Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1663-1683.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1663
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Peiqiong1,2, DONG Yanxin1, CHEN Guanchu1, WEN Shengjun3, YIN Jun4, CHEN Wei1,2(
), DONG Da1,2(
)
Received:2025-09-12
Online:2026-09-15
Published:2026-07-20
Contact:
CHEN Wei, DONG Da
E-mail:anti-monist@163.com;feixiandd@163.com
CLC Number:
ZHAO Peiqiong, DONG Yanxin, CHEN Guanchu, WEN Shengjun, YIN Jun, CHEN Wei, DONG Da. The animacy detectors: The embeddedness of animacy perception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(9): 1663-1683.
| [1] | 陈巍, 董达, 郭本禹. (2026). 理论心理学: 认知科学的视角. 华东师范大学出版社. |
| [2] |
董达, 陈巍. (2025). 人不是物: 社会认知的稽古维新. 心理学报, 57(1), 173-189.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0173 |
| [3] |
黄梅, 杨格晴, 王莹, 蒋毅. (2023). 基于动态线索感知生命性的认知神经机制. 心理科学进展, 31(8), 1460-1476.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01460 |
| [4] | 刘佳, 胡金生, 江宏君, 刘莹. (2021). 孤独症谱系障碍者基于运动线索的生命知觉. 心理科学, 44(4), 1012-1017. |
| [5] |
Abdai, J. (2025). Perception of animate motion in dogs. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1522489.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1522489 URL |
| [6] | Abdai, J., Uccheddu, S., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, Á. (2022). Exploring the advantages of using artificial agents to investigate animacy perception in cats and dogs. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 17(6), 065009. |
| [7] | Aflalo, T., Chivukula, S., Zhang, C., Rosario, E. R., Pouratian, N., & Andersen, R. A. (2022). Cognition through internal models: Mirror neurons as one manifestation of a broader mechanism [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.06.506071 |
| [8] |
Altman, M. N., Khislavsky, A. L., Coverdale, M. E., & Gilger, J. W. (2016). Adaptive attention: How preference for animacy impacts change detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 303-314.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.006 URL |
| [9] |
Bailey, R. L., & Lang, A. (2022). The importance of being animate: Information selection as a function of dynamic human-environment interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 923808.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923808 URL |
| [10] |
Barber, O., Somogyi, E., McBride, E. A., & Proops, L. (2023). Exploring the role of aliveness in children's responses to a dog, biomimetic robot, and toy dog. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107660.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107660 URL |
| [11] |
Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2022). Face perception: Computational insights from phylogeny. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(4), 350-363.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.01.006 pmid: 35232662 |
| [12] |
Ben-Ami, S., Gupta, P., Yadav, M., Shah, P., Talwar, G., Paswan, S., … Sinha, P. (2022). Human (but not animal) motion can be recognized at first sight-After treatment for congenital blindness. Neuropsychologia, 174, 108307.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108307 URL |
| [13] |
Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5(4), 221-225.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00504.x URL |
| [14] | Bliss, L., Vasas, V., Freeland, L., Roach, R., Ferrè, E.R., & Versace, E. (2023). A spontaneous gravity prior: Newborn chicks prefer stimuli that move against gravity. Biology Letters, 19(2), 20220502. |
| [15] | Boch, M., Wagner, I. C., Karl, S., Huber, L., & Lamm, C. (2023). Functionally analogous body- and animacy- responsive areas are present in the dog (Canis familiaris) and human occipito-temporal lobe. Communications Biology, 6(1), 645. |
| [16] |
Bonin, P., Gelin, M., & Bugaiska, A. (2014). Animates are better remembered than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 370-382.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0368-8 URL |
| [17] |
Bulkin, D. A., & Groh, J. M. (2006). Seeing sounds: Visual and auditory interactions in the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(4), 415-419.
pmid: 16837186 |
| [18] |
Carey, S. (2011). Précis of ‘the origin of concepts. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(3), 113-162.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000919 URL |
| [19] | Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press. |
| [20] |
Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1996). Science and core knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 515-533.
doi: 10.1086/289971 URL |
| [21] | Chang, D. H., & Troje, N. F. (2008). Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 1-10. |
| [22] |
Chang, D. H. F., Ban, B., Ikegaya, Y., Fujita, I., & Troje, N. F. (2018). Cortical and subcortical responses to biological motion. NeuroImage, 174, 87-96.
