Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 191-201.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00191
• Conceptual Framework • Next Articles
Received:
2020-08-21
Online:
2021-02-15
Published:
2020-12-29
Contact:
GU Junjuan
E-mail:jjshujing@163.com
CLC Number:
GU Junjuan, SHI Jinfu. The cognitive mechanism of Chinese character position processing and word boundary effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 191-201.
[1] | 邓耀臣, 冯志伟. (2013). 词汇长度与词汇频数关系的计量语言学研究. 外国语, 36, 29-39. doi: CNKI:SUN:WYXY.0.2013-03-002 |
[2] | 顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18, 193-199. |
[3] | 滑慧敏, 顾俊娟, 林楠, 李兴珊. (2017). 视觉词汇识别中的字符位置编码. 心理科学进展, 25, 1132-1138. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01132 |
[4] | 黄伯荣, 廖序东. (2007). 现代汉语. 北京: 高等教育出版社. |
[5] | 李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19, 459-470. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00459 |
[6] | 孟祥芝, 舒华. (1999). 汉语儿童阅读障碍研究. 心理发展与教育, 15, 54-57. doi: CNKI:SUN:XLFZ.0.1999-04-011 |
[7] | 彭聃龄, 丁国盛, 王春茂, Taft, M., 朱晓平. (1999). 汉语逆序词的加工——词素在词加工中的作用. 心理学报, 31, 36-46. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/16/12/025 |
[8] | 田晓梅, 王纯, 李童, 孟祥芝, 周晓林. (2006). 汉语双字词的心理词典存储——来自发展性阅读障碍个案的证据. 心理发展与教育, 22, 146-157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2006.02.009 |
[9] |
Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712607X224478
URL pmid: 17631694 |
[10] |
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1798-1819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.672437
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437 URL pmid: 22540902 |
[11] |
Beyersmann, E., McCormick, S. F., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2389-2410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.782326
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.782326 URL pmid: 23590520 |
[12] | Blythe, H. I., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading transposed text: Effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2424-2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0707-2 |
[13] |
Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1327 URL pmid: 16393049 |
[14] |
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.001 URL pmid: 17217942 |
[15] |
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2014). Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1557- 1575. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0609-2 URL pmid: 24643819 |
[16] | Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 39(A), 211-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785 |
[17] | Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCradle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235-254). New York: Psychology Press. |
[18] |
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organisation in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293-1326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293
URL pmid: 16393048 |
[19] | Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5 |
[20] |
Gu, J. J., Li, X. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 41, 127-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038639
URL pmid: 25621586 |
[21] |
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20
doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.20 URL pmid: 9483822 |
[22] |
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. L. ( 2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193367
URL pmid: 16615382 |
[23] | Johnson, R. L. (2007). The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.). Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 425-440). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. |
[24] |
Johnson, R. L., & Dunne, M. D. (2012). Parafoveal processing of transposed-letter words and nonwords: Evidence against parafoveal lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 191-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025983
doi: 10.1037/a0025983 URL pmid: 22060141 |
[25] |
Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 336-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.013
URL pmid: 23089042 |
[26] |
Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed- letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209 URL pmid: 17311489 |
[27] | Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 291-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000133 |
[28] | Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 530-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002 |
[29] |
Li, X. S., Gu, J. J., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 879-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030337
URL pmid: 23088542 |
[30] |
Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-Movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248
doi: 10.1037/rev0000231 URL pmid: 32658537 |
[31] |
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003 URL pmid: 19345938 |
[32] | Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2013). The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 781-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.832682 |
[33] |
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046-1059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035389
URL pmid: 24417292 |
[34] |
Ma, G. J., Pollatsek, A., Li, Y. G., & Li, X. S. (2017). Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it’s composed of noncontiguous characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 158- 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000298
URL pmid: 27504682 |
[35] |
Masserang, K. M., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 476- 495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.658037
URL pmid: 23082239 |
[36] |
Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Parafoveal preprocessing of word initial trigrams during reading in adults and children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 411-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000175
URL pmid: 26348198 |
[37] |
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127- 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.11.001 URL pmid: 19081083 |
[38] | Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578146 |
