Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 300-317.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00300
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Yuanxia1, LIU Guoxiong1, XIN Cong1, CHENG Li2,3()
Received:
2023-05-23
Online:
2024-02-15
Published:
2023-11-23
Contact:
CHENG Li
E-mail:chengli@bnu.du.cn
CLC Number:
ZHENG Yuanxia, LIU Guoxiong, XIN Cong, CHENG Li. Judging a book by its cover: The influence of facial features on children’s trust judgments[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(2): 300-317.
作者/年份 | 面孔特征 | 被试信息 | 任务性质 | 研究范式 | 主要相关结论 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rackoff等( | 性别 | 149名3~8岁儿童, 73名女生, 美国。 | 认识性(对科学/玩具证词的信任) | 冲突信息源范式 | 主试是男性时, 女孩的同性偏好减弱(性别刻板印象) 信息提供者是男/女科学家时, 都表现出同性偏好 |
Ma和Woolley ( | 性别 | 64名4岁和6岁儿童, 美国。 | 认识性(学习新物体功能, 寻求新信息) | 冲突信息源范式 | 同性偏好与性别刻板印象共存 |
Taylor ( | 性别 | 325名4~7岁儿童, 158名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(物体名称, 单词学习) | 冲突信息源范式 | 倾向于选择信任同性 |
Terrier等( | 性别 | E1:88名3、4岁儿童, 41名女生 E2:85名3、4岁儿童, 42名女生瑞士 | 认识性(确认盒子内的物体) | 冲突信息源范式 | 当认识线索一致时, 倾向于选择信任同性 |
Shenouda和Danovitch ( | 性别 | 74名3~5岁儿童, 37名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(职业与专业知识) | 访谈 | 美国儿童的推断基于信息提供者的专业而非性别, 埃及儿童更受到性别的影响 |
Boseovski等( | 性别 | 48名4~5岁、48名6~8岁儿童, 48名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(正确性问题和学习偏好问题) 社会性(对角色的偏好) | 冲突信息源范式 | 认识性任务:并未表现出性别偏好, 而是信任反刻板印象专家, 优先考虑专业知识; 社会性任务:同性偏好 |
Mirtaheri等( | 性别 | 106名3~4岁儿童, 48名女生, 伊朗中上阶层。 | 认识性(正确性问题和学习偏好问题) | 冲突信息源范式 | 倾向于信任同性, 性别分型得分高的女生倾向于信任男性 |
McDonald和Ma ( | 种族 | 64名3~4岁儿童, 30名女生, 加拿大。 | 社会性(“为什么提供虚假信息?是欺骗还是犯错”) | 冲突信息源变式(藏匿物品) | 轻信本种族的信息提供者, 口音胜过种族(两者冲突是, 轻信群体内口音) |
Li等( | 种族 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国。 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | (自闭症与正常儿童都)选择信任本种族而非其它种族提供的信息 |
Li等( | 面孔吸引力 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国。 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | 自闭症儿童选择性信任与面孔吸引力有关, 正常儿童的选择性信任与面孔吸引力无关 |
Bascandziev和Harris ( | 面孔吸引力 | 32名4~6岁儿童, 18名女生, 美国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 儿童更信任面孔吸引力高的人提供的信息 |
Bascandziev和Harris ( | 面孔吸引力 | 132名4~5岁儿童, 66名女生, 美国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 当不清楚信息提供者的认识状态时, 儿童更信任面孔吸引力高的人提供的信息; 面孔吸引力相同时, 信任正确率更高的信息提供者; 儿童对面孔吸引力低但正确率高和面孔吸引力高但正确率低的信息提供者之间信任没有差异 |
唐卫海等( | 面孔吸引力 | 195名4~6岁儿童, 96名女生, 中国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 正确率一致时, 对高面孔吸引力者的选择性信任; 儿童选择信任正确率高面孔吸引力低的信息提供者 |
马凤玲等( | 面孔可信度 | 118名7、9、11岁儿童, 58名女生, 中国。 | 社会性(如是否信任ta遵守承诺) | 对偶选择范式&情境故事访谈 | 幼儿3岁开始选择信任面孔可信度高的个体, 随着年龄增长, 选择概率越高。 |
Li等( | 面孔可信度 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | (自闭症与正常儿童的)选择性信任与面孔可信度无关 |
Ewing等( | 面孔可信度 | 4.8~6.0、9.5~11.8和成人各24名, 37名女生, 澳大利亚。 | 社会性(你原意给这个伙伴多少代币?) | 经济信任博弈范式 | 儿童会选择性地信任面孔可信度高的伙伴 |
Mondloch等( | 面孔可信度 | 30名成人(25名女性)和56名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“选择谁一起接受挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任面孔可信度高的伙伴一起接受(保守秘密和保护斗篷的)挑战 |
Charlesworth等( | 面孔可信度 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族。 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童认为可信度高的面孔比可信度低的面孔更可能做出值得信任的行为(如分享/助人) |
Palmquist和DeAngelis ( | 面孔可信度 | 60名4~5岁儿童, 32名女生, 美国 | 社会性(相信谁更擅长分享) 认识性(谁画得好/知道物体功能) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始信任面孔可信度高的更擅长分享 |
