The impact of demographic characteristics on public service motivation: Evidence from meta-analysis

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01631

Abstract

Abstract:

The method of meta-analysis was utilized to analyze the influence of demographic characteristics on public service motivation (PSM). 138 documents and 492 independent samples (N = 1078442) in total meet the criteria of meta-Analysis. Results showed that gender, age, education, organizational tenure, job tenure, position level and income were correlated with PSM positively. However, the linkages between demographic characteristics and PSM varies with dimensions of PSM, and there is no obvious correlation between marital status and PSM. In addition, the relationships between some demographic characteristics and PSM are moderated by PSM measurements, waves of data collection and cultural backgrounds. The results provided not only accurate estimates for how PSM is affected by demographic characteristics, but also insights for future research of PSM and management of public employees.

Key words: public service motivation, demographic characteristics, meta-analysis, PSM measurements, cultural difference

CLC Number:

B849:C91

XU Yan, LI Chaoping. The impact of demographic characteristics on public service motivation: Evidence from meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(10): 1631-1649.

Figures/Tables 5

References 190

	(注: *号开头的为纳入元分析的文献。)
[1]	包元杰, 李超平. (2016). 公共服务动机的测量: 理论结构与量表修订. 中国人力资源开发, (7), 83-91.
[2]	* 曹钶婕, 李超平. (2019). 公共服务动机对公务员绩效的影响机理(硕士学位论文). 兰州大学.
[3]	曹霞, 瞿皎姣. (2014). 资源保存理论溯源、主要内容探析及启示. 中国人力资源开发, (15), 75-80.
[4]	* 陈鼎祥, 刘帮成. (2019). 公益组织员工离职倾向的心理机制研究. 管理学刊, 32(4), 41-51.
[5]	* 陈鼎祥, 刘帮成, 隆添伊. (2019). 基于嵌入视角的公务员离职意愿分析. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 27(4), 120-129.
[6]	褚福磊, 王蕊, 高中华. (2018). 新员工资质过剩动态变化及作用机制: 组织社会化视角. 心理科学进展, 26(12), 2101-2112.
[7]	* 戴周超. (2018). 温州市公务员公共服务动机对工作绩效的影响研究(硕士学位论文). 福建农林大学, 福州.
[8]	段锦云, 张晨, 徐悦. (2016). 员工建言行为的人口统计特征元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1568-1582. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01568 URL
[9]	* 段哲哲. (2018). 2000年以来中国台湾地区公务员公共服务动机及其对工作投入的影响. 公共管理评论, (2), 77-97.
[10]	* 葛蕾蕾. (2016). 变革型领导对公务员工作态度的影响——公共服务动机的中介效应研究. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 29(3), 111-120.
[11]	* 郭刚建. (2016). 公共服务动机对工作投入的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 云南财经大学, 昆明.
[12]	何寒青, 陈坤. (2006). Meta分析中的异质性检验方法. 中国卫生统计, 23(6), 486-487.
[13]	* 江晓雨. (2014). 成都市公务员公共服务动机调查与分析 (硕士学位论文). 西南交通大学, 成都.
[14]	* 柯紫薇. (2015). 变革型领导对公务员工作绩效的影响 (硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
[15]	* 李碧莹. (2018). 公务员公共服务动机对工作绩效的影响研究 (硕士学位论文). 兰州大学.
[16]	* 李锋, 王浦劬. (2016). 基层公务员公共服务动机的结构与前因分析. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 55(1), 29-38.
[17]	李明, 叶浩生. (2012). 公共服务动机测量的发展与展望. 心理科学, 35(4), 932-936.
[18]	* 李琦. (2019). 基层公共部门行政组织文化对公务员组织公民行为的影响 (硕士学位论文). 兰州大学.
[19]	李锐, 毛寿龙. (2015). 公共服务动机文献综述研究. 现代管理科学, (2), 100-102.
[20]	李小华. (2008). 公共服务动机的结构及测量. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 61(6), 707-802.
[21]	* 李小华, 董军. (2012). 公务员公共服务动机对个体绩效的影响研究. 公共行政评论, 5(1), 105-121+181.
[22]	* 刘帮成, 周杭, 洪风波. (2017). 公共部门高承诺工作系统与员工建言行为关系研究: 基于公共服务动机的视角. 管理评论, 29(1), 62-69.
[23]	* 刘婷. (2016). 公共服务动机对公共部门雇员组织公民行为的影响机理 (硕士学位论文). 浙江大学, 杭州.
[24]	* 刘晓洋. (2017). 公共服务动机绩效促进模型与检验. 学术研究, (5), 62-68+177.
[25]	* 刘颖, 魏娜, 周东歌. (2019). 社会组织志愿者领导风格对下属行为和动机的影响研究. 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报, 23(2), 119-127.
[26]	* 罗欢. (2015). 广西乡镇公务员公共服务动机与工作投入关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 广西民族大学, 南宁.
[27]	* 马岩. (2016). 税务领军人才心理资本、公共服务动机与职业成功的关系研究. 税务研究, (11), 88-93.
[28]	马英, 洪晓楠. (2015). 高校辅导员职业价值观的实证研究. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 36(2), 126-131.
[29]	麦劲壮, 李河, 方积乾, 刘小清, 饶栩栩. (2006). Meta分析中失安全系数的估计. 循证医学, 6(5), 297-300. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2006.05.011 URL
[30]	毛凯贤, 李超平. (2015). 新员工主动行为及其在组织社会化中的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2167-2176. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.02167 URL
[31]	* 孟凡蓉, 吴建南. (2014). 公共服务动机视角下绩效工资公平感对工作投入的影响. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 34(1), 61-69.
[32]	* 孟凡蓉, 张玲. (2011). 绩效评价目标设置与公共服务动机: 心理需求满意感的中介效应. 情报杂志, 30(9), 202-207.
[33]	* 孙思睿, 刘帮成. (2019). 表面和谐如何影响社区公民行为?——来自公共部门变革情境下的探索. 珞珈管理评论, (3), 1-18.
[34]	谭新雨, 刘帮成, 汪艳霞. (2017). 激励-贡献导向下心理契约差异对公务员离职倾向的影响——基于公共服务动机和变革态度的综合分析. 公共管理学报, 14(4), 27-43+154.
[35]	* 谭新雨, 汪艳霞. (2017). 公共服务动机视角下服务型领导对公务员建言行为的影响. 软科学, 31(8), 51-55.
[36]	王建峰, 戴冰. (2020). “追名弃利”: 权力动机与社会存在对亲社会行为的影响. 心理学报, 52(1), 55-65.
[37]	* 王宁宁. (2018). 公务员变革型组织公民行为的形成机制研究 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
[38]	* 王浦劬, 杨晓曦. (2017). 当前党政干部公共服务动机状况调查——基于中部某市党政干部的实证研究. 人民论坛·学术前沿, (7), 70-81.
[39]	王亚华, 舒全峰. (2018). 中国乡村干部的公共服务动机: 定量测度与影响因素. 管理世界, 34(2), 93-102+187-188.
[40]	* 文宏, 张书. (2017). 官员“为官不为”影响因素的实证分析——基于A省垂直系统的数据. 中国行政管理, (10), 100-107.
[41]	吴胜涛, 朱廷劭, 戴雨欣, 汪小芹. (2019). 达则兼济天下: 基于文学智能分析的精英人物心理研究. 心理技术与应用, 7(10), 590-596.
[42]	* 徐诗佳. (2015). 公共服务动机与公务员工作绩效 (硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
[43]	胥彦, 李超平. (2019). 追踪研究在组织行为学中的应用. 心理科学进展, 27(4), 600-610.
[44]	* 杨靖云. (2013). 公务员公共服务动机促进绩效研究 (硕士学位论文). 福建师范大学, 福州.
[45]	* 叶先宝, 赖桂梅. (2011). 公共服务动机: 测量、比较与影响——基于福建省样本数据的分析. 中国行政管理, (8), 107-111.
[46]	* 于海波, 安然. (2018). 新形势下公务员缓解工作倦怠的二元路径——以工作重塑和心理授权为中介变量. 中国行政管理, (9), 123-129.
[47]	曾军荣. (2008). 公共服务动机: 概念、特征与测量. 中国行政管理, (2), 21-24.
[48]	* 张弘. (2015). 自我效能感与公务员绩效的关系: 公共服务动机的调节作用 (硕士学位论文). 兰州大学.
[49]	* 张佳. (2018). 公务员网络中心性、组织承诺与公共服务动机: 事务型领导的调节 (硕士学位论文). 中国科学技术大学, 合肥.
[50]	* 张宗贺, 刘帮成. (2020). 服务型领导激发公务员服务热情的过程机制——一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 41(1), 68-75.
[51]	* 赵晨, 高中华. (2014). 公共服务动机视域下公务员工作满意度对行为绩效的影响. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 1 6(6), 45-52.
[52]	* 郑楠, 周恩毅. (2017). 我国基层公务员的公共服务动机对职业幸福感影响的实证研究. 中国行政管理, (3), 83-87.
[53]	郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞. (2015). “达”则兼济天下?社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(2), 243-250. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00243 URL
