQA: A Chinese dataset for generating long counseling text for mental health support. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 (pp. 1489-1503). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.130
[77]	Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). The effect of emotional feedback on behavioral intention to use computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.003 URL
[78]	Tojib, D., Abdi, E., Tian, L., Rigby, L., Meads, J., & Prasad, T. (2023). What’s best for customers: Empathetic versus solution-oriented service robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15, 731-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-00970-w doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-00970-w URL
[79]	Tong, F., Lederman, R., D'Alfonso, S., Berry, K., & Bucci, S. (2022). Digital therapeutic alliance with fully automated mental health smartphone apps: A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 819623. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.819623
[80]	Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 6000-6010). Curran Associates Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3295222.3295349
[81]	Wambsganss, T., Soellner, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). Adaptive empathy learning support in peer review scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517740
[82]	Wang, H. L., Wu, Z. Z., & Lang, J. Y. (2020). Emotional first aid dataset [Data set]. https://github.com/chatopera/efaqa-corpus-zh
[83]	Wang, X., Li, X., Yin, Z., Wu, Y., & Liu, Jia. (2023). Emotional intelligence of large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.09042
[84]	Xiao, B., Bone, D., Van Segbroeck, M., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., Georgiou, P. G., & Narayanan, S. S. (2014). Modeling therapist empathy through prosody in drug addiction counseling. In Interspeech-2014 (pp. 213-217). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2014-55
[85]	Xiao, B., Can, D., Georgiou, P. G., Atkins, D., & Narayanan, S. S. (2012). Analyzing the language of therapist empathy in motivational interview based psychotherapy. In Proceedings of The 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[86]	Xiao, B., Imel, Z. E., Atkins, D. C., Georgiou, P. G., & Narayanan, S. S. (2015). Analyzing speech rate entrainment and its relation to therapist empathy in drug addiction counseling. In Interspeech-2015 (pp. 2489-2493). https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2015-537
[87]	Xiao, B., Imel, Z. E., Georgiou, P., Atkins, D. C., & Narayanan, S. S. (2016). Computational analysis and simulation of empathic behaviors: A survey of empathy modeling with behavioral signal processing framework. Current Psychiatry Reports, 18(5), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0682-5 doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0646-1 URL
[88]	Xiao, B., Imel, Z. E., Georgiou, P. G., Atkins, D. C., & Narayanan, S. S. (2015). "Rate my therapist": Automated detection of empathy in drug and alcohol counseling via speech and language processing. PLoS One, 10(12), Article e0143055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143055
[89]	Xu, A., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Sinha, V., & Akkiraju, R. (2017). A new chatbot for customer service on social media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3506-3510). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025496
[90]	Yalçın, Ö. N., & DiPaola, S. (2020). Modeling empathy: Building a link between affective and cognitive processes. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(4), 2983-3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09753-0 doi: 10.1007/s10462-019-09753-0 URL
[91]	Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608-1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679 doi: 10.1037/a0037679 URL pmid: 25347133
[92]	Zhang, J., & Centola, D. (2019). Social networks and health: New developments in diffusion, online and offline. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041421 doi: 10.1146/soc.2019.45.issue-1 URL
[93]	Zhou, K., Aiello, L. M., Scepanovic, S., Quercia, D., & Konrath, S. (2021). The language of situational empathy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449087
[94]	Zhu, S., Yu, T., Xu, T., Chen, H., Dustdar, S., Gigan, S., ... Pan, Y. (2023). Intelligent computing: The latest advances, challenges, and future. Intelligent Computing, 2, Article 0006. https://doi.org/10.34133/icomputing.0006