Palmquist等( | 面孔可信度 | 64名4~5岁儿童, 30名女生, 美国 | 知识性测试, 非知识性测试 | 对偶选择范式 | 4~5岁儿童认为面孔可信度高的人更熟悉物体功能 |
Siddique等( | 面孔可信度 | 42名7~10岁儿童, 31名女生, 澳大利亚 | 社会性(你原意给这个伙伴多少代币?) | 多回合经济信任游戏(寻宝游戏+魔法机器) | 倾向于信任面孔可信度高的伙伴 |
Charlesworth等( | 能力 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始认为看上去有能力的人比看上去没有能力的人更可能画出最好的画 |
Palmquist和DeAngelis ( | 能力 | 60名4~5岁儿童, 32名女生, 美国 | 社会性(相信谁更擅长分享) 认识性(谁画得好/知道物体功能) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始信任看上去有能力的画得更好、了解物体的功能 |
Palmquist等( | 能力 | 64名4~5岁儿童, 30名女生, 美国 | 知识性测试, 非知识性测试 | 对偶选择范式 | 4~5岁儿童根据面孔可信度而非能力判断他人的知识行为 |
Charlesworth等( | 面孔支配性 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 支配性高的面孔比顺从的面孔更可能做出主导性行为(主导游戏/拿起重物品) |
Mondloch等( | 面孔支配性 | 30名成人(25名女性)和56名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“选择谁一起接受挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任面孔支配性高的伙伴一起接受(对付巨龙和巨石的)挑战 |
Ewing等( | 表情 | 48名5~8岁(23名女生)、55名9~12岁(27名女生), 40名成年人(26名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“你想给你的伙伴多少代币?”) | 经济信任游戏 | 信任受到伙伴表情的影响, 程度依次是:快乐>中性>愤怒 |
Mondloch等( | 表情 | 30名成人(25名女性)和5名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“寻求谁的帮助以面对挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任表情快乐而非愤怒/恐惧的伙伴 |
Van Der Zant等( | 表情 | 60名5~8岁儿童, 28名女生, 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“寻求谁的帮助以面对挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 儿童并不认为表情快乐的人比表情中性的人更值得信任 |
Clément等( | 表情 | 99名3~5岁的儿童, 47名女生, 法国 | 认识性(学习新单词) | 冲突信息源范式 | 选择信任快乐面孔而非愤怒面孔提供的信息 |
Caulfield等( | 表情 | 15名6~12岁自闭症儿童、15名6~12岁正常儿童(7名女生)、16名成人(12名女性), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(如是否信任ta保守秘密) | 对偶选择范式&情境故事访谈 | (正常和自闭症)儿童都认为快乐面孔比愤怒面孔更值得信任。 |
Tang等( | 表情 | 50名4~5岁儿童, 26名女生, 中国 | 社会性(信任谁会遵守诺言) | 冲突信息源范式—变式 | 更信任表情积极的面孔 |
作者/年份 | 面孔特征 | 被试信息 | 任务性质 | 研究范式 | 主要相关结论 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rackoff等( | 性别 | 149名3~8岁儿童, 73名女生, 美国。 | 认识性(对科学/玩具证词的信任) | 冲突信息源范式 | 主试是男性时, 女孩的同性偏好减弱(性别刻板印象) 信息提供者是男/女科学家时, 都表现出同性偏好 |
Ma和Woolley ( | 性别 | 64名4岁和6岁儿童, 美国。 | 认识性(学习新物体功能, 寻求新信息) | 冲突信息源范式 | 同性偏好与性别刻板印象共存 |
Taylor ( | 性别 | 325名4~7岁儿童, 158名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(物体名称, 单词学习) | 冲突信息源范式 | 倾向于选择信任同性 |
Terrier等( | 性别 | E1:88名3、4岁儿童, 41名女生 E2:85名3、4岁儿童, 42名女生瑞士 | 认识性(确认盒子内的物体) | 冲突信息源范式 | 当认识线索一致时, 倾向于选择信任同性 |
Shenouda和Danovitch ( | 性别 | 74名3~5岁儿童, 37名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(职业与专业知识) | 访谈 | 美国儿童的推断基于信息提供者的专业而非性别, 埃及儿童更受到性别的影响 |
Boseovski等( | 性别 | 48名4~5岁、48名6~8岁儿童, 48名女生, 美国多种族。 | 认识性(正确性问题和学习偏好问题) 社会性(对角色的偏好) | 冲突信息源范式 | 认识性任务:并未表现出性别偏好, 而是信任反刻板印象专家, 优先考虑专业知识; 社会性任务:同性偏好 |
Mirtaheri等( | 性别 | 106名3~4岁儿童, 48名女生, 伊朗中上阶层。 | 认识性(正确性问题和学习偏好问题) | 冲突信息源范式 | 倾向于信任同性, 性别分型得分高的女生倾向于信任男性 |
McDonald和Ma ( | 种族 | 64名3~4岁儿童, 30名女生, 加拿大。 | 社会性(“为什么提供虚假信息?是欺骗还是犯错”) | 冲突信息源变式(藏匿物品) | 轻信本种族的信息提供者, 口音胜过种族(两者冲突是, 轻信群体内口音) |
Li等( | 种族 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国。 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | (自闭症与正常儿童都)选择信任本种族而非其它种族提供的信息 |
Li等( | 面孔吸引力 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国。 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | 自闭症儿童选择性信任与面孔吸引力有关, 正常儿童的选择性信任与面孔吸引力无关 |
Bascandziev和Harris ( | 面孔吸引力 | 32名4~6岁儿童, 18名女生, 美国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 儿童更信任面孔吸引力高的人提供的信息 |