[54]	* 朱春奎, 吴辰. (2012). 公共服务动机对工作满意度的影响研究. 公共行政评论, 5(1), 83-104+180-181.
[55]	* 朱光楠, 李敏, 严敏. (2012). 公务员公共服务动机对工作投入的影响研究. 公共行政评论, 5(1), 122-144+181.
[56]	Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 306-331. doi: 10.1177/1094428110375720 URL
[57]	* Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone, F., & Giauque, D. (2014). Policy environment and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 807-825. doi: 10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-4 URL
[58]	* Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone, F., Giauque, D., & Ritz, A. (2010). Motivating employees of the public sector: Does public service motivation matter? International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 213-246. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2010.503783 URL
[59]	* Andersen, L. B., & Kjeldsen, A. M. (2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector? International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 252-274. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2013.817253 URL
[60]	Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Scotts Valley, California, ReCAPP.
[61]	* Bao, Y., & Ge, L. (2019). Linking transformational leadership and value congruence among Chinese police force: The mediating role of goal clarity and the moderating role of public service motivation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(3), 373-395. doi: 10.1111/aupa.v78.3 URL
[62]	* Bao, Y., & Zhong, W. (2019). Public service motivation matters: Examining the differential effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on organizational identification and turnover intention. Public Management Review, 1-22.
[63]	* Belle, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2015). Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector: An experimental study with Italian government executives. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 99-123. doi: 10.1177/0734371X13520460 URL
[64]	* Borst, R. T. (2018). Comparing work engagement in people- changing and people-processing service providers: A mediation model with red tape, Autonomy, dimensions of PSM, and performance. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 287-313. doi: 10.1177/0091026018770225 URL pmid: 30135612
[65]	* Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2019). Exploring the job demands-resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 372-397. doi: 10.1177/0734371X17729870 URL
[66]	* Bottomley, P., Mostafa, A. M. S., Gould-Williams, J. S., & León-Cázares, F. (2016). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behaviours: The contingent role of public service motivation. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 390-405. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12108 URL
[67]	* Brænder, M., & Andersen, L. B. (2013). Does deployment to war affect public service motivation? A panel study of soldiers before and after their service in Afghanistan. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 466-477. doi: 10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-3 URL
[68]	* Bright, L. (2011). Does public service motivation affect the occupation choices of public employees? Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 11-24.
[69]	* Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218-239. doi: 10.1177/0091026014528478 URL
[70]	* Caillier, J. G. (2015). Towards a better understanding of public service motivation and mission valence in public agencies. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1217-1236. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.895033 URL
[71]	* Caillier, J. G. (2017). Public service motivation and decisions to report wrongdoing in U.S. federal agencies: Is this relationship mediated by the seriousness of the wrongdoing. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 810-825. doi: 10.1177/0275074015626299 URL
[72]	* Camilleri, E. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), 356-377. doi: 10.1108/00483480710731329 URL
[73]	* Campbell, J. W. (2018). Felt responsibility for change in public organizations: General and sector-specific paths. Public Management Review, 20(2), 232-253. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1302245 URL
[74]	* Campbell, J. W., & Im, T. (2016). Perceived public participation efficacy: The differential influence of public service motivation across organizational strata. Public Personnel Management, 45(3), 308-330. doi: 10.1177/0091026016664899 URL
[75]	Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 421-483. doi: 10.1177/109442819814004 URL
[76]	* Chen, C.-A. (2012). Sector imprinting: Exploring its impacts on managers’ perceived formalized personnel rules, perceived red tape, and current job tenure. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 320-340. doi: 10.1177/0275074011402492 URL
[77]	* Chen, C.-A., & Hsieh, C.-W. (2015). Knowledge sharing motivation in the public sector: The role of public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 812-832. doi: 10.1177/0020852314558032 URL
[78]	* Cho, Y. J., & Lee, J. W. (2011). Perceived trustworthiness of supervisors, employee satisfaction and cooperation. Public Management Review, 13(7), 941-965. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.589610 URL
[79]	* Christensen, R. K., Nesbit, R., & Stritch, J. M. (2018). The role of employees’ public service motives and organizational commitment in workplace giving campaigns. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(7), 644-658. doi: 10.1177/0275074017701223 URL
[80]	Coursey, D. H., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry's proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547-568.