doi: S1053-8119(18)30208-8 pmid: 29524623 |
| [23] |
Chang, D. H. F., Troje, N. F., Ikegaya, Y., Fujita, I., & Ban, H. (2021). Spatiotemporal dynamics of responses to biological motion in the human brain. Cortex, 136, 124-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.015 pmid: 33545617 |
| [24] | Cheng, Y., Yuan, X., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Eye pupil signals life motion perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 86( 2), 579-586. |
| [25] |
Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2011). Chicks like consonant music. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1270-1273.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611418244 pmid: 21934134 |
| [26] |
Cox, J. A., Cox, T. W., & Aimola, D. A. M. (2022). Are animates special? Exploring the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(9), 1746-1762.
doi: 10.1177/17470218221074686 URL |
| [27] |
Cox, J. A., Wu, Y., & Aimola Davies, A. M. (2024). Does animacy affect visual statistical learning? Revisiting the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3), 492-510.
doi: 10.1177/17470218231173883 URL |
| [28] | De Agrò, M., Rößler, D. C., Kim, K., & Shamble, P. S. (2021). Perception of biological motion by jumping spiders. PLoS Biology, 19(7), e3001172. |
| [29] | De Agrò, M., Winsor, A. M., Walsh, W., Shamble, P., & Jakob, E. (2025). Biological point-light displays scanning by the principal eyes of a jumping spider [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.23.661007 |
| [30] |
Deng, W., Sargent, B., Havens, K., Vanderbilt, D., Rosales, M., Pulido, J. C.,... Smith, B. A. (2023). Correlation between performance and quantity/variability of leg exploration in a contingency learning task during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 70, 101788.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101788 URL |
| [31] | Di Giorgio, E., Lunghi, M., Simion, F., & Vallortigara, G. (2017). Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: The case of self-propulsion. Developmental Science, 20(4), 10. |
| [32] | Di Giorgio, E., Lunghi, M., Vallortigara, G., & Simion, F. (2021). Newborns’ sensitivity to speed changes as a building block for animacy perception. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 542. |
| [33] | Di Giorgio, E., Rosa-Salva, O., Frasnelli, E., Calcagnì, A., Lunghi, M., Scattoni, M. L.,... Vallortigara, G. (2021). Abnormal visual attention to simple social stimuli in 4-month-old infants at high risk for Autism. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 15785. |
| [34] | Duarte, J. V., Abreu, R., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2022). A two-stage framework for neural processing of biological motion. NeuroImage, 259(5), 119403. |
| [35] | Farkas, E. B., Hernández-Pérez, R., Cuaya, L. V., Rojas- Hortelano, E., Gácsi, M., & Andics, A. (2024). Comparative fMRI reveals differences in the functional organization of the visual cortex for animacy perception in dogs and humans [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104525.1 |
| [36] |
Farroni, T., Menon, E., & Johnson, M. H. (2006). Factors influencing newborns' preference for faces with eye contact. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(4), 298-308.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.08.001 pmid: 17030037 |
| [37] |
Gilad-Gutnick, S., Kurian, G., Gupta, P., Tiwari, K., Shah, P., Raja, S.,... Sinha, P. (2019). Development of facial expression recognition following extended blindness: The importance of motion. Journal of Vision, 19(10), 21a.
doi: 10.1167/19.10.21a URL |
| [38] | Ghanouni, P., Memari, A. H., Shayestehfar, M., Moshayedi, P., Gharibzadeh, S., & Ziaee, V. (2015). Biological motion perception is affected by age and cognitive style in children aged 8-15. Neurology Research International, 2015, 594042. |
| [39] | Hagen, T., Espeseth, T., & Laeng, B. (2018). Chasing animals with split attention: Are animals prioritized in visual tracking? I-Perception, 9(5), 2041669518795932. |
| [40] |
Han, Q., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., & Bao, M. (2021). The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception. Cognition, 209, 104584.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104584 URL |
| [41] | Han, Y., Han, W., Li, L., Zhang, T., & Wang, Y. (2023). Identifying critical kinematic features of animate motion and contribution to animacy perception. iScience, 26(9), 107658. |
| [42] |
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259.
