Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1663-1683.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.1663
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Peiqiong1,2, DONG Yanxin1, CHEN Guanchu1, WEN Junsheng3, YIN Jun4, CHEN Wei1,2, DONG Da1,2
Received:2025-09-12
Online:2026-09-15
Published:2026-07-20
CLC Number:
ZHAO Peiqiong, DONG Yanxin, CHEN Guanchu, WEN Junsheng, YIN Jun, CHEN Wei, DONG Da. The animacy detectors: The embeddedness of animacy perception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(9): 1663-1683.
| [1] 陈巍, 董达, 郭本禹. (2026). 理论心理学: 认知科学的视角. 华东师范大学出版社. [2] 董达, 陈巍. (2025). 人不是物: 社会认知的稽古维新.心理学报, 57(1), 173-189. [3] 黄梅, 杨格晴, 王莹, 蒋毅. (2023). 基于动态线索感知生命性的认知神经机制.心理科学进展, 31(8), 1460-1476. [4] 刘佳, 胡金生, 江宏君, 刘莹. (2021). 孤独症谱系障碍者基于运动线索的生命知觉.心理科学, 44(4), 1012-1017. [5] Abdai, J. (2025). Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1522489. [6] Abdai J., Uccheddu S., Gácsi M., & Miklósi Á. (2022). Exploring the advantages of using artificial agents to investigate animacy perception in cats and dogs.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 17(6), 065009. [7] Aflalo T., Chivukula S., Zhang C., Rosario E. R., Pouratian N., & Andersen R. A. (2022). Cognition through internal models: Mirror neurons as one manifestation of a broader mechanism [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/ 2022.09.06.506071 [8] Altman M. N., Khislavsky A. L., Coverdale M. E., & Gilger J. W. (2016). Adaptive attention: How preference for animacy impacts change detection.Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 303-314. [9] Bailey, R. L., & Lang, A. (2022). The importance of being animate: Information selection as a function of dynamic human-environment interactions.Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 923808. [10] Barber O., Somogyi E., McBride E. A., & Proops L. (2023). Exploring the role of aliveness in children's responses to a dog, biomimetic robot, and toy dog.Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107660. [11] Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2022). Face perception: Computational insights from phylogeny.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(4), 350-363. [12] Ben-Ami S., Gupta P., Yadav M., Shah P., Talwar G., Paswan S., … Sinha P. (2022). Human (but not animal) motion can be recognized at first sight-After treatment for congenital blindness.Neuropsychologia, 174, 108307. [13] Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions.Psychological Science, 5(4), 221-225. [14] Bliss L., Vasas V., Freeland L., Roach R., Ferrè E.R., & Versace E. (2023). A spontaneous gravity prior: Newborn chicks prefer stimuli that move against gravity.Biology Letters, 19(2), 20220502. [15] Boch M., Wagner I. C., Karl S., Huber L., & Lamm C. (2023). Functionally analogous body- and animacy- responsive areas are present in the dog (Canis familiaris) and human occipito-temporal lobe.Communications Biology, 6(1), 645. [16] Bonin P., Gelin M., & Bugaiska A. (2014). Animates are better remembered than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli.Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 370-382. [17] Bulkin, D. A., & Groh, J. M. (2006). Seeing sounds: Visual and auditory interactions in the brain.Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(4), 415-419. [18] Carey, S. (2011). Précis of ‘the origin of concepts.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(3), 113-162. [19] Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.. [20] Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1996). Science and core knowledge.Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 515-533. [21] Chang, D. H., & Troje, N. F. (2008). Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals.Journal of Vision, 8(5), 1-10. [22] Chang D. H. F., Ban B., Ikegaya Y., Fujita I., & Troje N. F. (2018). Cortical and subcortical responses to biological motion.NeuroImage, 174, 87-96. [23] Chang D. H. F., Troje N. F., Ikegaya Y., Fujita I., & Ban H. (2021). Spatiotemporal dynamics of responses to biological motion in the human brain.Cortex, 136, 124-139. [24] Cheng Y., Yuan X., & Jiang Y. (2023). Eye pupil signals life motion perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 86(2), 579-586. [25] Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2011). Chicks like consonant music.Psychological Science, 22(10), 1270-1273. [26] Cox J. A., Cox T. W., & Aimola, D. A. M. (2022). Are animates special? Exploring the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(9), 1746-1762. [27] Cox J. A., Wu Y., & Aimola Davies, A. M. (2024). Does animacy affect visual statistical learning? Revisiting the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3), 492-510. [28] De Agrò M., Rößler D. C., Kim K., & Shamble P. S. (2021). Perception of biological motion by jumping spiders.PLoS Biology, 19(7), e3001172. [29] De Agrò M., Winsor A. M., Walsh W., Shamble P., & Jakob E. (2025). Biological point-light displays scanning by the principal eyes of a jumping spider [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.23.661007 [30] Deng W., Sargent B., Havens K., Vanderbilt D., Rosales M., Pulido J. C., .. Smith B. A. (2023). Correlation between performance and quantity/variability of leg exploration in a contingency learning task during infancy.Infant Behavior and Development, 70, 101788. [31] Di Giorgio E., Lunghi M., Simion F., & Vallortigara G. (2017). Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: The case of self-propulsion.Developmental Science, 20(4), 10. [32] Di Giorgio E., Lunghi M., Vallortigara G., & Simion F. (2021). Newborns’ sensitivity to speed changes as a building block for animacy perception.Scientific Reports, 11(1), 542. [33] Di Giorgio E., Rosa-Salva O., Frasnelli E., Calcagnì A., Lunghi M., Scattoni M. L., .. Vallortigara G. (2021). Abnormal visual attention to simple social stimuli in 4-month-old infants at high risk for Autism.Scientific Reports, 11(1), 15785. [34] Duarte J. V., Abreu R., & Castelo-Branco M. (2022). A two-stage framework for neural processing of biological motion.NeuroImage, 259(5), 119403. [35] Farkas E. B., Hernández-Pérez R., Cuaya L. V., Rojas- Hortelano E., Gácsi M., & Andics A. (2024). Comparative fMRI reveals differences in the functional organization of the visual cortex for animacy perception in dogs and humans [Preprint]. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10. 7554/eLife.104525.1 [36] Farroni T., Menon E., & Johnson M. H. (2006). Factors influencing newborns' preference for faces with eye contact.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95(4), 298-308. [37] Gilad-Gutnick S., Kurian G., Gupta P., Tiwari K., Shah P., Raja S., .. Sinha P. (2019). Development of facial expression recognition following extended blindness: The importance of motion.Journal of Vision, 19(10), 21a. [38] Ghanouni P., Memari A. H., Shayestehfar M., Moshayedi P., Gharibzadeh S., & Ziaee V. (2015). Biological motion perception is affected by age and cognitive style in children aged 8-15.Neurology Research International, 2015, 594042. [39] Hagen T., Espeseth T., & Laeng B. (2018). Chasing animals with split attention: Are animals prioritized in visual tracking?I-Perception, 9(5), 2041669518795932. [40] Han Q., Wang Y., Jiang Y., & Bao M. (2021). The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception.Cognition, 209, 104584. [41] Han Y., Han W., Li L., Zhang T., & Wang Y. (2023). Identifying critical kinematic features of animate motion and contribution to animacy perception.iScience, 26(9), 107658. [42] Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior.The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259. [43] Hirai, M., & Senju, A. (2020). The two-process theory of biological motion processing.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 111(19), 114-124. [44] Hume, D. (2007). The natural history of religion (T. H. Green & T. H. Grose, Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1779) [45] Ichwansyah R., Onda K., Egawa J., Matsuo T., Suzuki T., Someya T., .. Kawasaki K. (2024). Animacy processing by distributed and interconnected networks in the temporal cortex of monkeys.