[81]	Crone, E. A., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Worm, M., Somsen, R. J. M., & van der Molen, M. W. (2004). Switching between spatial stimulus-response mappings: A developmental study of cognitive flexibility. Developmental Science, 7(4), 443-455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00365.x URL pmid: 15484593
[82]	Cuddy, A. J. C., Wolf, E. B., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 622-635. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000027 URL pmid: 26414843
[83]	Dahlke, J. A., & Wiernik, B. M. (2019). Psychmeta: An R package for psychometric meta-analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(5), 415-416. URL pmid: 31235986
[84]	DeHart-Davis, L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S. K. (2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 873-887. doi: 10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-6 URL
[85]	* Desmidt, S., & Prinzie, A. (2019). Establishing a mission- based culture: Analyzing the relation between intra- organizational socialization agents, mission valence, public service motivation, goal clarity and work impact. International Public Management Journal, 22(4), 664-690. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1428253 URL
[86]	Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. URL pmid: 10877304
[87]	* French, P. E., & Emerson, M. C. (2014). Assessing the variations in reward preference for local government employees in terms of position, public service motivation, and public sector motivation. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(4), 552-576.
[88]	* Giauque, D., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., & Varone, F. (2013). HRM practices, intrinsic motivators, and organizational performance in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 42(2), 123-150. doi: 10.1177/0091026013487121 URL
[89]	Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., & Waldner, C. (2011). Putting public service motivation into context: A balance between universalism and particularism. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 227-253. doi: 10.1177/0020852311399232 URL
[90]	* Hansen, J. R., & Kjeldsen, A. M. (2018). Comparing affective commitment in the public and private sectors: A comprehensive test of multiple mediation effects. International Public Management Journal, 21(4), 558-588. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1276033 URL
[91]	Harari, M. B., Herst, D. E. L., Parola, H. R., & Carmona, B. P. (2017). Organizational correlates of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of two decades of empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 68-84. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muw056 URL
[92]	* Hartzler-Weakley, K. (2018). Examining the impact of transformational and transactional leadership style on work attitudes, motivation, and work outcomes in nonprofit organizations. [Order No. 10837902]. James Madison University. Harrisonburg, Virginia.
[93]	Higgins, J., Thompson, S., Deeks, J., & Altman, D. (2002). Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: A critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(1), 51-61. doi: 10.1258/1355819021927674 URL pmid: 11822262
[94]	Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[95]	Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[96]	* Hsieh, C.-W. (2018). No one can serve two masters: Revisiting the interaction effect of love of money and public service motivation on job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(4), 745-767.
[97]	* Hsieh, C.-W., Yang, K., & Fu, K.-J. (2012). Motivational bases and emotional labor: Assessing the impact of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 241-251. doi: 10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-2 URL
[98]	Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta- analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
[99]	* Jin, M. H., McDonald, B. D., Park, J., & Trevor Yu, K. Y. (2019). Making public service motivation count for increasing organizational fit: The role of followership behavior and leader support as a causal mechanism. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 98-115. doi: 10.1177/0020852316684008 URL
[100]	* Johnson, B. J. (2012). Public service motivation and the technical, political, and facilitator roles of city planners. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 30-45. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2011.635454 URL
[101]	* Jung, H.-J., Noh, S.-C., & Kim, I. (2018). Relative deprivation of temporary agency workers in the public sector: The role of public service motivation and the possibility of standard employment. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 410-426. doi: 10.1111/hrmj.v28.3 URL
[102]	* Karolidis, D., & Vouzas, F. (2019). From PSM to helping behavior in the contemporary Greek public sector: The roles of organizational identification and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(6), 1418-1447.
[103]	* Kim, J. (2018). The effects of relative organizational tenure on job behaviors in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 335-355. doi: 10.1177/0091026017753646 URL
[104]	* Kim, S. (2017). National culture and public service motivation: Investigating the relationship using Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1_suppl), 23-40.
[105]	Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., … de Vivo Paola. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79-102. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus027 URL
[106]	* Kim, T., Henderson, A. C., & Eom, T. H. (2015). At the front line: Examining the effects of perceived job significance, employee commitment, and job involvement on public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 713-733. doi: 10.1177/0020852314558028 URL
[107]	* Kjeldsen, A. M., & Andersen, L. B. (2013). How pro- social motivation affects job satisfaction: An international analysis of countries with different welfare state regimes. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(2), 153-176. doi: 10.1111/scps.2013.36.issue-2 URL
