The behavioral and neural response patterns of growth mindset affecting learning process: A perspective from self-regulation learning theory

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01947

Abstract

Abstract:

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) identifies growth mindset as a crucial predictor of adolescents' academic achievement and social adaptation. Cultivating a growth mindset among adolescents is seen as a transformative change in reshaping the educational landscape and has become a significant topic in education. Recent large-scale studies have shown that growth mindset interventions enhance adolescents' academic performance and alleviate their stress, while several meta-analyses have reported minimal effects of such interventions on academic performance. Evaluating the true effectiveness of growth mindset interventions in improving adolescents' academic performance remains a challenging and cutting-edge issue in this field.

Existing research has overly focused on learning outcomes, using academic performance as the primary measure of growth mindset and its intervention effects, while neglecting the behavioral aspects of the learning process. This oversight has obscured valuable assessment information, contributing to the current controversy. Therefore, this study explores the "behavioral and neural response patterns of how growth mindset influences the learning process," aiming to shift and innovate research perspectives, paradigms, and metrics in the following ways: (1) Process-Oriented Focus: This study emphasizes the process-oriented nature of learning and explores the effects of growth mindset and its interventions on various aspects of the learning process; (2) Metacognitive Framework: Based on self-regulated learning theory, this study adopts a metacognitive framework within a self-regulated learning paradigm to characterize the interactive patterns between growth mindset, motivation, metacognition, and self-regulated learning behaviors, thereby overcoming the limitations of previous research content and methods based on the social cognitive theory of motivation; (3) Comprehensive Assessment Tools: By constructing and integrating behavioral indicators, neural activity indicators, and brain plasticity indicators that reflect the influence of growth mindset on the learning process, this study provides multi-faceted assessment tools for scientifically evaluating the effectiveness of growth mindset interventions. This approach aims to mitigate the assessment bias caused by relying solely on learning outcome indicators.

Learning is a continuously self-regulated process. This study addresses the key scientific question of whether growth mindset influences the learning process by utilizing a self-regulated learning paradigm within a metacognitive framework. Through behavioral experiments, event-related potentials (ERP), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments, the study reveals the behavioral and neural response patterns influenced by growth mindset in feedback learning contexts. In the study 1, we use a self-regulated learning paradigm to examine whether growth mindset influences behavioral performance in learning processes within task/ability feedback contexts, reflecting the effects of growth mindset and feedback on the learning process through behavioral indicators. In the study 2, ERP technology is employed to investigate whether growth mindset influences brain neural signals during the learning process within task/ability feedback contexts, providing objective neural evidence of the influence of growth mindset and feedback on the learning process. In the study 3, we aim to examine whether, after implicit activation (short-term intervention) of a growth mindset in individuals with a fixed mindset within a laboratory setting, their behavioral performance and neural activity during the feedback learning process converge with those of individuals with a growth mindset. Additionally, using fMRI technology, the study explores whether long-term growth mindset interventions can significantly alter gray matter volume in key brain regions and the connectivity strength between large-scale networks, and whether the latter mediates the relationship between growth mindset interventions and academic performance. This examination reveals the brain plasticity mechanisms by which growth mindset interventions influence feedback learning processes and outcomes.

This study systematically explores the behavioral and neural response patterns influenced by growth mindset in the learning process, attempting to construct a theoretical framework for how growth mindset affects the learning process. Not only does it advance research on this topic from ongoing controversy towards greater clarity, but it also responds to the educational reform call for "strengthening process evaluation" in the new era. As brain plasticity-based growth mindset cultivation becomes widely applied in educational practice, clarifying the impact of growth mindset and its interventions on neural activity and brain plasticity during the learning process can provide a basis for accurately formulating and evaluating growth mindset cultivation programs for adolescents, promoting the scientific and standardized implementation of such programs. Moreover, integrating adolescents' growth mindset cultivation into supportive classroom feedback contexts is a direction that future educational practice could consider.

Key words: growth mindset, self-regulation learning, metacognitive monitoring and control, feedback, neural response patterns

CLC Number:

B849: G44

JIA Xiaoyu, LI Ping, LI Weijian. The behavioral and neural response patterns of growth mindset affecting learning process: A perspective from self-regulation learning theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(12): 1947-1960.

