Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 738-753.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00738
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
CUI Zhisong1, JIA Jianfeng2, ZOU Chunlong3, LI Ruiqin4
Received:
2023-10-15
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-03-05
CUI Zhisong, JIA Jianfeng, ZOU Chunlong, LI Ruiqin. The outcome of workplace cyberloafing and its feedback effects[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 738-753.
[1] 程垦, 王艺霏, 林英晖, 王菁. (2022). 观察者对亲组织不道德行为的反应及其反馈效应. [2] 褚福磊, 王蕊, 高中华. (2018). 新员工资质过剩动态变化及作用机制: 组织社会化视角. [3] 崔智淞, 王弘钰, 赵迪. (2022). “忠臣”还是”逆臣”?员工建设性越轨行为对主管绩效评价的非线性影响机制. [4] 郭玉冬, 欧琪雯, 段锦云. (2022). 领导者对员工主动行为的心理与行为反应. [5] 何伟怡, 陈璐璐. (2022). 相对剥夺感对网络怠工的影响——基于情绪耗竭和时间压力的中介调节机制. [6] 李玲玲, 黄桂. (2021). 组织中个体主动性行为”利与弊”. [7] 林玲, 唐汉瑛, 马红宇. (2010). 工作场所中的反生产行为及其心理机制. [8] 刘晨. (2021). 从”坏苹果”到”好公民”: 道德清洁理论视角下网络怠工行为向组织公民行为的转化机制. [9] 刘智强, 邓传军, 廖建桥, 龙立荣. (2015). 组织支持, 地位认知与员工创新:雇佣多样性视角. [10] 马君, 马兰明. (2023). 明星员工的社交悖论: 毁方瓦合还是卓尔不群. 南开管理评论. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230116.1122.001.html [11] 王弘钰, 崔智淞, 邹纯龙, 于佳利, 赵迪. (2019). 忠诚还是叛逆?中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为. [12] 王双龙, 张馨月. (2021). 网络闲逛行为对工作倦怠的作用机制研究. [13] 卫旭华, 邵建平, 王傲晨, 江楠. (2017). 组织成员地位的形成及影响机制. [14] 肖金岑, 赵修文, 张友欣, 卿涛. (2019). 知识型员工向同事横向学习的机制研究:自我效能与社会交换的作用. [15] 严瑜, 何亚男. (2016). 领导对建言反应的动机感知作用机制:基于归因理论的阐释. [16] 严瑜, 李彤. (2018). 工作场所不文明行为受害者向实施者反转的机制. [17] 张光磊, 陈汇, 刘文兴. (2018). 兼爱而相诺:基于代际特征的权力距离感知差异对员工工作绩效影响的案例研究. [18] 张靓婷, 王斌, 付景涛. (2021). 组织社会化视角下员工组织公民行为动态变化趋势及其形成机制. [19] 张生太, 张梦桃, 白少一, 仇泸毅, 刘娜. (2021). WSR方法论视角下环境不确定性对网络怠工的影响——高管团队冲突的中介作用. [20] 张颖, 段锦云, 王甫希, 屈金照, 彭雄良. (2022). "近朱者赤":同事主动行为如何激发员工动机和绩效. [21] 张永军, 于瑞丽, 赵国祥, 王明辉. (2015). 被动还是主动: 反应性与前摄性反生产行为解析. [22] 郑建君, 金盛华. (2009). 领导领域中归因理论的研究述评. [23] 朱金强, 徐世勇. (2015). 反生产力工作行为与亲社会违规行为——基于道德补偿理论的视角. [24] Aghaz, A., & Sheikh, A. (2016). Cyberloafing and job burnout: An investigation in the knowledge-intensive sector. [25] Akbulut Y., Dönmez O., & Dursun Ö. Ö. (2017). Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. [26] Askew K., Buckner J. E., Taing M. U., Ilie A., Bauer J. A., & Coovert M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. [27] Askew K. L., Ilie A., Bauer J. A., Simonet D. V., Buckner J. E., & Robertson T. A. (2019). Disentangling how coworkers and supervisors influence employee cyberloafing: What normative information are employees attending to?. [28] Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. [29] Blau G., Yang Y., & Ward-Cook K. (2006). Testing a measure of cyberloafing. [30] Block, W. (2001). Cyberslacking, business ethics and managerial economics. [31] Bolino M. C., Turnley W. H., Gilstrap J. B., & Suazo M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What's a “good soldier” to do?. [32] Carpenter N. C., Rangel B., Jeon G., & Cottrell J. (2017). Are supervisors and coworkers likely to witness employee counterproductive work behavior? An investigation of observability and self-observer convergence. [33] Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. [34] De Lara, P. Z. M. (2007). Relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing in the workplace: Has “anomia” a say in the matter?. [35] Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information- processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. [36] Gabriel A. S., Koopman J., Rosen C. C., & Johnson R. E. (2018). Helping others or helping oneself? An episodic examination of the behavioral consequences of helping at work. [37] Gökçearslan Ş., Mumcu F. K., Haşlaman T., & Çevik Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. [38] Henle, C. A., & Blanchard, A. L. (2008). The interaction of work stressors and organizational sanctions on cyberloafing. [39] Henle C. A., Kohut G., & Booth R. (2009). Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory. [40] Howard M. C., Cogswell J. E., & Smith M. B. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. [41] Hu Y., Chen Y., & Ye M. (2021). Eager to belong: Social cyberloafing as a coping response to workplace ostracism. [42] Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. [43] Kamins, A. (1995). [44] Kausto J., Elo A. L., Lipponen J., & Elovainio M. (2005). Moderating effects of job insecurity in the relationships between procedural justice and employee well-being: Gender differences. [45] Khan R., Murtaza G., Neveu J. P., & Newman A. (2022). Reciprocal relationship between workplace incivility and deviant silence—The moderating role of moral attentiveness. [46] Kim S., Cho S., & Park Y. (2022). Daily microbreaks in a self-regulatory resources lens: Perceived health climate as a contextual moderator via microbreak autonomy. [47] Kim S., Park Y., & Niu Q. (2017). Micro‐break activities at work to recover from daily work demands. [48] Kluemper D. H., Mossholder K. W., Ispas D., Bing M. N., Iliescu D., & Ilie A. (2019). When core self-evaluations influence employees’ deviant reactions to abusive supervision: The moderating role of cognitive ability. [49] Koay, K. Y. (2018). Workplace ostracism and cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation model. [50] Lanaj K., Hollenbeck J. R., Ilgen D. R., Barnes C. M., & Harmon S. J. (2013). The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. [51] Lian H., Ferris D. L., Morrison R., & Brown D. J. (2014). Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. [52] Liberman B., Seidman G., McKenna K. Y., & Buffardi L. E. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. [53] Lieke L., Johns G., Lyons B. J., & ter Hoeven, C. L. (2016). Why and when do employees imitate the absenteeism of co-workers?. [54] Lim P. K., Koay K. Y., & Chong W. Y. (2021). The effects of abusive supervision, emotional exhaustion and organizational commitment on cyberloafing: A moderated-mediation examination. [55] Lim, V. K. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. [56] Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work?. [57] Lin K. J., Savani K., & Ilies R. (2019). Doing good, feeling good? The roles of helping motivation and citizenship pressure. [58] Liu B., Cui Z., & Nanyangwe C. N. (2023). How line-manager leadership styles and employee-perceived HRM practices contribute to employee performance: A configurational perspective. [59] Liu H., Ji Y., & Dust S. B. (2021). “Fully recharged” evenings? The effect of evening cyber leisure on next-day vitality and performance through sleep quantity and quality, bedtime procrastination, and psychological detachment, and the moderating role of mindfulness. [60] Mahatanankoon P., Anandarajan M., & Igbaria M. (2004). Development of a measure of personal web usage in the workplace. [61] Martinko M. J., Harvey P., & Dasborough M. T. (2011). Attribution theory in the organizational sciences: A case of unrealized potential. [62] Mercado B. K., Giordano C., & Dilchert S. (2017). A meta-analytic investigation of cyberloafing. [63] O’Neill T. A., Hambley L. A., & Bercovich A. (2014). Prediction of cyberslacking when employees are working away from the office. [64] Pindek S., Krajcevska A., & Spector P. E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom. [65] Restubog S. L. D., Garcia P. R. J. M., Toledano L. S., Amarnani R. K., Tolentino L. R., & Tang R. L. (2011). Yielding to (cyber)-temptation: Exploring the buffering role of self-control in the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing behavior in the workplace. [66] Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? [67] Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. [68] Spector, P. E. (2011). The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): An integration of perspectives. [69] Spitzmuller, M., & Van Dyne, L. (2013). Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping. [70] Tsai, H. Y. (2023). Do you feel like being proactive day? How daily cyberloafing influences creativity and proactive behavior: The moderating roles of work environment. [71] Ugrin, J. C., & Michael Pearson, J. (2013). The effects of sanctions and stigmas on cyberloafing. [72] Van Gils S., Van Quaquebeke N., van Knippenberg D., van Dijke M., & De Cremer D. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness. [73] Wagner D. T., Barnes C. M., Lim V. K. G., & Ferris D. L. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. [74] Wu J., Mei W., Liu L., & Ugrin J. C. (2020). The bright and dark sides of social cyberloafing: Effects on employee mental health in China. [75] Zhang J., Akhtar M. N., Zhang Y., & Sun S. (2020). Are overqualified employees bad apples? A dual-pathway model of cyberloafing. [76] Zheng X., Zhu W., Zhao H., & Zhang C. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. [77] Zhong J., Chen Y., Yan J., & Luo J. (2022). The mixed blessing of cyberloafing on innovation performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. [78] Zhu J., Wei H., Li H., & Osburn H. (2021). The paradoxical effect of responsible leadership on employee cyberloafing: A moderated mediation model. [79] Zhu W., Treviño L. K., & Zheng X. (2016). Ethical leaders and their followers: The transmission of moral identity and moral attentiveness. |
[1] | JING Wei, CHEN Qi, XUE Yun Qing, YANG Miao, ZHANG Jie. Predictive coding deficits in autism: Abnormalities in feedback or feedforward connectivities? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 813-833. |
[2] | HOU Jiawen, LIU Fengjun, MENG Lu. Solitude and its effect and psychological mechanisms in the marketing field [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(4): 677-688. |
[3] | HU Biyun, MENG Liang. Formation and consequences of employee time theft: A motivational perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(3): 433-450. |
[4] | CHE Qiangyan, SUN Yunlin, JIN Jia, ZHU Chunyan, WANG Kai, YE Rong, YU Fengqiong. The application of neurofeedback for positive emotion enhancement in depression treatment [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(2): 342-363. |
[5] | Lei Jiang, Xianyuan Yang, Wei Mao, Jia Yang, Fangfang Yan, Chang-Bing Huang. Effects of Internal and External Feedback on Visual Perceptual Learning [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 124-124. |
[6] | ZHANG Fengxiang, CHEN Meixuan, PU Yi, KONG Xiang-Zhen. Individual differences in spatial navigation: A multi-scale perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1642-1664. |
[7] | MENG Liang, LI Dandan. Revisiting family motivation from the actor versus observer perspectives [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1342-1358. |
[8] | LIU Wenbin, QI Zhengtang, LIU Weina. The effects of different sensory functions on depression and its neuromechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 641-656. |
[9] | ZHU Xun, GU Xin. Evaluation of predictors’ relative importance: Methods and applications [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(1): 145-158. |
[10] | CHENG Ken, WANG Yifei, LIN Yinghui, WANG Jing. Observer reactions to unethical pro-organizational behavior and their feedback effects [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1944-1954. |
[11] | JIANG Jiali, LI Liyan, LI Ziying, LEI Xiuya, MENG Zelong. Predictors of continuation and cessation of non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1536-1545. |
[12] | CHEN Jing, WANG Yuzheng, WANG Jinyan, LUO Fei. The role of mindfulness in alleviating ostracism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1294-1302. |
[13] | JIN Yuchang, DENG Chenglong, WU Ping, LIN Xi, ZHENG Peixuan, AN Junxiu. Emoji image symbol’s social function and application [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1062-1077. |
[14] | LI Yun, RU Taotao, LI Siyu, CHEN Hanyu, XIE Shuya, ZHOU Guofu. Effects of ambient light on mood and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 389-405. |
[15] | XIAO Chengli, SUI Yuqing, XIAO Suheng, ZHOU Renlai. A new perspective on spatial interaction research: The effects of multiple social factors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 796-805. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||