[108]	* Kjeldsen, A. M., & Hansen, J. R. (2018). Sector differences in the public service motivation-job satisfaction relationship: Exploring the role of organizational characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(1), 24-48. doi: 10.1177/0734371X16631605 URL
[109]	* Lee, H. J., Oh, H. G., & Park, S. M. (2019). Do trust and culture matter for public service motivation development? Evidence from public sector employees in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 49(2), 290-323. doi: 10.1177/0091026019869738 URL
[110]	* Lee, H.-W. (2019). Moderators of the motivational effects of performance management: A comprehensive exploration based on expectancy theory. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 27-55. doi: 10.1177/0091026018783003 URL
[111]	Leisink, P., & Steijn, B. (2009). Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 35-52. doi: 10.1177/0020852308099505 URL
[112]	Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design iii: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24-25. URL pmid: 16557257
[113]	* Levitats, Z., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2017). Yours emotionally: How emotional intelligence infuses public service motivation and affects the job outcomes of public personnel. Public Administration, 95(3), 759-775. doi: 10.1111/padm.2017.95.issue-3 URL
[114]	* Liu, B. (2009). Evidence of public service motivation of social workers in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 349-366. doi: 10.1177/0020852309104180 URL
[115]	* Liu, B., & Perry, J. L. (2016). The psychological mechanisms of public service motivation: A two-wave examination. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 4-30. doi: 10.1177/0734371X14549672 URL
[116]	* Liu, B., & Tang, T. L.-P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718-727. doi: 10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-5 URL
[117]	* Liu, B., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Motivational bases of commitment to organizational change in the Chinese public sector. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 47(1), 1-8.
[118]	* Liu, B., Hu, W., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2015). From the west to the east: Validating servant leadership in the Chinese public sector. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 25-45. doi: 10.1177/0091026014555995 URL
[119]	* Liu, B., Perry, J. L., Tan, X., & Zhou, X. (2018). A cross-level holistic model of public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 21(5), 703-728. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2017.1370046 URL
[120]	* Liu, B., Tang, N., & Zhu, X. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China: An investigation of generalisability and instrumentality. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684-699. doi: 10.1108/01437720810919297 URL
[121]	* Liu, B., Tang, T. L.-P., & Yang, K. (2015). When does public service motivation fuel the job satisfaction fire? The joint moderation of person-organization fit and needs- supplies fit. Public Management Review, 17(6), 876-900. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.867068 URL
[122]	* Liu, B., Zhang, X., & Lv, X. (2014). Compassion as the affective dimension of public service motivation in a Chinese context. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 245-251. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2014.42.2.245 URL
[123]	* Liu, B., Zhang, X., Du, L., & Hu, Q. (2015). Validating the construct of public service motivation in for-profit organizations: A preliminary study. Public Management Review, 17(2), 262-287. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.798023 URL
[124]	* Luu, T. (2018). Discretionary HR practices and proactive work behaviour: The mediation role of affective commitment and the moderation roles of PSM and abusive supervision. Public Management Review, 20(6), 789-823. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1335342 URL
[125]	* Luu, T. T. (2019). Service-oriented high-performance work systems and service-oriented behaviours in public organizations: The mediating role of work engagement. Public Management Review, 21(6), 789-816. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1526314 URL
[126]	* Meng, F., & Wu, J. (2017). Policy expectation moderates the relationship between merit pay policy effectiveness and public service motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(8), 1305-1318. doi: 10.2224/sbp.4917 URL
[127]	* Miao, Q., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Schwarz, G. (2019). Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 77-85.
[128]	* Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803-832.
[129]	* Neumann, O. (2019). Giving something back to society: A study exploring the role of reciprocity norms in public service motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 159-184. doi: 10.1177/0734371X17698187 URL
[130]	* Nowell, B., Izod, A. M., Ngaruiya, K. M., & Boyd, N. M. (2016). Public service motivation and sense of community responsibility: Comparing two motivational constructs in understanding leadership within community collaboratives. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 26(4), 663-676. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muv048 URL
[131]	Pandey, S., & Stazyk, E. (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp.101-117). Oxford University Press.
[132]	* Park, S. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal: Developing a model of rater motivation. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 387-414. doi: 10.1177/0091026014530675 URL
[133]	* Park, S. M., & Kim, M. Y. (2015). Accountability and public service motivation in Korean government agencies. Public Money & Management, 35(5), 357-364.
[134]	* Park, S. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109-142. doi: 10.1080/10967490801887954 URL
