Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 906-920.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00906
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Lunwen1, YANG Fu1(), TIAN Yixin2, PEI Yurong3
Received:
2019-03-16
Online:
2021-05-15
Published:
2021-03-30
Contact:
YANG Fu
E-mail:yfu@swufe.edu.cn
CLC Number:
WU Lunwen, YANG Fu, TIAN Yixin, PEI Yurong. Job embeddedness: Consequences and theoretical explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 906-920.
作者数量 | 时间 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012及以前 | 2013~2014 | 2015~2016 | 2017~2018 | 2019及以后 | 合计 | |||||||
所在国家或地区 | ||||||||||||
美国 | 83 | 11 | 24 | 22 | 16 | 156 | ||||||
中国 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 12 | 31 | 86 | ||||||
澳大利亚 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 38 | ||||||
土耳其 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 28 | ||||||
中国香港 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 18 | ||||||
南非 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | ||||||
英国 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | ||||||
德国 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
印度 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | ||||||
日本 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
葡萄牙 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
泰国 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
以色列 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
中国台湾 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | ||||||
中国澳门 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
其他 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 22 | 11 | 49 | ||||||
合计 | 139 | 43 | 90 | 91 | 74 | 437 | ||||||
研究领域 | ||||||||||||
管理 | 95 | 34 | 67 | 47 | 56 | 299 | ||||||
心理学 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 52 | ||||||
商业 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 36 | ||||||
社会学 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
教育 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
其他 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 23 | 16 | 70 | ||||||
样本国家或地区 | ||||||||||||
美国 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 48 | ||||||
中国 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 39 | ||||||
南非 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10 | ||||||
印度 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
土耳其 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
伊朗 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | ||||||
泰国 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
日本 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
中国台湾 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
中国澳门 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
英国 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
其他 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 25 | ||||||
合计 | 38 | 18 | 30 | 34 | 41 | 161 |
作者数量 | 时间 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012及以前 | 2013~2014 | 2015~2016 | 2017~2018 | 2019及以后 | 合计 | |||||||
所在国家或地区 | ||||||||||||
美国 | 83 | 11 | 24 | 22 | 16 | 156 | ||||||
中国 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 12 | 31 | 86 | ||||||
澳大利亚 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 38 | ||||||
土耳其 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 28 | ||||||
中国香港 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 18 | ||||||
南非 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | ||||||
英国 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 | ||||||