Bascandziev和Harris ( | 面孔吸引力 | 132名4~5岁儿童, 66名女生, 美国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 当不清楚信息提供者的认识状态时, 儿童更信任面孔吸引力高的人提供的信息; 面孔吸引力相同时, 信任正确率更高的信息提供者; 儿童对面孔吸引力低但正确率高和面孔吸引力高但正确率低的信息提供者之间信任没有差异 |
唐卫海等( | 面孔吸引力 | 195名4~6岁儿童, 96名女生, 中国。 | 社会性(询问谁) 认识性(物体的名称) | 冲突信息源范式 | 正确率一致时, 对高面孔吸引力者的选择性信任; 儿童选择信任正确率高面孔吸引力低的信息提供者 |
马凤玲等( | 面孔可信度 | 118名7、9、11岁儿童, 58名女生, 中国。 | 社会性(如是否信任ta遵守承诺) | 对偶选择范式&情境故事访谈 | 幼儿3岁开始选择信任面孔可信度高的个体, 随着年龄增长, 选择概率越高。 |
Li等( | 面孔可信度 | 30名4.8~8.2岁自闭症儿童, 30名5~7岁正常儿童, 8名女生, 中国 | 认识性(找到糖果) | 冲突信息源变式—捉迷藏游戏 | (自闭症与正常儿童的)选择性信任与面孔可信度无关 |
Ewing等( | 面孔可信度 | 4.8~6.0、9.5~11.8和成人各24名, 37名女生, 澳大利亚。 | 社会性(你原意给这个伙伴多少代币?) | 经济信任博弈范式 | 儿童会选择性地信任面孔可信度高的伙伴 |
Mondloch等( | 面孔可信度 | 30名成人(25名女性)和56名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“选择谁一起接受挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任面孔可信度高的伙伴一起接受(保守秘密和保护斗篷的)挑战 |
Charlesworth等( | 面孔可信度 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族。 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童认为可信度高的面孔比可信度低的面孔更可能做出值得信任的行为(如分享/助人) |
Palmquist和DeAngelis ( | 面孔可信度 | 60名4~5岁儿童, 32名女生, 美国 | 社会性(相信谁更擅长分享) 认识性(谁画得好/知道物体功能) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始信任面孔可信度高的更擅长分享 |
Palmquist等( | 面孔可信度 | 64名4~5岁儿童, 30名女生, 美国 | 知识性测试, 非知识性测试 | 对偶选择范式 | 4~5岁儿童认为面孔可信度高的人更熟悉物体功能 |
Siddique等( | 面孔可信度 | 42名7~10岁儿童, 31名女生, 澳大利亚 | 社会性(你原意给这个伙伴多少代币?) | 多回合经济信任游戏(寻宝游戏+魔法机器) | 倾向于信任面孔可信度高的伙伴 |
Charlesworth等( | 能力 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始认为看上去有能力的人比看上去没有能力的人更可能画出最好的画 |
Palmquist和DeAngelis ( | 能力 | 60名4~5岁儿童, 32名女生, 美国 | 社会性(相信谁更擅长分享) 认识性(谁画得好/知道物体功能) | 对偶选择范式 | 儿童5岁开始信任看上去有能力的画得更好、了解物体的功能 |
Palmquist等( | 能力 | 64名4~5岁儿童, 30名女生, 美国 | 知识性测试, 非知识性测试 | 对偶选择范式 | 4~5岁儿童根据面孔可信度而非能力判断他人的知识行为 |
Charlesworth等( | 面孔支配性 | 99名3~10岁儿童, 57名女生, 美国多种族 | 社会性(助人/分享) 主导性(拿起重物/主导游戏) 能力性(唱歌/画画) | 对偶选择范式 | 支配性高的面孔比顺从的面孔更可能做出主导性行为(主导游戏/拿起重物品) |
Mondloch等( | 面孔支配性 | 30名成人(25名女性)和56名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“选择谁一起接受挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任面孔支配性高的伙伴一起接受(对付巨龙和巨石的)挑战 |
Ewing等( | 表情 | 48名5~8岁(23名女生)、55名9~12岁(27名女生), 40名成年人(26名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“你想给你的伙伴多少代币?”) | 经济信任游戏 | 信任受到伙伴表情的影响, 程度依次是:快乐>中性>愤怒 |
Mondloch等( | 表情 | 30名成人(25名女性)和5名4~11岁儿童(32名女生), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“寻求谁的帮助以面对挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 选择信任表情快乐而非愤怒/恐惧的伙伴 |
Van Der Zant等( | 表情 | 60名5~8岁儿童, 28名女生, 澳大利亚 | 社会性(“寻求谁的帮助以面对挑战”) | 故事书任务—金银岛挑战 | 儿童并不认为表情快乐的人比表情中性的人更值得信任 |
Clément等( | 表情 | 99名3~5岁的儿童, 47名女生, 法国 | 认识性(学习新单词) | 冲突信息源范式 | 选择信任快乐面孔而非愤怒面孔提供的信息 |
Caulfield等( | 表情 | 15名6~12岁自闭症儿童、15名6~12岁正常儿童(7名女生)、16名成人(12名女性), 澳大利亚 | 社会性(如是否信任ta保守秘密) | 对偶选择范式&情境故事访谈 | (正常和自闭症)儿童都认为快乐面孔比愤怒面孔更值得信任。 |
Tang等( | 表情 | 50名4~5岁儿童, 26名女生, 中国 | 社会性(信任谁会遵守诺言) | 冲突信息源范式—变式 | 更信任表情积极的面孔 |
[1] |
陈丽君, 江洁, 任志洪, 袁宏. (2017). “阳刚”还是“清秀”更具吸引力?——对男性面孔二态性不同偏好的元分析. 心理科学进展, 25(4), 553-569.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00553 |
[2] | 陈丽君, 王欣, 赵陵波, 陈昕, 王益文. (2018). 面孔二态性对学前儿童信任行为的影响——来自人格标签的解释. 心理发展与教育, 34(5), 513-522. |
[3] | 丁雪辰, 桑标, 潘婷婷. (2017). 幼儿选择性信任与心理理论和执行功能的关联:来自追踪研究的证据. 心理科学, 40(5), 1129-1135. |
[4] | 韩尚锋, 李玥, 刘燊, 徐强, 谭群, 张林. (2018). 美在观察者眼中: 陌生面孔吸引力评价中的晕轮效应与泛化效应. 心理学报, 50(4), 363-376. |
[5] |