[135]	Parola, H. R., Harari, M. B., Herst, D. E. L., & Prysmakova, P. (2018). Demographic determinants of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of PSM-age and -gender relationships. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1397-1419. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1550108 URL
[136]	Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303 URL
[137]	* Perry, J. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181-197. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024345 URL
[138]	Perry, J. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 10(2), 471-488.
[139]	Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681-690. doi: 10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-5 URL
[140]	Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373. doi: 10.2307/976618 URL
[141]	Pitariu, A. H., & Ployhart, R. E. (2010). Explaining change: Theorizing and testing dynamic mediated longitudinal relationships. Journal of Management, 36(2), 405-429. doi: 10.1177/0149206308331096 URL
[142]	* Potipiroon, W., & Faerman, S. (2016). What difference do ethical leaders make? Exploring the mediating role of interpersonal justice and the moderating role of public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 19(2), 171-207. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1141813 URL
[143]	* Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211-238. doi: 10.1177/0091026017717241 URL
[144]	* Potipiroon, W., Srisuthisa-ard, A., & Faerman, S. (2019). Public service motivation and customer service behaviour: Testing the mediating role of emotional labour and the moderating role of gender. Public Management Review, 21(5), 650-668. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1500629 URL
[145]	* Prysmakova, P. (2016). From compliance to commitment: Centralization and public service motivation in different administrative regimes. International Journal of Manpower, 37(5), 878-899. doi: 10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0253 URL
[146]	* Prysmakova, P. (2019). Understanding relationships between public service motivation and involvement in socio-political organizations: Perspectives of organizational field theory. Public Administration, 97(2), 429-450. doi: 10.1111/padm.2019.97.issue-2 URL
[147]	* Quratulain, S., & Khan, A. K. (2015a). How does employees’ public service motivation get affected? A conditional process analysis of the effects of person-job fit and work pressure. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 266-289. doi: 10.1177/0091026014568461 URL
[148]	* Quratulain, S., & Khan, A. K. (2015b). Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: Testing a model of moderated mediation. Review of Public Personnel Administr ation, 35(4), 307-332.
[149]	* Quratulain, S., Khan, A. K., & Sabharwal, M. (2019). Procedural fairness, public service motives, and employee work outcomes: Evidence from Pakistani public service organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 276-299. doi: 10.1177/0734371X17718029 URL
[150]	Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
[151]	* Ripoll, G., & Ballart, X. (2019). Judging unethical behavior: The different effects of external and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 1-23.
[152]	* Ripoll, G., & Breaugh, J. (2019). At their wits’ end? Economic stress, motivation and unethical judgement of public servants. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1516-1537. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1561929 URL
[153]	* Ritz, A. (2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 53-78. doi: 10.1177/0020852308099506 URL
[154]	Romzek, B. S. (1990). Employee investment and commitment: The ties that bind. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 374-382. doi: 10.2307/976619 URL
[155]	Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta- analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (pp. 1-7). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[156]	* Schwarz, G., Newman, A., Cooper, B., & Eva, N. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025-1041. doi: 10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-4 URL
[157]	* Shim, D. C., & Park, H. H. (2019). Public service motivation in a work group: Role of ethical climate and servant leadership. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 203-225. doi: 10.1177/0091026018806013 URL
[158]	* Shim, D. C., Park, H. H., & Eom, T. H. (2017). Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: Does public service motivation matter? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 563-582. doi: 10.1177/0020852315582137 URL
[159]	* Song, M., Kwon, I., Cha, S., & Min, N. (2017). The effect of public service motivation and job level on bureaucrats’ preferences for direct policy instruments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 36-51. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muw036 URL
[160]	* Stritch, J. M., & Christensen, R. K. (2016). Going green in public organizations: Linking organizational commitment and public service motives to public employees’ workplace eco-initiatives. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 337-355. doi: 10.1177/0275074014552470 URL
[161]	* Sun, R., Peng, S., & Pandey, S. K. (2014). Testing the effect of person-environment fit on employee perceptions of organizational goal ambiguity. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 465-495.
[162]	* Taylor, J. (2007). The impact of public service motives on work outcomes in Australia: A comparative multi- dimensional analysis. Public Administration, 85(4), 931-959. doi: 10.1111/padm.2007.85.issue-4 URL
[163]	* Taylor, J. (2008). Organizational influences, public service motivation and work outcomes: An Australian study. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 67-88. doi: 10.1080/10967490801887921 URL
[164]	* Taylor, J. (2014). Public service motivation, relational job design, and job satisfaction in local government. Public Administration, 92(4), 902-918. doi: 10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-4 URL