doi: 10.2307/1416950 URL |
| [43] | Hirai, M., & Senju, A. (2020). The two-process theory of biological motion processing. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 111( 19), 114-124. |
| [44] | Hume, D. (2007). The natural history of religion (T. H. Green & T. H. Grose, Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1779) |
| [45] |
Ichwansyah, R., Onda, K., Egawa, J., Matsuo, T., Suzuki, T., Someya, T.,... Kawasaki, K. (2024). Animacy processing by distributed and interconnected networks in the temporal cortex of monkeys. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1478439.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1478439 URL |
| [46] |
Ioannucci, S., & Vetter, P. (2025). Semantic audio-visual congruence modulates visual sensitivity to biological motion across awareness levels. Cognition, 262, 106181.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106181 URL |
| [47] |
Jacobs, A., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 822-835.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.822 URL |
| [48] |
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201-211.
doi: 10.3758/BF03212378 URL |
| [49] |
Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 766-774.
pmid: 16276354 |
| [50] | Johnson, M. H. (2006). Biological motion: A perceptual life detector? Current Biology, 16(10), R376-R377. |
| [51] |
Jörges, B., & López-Moliner, J. (2017). Gravity as a strong prior: Implications for perception and action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 203.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00203 pmid: 28503140 |
| [52] | Kobylkov, D., Rosa-Salva, O., Zanon, M., & Vallortigara, G. (2024). Innate face-selectivity in the brain of young domestic chicks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(40), e2410404121. |
| [53] | Kominsky, J. F., Li, Y., & Carey, S. (2022). Infants' attributions of insides and animacy in causal interactions. Cognitive Science, 46(1), e13087. |
| [54] |
Kuraoka, K., & Nakamura, K. (2025). Differential and temporally dynamic involvement of primate amygdala nuclei in face reality and reward information processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(49), e0093242025.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0093-24.2025 URL |
| [55] |
Larsch, J., & Baier, H. (2018). Biological motion as an innate perceptual mechanism driving social affiliation. Current Biology, 28(22), 3523-3532.
doi: S0960-9822(18)31209-0 pmid: 30393036 |
| [56] | Lemaire, B. S. (2020). No evidence of spontaneous preference for slowly moving objects in visually naïve chicks. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 6277. |
| [57] |
Lemaire, B. S., & Vallortigara, G. (2023). Life is in motion (through a chick’s eye). Animal Cognition, 26(1), 129-140.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01703-8 |
| [58] | Lisboa, I. C., Basso, D. M., Santos, J. A., & Pereira, A. F. (2022). Three-months-old' preferences for biological motion configuration and its subsequent decline. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 566. |
| [59] |
Lorenzi, E., Mayer, U., Rosa-Salva, O., & Vallortigara, G. (2017). Dynamic features of animate motion activate septal and preoptic areas in visually naïve chicks (Gallus gallus). Neuroscience, 354, 54-68.
doi: S0306-4522(17)30280-4 pmid: 28450266 |
| [60] | Lorenzi, E., Nadalin, G., Morandi-Raikova, A., Mayer, U., & Vallortigara, G. (2024). Noncortical coding of biological motion in newborn chicks’ brain. Cerebral Cortex, 34(6), bhae262. |
| [61] | Lorenzi,, E., & Vallortigara, G. (2021). Evolutionary and neural bases of the sense of animacy. In A. B. Kaufman, J. Call & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of animal cognition (pp. 295-321). Cambridge University Press. |
| [62] | Lu, X., Hu, Z., Xin, Y., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Zhang, P., Liu, N., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Detecting biological motion signals in human and monkey superior colliculus: A subcortical- cortical pathway for biological motion perception. Nature Communications, 15(1), 9606. |
| [63] |
Lunghi, M., & Di Giorgio, E. (2024). I like the way you move: How animate motion affects visual attention in early human infancy. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1459550.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1459550 URL |
| [64] | Ma, X., Yuan, X., Liu, J., Shen, L., Yu, Y., Zhou, W.,... Jiang, Y. (2022). Gravity-dependent animacy perception in zebrafish. Research, 2022, 9829016. |
| [65] | Maldarelli, G., Dissegna, A., Ravignani, A., & Chiandetti, C. (2024). Chicks produce consonant, sometimes jazzy, sounds. Biology Letters, 20(9), 20240374. |
| [66] |
Matsuda, G., Ishiguro, H., & Hiraki, K. (2015). Infant discrimination of humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1397.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01397 pmid: 26441772 |
| [67] | Mayer, U., Rosa-Salva, O., Loveland, J. L., & Vallortigara, G. (2019). Selective response of the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala to a naturalistic social stimulus in visually naive domestic chicks. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9849. |
| [68] |
McKyton, A., Ben-Zion, I., & Zohary, E. (2018). Lack of automatic imitation in newly sighted individuals. Psychological Science, 29(2), 304-310.