德国 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
印度 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | ||||||
日本 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
葡萄牙 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
泰国 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
以色列 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
中国台湾 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | ||||||
中国澳门 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
其他 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 22 | 11 | 49 | ||||||
合计 | 139 | 43 | 90 | 91 | 74 | 437 | ||||||
研究领域 | ||||||||||||
管理 | 95 | 34 | 67 | 47 | 56 | 299 | ||||||
心理学 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 52 | ||||||
商业 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 36 | ||||||
社会学 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
教育 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | ||||||
其他 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 23 | 16 | 70 | ||||||
样本国家或地区 | ||||||||||||
美国 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 48 | ||||||
中国 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 39 | ||||||
南非 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10 | ||||||
印度 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
土耳其 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
伊朗 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | ||||||
泰国 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
日本 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | ||||||
中国台湾 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
中国澳门 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
英国 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||||||
其他 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 25 | ||||||
合计 | 38 | 18 | 30 | 34 | 41 | 161 |
理论基础 | 时间 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012及以前 | 2013~2014 | 2015~2016 | 2017~2018 | 2019及以后 | 合计 | |
资源保存理论 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 22 |
计划行为理论 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
社会资本理论 | 3(1) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
工作-角色依附理论 | 2 | 0 | 1(1) | 0 | 0 | 3 |
传染过程理论 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
未来时间透视理论 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
理论基础 | 时间 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012及以前 | 2013~2014 | 2015~2016 | 2017~2018 | 2019及以后 | 合计 | |
资源保存理论 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 22 |
计划行为理论 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
社会资本理论 | 3(1) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
工作-角色依附理论 | 2 | 0 | 1(1) | 0 | 0 | 3 |
传染过程理论 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
未来时间透视理论 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
理论视角 | 理论基础 | 研究者 | 自变量 | 中介变量 | 结果变量 | 引用次数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源保存理论 | 人们总是努力获取、培育和保护其认为宝贵的资源, 无论是资源潜在或实际的损失, 都将引起个体的紧张和压力(Hobfoll, | Harris et al. | 工作嵌入 | 工作满意度、离职意愿、实际离职率 | 92 | |
Kiazad et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职、组织公民行为、反生产行为 | 51 | |||
Ng & Feldman, | 工作嵌入 | 工作动力, 社交网络行为 | 25 | |||
Tian et al. | 工作嵌入 | 工作绩效 | 23 | |||
Thakur & Bhatnagar, | 工作嵌入 | 留职意愿 | 11 | |||
Cheng, | 工作嵌入 | 销售绩效、离职 | 13 | |||
Ghosh, | 工作嵌入 | 亲组织非伦理行为 | 11 | |||
Ampofo et al. | 工作嵌入 | 生活满意度 | 9 | |||
Ghosh et al. | 工作嵌入 | 角色绩效 | 8 | |||
Greene et al. | 工作嵌入 | 任务绩效、关系绩效 | 4 | |||
计划行为理论 | 行为意向是预测和解释个体行为最直接的因素, 主要受行为态度和主观规范的影响(Ajzen, | Jiang et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职意愿 | 离职行为 | 139 |