[165]	* Taylor, J., & Westover, J. H. (2011). Job satisfaction in the public service: The effects of public service motivation, workplace attributes and work relations. Public Management Review, 13(5), 731-751. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.532959 URL
[166]	* Teo, S. T. T., Pick, D., Xerri, M., & Newton, C. (2016). Person-organization fit and public service motivation in the context of change. Public Management Review, 18(5), 740-762. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1045016 URL
[167]	Trautmann, S. T., van de Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social class and (un)ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487-497. doi: 10.1177/1745691613491272 URL pmid: 26173207
[168]	* Tsai, C.-C., Stritch, J. M., & Christensen, R. K. (2016). Eco- helping and Eco-civic engagement in the public workplace. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(2), 336-360.
[169]	* Tuan (Tuan Luu), L. T. (2018). Behind the influence of job crafting on citizen value co-creation with the public organization: Joint effects of paternalistic leadership and public service motivation. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1533-1561. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1430247 URL
[170]	* Tuan, L. T. (2016). How servant leadership nurtures knowledge sharing: The mediating role of public service motivation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(1), 91-108. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2015-0112 URL
[171]	* Tuan, L. T. (2017). Reform in public organizations: The roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms. Public Management Review, 19(4), 518-541. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1195438 URL
[172]	* Tuan, L. T. (2019). HR flexibility and job crafting in public organizations: The roles of knowledge sharing and public service motivation. Group & Organization Management, 44(3), 549-577.
[173]	* Tuan, L. T., & Thao, V. T. (2018). Charismatic leadership and public service recovery performance. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(1), 108-123.
[174]	* Ugaddan, R. G., & Park, S. M. (2017). Quality of leadership and public service motivation: A social exchange perspective on employee engagement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(3), 270-285. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2016-0133 URL
[175]	* van Loon, N. M. (2017). Does context matter for the type of performance-related behavior of public service motivated employees? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(4), 405-429. doi: 10.1177/0734371X15591036 URL
[176]	* van Loon, N. M., Vandenabeele, W., & Leisink, P. (2017). Clarifying the relationship between public service motivation and in-role and extra-role behaviors: The relative contributions of person-job and person-organization fit. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 699-713. doi: 10.1177/0275074015617547 URL
[177]	Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556. doi: 10.1080/14719030701726697 URL
[178]	* Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11-34. doi: 10.1177/0020852308099504 URL
[179]	* Vandenabeele, W. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153-173. doi: 10.1177/0734371X14521458 URL
[180]	Vandenabeele, W., Brewer, G. A., & Ritz, A. (2014). Past, present, and future of public service motivation research. Public Administration, 92(4), 779-789. doi: 10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-4 URL
[181]	* Vogel, R., Homberg, F., & Gericke, A. (2016). Abusive supervision, public service motivation, and employee deviance: The moderating role of employment sector. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 4(3), 214-231. doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-08-2015-0034 URL
[182]	* Walton, M. A., Clerkin, R. M., Christensen, R. K., Paarlberg, L. E., Nesbit, R., & Tschirhart, M. (2017). Means, motive and opportunity: Exploring board volunteering. Personnel Review, 46(1), 115-135. doi: 10.1108/PR-01-2015-0012 URL
[183]	* Wang, W., & Seifert, R. (2020). BAME staff and public service motivation: The mediating role of perceived fairness in English local government. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 653-664. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3953-8 URL
[184]	Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108-130. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6 URL
[185]	Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (2010). Gender. In S. T.Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed. pp.629-667). Wiley.
[186]	* Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Isett, K. R. (2013). Motivated to adapt? The role of public service motivation as employees face organizational change. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 738-747. doi: 10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-5 URL
[187]	Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Pandey, S. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197-223. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2013.817242 URL
[188]	* Wright, B. E., Hassan, S., & Christensen, R. K. (2017). Job choice and performance: Revisiting core assumptions about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(1), 108-131. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2015.1088493 URL
[189]	* Zheng, Y., Wu, C.-H., & Graham, L. (2019). Work-to-non- work spillover: The impact of public service motivation and meaningfulness on outcomes in work and personal life domains. Public Management Review, 22(4), 578-601. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1601242 URL
[190]	* Zhu, C., & Wu, C. (2016). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Chinese provincial governments. Chinese Management Studies, 10(4), 770-786. doi: 10.1108/CMS-08-2016-0168 URL