doi: 10.1177/0956797617731755 pmid: 29231786 |
| [69] | Mezrai, N., Arduini, L., Dickel, L., Chiao, C. C., & Darmaillacq, A. S. (2020). Awareness of danger inside the egg: Evidence of innate and learned predator recognition in cuttlefish embryos. Learning & Behavior, 48(4), 401-410. |
| [70] | Michotte,, A. (1950). The emotions regarded as functional connections. In M. Reymert (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Mooseheart symposium (pp.114-125). New York: McGraw-Hill. Reprinted in Thinès, G., Costall, A., and Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 103-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1991. |
| [71] |
Mitra, S., Namazifard, S., Bellini, D. M., Sarne, A. L., Halder, B., Eisenbrandt, M. R.,... Dewell, R. B. (2026). To jump or not to jump: Comparing effects of phenotypic plasticity on the visual responses and escape behavior of locusts and grasshoppers. Journal of Neurophysiology, 135(1), 312-323.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00442.2025 URL |
| [72] |
Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98(2), 164-181.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.164 pmid: 2047512 |
| [73] |
Mudrik, L., Faivre, N., & Koch, C. (2014). Information integration without awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 488-496.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.009 pmid: 24933626 |
| [74] |
Nakayasu, T., & Watanabe, E. (2014). Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish. Animal Cognition, 17(3), 559-575.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0687-y pmid: 24141876 |
| [75] |
Nes, A. (2023). Perception needs modular stimulus-control. Synthese, 201, 188.
doi: 10.1007/s11229-023-04181-8 |
| [76] |
New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(42), 16598-16603.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703913104 pmid: 17909181 |
| [77] |
Norman, J. F., Payton, S. M., Long, J. R., & Hawkes, L. M. (2004). Aging and the perception of biological motion. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 219-225.
pmid: 15065947 |
| [78] | Norman, J. F., Ramirez, A. B., Bryant, E. N., Adcock, P., Parekh, H., Brase, A. M., & Peterson, R. D. (2024). Aging and the visual perception of rigid and nonrigid motion. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 27657. |
| [79] |
Orlov, T., Raveh, M., McKyton, A., Ben-Zion, I., & Zohary, E. (2021). Learning to perceive shape from temporal integration following late emergence from blindness. Current Biology, 31(14), 3162-3167.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.059 URL |
| [80] |
Papeo, L., Goupil, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2019). Visual search for people among people. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1483-1496.
doi: 10.1177/0956797619867295 pmid: 31532709 |
| [81] |
Pavlova, M., Krägeloh-Mann, I., Sokolov, A., & Birbaumer, N. (2001). Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception, 30(8), 925-933.
pmid: 11578078 |
| [82] | Peristeri, E., Andreou, M., Ketseridou, S. N., Machairas, I., Papadopoulou, V., Stravoravdi, A. S., Bamidis, P. D., & Frantzidis, C. A. (2023). Animacy processing in autism: Event-related potentials reflect social functioning skills. Brain Sciences, 13(12), 1656. |
| [83] | Poom, L. (2025). Dynamics of visual reversals from ambiguous spinning biological-motion and rigid structure-from-motion. I-Perception, 16(3), 1-22. |
| [84] |
Portugal, A. M., Viktorsson, C., Taylor, M. J., Mason, L., Tammimies, K., Ronald, A., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2024). Infants' looking preferences for social versus non-social objects reflect genetic variation. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(1), 115-124.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01764-w pmid: 38012276 |
| [85] |
Pratt, J., Radulescu, P. V., Guo, R. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1724-1730.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610387440 pmid: 20974713 |
| [86] | Rajendran, S. S., Bottari, D., Shareef, I., Pitchaimuthu, K., Sourav, S., Troje, N. F., Kekunnaya, R., & Röder, B. (2020). Biological action identification does not require early visual input for development. eNeuro, 7(5), ENEURO. 0534-19.2020. |
| [87] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Grassi, M., Lorenzi, E., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2016). Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes. Cognition, 157, 49-60.