Figures/Tables 2

References 122

[1]	曹晓华, 王本驰, 家晓余, 李锋盈. (2014). 惩罚对学习时间分配中决策与绩效的影响. 心理与行为研究, 12(4), 462-468.
[2]	陈纯槿. (2022). 成长型思维能有效提升青少年学业素养吗? 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 61(5), 167-177.
[3]	刁春婷, 周文倩, 黄臻. (2020). 小学生成长型思维模式与学业成绩, 生活满意度的关系: 学业自我效能感的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 18(4), 524-529.
[4]	高承海, 侯玲, 吕超, 万明钢. (2012). 内隐理论与群体关系. 心理科学进展, 20(8), 1180-1188.
[5]	冀月欣, 刘畅, 赵越, 王笛新, 胡小勇. (2024). 成长心态效应的异质性及边界条件. 心理科学进展, 32(3), 514-526. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00514
[6]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. (2019). 掌握程度和社会性线索对元认知监控的影响. 心理发展与教育, 35(6), 641-647.
[7]	家晓余. (2018). 个体能力观对创造性思维的影响 [博士学位论文]. 浙江大学, 杭州.
[8]	李凌艳, 耿丽娜. (2018). 成长型思维模式干预项目及其对我国自主发展教育落地的启示. 教育科学研究, 282(9), 80-85.
[9]	林丹华. (2020). 基于脑科学的成长型思维与学生学业成就提升. 教育家, 252(48), 78-79.
[10]	刘淑芳, 陈功香. (2023). 基于脑科学的动态元认知监控理论新发展. 教育生物学杂志, 11(1), 1-6.
[11]	龙君伟. (2003). 反馈干预及其影响绩效的内部机制. 心理科学进展, 11(4), 452-456.
[12]	宋淑娟, 许秀萍. (2019). 思维模式对留守经历大学生心理韧性的影响. 中国特殊教育, 11, 64-68.
[13]	孙海龙, 邢强. (2014). 反馈对知觉类别学习的影响及其认知神经生理机制. 心理科学进展, 22(1), 67-74. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00067
[14]	Aditomo A. (2015). Students’ response to academic setback: “Growth Mindset” as a buffer against demotivation. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(2), 198-222.
[15]	Ariel R., Dunlosky J., & Bailey H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432-447.
[16]	Bahník Š., & Vranka M. A. (2017). Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 139-143.
[17]	Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
[18]	Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. H., & Dweck C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x pmid: 17328703
[19]	Boaler J. (2013). Ability and mathematics: The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. Forum, 55(1), 143-152.
[20]	Burnette J. L., Hoyt C. L., Russell V. M., Lawson B., Dweck C. S., & Finkel E. (2020). A growth mindset intervention improves interest but not academic performance in the field of computer science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 107-116.
[21]	Butler D. L., & Winne P. H. (1995). Feedback and self- regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
[22]	Callender A. A., Franco-Watkins A. M., & Roberts A. S. (2016). Improving metacognition in the classroom through instruction, training, and feedback. Metacognition and Learning, 11, 215-235.
[23]	Canning E. A., Muenks K., Green D. J., & Murphy M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), 4734.
[24]	Chen L., Chang H., Rudoler J., Arnardottir E., Zhang Y., de Los Angeles C., & Menon V. (2022). Cognitive training enhances growth mindset in children through plasticity of cortico-striatal circuits. npj Science of Learning, 7(1), 30-40. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00146-7 pmid: 36371438
[25]	Chen W. W., & Wong Y. L. (2015). Chinese mindset: Theories of intelligence, goal orientation and academic achievement in Hong Kong students. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 714-725.
[26]	Chiu C. Y., Hong Y. Y., & Dweck C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.19 pmid: 9216077
[27]	Choi E., Johnson D. A., Moon K., & Oah S. (2018). Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional responses. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 38(2-3), 97-115.
[28]	Clark I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249.
[29]	Claro S., Paunesku D., & Dweck C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664-8668.
[30]	Cutumisu M. (2019). Feedback valence agency moderates the effect of preservice teachers’ growth mindset on the relation between revising and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 453404.
[31]	De Castella K., & Byrne D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 245-267.
[32]	Degol J. L., Wang M. T., Zhang Y., & Allerton J. (2018). Do growth mindsets in math benefit females? Identifying pathways between gender, mindset, and motivation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 976-990. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0739-8 pmid: 28889203
[33]	Dimotakis N., Mitchell D., & Maurer T. (2017). Positive and negative assessment center feedback in relation to development self-efficacy, feedback seeking, and promotion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(11), 1514-1527. doi: 10.1037/apl0000228 pmid: 28749150
[34]	Dunlosky J., & Bjork R. A. (2013). Handbook of metamemory and memory. Taylor & Francis.
[35]	Dunlosky J., & Matvey G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27( 5), 1180-1191.
[36]	Dupeyrat C., & Mariné C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59.
[37]	Dweck C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development.. Psychology Press.
[38]	Dweck C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
[39]	Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y., & Hong Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322-333.