[39] |
Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 384-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384 URL pmid: 19130764 |
[40] | Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Psychology Press. |
[41] | Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5 |
[42] |
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00274-5.5
URL pmid: 9666972 |
[43] |
Rayner, K., Li, X. S., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. L. ( 2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03206448
doi: 10.3758/bf03206448 URL pmid: 16615333 |
[44] |
Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01684.x URL pmid: 16507057 |
[45] |
Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language & Cognitive Processes, 26, 482-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.500020
doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.500020 URL pmid: 22933829 |
[46] |
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C., & Rastle, K. (2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 988-996. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0
URL pmid: 23543423 |
[47] | Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198 |
[48] | Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 745-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 |
[49] | Taft, M., & Nillsen, C. (2013). Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 917-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.679662 |
[50] | Taft, M., & Zhu, X. P. (1997). Sub-morphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.761 |
[51] | Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Children’s and adults’ parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 531-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.999076 |
[52] |
White, S. J., Johnson, R. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1261-1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1261 URL pmid: 18823209 |
[53] | Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013). Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.753077 |
[54] |
Winskel, H., Perea, M., & Ratitamkul, T. (2012) On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: The case of Thai. Experimental Psychology, 59, 68-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000127
URL pmid: 16556559 |
[55] |
Witzel, N., Qiao, X. M., & Forster, K. (2011). Transposed letter priming with horizontal and vertical text in Japanese and English readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 914-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022194
URL pmid: 21639675 |
[56] | Yang, J. M. (2013). Preview effects of plausibility and character order in reading Chinese transposed words: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 18-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2013.01553.x. |
[57] |
Zhou, J. Y., Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., Taft, M., & Li, X. S. (2017). The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 31, 607-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y
doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9800-y URL |
[58] |
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Lété, B., & Grainger, J. (2014). Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: Tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1026-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035187
doi: 10.1037/a0035187 URL |
[1] | ZHANG Caihui, YE Jianqiao, YANG Jing. Brain mechanism underlying learning Chinese as a second language [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 747-758. |
[2] | WEN Bo, TAO Lei. Public service motivation in the Chinese context: Theory construction and workplace consequences [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(2): 239-254. |
[3] | QIU Xiaoyan, GE Yanying, HU Chao. A theoretical study on the application of expressive writing to psychological rescue in social disasters [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2799-2808. |
[4] | LI Lin, ZHAO Sainan, ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Jingxin. Understanding mechanisms of prediction error cost in Chinese reading for older adults [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(1): 1-14. |
[5] | YU Wenbo, WANG Lu, CHENG Xingyue, WANG Tianlin, ZHANG Jingjing, LIANG Dandan. The influence of linguistic experience on statistical word segmentation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 787-795. |
[6] | ZHANG Manman, ZANG Chuanli, BAI Xuejun. The spatial extent and depth of parafoveal pre-processing during Chinese reading [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 871-882. |
[7] | WEI Tongqi, CAO Hui, BI Hong-Yan, YANG Yang. Writing deficits in developmental dyslexia and its neural mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 75-84. |
[8] | ZHU Zhaoxia, LIU Li, CUI Lei, PENG Danling. The influence of writing on reading: Evidence from the contrast between traditional writing and typing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 796-803. |
[9] | ZANG Chuanli, LU Zijia, ZHANG Zhichao. The role of semantic and syntactic information in parafoveal prcoessing during reading [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 11-19. |
[10] | ZHAO Jing. Skills of visual attention span in developmental dyslexia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 20-26. |
[11] | Qingqing QU, Weilin LIU, Xingshan LI. The functional unit of phonological encoding in Chinese spoken production: Study on phonemes [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1535-1544. |
[12] | WANG Ting, YANG Fu. Career success: Antecedents and mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1488-1500. |
[13] | ZHANG Ying, YANG Fu. Feedback-seeking behavior: Influencing factors and localization development [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1121-1130. |
[14] | YU Wenbo, LIANG Dandan. Word segmentation cues in the process of spoken language [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1765-1774. |
[15] | ZHANG Ying, YANG Fu. Proactive personality: Mechanisms and future directions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(9): 1544-1551. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||