Peltokorpi et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职意愿 | 离职行为 | 35 | ||
社会资本理论 | 个体通过社会互动关系, 从社会关系网络中获取的资源总和(Nahapiet & Ghoshal, | 买忆媛, 辜雪娜, | 工作嵌入 | 创业活动的集中性和时间跨度 | 39 | |
Mai & Zheng, | 工作嵌入 | 实施创业、创业绩效 | 5 | |||
工作-角色依附理论 | 个体对工作的投入程度会增加他们对工作角色的依恋连接, 加强组织依附感, 由此抗拒如退休、转业等离开当前组织的行为(Carter & Cook, | Smith et al. | 工作嵌入 | 退休 | 32 | |
Bamberger & Bacharach, | 工作嵌入 | 退休 | 7 | |||
传染过程视角 | 离职传染模型和嵌入传染模型。 | Felps et al. | 工作嵌入 | 目睹同事的求职行为 | 离职行为 | 223 |
Ng & Feldman, | 感知主管工作嵌入 | 组织信任 | 员工工作嵌入 | 55 | ||
未来时间透视理论 | 个体对未来目标的预期, 是一种员工对组织未来发展的期望(Seijts, | Ng & Feldman, | 工作嵌入 | 建言行为 | 55 | |
Ng & Lucianetti, | 工作嵌入 | 学习目标导向 | 建言行为 | 4 |
理论视角 | 理论基础 | 研究者 | 自变量 | 中介变量 | 结果变量 | 引用次数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源保存理论 | 人们总是努力获取、培育和保护其认为宝贵的资源, 无论是资源潜在或实际的损失, 都将引起个体的紧张和压力(Hobfoll, | Harris et al. | 工作嵌入 | 工作满意度、离职意愿、实际离职率 | 92 | |
Kiazad et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职、组织公民行为、反生产行为 | 51 | |||
Ng & Feldman, | 工作嵌入 | 工作动力, 社交网络行为 | 25 | |||
Tian et al. | 工作嵌入 | 工作绩效 | 23 | |||
Thakur & Bhatnagar, | 工作嵌入 | 留职意愿 | 11 | |||
Cheng, | 工作嵌入 | 销售绩效、离职 | 13 | |||
Ghosh, | 工作嵌入 | 亲组织非伦理行为 | 11 | |||
Ampofo et al. | 工作嵌入 | 生活满意度 | 9 | |||
Ghosh et al. | 工作嵌入 | 角色绩效 | 8 | |||
Greene et al. | 工作嵌入 | 任务绩效、关系绩效 | 4 | |||
计划行为理论 | 行为意向是预测和解释个体行为最直接的因素, 主要受行为态度和主观规范的影响(Ajzen, | Jiang et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职意愿 | 离职行为 | 139 |
Peltokorpi et al. | 工作嵌入 | 离职意愿 | 离职行为 | 35 | ||
社会资本理论 | 个体通过社会互动关系, 从社会关系网络中获取的资源总和(Nahapiet & Ghoshal, | 买忆媛, 辜雪娜, | 工作嵌入 | 创业活动的集中性和时间跨度 | 39 | |
Mai & Zheng, | 工作嵌入 | 实施创业、创业绩效 | 5 | |||
工作-角色依附理论 | 个体对工作的投入程度会增加他们对工作角色的依恋连接, 加强组织依附感, 由此抗拒如退休、转业等离开当前组织的行为(Carter & Cook, | Smith et al. | 工作嵌入 | 退休 | 32 | |
Bamberger & Bacharach, | 工作嵌入 | 退休 | 7 | |||
传染过程视角 | 离职传染模型和嵌入传染模型。 | Felps et al. | 工作嵌入 | 目睹同事的求职行为 | 离职行为 | 223 |
Ng & Feldman, | 感知主管工作嵌入 | 组织信任 | 员工工作嵌入 | 55 | ||
未来时间透视理论 | 个体对未来目标的预期, 是一种员工对组织未来发展的期望(Seijts, | Ng & Feldman, | 工作嵌入 | 建言行为 | 55 | |
Ng & Lucianetti, | 工作嵌入 | 学习目标导向 | 建言行为 | 4 |
[1] | 段锦云, 凌斌. (2011). 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响. 心理学报, 43(10),1185-1197. |
[2] | 高中华, 赵晨. (2014). 工作家庭两不误为何这么难?基于工作家庭边界理论的探讨. 心理学报, 46(4),552-568. |
[3] | 金家飞, 徐姗, 王艳霞. (2014). 角色压力、工作家庭冲突和心理抑郁的中美比较. 心理学报, 46(8),1144-1160. |
[4] | 刘宗华, 李燕萍, 郑馨怡. (2018). 工作嵌入对员工创新行为的影响:内部人身份感知和主管支持的作用. 中国人力资源开发, 35(7),148-158. |
[5] | 买忆媛, 辜雪娜. (2011). 工作经验一定有助于创业过程吗:基于工作内嵌入的分析. 南开管理评论, (2),146-151. |
[6] | 买忆媛, 周嵩安, 梅琳. (2009). 工作嵌入对科技型员工离职创业活动的影响. 南开管理评论, (2),69-76. |
[7] | 毛畅果, 郭磊. (2020). 组织管理研究中的权力距离倾向:内涵、测量与影响. 中国人力资源开发, (1),21-34. |
[8] | 隋杨, 王辉, 岳旖旎, Fred Luthans. (2012). 变革型领导对员工绩效和满意度的影响:心理资本的中介作用及程序公平的调节作用. 心理学报, 44(9),1217-1230. |
[9] | 吴论文, 杨付. (2019). 政治技能的实施效果及其理论解释. 心理科学进展, 27(12),2109-2121. |
[10] | 吴晓波, 张超群, 王莹. (2014). 社会网络、创业效能感与创业意向的关系研究. 科研管理, 35(2),104-110. |
[11] | 王永丽, 卢海陵. (2018). 工作嵌入、工作家庭平衡与家庭内关系--基于员工及其配偶配对的视角. 管理评论, 30(11),132-142. |
[12] | 王桢. (2012). 团队内工作投入的人际传导机制. 心理科学进展, 20(10),1531-1537. |
[13] | 严瑜, 王轶鸣. (2016). 工作场所无礼行为的溢出和交叉效应:超越职场范围的负性作用机制. 心理科学进展, 24(12),1934-1945. |
[14] | 严瑜, 张倩. (2014). “过犹不及”——组织公民行为消极面的解读与探析. 心理科学进展, 22(5),834-844. |
[15] | 杨春江, 刘丹, 毛承成. (2019). 中国情境下的工作嵌入:构念内涵、维度和量表开发. 管理工程学报, 33(1),127-138. |
[16] | 杨付, 王桢, 张丽华. (2012). 员工职业发展过程中的“边界困境”:是机制的原因, 还是人的原因? 管理世界, (11),89-109. |
[17] | 张鹏, 邓然, 张立琨. (2015). 企业家社会资本与创业绩效关系研究. 科研管理, (8),124-132. |
[18] |
Adams, G. A., Prescher, J., Beehr, T. A., & Lepisto, L. (2002). Applying work-role attachment theory to retirement decision-making. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54(2),125-137.