[40]	Dweck C. S., & Leggett E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
[41]	Dweck C. S., & Yeager D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496. doi: 10.1177/1745691618804166 pmid: 30707853
[42]	Ehrlinger J., Mitchum A. L., & Dweck C. S. (2016). Understanding overconfidence: Theories of intelligence, preferential attention, and distorted self-assessment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 94-100.
[43]	Enders N., Gaschler R., & Kubik V. (2021). Online quizzes with closed questions in formal assessment: How elaborate feedback can promote learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(1), 91-106.
[44]	Fiedler K., Ackerman R., & Scarampi C. (2019). Metacognition:Monitoring and controlling one’s own knowledge, reasoning and decisions. In R. J.Sternberg & J.Funke (Eds.), Introduction to the psychology of human thought (pp. 89-111). Heidelberg University Publishing.
[45]	Finn B., Thomas R., & Rawson K. A. (2018). Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning. Learning and Instruction, 54, 104-113.
[46]	Fishbach A., Eyal T., & Finkelstein S. R. (2010). How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 517-530.
[47]	Flavell J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B.Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
[48]	Fong C. J., Patall E. A., Vasquez A. C., & Stautberg S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 121-162. doi: 10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6
[49]	Fong C. J., & Schallert D. L. (2023). “Feedback to the future”: Advancing motivational and emotional perspectives in feedback research. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 146-161.
[50]	Fong C. J., Warner J. R., Williams K. M., Schallert D. L., Chen L. H., Williamson Z. H., & Lin S. (2016). Deconstructing constructive criticism: The nature of academic emotions associated with constructive, positive, and negative feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 393-399.
[51]	Freedberg M., Glass B., Filoteo J. V., Hazeltine E., & Maddox W. T. (2017). Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning. Memory & Cognition, 45, 12-25.
[52]	Haddara N., & Rahnev D. (2022). The impact of feedback on perceptual decision-making and metacognition: Reduction in bias but no change in sensitivity. Psychological Science, 33(2), 259-275.
[53]	Hattie J., & Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
[54]	Hecht C. A., Yeager D. S., Dweck C. S., & Murphy M. C. (2021). Beliefs, affordances, and adolescent development: Lessons from a decade of growth mindset interventions. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 61, 169-197. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2021.04.004 pmid: 34266564
[55]	Higgins E. T., & Rholes W. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 363-378.
[56]	Hong Y. Y., Chiu C. Y., Dweck C. S., Lin D. M. S., & Wan W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 77(3), 588-599.
[57]	Ikeda K., Yue C. L., Murayama K., & Castel A. D. (2016). Achievement goals affect metacognitive judgments. Motivation Science, 2(4), 199-219. doi: 10.1037/mot0000047 pmid: 28983496
[58]	Jia X., Hao L., He L., Li P., Liu M., Zhang Y., & Qiu J. (2023). Regional gray matter volume is associated with growth mindset: A voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroscience, 509, 96-102.
[59]	Jia X., Li W., & Cao L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404 pmid: 31708842
[60]	Jia X., Xu T., & Zhang Y. (2022). The Role of metacognitive strategy monitoring and control in the relationship between creative mindsets and divergent thinking performance. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 35.
[61]	Koriat A., Ma'ayan H., & Nussinson R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36-69.
[62]	Krijgsman C., Mainhard T., van Tartwijk J., Borghouts L., Vansteenkiste M., Aelterman N., & Haerens L. (2019). Where to go and how to get there: Goal clarification, process feedback and students’ need satisfaction and frustration from lesson to lesson. Learning and Instruction, 61, 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.005
[63]	Labuhn A. S., Zimmerman B. J., & Hasselhorn M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173-194.
[64]	Lee H. W., Lim K. Y., & Grabowski B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 629-648.
[65]	Li F., Wang J., Du B., & Cao B. (2018). Electrophysiological response to the informative value of feedback revealed in a segmented Wisconsin card sorting test. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 57. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00057 pmid: 29459841
[66]	Li Y., & Bates T. C. (2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1640-1655.
[67]	Li Y., & Bates T. C. (2020). Testing the association of growth mindset and grades across a challenging transition: Is growth mindset associated with grades? Intelligence, 81, 101471.
[68]	Luft C. D. B., Nolte G., & Bhattacharya J. (2013). High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 2029-2038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2565-12.2013 pmid: 23365240