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1478439. [46] Ioannucci, S., & Vetter, P. (2025). Semantic audio-visual congruence modulates visual sensitivity to biological motion across awareness levels.Cognition, 262, 106181. [47] Jacobs A., Pinto J., & Shiffrar M. (2004). Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 822-835. [48] Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201-211. [49] Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 766-774. [50] Johnson, M. H. (2006). Biological motion: A perceptual life detector?Current Biology, 16(10), R376-R377. [51] Jörges, B., & López-Moliner, J. (2017). Gravity as a strong prior: Implications for perception and action.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 203. [52] Kobylkov D., Rosa-Salva O., Zanon M., & Vallortigara G. (2024). Innate face-selectivity in the brain of young domestic chicks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(40), e2410404121. [53] Kominsky J. F., Li Y., & Carey S. (2022). Infants' attributions of insides and animacy in causal interactions.Cognitive Science, 46(1), e13087. [54] Kuraoka, K., & Nakamura, K. (2025). Differential and temporally dynamic involvement of primate amygdala nuclei in face reality and reward information processing.Journal of Neuroscience, 45(49), e0093242025. [55] Larsch, J., & Baier, H. (2018). Biological motion as an innate perceptual mechanism driving social affiliation.Current Biology, 28(22), 3523-3532. [56] Lemaire, B. S. (2020). No evidence of spontaneous preference for slowly moving objects in visually naïve chicks.Scientific Reports, 10(1), 6277. [57] Lemaire, B. S., & Vallortigara, G. (2023). Life is in motion (through a chick’s eye).Animal Cognition, 26(1), 129-140. [58] Lisboa I. C., Basso D. M., Santos J. A., & Pereira A. F. (2022). Three-months-old' preferences for biological motion configuration and its subsequent decline.Brain Sciences, 12(5), 566. [59] Lorenzi E., Mayer U., Rosa-Salva O., & Vallortigara G. (2017). Dynamic features of animate motion activate septal and preoptic areas in visually naïve chicks (Gallus gallus).Neuroscience, 354, 54-68. [60] Lorenzi E., Nadalin G., Morandi-Raikova A., Mayer U., & Vallortigara G. (2024). Noncortical coding of biological motion in newborn chicks’ brain. Cerebral Cortex, 34(6), bhae262. [61] Lorenzi E.,& Vallortigara, G. (2021). Evolutionary and neural bases of the sense of animacy. In A. B. Kaufman, J. Call & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of animal cognition (pp. 295-321). Cambridge University Press. [62] Lu X., Hu Z., Xin Y., Yang T., Wang Y., Zhang P., Liu N., & Jiang Y. (2024). Detecting biological motion signals in human and monkey superior colliculus: A subcortical- cortical pathway for biological motion perception.Nature Communications, 15(1), 9606. [63] Lunghi, M., & Di Giorgio, E. (2024). I like the way you move: How animate motion affects visual attention in early human infancy.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1459550. [64] Ma X., Yuan X., Liu J., Shen L., Yu Y., Zhou W., .. Jiang Y. (2022). Gravity-dependent animacy perception in zebrafish.Research, 2022, 9829016. [65] Maldarelli G., Dissegna A., Ravignani A., & Chiandetti C. (2024). Chicks produce consonant, sometimes jazzy, sounds.Biology Letters, 20(9), 20240374. [66] Matsuda G., Ishiguro H., & Hiraki K. (2015). Infant discrimination of humanoid robots.Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1397. [67] Mayer U., Rosa-Salva O., Loveland J. L., & Vallortigara G. (2019). Selective response of the nucleus taeniae of the amygdala to a naturalistic social stimulus in visually naive domestic chicks.Scientific Reports, 9(1), 9849. [68] McKyton A., Ben-Zion I., & Zohary E. (2018). Lack of automatic imitation in newly sighted individuals.Psychological Science, 29(2), 304-310. [69] Mezrai N., Arduini L., Dickel L., Chiao C. C., & Darmaillacq A. S. (2020). Awareness of danger inside the egg: Evidence of innate and learned predator recognition in cuttlefish embryos.Learning & Behavior, 48(4), 401-410. [70] Michotte, A. (1950). The emotions regarded as functional connections. In M. Reymert (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Mooseheart symposium (pp.114-125). New York: McGraw-Hill. Reprinted in Thinès, G., Costall, A., and Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 103-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1991. [71] Mitra S., Namazifard S., Bellini D. M., Sarne A. L., Halder B., Eisenbrandt M. R., .. Dewell R. B. (2026). To jump or not to jump: Comparing effects of phenotypic plasticity on the visual responses and escape behavior of locusts and grasshoppers.Journal of Neurophysiology, 135(1), 312-323. [72] Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition.Psychological Review, 98(2), 164-181. [73] Mudrik L., Faivre N., & Koch C. (2014). Information integration without awareness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(9), 488-496. [74] Nakayasu, T., & Watanabe, E. (2014). Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish.Animal Cognition, 17(3), 559-575. [75] Nes, A. (2023). Perception needs modular stimulus-control.Synthese, 201, 188. [76] New J., Cosmides L., & Tooby J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(42), 16598-16603. [77] Norman J. F., Payton S. M., Long J. R., & Hawkes L. M. (2004). Aging and the perception of biological motion.Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 219-225. [78] Norman J. F., Ramirez A. B., Bryant E. N., Adcock P., Parekh H., Brase A. M., & Peterson R. D. (2024). Aging and the visual perception of rigid and nonrigid motion.Scientific Reports, 14(1), 27657. [79] Orlov T., Raveh M., McKyton A., Ben-Zion I., & Zohary E. (2021). Learning to perceive shape from temporal integration following late emergence from blindness. Current Biology, 31(14), 3162-3167.e5. [80] Papeo L., Goupil N., & Soto-Faraco S. (2019). Visual search for people among people.Psychological Science, 30(10), 1483-1496. [81] Pavlova M., Krägeloh-Mann I., Sokolov A., & Birbaumer N. (2001). Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children.Perception, 30(8), 925-933. [82] Peristeri E., Andreou M., Ketseridou S. N., Machairas I., Papadopoulou V., Stravoravdi A. S., Bamidis P. D., & Frantzidis C. A. (2023). Animacy processing in autism: Event-related potentials reflect social functioning skills.Brain Sciences, 13(12), 1656. [83] Poom, L. (2025). Dynamics of visual reversals from ambiguous spinning biological-motion and rigid structure-from-motion.I-Perception, 16(3), 1-22. [84] Portugal A. M., Viktorsson C., Taylor M. J., Mason L., Tammimies K., Ronald A., & Falck-Ytter T. (2024). Infants' looking preferences for social versus non-social objects reflect genetic variation.Nature Human Behaviour, 8(1), 115-124. [85] Pratt J., Radulescu P. V., Guo R. M., & Abrams R. A. (2010). It’s alive! Animate motion captures visual attention.Psychological Science, 21(11), 1724-1730. [86] Rajendran S. S., Bottari D., Shareef I., Pitchaimuthu K., Sourav S., Troje N. F., Kekunnaya R., & Röder B. (2020). Biological action identification does not require early visual input for development. eNeuro, 7(5), ENEURO.0534-19.2020. [87] Rosa-Salva O., Grassi M., Lorenzi E., Regolin L., & Vallortigara G. (2016). Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes.Cognition, 157, 49-60. [88] Rosa-Salva O., Hernik M., Broseghini A., & Vallortigara G. (2018). Visually-naïve chicks prefer agents that move as if constrained by a bilateral body-plan.Cognition, 173, 106-114. [89] Rosa-Salva O., Hernik M., Fabbroni M., Lorenzi E., & Vallortigara G. (2023). Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability.Animal Cognition, 26(4), 1177-1189. [90] Rosa-Salva O., Mayer U., & Vallortigara G. (2015). Roots of a social brain: Developmental models of emerging animacy-detection mechanisms.