doi: S0010-0277(16)30204-9 pmid: 27592411 |
| [88] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Hernik, M., Broseghini, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2018). Visually-naïve chicks prefer agents that move as if constrained by a bilateral body-plan. Cognition, 173, 106-114.
doi: S0010-0277(18)30012-X pmid: 29367016 |
| [89] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Hernik, M., Fabbroni, M., Lorenzi, E., & Vallortigara, G. (2023). Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability. Animal Cognition, 26(4), 1177-1189.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01764-3 |
| [90] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Mayer, U., & Vallortigara, G. (2015). Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 50, 150-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.015 URL |
| [91] |
Rosa-Salva, O., Mayer, U., Versace, E., Hébert, M., Lemaire, B. S., & Vallortigara, G. (2021). Sensitive periods for social development: Interactions between predisposed and learned mechanisms. Cognition, 213, 104552.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104552 URL |
| [92] | Scholl, B., J., & Gao, T. (2013). Perceiving animacy and intentionality:Visual processing or higher-level judgment? In M. D. Rutherford & V. A. Kuhlmeier (Eds.), Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp. 197-229). Boston Review. |
| [93] |
Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299-309.
pmid: 10904254 |
| [94] |
Shen, L., Lu, X., Wang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Audiovisual correspondence facilitates the visual search for biological motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(6), 2272-2281.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02308-z |
| [95] |
Shen, L., Yang, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Understanding biological motion through the lens of animate motion processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1630742.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1630742 URL |
| [96] |
Shultz, S., & McCarthy, G. (2014). Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus. Neuropsychologia, 60(1), 115-120.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.019 URL |
| [97] |
Simion, F., Di Giorgio, E., Leo, I., & Bardi, L. (2011). The processing of social stimuli in early infancy: From faces to biological motion perception. Progress in Brain Research, 189, 173-193.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53884-0.00024-5 pmid: 21489389 |
| [98] |
Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(2), 809-813.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707021105 pmid: 18174333 |
| [99] |
Sommer, K., Redshaw, J., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., & Nielsen, M. (2021). The early ontogeny of infants’ imitation of on screen humans and robots. Infant Behavior and Development, 64, 101614.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101614 URL |
| [100] |
Sommer, K., Slaughter, V., Wiles, J., Owen, K., Chiba, A. A., Forster, D.,... Nielsen, M. (2021). Can a robot teach me that? Children’s ability to imitate robots. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105040.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105040 URL |
| [101] |
Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(1), 394-398.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706079105 pmid: 18172214 |
| [102] | Tian, J., Yang, F., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wang, N., Jiang, Y., & Yang, L. (2024). Atypical local and global biological motion perception in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. eLife, 12, RP90313. |
| [103] |
Triantafyllidis, A., Alexiadis, A., Votis, K., & Tzovaras, D. (2023). Social robot interventions for child healthcare: A systematic review of the literature. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 3, 100108.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100108 URL |
| [104] | Troje, N., F., & Chang, D. H. F. (2013). Shape-independent processing of biological motion. In K. L. Johnson & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), People watching: Social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception (pp. 82-100). Oxford University Press. |
| [105] |
Troje, N. F., & Chang, D. H. F. (2023). Life detection from biological motion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 26-32.
doi: 10.1177/09637214221128252 pmid: 36875153 |
| [106] |
Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a “life detector”? Current Biology, 16(8), 821-824.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.022 URL |
| [107] |
Troje, N. F., Westhoff, C., & Lavrov, M. (2005). Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(4), 667-675.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193523 URL |
| [108] | Vallortigara,, G. (2012). Aristotle and the chicken:Animacy and the origins of beliefs. In A. Fasolo (eds.), The theory of evolution and its impact (pp. 189-199). Springer, Milano. |
| [109] | Vallortigara, G. (2021). Born knowing: Imprinting and the origins of knowledge. MIT Press. |
| [110] | Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2006). Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Current Biology, 16(8), PR279-R280. |
| [111] | Vallortigara, G., Regolin, L., & Marconato, F. (2005). Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns. PLoS Biology, 3(7), e208. |
| [112] |
Versace, E., Fracasso, I., Baldan, G., Dalle Zotte, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2017). Newborn chicks show inherited variability in early social predispositions for hen-like stimuli. Scientific Reports, 7, 40296.