[69]	Macnamara B. N., & Burgoyne A. P. (2023). Do growth mindset interventions impact students' academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 133-173.
[70]	Marsden K. E., Ma W. J., Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., & Chiu P. H. (2015). Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15( 2), 276-286.
[71]	Metcalfe J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100(1), 3-22. pmid: 8426880
[72]	Metcalfe J., & Kornell N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 530-542.
[73]	Miller T. M., & Geraci L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 303-314.
[74]	Miura N., Tanabe H. C., Sasaki A. T., Harada T., & Sadato N. (2017). Neural evidence for the intrinsic value of action as motivation for behavior. Neuroscience, 352, 190-203. doi: S0306-4522(17)30239-7 pmid: 28396007
[75]	Moser J. S., Schroder H. S., Heeter C., Moran T. P., & Lee Y. H. (2011). Mind your errors: Evidence for a neural mechanism linking growth mindset to adaptive posterror adjustments. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1484-1489.
[76]	Muenks K., Canning E. A., LaCosse J., Green D. J., Zirkel S., Garcia J. A., & Murphy M. C. (2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119-2144.
[77]	Muenks K., & Yan V. X. (2022). University STEM instructors with stronger failure-as-debilitating mindsets are perceived to engage in fewer mastery-oriented teaching Practices by their students: An exploratory study. Social Psychology of Education, 25(5), 1205-1219.
[78]	Narciss S. (2013). Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Education Review, 23(1), 7-26.
[79]	Narciss S., & Huth K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. Instructional design for multimedia learning, 181195.
[80]	Nelson T. O. (1990). Metamemory:A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H.Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). Academic Press, Inc.
[81]	Nelson T. O., & Leonesio R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14( 4), 676-686.
[82]	Nelson T. O., & Narens L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J.Metcalfe & A. P.Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). MIT Press.
[83]	Nicol D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
[84]	Ng B. (2018). The neuroscience of growth mindset and intrinsic motivation. Brain Sciences, 8(2), 20.
[85]	O'Connor, A. J., Nemeth, C. J., & Akutsu, S. (2013). Consequences of beliefs about the malleability of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 155-162.
[86]	OECD. (2021). Sky’s the limit: Growth mindset, students, and schools in PISA. PISA 2018. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/growth-mindset.pdf.
[87]	Panadero E., & Lipnevich A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416.
[88]	Parada S., & Verlhiac J. F. (2022). The effect of a short computerized growth mindset intervention with implementation intentions on French students entering university. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(3), 561-572.
[89]	Paunesku D., Walton G. M., Romero C., Smith E. N., Yeager D. S., & Dweck C. S. (2015). Mindset interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784-793. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571017 pmid: 25862544
[90]	Pieschl S., Stahl E., & Bromme R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 17-37.
[91]	Polley T. (2018). Believing is achieving: Targeting beliefs about intelligence to increase learning in Bangladeshi secondary schools [Unpublished job market paper]. Duke University.
[92]	Puusepp I., Linnavalli T., Huuskonen M., Kukkonen K., Huotilainen M., Kujala T.,... Tirri K. (2021). Mindsets and neural mechanisms of automatic reactions to negative feedback in mathematics in elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 635972.
[93]	Rege M., Hanselman P., Solli I. F., Dweck C. S., Ludvigsen S., Bettinger E.,... Yeager D. S. (2021). How can we inspire nations of learners? An investigation of growth mindset and challenge-seeking in two countries. American Psychologist, 76(5), 755-767.
[94]	Romero C., Master A., Paunesku D., Dweck C. S., & Gross J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14(2), 227-234. doi: 10.1037/a0035490 pmid: 24512251
[95]	Rudolph K. D. (2010). Implicit theories of peer relationships. Social Development, 19(1), 113-129. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00534.x pmid: 20396649
[96]	Sarrasin J. B., Nenciovici L., Foisy L. M. B., Allaire- Duquette G., Riopel M., & Masson S. (2018). Effects of teaching the concept of neuroplasticity to induce a growth mindset on motivation, achievement, and brain activity: A meta-analysis. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 12, 22-31.
[97]	Schroder H. S., Dawood S., Yalch M. M., Donnellan M. B., & Moser J. S. (2015). The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(2), 120-139.