寇慧, 苏艳华, 张妍, 孔繁昌, 胡媛艳, 王洋, 陈红. (2013). 面孔吸引力的影响因素: 观察者假设. 心理科学进展, 21(12), 2144-2153.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02144 |
[6] | 李海峰, 梁子峰, 王哲, 孙宇浩. (2019). 知觉场理论对面孔知觉年龄偏差效应的解释. 心理科学, 42(05), 1076-1082. |
[7] | 李鸥, 陈红. (2010). 面孔吸引力的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学进展, 18(3), 472-479. |
[8] | 刘晨, 温芳芳, 佐斌. (2019). 以貌取人可行吗?——基于面孔的特质推理及准确性. 心理科学, 42(1), 150-156. |
[9] | 刘燊, 韩尚锋, 王秀娟, 李婉悦, 甘烨彤, 徐强, 张林. (2020). 面孔社会知觉模型发展的回顾与展望. 心理科学, 43(1), 132-143. |
[10] | 马凤玲, 郑婷婷, 蔡维香, 徐芬. (2014). 信任倾向和面孔可信度对小学儿童信任判断的影响. 应用心理学, 20(3), 216-226. |
[11] |
齐玥, 秦邵天, 王可昕, 陈文锋. (2022). 面孔可信度评价调节:经验迁移假说的提出与验证. 心理科学进展, 30(4), 715-722.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00715 |
[12] |
唐卫海, 钟汝波, 许晓旭, 刘希平. (2019). 面孔吸引力和信息正确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 71-84.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00071 |
[13] |
徐华伟, 牛盾, 李倩. (2016). 面孔吸引力和配偶价值: 进化心理学视角. 心理科学进展, 24(7), 1130-1138.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01130 |
[14] |
张超, 卫旭华, 黎英明. (2022). 面相识人:基于认知视角的解释. 心理科学进展, 30(2), 308-323.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00308 |
[15] |
张坤坤, 张珂烨, 张火垠, 罗文波. (2019). 面孔可信度加工的时间进程和影响因素. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1394-1403.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01394 |
[16] | 张林, 李玥, 刘燊, 谭群, 徐强, 杨亚平. (2016). 陌生面孔的印象加工: 基于面孔特征的视角. 心理科学, 39(6), 1373-1378. |
[17] |
张倩, 陈林林, 杨群. (2018). 审判决策过程中的面孔特征效应. 心理科学进展, 26(4), 698-709.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00698 |
[18] |
张耀华, 朱莉琪. (2014). 认识性信任: 学龄前儿童的选择性学习. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 86-96.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00086 |
[19] |
Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O'connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32(3), 537-551.
doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3 pmid: 11709163 |
[20] | Anindya, A. (2022). The role of youth in raising gender awareness on social media. ICGCS 2021: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Gender, Culture and Society (pp. 30-31). August 2021, Padang, Indonesia. |
[21] |
Baccolo, E., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2020). Age‐related differences in sensitivity to facial trustworthiness: Perceptual representation and the role of emotional development. Child Development, 91(5), 1529-1547.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.13340 |
[22] |
Baccolo, E., Quadrelli, E., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2021). Neural sensitivity to trustworthiness cues from realistic face images is associated with temperament: An electrophysiological study with 6-month-old infants. Social Neuroscience, 16(6), 668-683.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1976271 URL |
[23] |
Bascandziev, I., & Harris, P. L. (2014). In beauty we trust: Children prefer information from more attractive informants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 94-99.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12022 pmid: 24164592 |
[24] |
Bascandziev, I., & Harris, P. L. (2016). The beautiful and the accurate: Are children’s selective trust decisions biased? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 92-105.