doi: 10.1038/srep40296 pmid: 28117411 |
| [113] |
Vestner, T., Tipper, S. P., Hartley, T., Over, H., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2019). Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(7), 1251-1268.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000545 URL |
| [114] | Völter, C. J., & Huber, L. (2022). Pupil size changes reveal dogs’ sensitivity to motion cues. iScience, 25(9), 104801. |
| [115] |
Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 624-631.
pmid: 12740580 |
| [116] |
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Xu, Q., Liu, D., Ji, H., Yu, Y., Hu, Z., Yuan, P., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Heritability of reflexive social attention triggered by eye gaze and walking direction: Common and unique genetic underpinnings. Psychological Medicine, 50(3), 475-483.
doi: 10.1017/S003329171900031X pmid: 30829191 |
| [117] |
Wang, Y., Wang, L., Xu, Q., Liu, D., Chen, L., Troje, N. F., He, S., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(8), 1937-1942.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714655115 pmid: 29358377 |
| [118] | Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Huang, W., Xu, Q., Liu, D., Zhou, W., Chen, S., & Jiang, Y. (2022). Modulation of biological motion perception in humans by gravity. Nature Communications, 13(1), 2765. |
| [119] |
Yang, G., Wang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Social perception of animacy: Preferential attentional orienting to animals links with autistic traits. Cognition, 251, 105900.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105900 URL |
| [120] |
Zohary, E., Zion, I. B., Schreiber, C., & McKyton, A. (2018). Impairment of “vision for action” functions in the newly sighted, following early-onset and prolonged visual deprivation. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 183-183.
doi: 10.1167/18.10.183 URL |
| [1] | WANG Yong, DONG Da, CHEN Wei. Minimal other minds: An ontogenetic investigation of animacy perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(7): 1208-1218. |
| [2] | Zhihao Yang, Gaoxing Mei. Cross-Category Serial Dependence in Social Attention [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 128-128. |
| [3] | Suqi Huang, Yiping Ge, Li Wang, Yi Jiang. Biological Motion Cues Modulate Visual Working Memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 85-85. |
| [4] | Haoyuan Tan, Qianyu Zhang, Yijie Kuai. Serial Repulsion of Biological Motion Emotion Perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 52-52. |
| [5] | Chang Chen, W. Paul Boyce, Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford. poral Contextual Modulation on Perceived Walking Direction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 35-35. |
| [6] | Yifei Han, Wenhao Han, Liang Li, Tao Zhang, Yizheng Wang. Identifying Critical Kinematic Features of Animate Motion and Contribution to Animacy Perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 26-26. |
| [7] | Mei Huang, Yi Jiang, Ying Wang. Adaptation of the Perception of Animacy from Biological Motion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 17-17. |
| [8] | Tingting Feng, Wenhao Han, Tao Zhang. The Neuronal Mechanism of Biological Motion Information Processing in the Fundus of Superior Temporal Area [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 164-164. |
| [9] | HUANG Mei, YANG Ge-Qing, WANG Ying, JIANG Yi. Animacy perception from motion cues: Cognitive and neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1460-1476. |
| [10] | PENG Yujia, WANG Yuxi, LU Di. The mechanism of emotion processing and intention inference in social anxiety disorder based on biological motion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(6): 905-914. |
| [11] | CHEN Jingqiu, FAN Qingyue, HUANG Minyan. The withdrawal behaviors of rural migrant workers: A perspective from multiple embeddedness and identity strain [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1955-1967. |
| [12] | WU Lunwen, YANG Fu, TIAN Yixin, PEI Yurong. Job embeddedness: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 906-920. |
| [13] | PAN Jing, ZHANG Huiyuan, CHEN Donghao, XU Hongge. Visual search in real world: The role of dynamic and static optical information [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1219-1231. |
| [14] | Li Shen, Ruichen Hu, Xiangyong Yuan, Ying Wang, Yi Jiang. Cortical Tracking of Biological Motion Information [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 80-80. |
| [15] | ZHENG Xiaoming;LU Shuye. Thriving at Work: Focus on Employee’s Health and Growth [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(7): 1283-1293. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||