检验	性别	年龄	教育程度	组织任期	职位等级	收入	工作任期	婚姻状况
Egger's回归系数检验
intercept	-1.22	1.07	1.09	1.72	-3.51	-2.38	1.25	0.47
p	0.013	0.032	0.071	0.000	0.001	0.065	0.286	0.775
Begg秩相关检验
Z	-0.86	0.461	0.02	-1.02	-1.78	-0.19	-0.45	0.39
p	0.389	0.645	0.981	0.307	0.074	0.843	0.656	0.697

检验	性别	年龄	教育程度	组织任期	职位等级	收入	工作任期	婚姻状况
Egger's回归系数检验
intercept	-1.22	1.07	1.09	1.72	-3.51	-2.38	1.25	0.47
p	0.013	0.032	0.071	0.000	0.001	0.065	0.286	0.775
Begg秩相关检验
Z	-0.86	0.461	0.02	-1.02	-1.78	-0.19	-0.45	0.39
p	0.389	0.645	0.981	0.307	0.074	0.843	0.656	0.697

人口统计学特征变量	公共服务动机	k	N	r	ρ	SD	95% CI		80% CV		Q	I²
人口统计学特征变量	公共服务动机	k	N	r	ρ	SD	LL	UL	LL	UL	Q	I²
性别	PSM	125	266890	0.02	0.02	0.09	0.00	0.03	-0.1	0.13	2229.00***	94.44
	APM	27	64920	-0.06	-0.07	0.09	-0.10	-0.03	-0.18	0.05	538.06***	95.17
	CPI	25	68077	-0.01	-0.02	0.08	-0.05	0.02	-0.12	0.09	431.66***	94.44
	COM	28	57043	0.05	0.06	0.09	0.03	0.10	-0.05	0.18	461.17***	94.15
	SS	27	33032	-0.06	-0.06	0.06	-0.09	-0.04	-0.13	0.00	98.63***	73.64
年龄	PSM	109	215634	0.07	0.07	0.10	0.06	0.09	-0.05	0.20	1992.96***	94.58
	APM	30	67151	0.06	0.07	0.09	0.03	0.10	-0.05	0.18	559.88***	94.82
	CPI	26	66149	0.10	0.11	0.10	0.07	0.15	-0.02	0.25	699.53***	96.43
	COM	29	55115	0.10	0.11	0.10	0.07	0.15	-0.02	0.24	554.65***	94.95
	SS	29	31757	0.11	0.13	0.13	0.08	0.18	-0.04	0.30	570.77***	95.09
教育程度	PSM	92	293842	0.03	0.04	0.09	0.02	0.06	-0.07	0.15	2214.68***	95.89
	APM	20	42604	0.19	0.20	0.12	0.15	0.26	0.04	0.37	668.58***	97.16
	CPI	15	41657	0.11	0.12	0.09	0.07	0.17	0.00	0.24	341.91***	95.91
	COM	20	44050	0.05	0.06	0.10	0.01	0.10	-0.07	0.18	395.34***	95.19
	SS	20	20594	0.00	0.00	0.10	-0.04	0.05	-0.13	0.13	205.50***	90.75
婚姻状况	PSM	11	9824	0.04	0.04	0.08	-0.02	0.10	-0.07	0.15	64.10***	84.40
	APM	1	912	0.14	0.15	-	0.09	0.21	-	-	-	-
	CPI	1	912	0.44	0.48	-	0.43	0.53	-	-	-	-
	COM	1	912	0.32	0.35	-	0.29	0.41	-	-	-	-
	SS	1	912	0.43	0.47	-	0.42	0.52	-	-	-	-
组织任期	PSM	86	167955	0.02	0.02	0.08	0.00	0.04	-0.08	0.13	1145.03***	92.58
	APM	19	49723	0.00	0.00	0.06	-0.03	0.02	-0.08	0.07	156.92***	88.53
	CPI	18	49067	0.04	0.04	0.11	-0.01	0.10	-0.11	0.19	603.03***	97.18
	COM	18	36245	0.04	0.04	0.09	0.00	0.09	-0.07	0.15	256.22***	93.36
	SS	17	12696	0.15	0.17	0.16	0.08	0.25	-0.04	0.37	306.61***	94.78
工作任期	PSM	15	48822	0.04	0.04	0.06	0.01	0.07	-0.03	0.11	151.08***	90.73
	APM	3	4133	-0.02	-0.03	0.03	-0.09	0.03	-0.03	-0.03	1.79	-
	CPI	3	4133	0.08	0.09	0.04	-0.01	0.19	0.03	0.15	4.49	-
	COM	3	4133	0.05	0.06	0.08	-0.14	0.25	-0.08	0.20	17.23***	-
	SS	3	4133	0.08	0.09	0.01	0.07	0.12	0.09	0.09	0.26	-
职位等级	PSM	30	31515	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.10	0.18	0.00	0.29	404.73***	92.83
	APM	12	18082	0.12	0.13	0.09	0.08	0.19	0.02	0.25	139.83***	92.13
	CPI	12	18082	0.13	0.15	0.08	0.10	0.20	0.04	0.26	124.66***	91.18
	COM	12	19528	0.05	0.06	0.12	-0.02	0.13	-0.11	0.22	266.34***	95.87
	SS	13	19760	0.07	0.08	0.11	0.01	0.15	-0.07	0.23	242.72***	95.06
收入	PSM	24	43960	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.09	0.18	0.00	0.28	506.45***	95.46
	APM	10	29392	0.21	0.22	0.13	0.13	0.31	0.05	0.40	481.07***	98.13
	CPI	10	29392	0.11	0.13	0.08	0.07	0.19	0.02	0.24	177.85***	94.94
	COM	9	15860	0.05	0.06	0.14	-0.05	0.17	-0.13	0.26	290.83***	97.25
	SS	9	15860	0.05	0.05	0.12	-0.04	0.15	-0.11	0.22	212.43***	96.23