[98]	Schroder H. S., Fisher M. E., Lin Y., Lo S. L., Danovitch J. H., & Moser J. S. (2017). Neural evidence for enhanced attention to mistakes among school-aged children with a growth mindset. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 42-50. doi: S1878-9293(16)30218-3 pmid: 28131929
[99]	Schroder H. S., Moran T. P., Donnellan M. B., & Moser J. S. (2014). Mindset induction effects on cognitive control: A neurobehavioral investigation. Biological Psychology, 103, 27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.004 pmid: 25149141
[100]	Shute V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
[101]	Sisk V. F., Burgoyne A. P., Sun J., Butler J. L., & Macnamara B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mindsets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549-571.
[102]	Viciana J., Cervelló E. M., & Ramírez-Lechuga J. (2007). Effect of manipulating positive and negative feedback on goal orientations, perceived motivational climate, satisfaction, task choice, perception of ability, and attitude toward physical education lessons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(1), 67-82. pmid: 17918550
[103]	Walton G. M., & Yeager D. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219-226. doi: 10.1177/0963721420904453 pmid: 32719574
[104]	Wang M. T., Zepeda C. D., Qin X., Del Toro J., & Binning K. R. (2021). More than growth mindset: Individual and interactive links among socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents’ability mindsets, metacognitive skills, and math engagement. Child Development, 92(5), 957-976.
[105]	Wang S., Dai J., Li J., Wang X., Chen T., Yang X.,... Gong Q. (2018). Neuroanatomical correlates of grit: Growth mindset mediates the association between gray matter structure and trait grit in late adolescence. Human Brain Mapping, 39(4), 1688-1699. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23944 pmid: 29331059
[106]	Wang Y., Kuhlman D. M., Roberts K., Yuan B., Zhang Z., Zhang W., & Simons R. F. (2017). Social value orientation modulates the FRN and P300 in the chicken game. Biological Psychology, 127, 89-98. doi: S0301-0511(17)30081-9 pmid: 28465046
[107]	Wang Y., Sperling R. A., & Malcos J. L. (2024). Supporting college students’ metacognitive monitoring in a biology course through practice and timely monitoring feedback. Metacognition and Learning, 1-40.
[108]	Wang Z., Cao Y., & Gong S. (2023). Who can benefit more from more or less elaborated feedback in a computer- based assessment? Dominant goal orientation matters. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(3), 671-695.
[109]	White M. C., & DiBenedetto M. K. (2017). Self-regulation:An integral part of standards-based education. In D. H.Schunk & J. A.Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 208-222). Routledge.
[110]	Winne P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J.Zimmerman & D. H.Schunk (Eds.),Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153-189). Lawrence Erlbaum.
[111]	Winne P. H., & Hadwin A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J.Hacker, J.Dunlosky & A. C.Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[112]	Winne P. H., & Perry N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M.Boekaerts, P. R.Pintrich, & M. Ziedner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Academic Press, Inc.
[113]	Xu K. M., Koorn P., De Koning B., Skuballa I. T., Lin L., Henderikx M.,... Paas F. (2021). A growth mindset lowers perceived cognitive load and improves learning: Integrating motivation to cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1177-1191.
[114]	Yan V., & Schuetze B. A. (2022). What is meant by “Growth Mindset”? Current theory, measurement practices, and empirical results leave much open to interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 206-219.
[115]	Yan V. X., Thai K. P., & Bjork R. A. (2014). Habits and beliefs that guide self-regulated learning: Do they vary with mindset? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 140-152.
[116]	Yeager D. S., Bryan C. J., Gross J. J., Murray J. S., Cobb D. K., Santos P. H. F.,... Jamieson J. P. (2022). A synergistic mindsets intervention protects adolescents from stress. Nature, 607(7919), 512-520.
[117]	Yeager D. S., & Dweck C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75 (9), 1269-1284. doi: 10.1037/amp0000794 pmid: 33382294
[118]	Yeager D. S., Hanselman P., Walton G. M., Murray J. S., Crosnoe R., Muller C.,... Dweck C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369.
[119]	Yeager D. S., Romero C., Paunesku D., Hulleman C. S., Schneider B., Hinojosa C.,... Dweck C. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374-391. pmid: 27524832
[120]	Zeng G., Hou H., & Peng K. (2016). Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 217988.
[121]	Zhu Y., Leong V., Hou Y., Zhang D., Pan Y., & Hu Y. (2022). Instructor-learner neural synchronization during elaborated feedback predicts learning transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1427-1441.
[122]	Zimmerman B. J., & Martinez-Pons M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290.