Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 2172-2183.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.02172
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
GAO Zaifeng1(), LI Wenmin1, LIANG Jiawen1, PAN Hanxi1, XU Wei2, SHEN Mowei1
Received:
2020-12-27
Published:
2021-10-26
Contact:
GAO Zaifeng
E-mail:zaifengg@zju.edu.cn
CLC Number:
GAO Zaifeng, LI Wenmin, LIANG Jiawen, PAN Hanxi, XU Wei, SHEN Mowei. Trust in automated vehicles[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2172-2183.
[1] | 施彦玮. (2019). 环境知觉对L2自动驾驶人机信任的影响 (硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州, |
[2] | 许为. (2019). 四论以用户为中心的设计:以人为中心的人工智能. 应用心理学, 25(4), 291-305. |
[3] | 许为. (2020). 五论以用户为中心的设计:从自动化到智能时代的自主化以及自动驾驶车. 应用心理学, 26(2), 108-128. |
[4] | Adams, B. D., Bruyn, L. E., Houde, S., Angelopoulos, P., Iwasa-Madge, K., & McCann, C.(2003). Trust in automated systems. Toronto: Ministry of National Defence, |
[5] |
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. L.(2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036-1060.
pmid: 15482072 |
[6] |
Armstrong, S. J., Peterson, E. R., & Rayner, S. G.(2012). Understanding and defining cognitive style and learning style: A Delphi study in the context of educational psychology. Educational Studies, 38(4), 449-455.
doi: 10.1080/03055698.2011.643110 URL |
[7] |
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., ... Rahwan, I.(2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563(7729), 59-64.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 URL |
[8] |
Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F.(2013). The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 47-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006 URL |
[9] | Brown, R. D., & Galster, S. M.(2004, September). Effects of reliable and unreliable automation on subjective measures of mental workload, situation awareness, trust and confidence in a dynamic flight task. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 147-151). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. |
[10] | Cao, S., Qin, Y. L., & Shen, M. W.(2013). Modeling the effect of driving experience on lane keeping performance using ACT-R cognitive architecture. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(21), 2078-2086. |
[11] | Carlson, M. S., Drury, J. L., Desai, M., Kwak, H., & Yanco, H. A.(2014, March). Identifying factors that influence trust in automated cars and medical diagnosis systems. In 2014 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, |
[12] | Celmer, N., Branaghan, R., & Chiou, E.(2018, September). Trust in branded autonomous vehicles & performance expectations: A theoretical framework. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 1761-1765). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. |
[13] | Chen, F., Ren, Q., Gao, Z., Wen, Z., & Yang, H.(2021). Unsettled issues in vehicle autonomy, artificial intelligence, and human-machine interaction. SAE Technical Paper, |
[14] |
Chen, J. Y. C., Lakhmani, S. G., Stowers, K., Selkowitz, A. R., Wright, J. L., & Barnes, M.(2018). Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(3), 259-282.
doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2017.1315750 URL |
[15] | Chien, S. Y., Lewis, M., Semnani-Azad, Z., & Sycara, K.(2014, September). An empirical model of cultural factors on trust in automation. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 859-863). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. |
[16] | Chien, S. Y., Semnani-Azad, Z., Lewis, M., & Sycara, K.(2014, June). Towards the development of an inter-cultural scale to measure trust in automation. In International conference on cross-cultural design (pp. 35-46). Springer, Cham. |
[17] | Chien, S. Y., Sycara, K., Liu, J. S., & Kumru, A.(2016, September). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede's cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 841-845). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. |
[18] |
Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G.(2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692-702.
doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549 URL |
[19] | Cohen, M. S., Parasuraman, R., Serfaty, D., & Andes, R. C.(1997). Trust in decision aids: A model and a training strategy. Arlington, VA: Cognitive Technologies, Inc. |
[20] | Cramer, H., Evers, V., Kemper, N., & Wielinga, B.(2008, December). Effects of autonomy, traffic conditions and driver personality traits on attitudes and trust towards in-vehicle agents. In 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (Vol. 3, pp. 477-482)IEEE. |
[21] | de Visser, E. J., Cohen, M., Freedy, A., & Parasuraman, R.(2014, June). A design methodology for trust cue calibration in cognitive agents. In International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality (pp. 251-262). Springer, Cham. |
[22] |
de Visser, E. J., Pak, R., & Shaw, T. H.(2018). From ‘automation' to ‘autonomy': The importance of trust repair in human-machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61(10), 1409-1427.