URL pmid: 12054271 |
[19] | Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., & Shah, S. I. (2018). Frontline employees' high-performance work practices, trust in supervisor, job-embeddedness and turnover intentions in hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3),1436-1452. |
[20] | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2),179-211. |
[21] | Allen, D. G., Peltokorpi, V., & Rubenstein, A. L. (2016). When "embedded" means "stuck": Moderating effects of job embeddedness in adverse work environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12),1670-1686. |
[22] | Ampofo, E. T., Coetzer, A., & Poisat, P. (2017). Relationships between job embeddedness and employees' life satisfaction. Employee Relations, 39(7),951-966. |
[23] | Ampofo, E. T., Coetzer, A., & Poisat, P. (2018). Extending the job embeddedness-life satisfaction relationship: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance, 5(3),236-258. |
[24] |
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1),105-123.
doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4 URL |
[25] |
Bambacas, M., & Kulik, T. C. (2013). Job embeddedness in China: How HR practices impact turnover intentions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(10),1933-1952.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2012.725074 URL |
[26] | Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2014). Predicting retirement upon eligibility: An embeddedness perspective. Human Resource Management, 53(1),1-22. |
[27] | Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
[28] | Burnette, J. L., & Pollack, J. M. (2013). Implicit theories of work and job fit: Implications for job and life satisfaction. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 35(4),360-372. |
[29] | Carter, M. A. T., & Cook, K. (1995). Adaptation to retirement: Role changes and psychological resources. Career Development Quarterly, 44(1),67-82. |
[30] | Cheng, C. -Y. (2014). A longitudinal study of newcomer job embeddedness and sales outcomes for life insurance salespersons. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1430- 1438. |
[31] | Cheng, C. -Y., & Chang, J. -N. (2015). Does network building improve sales performance? The stabilizing role of job embeddedness. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness-People and Performance, 2(2),110-133. |
[32] | Coetzer, A., Inma, C., Poisat, P., Redmond, J., & Standing, C. (2018). Job embeddedness and employee enactment of innovation-related work behaviours. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2),222-239. |
[33] | Coetzer, A., Inma, C., Poisat, P., Redmond, J., & Standing, C. (2019). Does job embeddedness predict turnover intentions in SMEs? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(2),340-361. |
[34] | de Janasz, S. C., & Sullivan, S. E. (2004). Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2),263-283. |
[35] | Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2017). The mediating role of organizational embeddedness on the relationship between quality of work life and turnover: Perspectives from healthcare professionals. International Journal of Manpower, 38(5),696-711. |
[36] | Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2018). Examining the relationships between HR practices, organizational job embeddedness, job satisfaction, and quit intention: Evidence from Thai accountants. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 10(2-3),130-148. |
[37] | Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., Hekman, D. R., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Harman, W. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3),545-561. |
[38] | Ferguson, M. (2012). You cannot leave it at the office: Spillover and crossover of coworker incivility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4),571-588. |
[39] | Ferreira, A. I., Martinez, L. F., Lamelas, J. P., & Rodrigues, R. I. (2017). Mediation of job embeddedness and satisfaction in the relationship between task characteristics and turnover a multilevel study in Portuguese hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1),248-267. |
[40] | Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2),117-140. |
[41] | Forret, M. L., & Dougherty, T. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3),419-437. |
[42] | Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1120- 1145. |
[43] |
Ghosh, D., & Gurunathan, L. (2014). Job embeddedness: A ten-year literature review and proposed guidelines. Global Business Review, 16(5),856-866.
doi: 10.1177/0972150915591652 URL |
[44] | Ghosh, D., Sekiguchi, T., & Gurunathan, L. (2017). Organizational embeddedness as a mediator between justice and in-role performance. Journal of Business Research, 75,130-137. |
[45] | Ghosh, S. K. (2017). The direct and interactive effects of job insecurity and job embeddedness on unethical pro-organizational behavior: An empirical examination. Personnel Review, 46(6),1182-1198. |
[46] |
Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing: The challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1),61-76.