doi: S0022-0965(16)30079-0 pmid: 27518811 |
[25] |
Bigler, R. S. (1997). Conceptual and methodological issues in the measurement of children’s sex typing. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 53-69.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00100.x URL |
[26] |
Boseovski, J. J., Hughes, C., & Miller, S. E. (2016). Expertise in unexpected places: Children’s acceptance of information from gender counter-stereotypical experts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 161-176.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.002 pmid: 26433196 |
[27] |
Briole, S. (2021). Are girls always good for boys? Short and long term effects of school peers’ gender. Economics of Education Review, 84, 102150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102150
doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102150 URL |
[28] |
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Caspers, S., Kurth, F., Habel, U., Zilles, K., Laird, A., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2011). ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Brain Structure Function, 215(3-4), 209-223.
doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0287-4 URL |
[29] |
Caulfield, F., Ewing, L., Bank, S., & Rhodes, G. (2016). Judging trustworthiness from faces: Emotion cues modulate trustworthiness judgments in young children. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 503-518.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12156 pmid: 26493772 |
[30] |
Caulfield, F., Ewing, L., Burton, N., Avard, E., & Rhodes, G. (2014). Facial trustworthiness judgments in children with ASD are modulated by happy and angry emotional cues. PLOS ONE, 9(5), e97644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097644
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097644 URL |
[31] |
Centorrino, S., Djemai, E., Hopfensitz, A., Milinski, M., & Seabright, P. (2015). Honest signaling in trust interactions: Smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher earning opportunities. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 8-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.08.001 URL |
[32] |
Chang, S.-A. A., & Baskin-Sommers, A. (2020). Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood affects neural processing of facial trustworthiness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 409.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00409
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00409 URL |
[33] |
Charlesworth, T. E., Hudson, S.-k. T., Cogsdill, E. J., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Children use targets’ facial appearance to guide and predict social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 55(7), 1400-1413.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000734 pmid: 30998034 |
[34] |
Clément, F., Bernard, S., Grandjean, D., & Sander, D. (2013). Emotional expression and vocabulary learning in adults and children. Cognition and Emotion, 27(3), 539-548.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.724012 URL |
[35] |
Cogsdill, E., & Banaji, M. (2015). Face-trait inferences show robust child-adult agreement: Evidence from three types of faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 150-156.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.007 URL |
[36] |
Cogsdill, E. J., Todorov, A. T., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1132-1139.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614523297 pmid: 24570261 |
[37] |
Cooper, P. A., Geldart, S. S., Mondloch, C. J., & Maurer, D. (2006). Developmental changes in perceptions of attractiveness: A role of experience? Developmental Science, 9(5), 530-543.
pmid: 16911455 |
[38] |
Corriveau, K. H., Kinzler, K. D., & Harris, P. L. (2013). Accuracy trumps accent in children's endorsement of object labels. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 470-479.
doi: 10.1037/a0030604 pmid: 23231692 |
[39] |
Crookes, K., & McKone, E. (2009). Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111(2), 219-247.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004 pmid: 19296930 |
[40] |
Damon, F., Quinn, P., Heron-Delaney, M., Lee, K., & Pascalis, O. (2016). Development of category formation for faces differing by age in 9- to 12-month-olds: An effect of experience with infant faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 582-597.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12152 pmid: 27393740 |
[41] |
Danovitch, J. H., & Mills, C. M. (2014). How familiar characters influence children’s judgments about information and products. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128(2), 1-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.001 URL |
[42] |
De Neys, W., Hopfensitz, A., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2015). Adolescents gradually improve at detecting trustworthiness from the facial features of unknown adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47, 17-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.01.002 URL |
[43] |
Dong, Y., Li, Y., & Sun, T. (2014). Happy faces considered trustworthy irrespective of perceiver's mood: Challenges to the mood congruency effect. Computers & Security, 47, 85-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2014.04.010 URL |
[44] |
Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736-748.
pmid: 15898872 |
[45] | Eggleston, A., Flavell, J. C., Tipper, S. P., Cook, R., & Over, H. (2021). Culturally learned first impressions occur rapidly and automatically and emerge early in development. Developmental Science, 24(2), 1-9. |
[46] |
Eggleston, A., McCall, C., Cook, R., & Over, H. (2021). Parents reinforce the formation of first impressions in conversation with their children. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0256118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256118
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256118 URL |
[47] |
Ewing, L., Caulfield, F., Read, A., & Rhodes, G. (2015). Perceived trustworthiness of faces drives trust behaviour in children. Developmental Science, 18(2), 327-334.