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725 pmid: 29578376 |
[23] |
de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D.(2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58(6), 719-735.
doi: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00039-9 URL |
[24] |
Donmez, B., Boyle, L. N., Lee, J. D., & McGehee, D. V.(2006). Drivers' attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(6), 387-398.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2006.02.001 URL |
[25] | DOT, U.(2018). Preparing for the future of transportation: Automated vehicles 3. 0. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.transportation.gov/policy-initiatives/automated-vehicles/av-40 |
[26] |
Du, N., Haspiel, J., Zhang, Q. N., Tilbury, D., Pradhan, A., Yang, J., & Robert, L.(2019). Look who's talking now: Implications of AV's explanations on driver's trust, AV preference, anxiety and mental workload. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 104, 428-442.
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.025 URL |
[27] |
Ekman, F., Johansson, M., Bligård, L. O., Karlsson, M., & Strömberg, H.(2019). Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 268-279.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.026 URL |
[28] | Ekman, F., Johansson, M., & Sochor, J.(2016, October). To See or Not to See: The Effect of Object Recognition on Users' Trust in" Automated Vehicles". In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1-4), Gothenburg, Sweden, |
[29] |
Ekman, F., Johansson, M., & Sochor, J.(2018). Creating appropriate trust in automated vehicle systems: A framework for HMI design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(1), 95-101.
doi: 10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209 URL |
[30] |
Endsley, M. R.(1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32-64.
doi: 10.1518/001872095779049543 URL |
[31] | Endsley, M. R.(2016). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design (2ed.). CRC press. |
[32] |
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T.(2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 URL |
[33] | European Road Transport Research Advisory Council ERTRAC working group. (2019). Connected Automated Driving Roadmap. ERTRAC, |
[34] | Fahrenfort, J. J., van Driel, J., van Gaal, S., & Olivers, C. N. L.(2018). From ERPs to MVPA Using the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling Toolbox (ADAM). Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12. |
[35] | Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., & Neukum, A.(2017, June) Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 365-372). IEEE. |
[36] | French, B., Duenser, A., Heathcote, A.(2018). Trust in Automation - A Literature Review. CSIRO, Australia. |
[37] | Gao, J., & Lee, J. D.(2006). Extending the decision field theory to model operators' reliance on automation in supervisory control situations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(5), 943-959. |
[38] |
Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K.(2015). Trust in automation-before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3025-3032.
doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847 URL |
[39] |
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J.,& Parasuraman, R.(2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(5), 517-527.
doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254 URL |
[40] |
Hancock, P. A., Nourbakhsh, I., & Stewart, J.(2019). On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7684-7691.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805770115 URL |
[41] |
Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F.(2018). Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving-effects of drivers' age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1017-1032.
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448 URL |
[42] | Häuslschmid, R., von Bülow, M., Pfleging, B., & Butz, A.(2017, March). Supporting trust in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 319-329). ACM. |
[43] |
Haxby, J. V., Connolly, A. C., & Guntupalli, J. S.(2014). Decoding neural representational spaces using multivariate pattern analysis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 37(1), 435-456.
doi: 10.1146/neuro.2014.37.issue-1 URL |
[44] | Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., & Davidsson, S.(2013, October). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 210-217). ACM. |
[45] |
Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., & Krems, J. F.(2017). Prior familiarization with takeover requests affects drivers' takeover performance and automation trust. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(3), 457-470.
doi: 10.1177/0018720816678714 URL |
[46] | Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J. F., & Toenert, L.(2015). Effects of take-over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the eighth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (pp.331-337). University of Iowa. |
[47] |
Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F.(2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(3), 509-519.
doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744 URL |
[48] |
Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M.(2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(3), 407-434.
doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570 URL |
[49] |
Jian, J. Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G.(2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53-71.
doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04 URL |
[50] | Jonsson, I. M., Harris, H., & Nass, C.(2008, April). How accurate must an in-car information system be?: Consequences of accurate and inaccurate information in cars. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp.1665-1674). ACM. |
[51] | Kelleher, K.(2018). Man arrested for drunk driving after officers found him asleep in Tesla running in autopilot mode. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from http://fortune.com/2018/11/30/man-arrested-drunk-driving-asleep-tesla-autopilot-mode/ |
[52] | Khastgir, S., Birrell, S., Dhadyalla, G., & Jennings, P.(2017). Calibrating trust to increase the use of automated systems in a vehicle. In Advances in human aspects of transportation (pp. 535-546). Springer, Cham. |
[53] | Kohn, S. C., Quinn, D., Pak, R., de Visser, E. J., & Shaw, T. H.(2018, September). Trust Repair Strategies with Self-Driving Vehicles: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 1108-1112). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. |
[54] |
Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., & Nass, C.(2015). Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 9(4), 269-275.
doi: 10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2 URL |
[55] |
Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K.(2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006 URL |
[56] |
Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Stiegemeier, D., & Baumann, M.(2020). The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(5), 718-736.
doi: 10.1177/0018720819853686 URL |
[57] |
Kunze, A., Summerskill, S. J., Marshall, R., & Filtness, A. J.(2019). Automation transparency: Implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces. Ergonomics, 62(3), 345-360.