doi: 10.1177/1745691610393523 URL pmid: 26162116 |
[47] | Greene, J., Mero, N., & Werner, S. (2018). The negative effects of job embeddedness on performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1),58-73. |
[48] | Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1993). Family discourse, organizational embeddedness, and local enactment. Journal of Family Issues, 14(1),66-81. |
[49] | Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6),1452-1465. |
[50] | Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334- 1364. |
[51] | Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22(3),242-256. |
[52] | Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2011). The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX-outcomes relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2),271-281. |
[53] | Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. Marketing Review, 3(4),479-498. |
[54] | Helman, R., Copeland, C., Vanderhei, J., & Salisbury, D. (2008). EBRI 2008 recent retirees survey: Report of findings. EBRI Issue Brief, (319),3-22. |
[55] | Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3),513-524. |
[56] | Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1),103-128. |
[57] |
Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5),831-858.
URL pmid: 22925138 |
[58] | Hussain, T., & Deery, S. (2017). Why do self-initiated expatriates quit their jobs: The role of job embeddedness and shocks in explaining turnover intentions. International Business Review, 27(1),281-288. |
[59] | Jia, J., Yan, J., Jahanshahi, A. A., Lin, W., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2020). What makes employees more proactive? Roles of job embeddedness, the perceived strength of the HRM system and empowering leadership. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(1),107-127. |
[60] | Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5),1077-1096. |
[61] | Johnson, A. E., Sachau, D. A., & Englert, D. (2010). Organizational and occupational embeddedness of federal law enforcement personnel. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology, 25(2),75-89. |
[62] | Kapil, K., & Rastogi, R. (2018). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviour: The roles of leader-member exchange and organizational job embeddedness. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(1),56-75. |
[63] | Kiazad, K., Holtom, B. C., Hom, P. W., & Newman, A. (2015). Job embeddedness: A multifoci theoretical extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3),641-659. |
[64] | Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions,3-90. |
[65] | Lawler, E. E., & Finegold, D. (2000). Individualizing the organization: Past, present, and future. Organizational Dynamics, 29(1),1-15. |
[66] | Lee, C. -J., & Huang, S. Y. B. (2019). Can ethical leadership hinder sales performance? A limited resource perspective of job embeddedness. Chinese Management Studies, 13(4),985-1002. |
[67] | Linder, C. (2019). Expatriates' motivations for going abroad: The role of organisational embeddedness for career satisfaction and job effort. Employee Relations, 41(3),552-570. |
[68] | Mai, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2013). How on-the-Job embeddedness influences new venture creation and growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4),508-524. |
[69] | Meuer, J., Tröster, C., Angstmann, M., Backes-Gellner, U., & Pull, K. (2019). Embeddedness and the repatriation intention of assigned and self-initiated expatriates. European Management Journal, 37(6),784-793. |
[70] | Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6),1102-1121. |
[71] | Mitchell, T.R., & Lee T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment? Research in Organizational Behavior, 23(3),189-246. |
[72] |
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5),336-341.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 URL pmid: 20171303 |
[73] | Mosakowski, E. (1993). A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy-performance relationship: An empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management, 19(4),819-839. |
[74] | Nabi, G. R. (2003). Graduate employment and underemployment: Opportunity for skill use and career experiences amongst recent business graduates. Education Training, 45(7),371-382. |
[75] | Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2),242-266. |
[76] | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Organizational embeddedness and occupational embeddedness across career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2),336-351. |
[77] | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The impact of job embeddedness on innovation-related behaviors. Human Resource Management, 49(6),1067-1087. |
[78] | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013a). Changes in perceived supervisor embeddedness: Effects on employees’ embeddedness, organizational trust, and voice behavior. Personnel Psychology, 66(3),645-685. |
[79] | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013b). The effects of organisational embeddedness on insomnia. Applied Psychology - an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee - Revue Internationale, 62(2),330-357. |
[80] | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Community embeddedness and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness. Human Relations, 67(1),71-103. |
[81] | Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2018). Are embedded employees active or passive? The roles of learning goal orientation and preferences for wide task boundaries and job mobility in the embeddedness-voice link. Human Resource Management, 57(5),1251-1269. |
[82] | Peltokorpi, V., Allen, D. G., & Froese, F. (2015). Organizational embeddedness, turnover intentions, and voluntary turnover: The moderating effects of employee demographic characteristics and value orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2),292-312. |
[83] | Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good- thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2),313-338. |
[84] | Rusk, N., & Rothbaum, F. (2010). From stress to learning: Attachment theory meets goal orientation theory. Review of General Psychology, 14(1),31-43. |
[85] |
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, S. J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2),224-253.