doi: 10.1111/desc.12218 pmid: 25051999 |
[48] |
Ewing, L., Sutherland, C. A., & Willis, M. L. (2019). Children show adult-like facial appearance biases when trusting others. Developmental Psychology, 55(8), 1694-1701.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000747 pmid: 31045400 |
[49] |
Forgas, J. P. (2008). Affect and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 94-101.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00067.x pmid: 26158876 |
[50] |
Hassin, R., & Trope, Y. (2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 837-852.
pmid: 10821193 |
[51] |
Heron-Delaney, M., Quinn, P. C., Damon, F., Lee, K., & Pascalis, O. (2018). Development of preferences for differently aged faces of different races. Social Development, 27(1), 172-186.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12253 pmid: 29403159 |
[52] | Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2015). The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Current Biology, 25(14), R621-R634. |
[53] |
Jessen, S., & Grossmann, T. (2016). Neural and behavioral evidence for infants' sensitivity to the trustworthiness of faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(11), 1728-1736.
pmid: 27315276 |
[54] |
Jessen, S., & Grossmann, T. (2020). Neural evidence for the impact of facial trustworthiness on object processing in a gaze-cueing task in 7-month-old infants. Social Neuroscience, 15(1), 74-82.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2019.1651764 pmid: 31389306 |
[55] |
Johnson, S. P., Alt, N. P., Biosah, C., Dong, M., Goodale, B., Senturk, D., & Johnson, K. L. (2021). Development of infants’ representation of female and male faces. Vision Research, 184, 1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.02.005 pmid: 33765637 |
[56] |
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251.
doi: 10.1037/h0034747 URL |
[57] | Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month- olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8(6), F31-F36. |
[58] |
Kinzler, K. D. (2021). Language as a social cue. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 241-264.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103034 pmid: 33400567 |
[59] |
Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14(1), 106-111.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00965.x URL |
[60] |
Kinzler, K. D., Shutts, K., DeJesus, J., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623 URL |
[61] |
Kinzler, K. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Do infants show social preferences for people differing in race? Cognition, 119(1), 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.019 pmid: 21334605 |
[62] |
Koenig, M. A., Clément, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children's use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15(10), 694-698.
pmid: 15447641 |
[63] |
Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76(6), 1261-1277.
pmid: 16274439 |
[64] | Lee, V., Cheal, J. L., & Rutherford, M. (2015). Categorical perception along the happy-angry and happy-sad continua in the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 40, 95-102. |
[65] |
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 473-493.
doi: 10.1080/026999300402763 URL |
[66] | Li, P., Zhang, C., & Yi, L. (2016). Brief report: Sensitivity of children with autism spectrum disorders to face appearance in selective trust. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 46(7), 2520-2525. |
[67] |
Li, Q., Heyman, G. D., Mei, J., & Lee, K. (2019). Judging a book by its cover: Children's facial trustworthiness as judged by strangers predicts their real-world trustworthiness and peer relationships. Child Development, 90(2), 562-575.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12907 pmid: 28771694 |
[68] |
Li, Q., Zhang, W., Heyman, G. D., Compton, B. J., & Lee, K. (2020). Susceptibility to being lured away by a stranger: A real-world field test of selective trust in early childhood. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1488-1496.
doi: 10.1177/0956797620966526 pmid: 33196345 |
[69] |
Li, Y., Jiao, X., Liu, Y., Tse, C. S., & Dong, Y. (2021). Age differences in facial trustworthiness judgement based on multiple facial cues. British Journal of Psychology, 112(2), 474-492.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.v112.2 URL |
[70] |
Liu, S., Quinn, P., Xiao, N. G., Wu, Z., Liu, G., & Lee, K. (2018). Relations between scanning and recognition of own-and other-race faces in 6-and 9-month-old infants. PsyCh Journal, 7(2), 92-102.
doi: 10.1002/pchj.2018.7.issue-2 URL |
[71] |
Lucas, A. J., Lewis, C., Pala, F. C., Wong, K., & Berridge, D. (2013). Social-cognitive processes in preschoolers' selective trust: Three cultures compared. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 579-590.
doi: 10.1037/a0029864 pmid: 22946437 |
[72] | Luo, X., Song, J., Guan, J., Wang, X., & Chen, L. (2023). Influence of facial dimorphism on interpersonal trust: Weighing warmth and competence traits in different trust situations. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04472-w |
[73] |
Ma, F., Xu, F., & Luo, X. (2016). Children's facial trustworthiness judgments: Agreement and relationship with facial attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 499.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00499 pmid: 27148111 |
[74] |
Ma, L., & Ganea, P. A. (2010). Dealing with conflicting information: Young children's reliance on what they see versus what they are told. Developmental Science, 13(1), 151-160.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00878.x pmid: 20121871 |
[75] |
Ma, L., & Woolley, J. D. (2013). Young children's sensitivity to speaker gender when learning from others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(1), 100-119.