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1547842 URL |
[58] |
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A.(2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 46(1), 50-80.
doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 URL |
[59] |
Lee, J. G., Kim, K. J., Lee, S., & Shin, D. H.(2015). Can autonomous vehicles be safe and trustworthy? Effects of appearance and autonomy of unmanned driving systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 682-691.
doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547 URL |
[60] |
Li, W. M., Yao, N. L., Shi, Y. W., Nie, W. R., Zhang, Y. H., Li, X. R., ... Gao, Z. F.(2020). Personality Openness Predicts Driver Trust in Automated Driving. Automotive Innovation, 3(1), 3-13.
doi: 10.1007/s42154-019-00086-w URL |
[61] |
Manzey, D., Reichenbach, J., & Onnasch, L.(2012). Human performance consequences of automated decision aids: The impact of degree of automation and system experience. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(1), 57-87.
doi: 10.1177/1555343411433844 URL |
[62] |
Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R.(2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human- automation interactions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(2), 194-210.
doi: 10.1518/001872008X288574 URL |
[63] |
Meyers, E.(2013). The neural decoding toolbox. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 8.
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2013.00008 pmid: 23734125 |
[64] | Mirnig, A. G., Wintersberger, P., Sutter, C., & Ziegler, J.(2016, October). A framework for analyzing and calibrating trust in automated vehicles. In Adjunct proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 33-38). ACM. |
[65] | Mishler, S.(2019). Whose drive is it anyway? Using multiple sequential drives to establish patterns of learned trust, error cost, and non-active trust repair while considering daytime and nighttime differences as a proxy for difficulty (Unpublished Master's thesis). Old Dominion University, Virginia. |
[66] | Molnar, L. J.(2017). Age-related differences in driver behavior associated with automated vehicles and the transfer of control between automated and manual control: A simulator evaluation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute. |
[67] |
Molnar, L. J., Ryan, L. H., Pradhan, A. K., Eby, D. W., Louis, R. M. S., & Zakrajsek, J. S.(2018). Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58, 319-328.
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.004 URL |
[68] | Morris, D. M., Erno, J. M., & Pilcher, J. J.(2017, September). Electrodermal response and automation trust during simulated self-driving car use. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 1759-1762). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, |
[69] | National Transportation Safety Board. (2018, March). Preliminary report: Crash and post-crash fire of electric- powered passenger vehicle. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/HWY18FH011-preliminary.aspx |
[70] | Niu, D. F., Terken, J., & Eggen, B.(2018). Anthropomorphizing information to enhance trust in autonomous vehicles. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(6), 352-359. |
[71] | Noah, B. E., & Walker, B. N.(2017, March). Trust Calibration through Reliability Displays in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 361-362). ACM. |
[72] | Noah, B. E., Wintersberger, P., Mirnig, A. G., Thakkar, S., Yan, F., Gable, T. M., ... McCall, R.(2017, September). First workshop on trust in the age of automated driving. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications adjunct (pp. 15-21). ACM. |
[73] |
Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P.(2016). Fully automated driving: Impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 58(2), 229-241.