URL pmid: 10307892 |
[86] |
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2),344-354.
doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24348410 URL |
[87] | Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132(2),154-168. |
[88] | Smith, D. R., Holtom, B. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Enhancing precision in the prediction of voluntary turnover and retirement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1),290-302. |
[89] | Tabak, F., & Hendy, N. T. (2016). Work engagement: Trust as a mediator of the impact of organizational job embeddedness and perceived organizational support. Organization Management Journal, 13(1),21-31. |
[90] | Thakur, S. J., & Bhatnagar, J. (2017). Mediator analysis of job embeddedness: Relationship between work-life balance practices and turnover intentions. Employee Relations, 39(5),718-731. |
[91] | Tian, A. W., Cordery, J., & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5),947-968. |
[92] | Wang, Q., Liao, Y., & Burns, G. N. (2019). General, work-specific, and work-role conscientiousness measures in predicting work criteria: A comparative perspective. Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12234. |
[93] | Wijayanto, B. R., & Kismono, G. (2004). The effect of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship behavior. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6(3),335-354. |
[94] | Zhang, L., Fan, C., Deng, Y., Lam, C. F., Hu, E., & Wang, L. (2019). Exploring the interpersonal determinants of job embeddedness and voluntary turnover: A conservation of resources perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(3),413-432. |
[95] | Zhang, M., Fried, D. D., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). A review of job embeddedness: Conceptual, measurement issues, and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3),220-231. |
[1] | WEN Bo, TAO Lei. Public service motivation in the Chinese context: Theory construction and workplace consequences [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 239-254. |
[2] | YANG Fu, LIU Qing. The consequences of calling [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(9): 1647-1656. |
[3] | WEN Zhonglin, FANG Jie, SHEN Jiaqi, TAN Yitian, LI Dingxin, MA Yiming. A review of research on psychological statistics in China’s mainland from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(8): 1331-1344. |
[4] | WANG Ting, YANG Fu. Leader humor: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1631-1642. |
[5] | WU Lunwen, YANG Fu. Political skill: Consequences and theoretical explanation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2109-2121. |
[6] | LI Fangjun, ZHENG Fenfang, YANG Qianyi, WANG Shuman. The consequential influence of employee voice behavior and its boundary conditions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 710-718. |
[7] | HENG Shupeng, ZHOU Zongkui, SUN Lijun. HENG Shupeng; ZHOU Zongkui; SUN Lijun [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1565-1578. |
[8] | WEI Xuhua, SHAO Jianping, WANG Aochen, JIANG Nan. Antecedents and consequences of organizational member status [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1972-1981. |
[9] | LI Haidong; DUAN Jinyun; ZENG Kai. The concept, antecedents and consequences of loyalty to supervisor [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 133-144. |
[10] | LIU Yanli; LU Guizhi; LIU Yong. Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 228-241. |
[11] | SUN Jianmin; ZHANG Yejun. Presenteeism in the Workplace: A New Topic in Organization and Management Research [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 654-668. |
[12] | HU Shaonan; WANG Yong. Concept, Measurements, Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1975-1984. |
[13] | ZHANG Tian;DING Xuechen;WENG Jing;FU Hong;XUE Yan. Does Forgiveness Increase or Reduce the Possibility of Further Offenses: The Discussion about the Consequences of Forgiveness Based on the Perspective of Offender [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 104-111. |
[14] | FENG Yi;CAI Huajian;SHI Yuanyuan. Cultural Products: A Special Perspective for Cultural Psychology [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 326-335. |
[15] | LIU Li;SHI Yan. The Current Status, Problems, and Recommendations on Clinical Sport Psychology Research [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1495-1506. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||