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 50, 150-168. [91] Rosa-Salva O., Mayer U., Versace E., Hébert M., Lemaire B. S., & Vallortigara G. (2021). Sensitive periods for social development: Interactions between predisposed and learned mechanisms.Cognition, 213, 104552. [92] Scholl, B. J., & Gao, T. (2013). Perceiving animacy and intentionality: Visual processing or higher-level judgment? In M. D. Rutherford & V. A. Kuhlmeier (Eds.), Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp. 197-229). Boston Review. [93] Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299-309. [94] Shen L., Lu X., Wang Y., & Jiang Y. (2023). Audiovisual correspondence facilitates the visual search for biological motion.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(6), 2272-2281. [95] Shen L., Yang X., Jiang Y., & Wang Y. (2025). Understanding biological motion through the lens of animate motion processing.Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1630742. [96] Shultz, S., & McCarthy, G. (2014). Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus.Neuropsychologia, 60(1), 115-120. [97] Simion F., Di Giorgio E., Leo I., & Bardi L. (2011). The processing of social stimuli in early infancy: From faces to biological motion perception.Progress in Brain Research, 189, 173-193. [98] Simion F., Regolin L., & Bulf H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(2), 809-813. [99] Sommer K., Redshaw J., Slaughter V., Wiles J., & Nielsen M. (2021). The early ontogeny of infants’ imitation of on screen humans and robots.Infant Behavior and Development, 64, 101614. [100] Sommer K., Slaughter V., Wiles J., Owen K., Chiba A. A., Forster D., .. Nielsen M. (2021). Can a robot teach me that? Children’s ability to imitate robots.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, 105040. [101] Sugita, Y. (2008). Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(1), 394-398. [102] Tian J., Yang F., Wang Y., Wang L., Wang N., Jiang Y., & Yang L. (2024). Atypical local and global biological motion perception in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. eLife, 12, RP90313. [103] Triantafyllidis A., Alexiadis A., Votis K., & Tzovaras D. (2023). Social robot interventions for child healthcare: A systematic review of the literature.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 3, 100108. [104] Troje N. F.,& Chang, D. H. F. (2013). Shape-independent processing of biological motion. In K. L. Johnson & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), People watching: Social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception (pp. 82-100). Oxford University Press. [105] Troje, N. F., & Chang, D. H. F. (2023). Life detection from biological motion.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 26-32. [106] Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a “life detector”?Current Biology, 16(8), 821-824. [107] Troje N. F., Westhoff C., & Lavrov M. (2005). Person identification from biological motion: Effects of structural and kinematic cues.Perception & psychophysics, 67(4), 667-675. [108] Vallortigara, G. (2012). Aristotle and the chicken: Animacy and the origins of beliefs. In A. Fasolo (eds.), The theory of evolution and its impact(pp. 189-199). Springer, Milano. [109] Vallortigara, G. (2021). Born knowing: Imprinting and the origins of knowledge. MIT Press. [110] Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2006). Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Current Biology, 16(8), PR279-R280. [111] Vallortigara G., Regolin L., & Marconato F. (2005). Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns.PLoS Biology, 3(7), e208. [112] Versace E., Fracasso I., Baldan G., Dalle Zotte A., & Vallortigara G. (2017). Newborn chicks show inherited variability in early social predispositions for hen-like stimuli.Scientific Reports, 7, 40296. [113] Vestner T., Tipper S. P., Hartley T., Over H., & Rueschemeyer S. A. (2019). Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(7), 1251-1268. [114] Völter, C. J., & Huber, L. (2022). Pupil size changes reveal dogs’ sensitivity to motion cues.iScience, 25(9), 104801. [115] Vuilleumier P., Armony J. L., Driver J., & Dolan R. J. (2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions.Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 624-631. [116] Wang L., Wang Y., Xu Q., Liu D., Ji H., Yu Y., Hu Z., Yuan P., & Jiang Y. (2020). Heritability of reflexive social attention triggered by eye gaze and walking direction: Common and unique genetic underpinnings.Psychological Medicine, 50(3), 475-483. [117] Wang Y., Wang L., Xu Q., Liu D., Chen L., Troje N. F., He S., & Jiang Y. (2018). Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(8), 1937-1942. [118] Wang Y., Zhang X., Wang C., Huang W., Xu Q., Liu D., Zhou W., Chen S., & Jiang Y. (2022). Modulation of biological motion perception in humans by gravity.Nature Communications, 13(1), 2765. [119] Yang G., Wang Y., & Jiang Y. (2024). Social perception of animacy: Preferential attentional orienting to animals links with autistic traits.Cognition, 251, 105900. [120] Zohary E., Zion I. B., Schreiber C., & McKyton A. (2018). Impairment of “vision for action” functions in the newly sighted, following early-onset and prolonged visual deprivation.Journal of Vision, 18(10), 183-183. |
| [1] | WANG Yong, DONG Da, CHEN Wei. Minimal other minds: An ontogenetic investigation of animacy perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2026, 34(7): 1208-1218. |
| [2] | Zhihao Yang, Gaoxing Mei. Cross-Category Serial Dependence in Social Attention [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 128-128. |
| [3] | Suqi Huang, Yiping Ge, Li Wang, Yi Jiang. Biological Motion Cues Modulate Visual Working Memory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 85-85. |
| [4] | Haoyuan Tan, Qianyu Zhang, Yijie Kuai. Serial Repulsion of Biological Motion Emotion Perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 52-52. |
| [5] | Chang Chen, W. Paul Boyce, Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford. poral Contextual Modulation on Perceived Walking Direction [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 35-35. |
| [6] | Yifei Han, Wenhao Han, Liang Li, Tao Zhang, Yizheng Wang. Identifying Critical Kinematic Features of Animate Motion and Contribution to Animacy Perception [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 26-26. |
| [7] | Mei Huang, Yi Jiang, Ying Wang. Adaptation of the Perception of Animacy from Biological Motion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 17-17. |
| [8] | Tingting Feng, Wenhao Han, Tao Zhang. The Neuronal Mechanism of Biological Motion Information Processing in the Fundus of Superior Temporal Area [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 164-164. |
| [9] | HUANG Mei, YANG Ge-Qing, WANG Ying, JIANG Yi. Animacy perception from motion cues: Cognitive and neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1460-1476. |
| [10] | PENG Yujia, WANG Yuxi, LU Di. The mechanism of emotion processing and intention inference in social anxiety disorder based on biological motion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(6): 905-914. |
| [11] | CHEN Jingqiu, FAN Qingyue, HUANG Minyan. The withdrawal behaviors of rural migrant workers: A perspective from multiple embeddedness and identity strain [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1955-1967. |
| [12] | WU Lunwen, YANG Fu, TIAN Yixin, PEI Yurong. Job embeddedness: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 906-920. |
| [13] | PAN Jing, ZHANG Huiyuan, CHEN Donghao, XU Hongge. Visual search in real world: The role of dynamic and static optical information [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1219-1231. |
| [14] | Li Shen, Ruichen Hu, Xiangyong Yuan, Ying Wang, Yi Jiang. Cortical Tracking of Biological Motion Information [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(suppl.): 80-80. |
| [15] | ZHENG Xiaoming;LU Shuye. Thriving at Work: Focus on Employee’s Health and Growth [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(7): 1283-1293. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||