doi: 10.1177/0018720815612319 URL |
[74] | Petersen, L., Tilbury, D., Robert, L., & Yang, X. J.(2017, August) Effects of augmented situational awareness on driver trust in semi-autonomous vehicle operation. In 2017 NDIA ground vehicle systems engineering and technology symposium. Novi, MI. |
[75] | Petersen, L., Zhao, H. J., Tilbury, D. M., Yang, X. J. & Robert, L. P.(2018, August). The influence of risk on driver's trust in autonomous driving system. In Proceedings of the 2018 ground vehicle systems engineering and technology symposium, Novi, MI. |
[76] |
Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J.-F., Breazeal, C., ... Wellman, M.(2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477-486.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y URL |
[77] |
Riding, R., & Cheema, I.(1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
doi: 10.1080/0144341910110101 URL |
[78] | SAE, China. (2020). Technology roadmap for energy saving and new energy vehicles 2.0. China Machine Press. |
[79] | SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. (2018). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE International. |
[80] | Saffarian, M., de Winter, J. C., & Happee, R.(2012, September). Automated driving: Human-factors issues and design solutions. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 2296-2300). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. |
[81] | Schaefer, K. E., Billings, D. R., Szalma, J. L., Adams, J. K., Sanders, T. L., Chen, J. Y., & Hancock, P. A.(2014). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for human-robot interaction. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center. |
[82] | Soh, H., Reid, L. N., & King, K. W.(2009). Measuring trust in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 83-104. |
[83] | Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S.(2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 71-96. |
[84] | Toffetti, A., Wilschut, E. S., Martens, M. H., Schieben, A., Rambaldini, A., Merat, N., & Flemisch, F.(2009). CityMobil: Human factor issues regarding highly automated vehicles on eLane. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2110(1), 1-8. |
[85] | Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H.(2012). Trust in smart systems: Sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(5), 799-810. |
[86] | Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H.(2015). Trusting a virtual driver that looks, acts, and thinks like you. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(5), 895-909. |
[87] | Walker, F., Verwey, W. V., & Martens, M.(2018, June). Gaze behaviour as a measure of trust in automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 6th humanist conference, Hague, Netherlands. |
[88] | Walker, G. H., & Stanton, N. A.(2017). Human factors in automotive engineering and technology. London: CRC Press. |
[89] | Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N.(2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113-117. |
[90] | Wintersberger, P., Noah, B. E., Kraus, J., McCall, R., Mirnig, A. G., Kunze, A., ... Walker, B. N.(2018, September). Second Workshop on Trust in the Age of Automated Driving. In Adjunct proceedings of the 10th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 56-64). ACM. |
[91] | Zhang, Q. N., Robert, L., Du, N., & Yang, X. J.(2018). Trust in AVs: The impact of expectations and individual differences. Presented at the Conference on Autonomous Vehicles in Society: Building a Research Agenda, Ann Arbor, MI. |
[92] | Zihsler, J., Hock, P., Walch, M., Dzuba, K., Schwager, D., Szauer, P., & Rukzio, E.(2016, October). Carvatar: Increasing trust in highly-automated driving through social cues. In Adjunct proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 9-14). ACM. |
[1] | ZHU Ningyi, JIANG Ning, LIU Yan. The development of employees’ feeling trusted by their supervisors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1448-1462. |
[2] | QI Yue, QIN Shaotian, WANG Kexin, CHEN Wenfeng. Regulation of facial trustworthiness evaluation: The proposal and empirical verification of the experience transfer hypothesis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 715-722. |
[3] | QU Jiachen, GONG Zhe. Are there sex differences in trust levels? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(12): 2236-2245. |
[4] | XU Yi, LIU Yixuan. The impact of trust in technology and trust in leadership on the adoption of new technology from employee's perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(10): 1711-1723. |
[5] | GONG Zhe, TANG Yujie, LIU Chang. Can trust game measure trust? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(1): 19-30. |
[6] | GAO Qinglin, ZHOU Yuan. Psychological and neural mechanisms of trust formation: A perspective from computational modeling based on the decision of investor in the trust game [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(1): 178-189. |
[7] | HUANG Chongrong, HU Yu. The relationship between trust and creativity in organizations: Evidence from meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1118-1132. |
[8] | YAN Aimin, LI Yali, XIE Julan, LI Ying. Differential responses of employees to corporate social responsibility: An interpretation based on attribution theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 1004-1014. |
[9] | LI Qinggong, WANG Zhenyan, SUN Jieyuan, SHI Yan. The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 746-751. |
[10] | CHEN Ying, XU Minxia, WANG Xinjian. The cognitive neural network model of trust [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 800-809. |
[11] | MA Shu, ZHANG Wei, SHI Jinlei, YANG Zhen. The human factors of the take-over process in conditional automated driving based on cognitive mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 150-160. |
[12] | Ya-xuan Ang, Fang-fang Wang, Yong-na Li. The Positivity Effect in Facial Trustworthiness Judgment in Older Adults: Age Difference and the Effects of Cognitive Declines [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 11-11. |
[13] | Ya-xuan Ang, Xin-yue Liu, Shi-wei Yang, Yong-na Li. The Positivity Effect of Facial Trustworthiness in Older Adults: The Influence of Facial Expressions and Face Age [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 12-12. |
[14] | LIAO Jiajun, LI Hong, WU Yin. Testosterone and human decision-making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1607-1621. |
[15] | ZHANG Kunkun, ZHANG Keye, ZHANG Huoyin, LUO Wenbo. The time course and influence factors of facial trustworthiness processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(8): 1394-1403. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||