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.638687 URL |
[76] | Masuda, N., & Fu, F. (2015). Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism. Fprime Reports, 7, 27. |
[77] |
Mattarozzi, K., Todorov, A., Marzocchi, M., Vicari, A., & Russo, P. M. (2015). Effects of gender and personality on first impression. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0135529. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135529
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135529 URL |
[78] |
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
doi: 10.2307/258792 URL |
[79] |
McDonald, K. P., & Ma, L. (2016). Preschoolers’ credulity toward misinformation from ingroup versus outgroup speakers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 148, 87-100.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.011 pmid: 27135169 |
[80] |
Mirtaheri, G., Babaie, A., Vahidi, E., & Ghanbari, S. (2023). Gender influences on children’s selective trust of adult testimony in Iranian context. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 147-171.
doi: 10.1080/17405629.2022.2060962 URL |
[81] |
Mondloch, C. J., Gerada, A., Proietti, V., & Nelson, N. L. (2019). The influence of subtle facial expressions on children’s first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 180, 19-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.002 URL |
[82] |
Morawska, A. (2020). The effects of gendered parenting on child development outcomes: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(4), 553-576.
doi: 10.1007/s10567-020-00321-5 |
[83] |
Mussel, P., Göritz, A. S., & Hewig, J. (2013). The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 381-385.
doi: 10.1017/S1930297500006045 URL |
[84] |
Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381 pmid: 11300573 |
[85] |
Olivola, C. Y., Funk, F., & Todorov, A. (2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 566-570.
pmid: 25344029 |
[86] |
Palmquist, C. M., Cheries, E. W., & DeAngelis, E. R. (2020). Looking smart: Preschoolers’ judgements about knowledge based on facial appearance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 31-41.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12303 pmid: 31553507 |
[87] |
Palmquist, C. M., & DeAngelis, E. R. (2020). Valence or traits? Developmental change in children’s use of facial features to make inferences about others. Cognitive Development, 56, 100948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100948
doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100948 URL |
[88] |
Pazda, A. D., Thorstenson, C. A., Elliot, A. J., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Women’s facial redness increases their perceived attractiveness: Mediation through perceived healthiness. Perception, 45(7), 739-754.
doi: 10.1177/0301006616633386 pmid: 26908567 |
[89] |
Rackoff, G. N., Lagoni, D. W., Shoshany, M. F., Moursi, N. A., & Hennefield, L. (2022). The impact of informant gender on children’s endorsement of scientific and non- scientific information. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 170-186.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.v40.1 URL |
[90] |
Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 146-174.
doi: 10.1037/a0025750 pmid: 22061689 |
[91] |
Rostovtseva, V. V., Butovskaya, M. L., Mezentseva, A. A., & Weissing, F. J. (2022). Effects of sex and sex-related facial traits on trust and trustworthiness: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925601
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925601 URL |
[92] |
Rottman, J., Johnston, A. M., Bierhoff, S., Pelletier, T., Grigoreva, A. D., & Benitez, J. (2020). In sickness and in filth: Developing a disdain for dirty people. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 196, 104858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104858
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104858 URL |
[93] |
Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 409-426.
doi: 10.1037/a0031050 pmid: 23276271 |
[94] | Shenouda, C. K., & Danovitch, J. H. (2014). Does a male nurse know about football? American and Egyptian children’s understanding of gender and expertise. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(3-4), 63-87. |
[95] |
Shevlin, B. R., & Krajbich, I. (2021). Attention as a source of variability in decision-making: Accounting for overall- value effects with diffusion models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 105, 102594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102594
doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2021.102594 URL |
[96] |
Siddique, S., Jeffery, L., Palermo, R., Collova, J. R., & Sutherland, C. A. (2022). Children’s dynamic use of face-and behavior-based cues in an economic trust game. Developmental Psychology, 58(12), 2275-2286.
doi: 10.1037/dev0001438 pmid: 36136782 |
[97] |
Siddique, S., Sutherland, C. A., Palermo, R., Foo, Y. Z., Swe, D. C., & Jeffery, L. (2022). Development of face-based trustworthiness impressions in childhood: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Cognitive Development, 61, 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101131
doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101131 URL |
[98] |
Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13(2), 147-183.
doi: 10.1006/drev.1993.1007 URL |
[99] |
Silvestri, V., Arioli, M., Baccolo, E., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2022). Sensitivity to trustworthiness cues in own-and other-race faces: The role of spatial frequency information. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0272256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272256
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272256 URL |
[100] |
Slepian, M. L., & Ames, D. R. (2016). Internalized impressions: The link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior is mediated by targets’ expectations of how they will be judged. Psychological Science, 27(2), 282-288.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615594897 URL |
[101] |
Sutherland, C. A., & Young, A. W. (2022). Understanding trait impressions from faces. British Journal of Psychology, 113(4), 1056-1078.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12583 pmid: 35880691 |
[102] |
Sutherland, C. A., Young, A. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties. British Journal of Psychology, 108(2), 397-415.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12206 pmid: 27443971 |
[103] |
Tang, Y., Harris, P. L., Zou, H., & Xu, Q. (2019). The impact of emotional expressions on children’s trust judgments. Cognition Emotion, 33(2), 318-331.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1449735 URL |
[104] |
Taylor, M. G. (2013). Gender influences on children’s selective trust of adult testimony. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(4), 672-690.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.04.003 URL |
[105] |
Terrier, N., Bernard, S., Mercier, H., & Clément, F. (2016). Visual access trumps gender in 3-and 4-year-old children’s endorsement of testimony. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 223-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.002 URL |
[106] |
Tham, D. S. Y., Bremner, J. G., & Hay, D. (2017). The other-race effect in children from a multiracial population: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 128-137.