人口统计学特征变量	公共服务动机	k	N	r	ρ	SD	95% CI		80% CV		Q	I²
人口统计学特征变量	公共服务动机	k	N	r	ρ	SD	LL	UL	LL	UL	Q	I²
性别	PSM	125	266890	0.02	0.02	0.09	0.00	0.03	-0.1	0.13	2229.00***	94.44
	APM	27	64920	-0.06	-0.07	0.09	-0.10	-0.03	-0.18	0.05	538.06***	95.17
	CPI	25	68077	-0.01	-0.02	0.08	-0.05	0.02	-0.12	0.09	431.66***	94.44
	COM	28	57043	0.05	0.06	0.09	0.03	0.10	-0.05	0.18	461.17***	94.15
	SS	27	33032	-0.06	-0.06	0.06	-0.09	-0.04	-0.13	0.00	98.63***	73.64
年龄	PSM	109	215634	0.07	0.07	0.10	0.06	0.09	-0.05	0.20	1992.96***	94.58
	APM	30	67151	0.06	0.07	0.09	0.03	0.10	-0.05	0.18	559.88***	94.82
	CPI	26	66149	0.10	0.11	0.10	0.07	0.15	-0.02	0.25	699.53***	96.43
	COM	29	55115	0.10	0.11	0.10	0.07	0.15	-0.02	0.24	554.65***	94.95
	SS	29	31757	0.11	0.13	0.13	0.08	0.18	-0.04	0.30	570.77***	95.09
教育程度	PSM	92	293842	0.03	0.04	0.09	0.02	0.06	-0.07	0.15	2214.68***	95.89
	APM	20	42604	0.19	0.20	0.12	0.15	0.26	0.04	0.37	668.58***	97.16
	CPI	15	41657	0.11	0.12	0.09	0.07	0.17	0.00	0.24	341.91***	95.91
	COM	20	44050	0.05	0.06	0.10	0.01	0.10	-0.07	0.18	395.34***	95.19
	SS	20	20594	0.00	0.00	0.10	-0.04	0.05	-0.13	0.13	205.50***	90.75
婚姻状况	PSM	11	9824	0.04	0.04	0.08	-0.02	0.10	-0.07	0.15	64.10***	84.40
	APM	1	912	0.14	0.15	-	0.09	0.21	-	-	-	-
	CPI	1	912	0.44	0.48	-	0.43	0.53	-	-	-	-
	COM	1	912	0.32	0.35	-	0.29	0.41	-	-	-	-
	SS	1	912	0.43	0.47	-	0.42	0.52	-	-	-	-
组织任期	PSM	86	167955	0.02	0.02	0.08	0.00	0.04	-0.08	0.13	1145.03***	92.58
	APM	19	49723	0.00	0.00	0.06	-0.03	0.02	-0.08	0.07	156.92***	88.53
	CPI	18	49067	0.04	0.04	0.11	-0.01	0.10	-0.11	0.19	603.03***	97.18
	COM	18	36245	0.04	0.04	0.09	0.00	0.09	-0.07	0.15	256.22***	93.36
	SS	17	12696	0.15	0.17	0.16	0.08	0.25	-0.04	0.37	306.61***	94.78
工作任期	PSM	15	48822	0.04	0.04	0.06	0.01	0.07	-0.03	0.11	151.08***	90.73
	APM	3	4133	-0.02	-0.03	0.03	-0.09	0.03	-0.03	-0.03	1.79	-
	CPI	3	4133	0.08	0.09	0.04	-0.01	0.19	0.03	0.15	4.49	-
	COM	3	4133	0.05	0.06	0.08	-0.14	0.25	-0.08	0.20	17.23***	-
	SS	3	4133	0.08	0.09	0.01	0.07	0.12	0.09	0.09	0.26	-
职位等级	PSM	30	31515	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.10	0.18	0.00	0.29	404.73***	92.83
	APM	12	18082	0.12	0.13	0.09	0.08	0.19	0.02	0.25	139.83***	92.13
	CPI	12	18082	0.13	0.15	0.08	0.10	0.20	0.04	0.26	124.66***	91.18
	COM	12	19528	0.05	0.06	0.12	-0.02	0.13	-0.11	0.22	266.34***	95.87
	SS	13	19760	0.07	0.08	0.11	0.01	0.15	-0.07	0.23	242.72***	95.06
收入	PSM	24	43960	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.09	0.18	0.00	0.28	506.45***	95.46
	APM	10	29392	0.21	0.22	0.13	0.13	0.31	0.05	0.40	481.07***	98.13
	CPI	10	29392	0.11	0.13	0.08	0.07	0.19	0.02	0.24	177.85***	94.94
	COM	9	15860	0.05	0.06	0.14	-0.05	0.17	-0.13	0.26	290.83***	97.25
	SS	9	15860	0.05	0.05	0.12	-0.04	0.15	-0.11	0.22	212.43***	96.23

自变量	测量工具	k	N	r	SD	95% CI		80% CV		Q_w	I²	Q_b
自变量	测量工具	k	N	r	SD	LL	UL	LL	UL	Q_w	I²	Q_b
性别	四维	89	80519	-0.04	0.09	-0.06	-0.02	-0.15	0.07	671.44***	86.89	42.54***
性别	other	22	52026	0.00	0.06	-0.03	0.03	-0.07	0.07	164.99***	87.27	42.54***
年龄	四维	80	69313	0.13	0.11	0.10	0.15	-0.01	0.26	876.96***	90.99	174.23***
年龄	other	18	49847	0.05	0.05	0.02	0.07	-0.01	0.11	120.26***	85.86	174.23***
教育程度	四维	70	60652	0.09	0.10	0.07	0.12	-0.02	0.21	557.63***	87.63	33.34***
教育程度	other	10	38293	0.13	0.07	0.08	0.18	0.04	0.22	160.87***	94.41	33.34***
组织任期	四维	66	54063	0.07	0.10	0.05	0.10	-0.04	0.19	504.87***	87.13	93.04***
组织任期	other	16	41124	0.01	0.06	-0.02	0.05	-0.07	0.09	151.16***	90.08	93.04***