doi: S0022-0965(16)30233-8 pmid: 27965175 |
[107] | Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness:An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 208-224. |
[108] |
Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J. M., Oosterhof, N. N., & Falvello, V. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13(4), 724-738.
doi: 10.1037/a0032335 pmid: 23627724 |
[109] |
Todorov, A., Mende-Siedlecki, P., & Dotsch, R. (2013). Social judgments from faces. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(3), 373-380.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.010 pmid: 23347644 |
[110] |
Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519-545.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831 pmid: 25196277 |
[111] |
Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813-833.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813 URL |
[112] |
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455-460.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001 pmid: 18951830 |
[113] |
Tong, Y., Danovitch, J., Wang, F., Williams, A., & Li, H. (2021). Unsafe to eat? How familiar cartoon characters affect children’s learning about potentially harmful foods. Appetite, 167, 105649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105649
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105649 URL |
[114] |
Trujillo, L. T., Jankowitsch, J. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2014). Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: A neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(3), 1061-1076.
doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0230-2 URL |
[115] |
Tsankova, E., & Kappas, A. (2016). Facial skin smoothness as an indicator of perceived trustworthiness and related traits. Perception, 45(4), 400-408.
pmid: 26621963 |
[116] |
Van Der Zant, T., Reid, J., Mondloch, C. J., & Nelson, N. L. (2021). The influence of postural emotion cues on implicit trait judgements. Motivation and Emotion, 45(5), 641-648.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-021-09889-z |
[117] |
Vingilis-Jaremko, L., & Maurer, D. (2013). The influence of symmetry on children’s judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 42(3), 302-320.
pmid: 23837207 |
[118] |
Wang, Q. (2016). Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 583-596.
pmid: 27694456 |
[119] |
Weiss, A., Michels, C., Burgmer, P., Mussweiler, T., Ockenfels, A., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Trust in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(1), 95-114.
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000334 URL |
[120] |
Yang, T., Chen, H., Hu, Y., Zheng, Y., & Wang, W. (2015). Preferences for sexual dimorphism on attractiveness levels: An eye-tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 179-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.005 URL |
[121] |
Zhao, N., Ma, M., & Zhang, J. (2017). Going beyond the beauty-trust Link: The moderating role of mood. Current Psychology, 36(4), 927-935.
doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9481-8 URL |
[1] | Yan Yang, Dingping Yang, Xinping Yu. Cognitive Function in Children with Strabismus [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 44-44. |
[2] | Ruoying Zheng, Guomei Zhou. The Cheerleader Effect in Multiple Social Groups [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 47-47. |
[3] | Da Wang, Zhihao Yang, Gaoxing Mei. Serial Dependence in the Ensemble Perception of Facial Attractiveness and Facial Expression [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 114-114. |
[4] | LU Xiaowei, GUO Zhibin, CHENG Yu, SHEN Jie, GUI Wenjun, ZHANG Lin. Evaluation of facial trustworthiness in older adults: A positivity effect and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1496-1503. |
[5] | PU Xiaoping, HU Hao, ZHU Jina, TANG Yipeng. Influence of facial attractiveness on the allocation of attentional resources: Moderating effect of evolutionary motivations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1109-1120. |
[6] | ZHANG Libin, ZHANG Qiwen, WANG Chenxu, ZHANG Yunyun. The co-varying relationship between children and adolescents’ peer networks and bullying-related behaviors from the perspective of social networks [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 416-427. |
[7] | DENG Shichang, LIN Zihan, LU Yuqian, LI Xiangqian. New playmates in the age of intelligence: Characteristics of children’s interactions with robots and their impact on child development [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(12): 2319-2336. |
[8] | BU Xiaoou, WANG Yao, DU Yawen, WANG Pei. Application of machine learning in early screening of children with dyslexia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(11): 2092-2015. |
[9] | LI Kaiqian, LIANG Dandan. Abnormalities in the brain of preschool children at risk for developmental dyslexia and early neural markers of dyslexia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(10): 1912-1923. |
[10] | JIANG Danying, YANG Yunmei, LI Jing. Children's distributive justice in group context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2004-2019. |
[11] | JIANG Han. Developing an online model of educational rehabilitation for children with ADHD [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1747-1758. |
[12] | ZHOU Guomei, ZHENG Ruoying, LIN Jia, LIU Xinge. The holistic representation of facial attractiveness and the attractiveness enhancement mechanism of dynamic faces [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1429-1438. |
[13] | KANG Dan, LI Jiajia, CAI Shu. Preschool children’s sleep problem and language disorder [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1270-1281. |
[14] | QI Yue, QIN Shaotian, WANG Kexin, CHEN Wenfeng. Regulation of facial trustworthiness evaluation: The proposal and empirical verification of the experience transfer hypothesis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 715-722. |
[15] | LIU Xiaohan, CHEN Minglong, GUO Jing. Application of machine learning in prognosis and trajectory of post-traumatic stress disorder in children [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 851-862. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||