Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 1302-1314.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.01302
• Meta-Analysis • Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Tian, WANG Yu, GONG Fangying, SHI Ke, LI Xi, LIU Wei(), CHEN Ning()
Received:
2023-04-13
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-06-05
CLC Number:
TANG Tian, WANG Yu, GONG Fangying, SHI Ke, LI Xi, LIU Wei, CHEN Ning. The relationship between parenting styles and positive development of Chinese adolescents : A series of meta-analytic studies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(8): 1302-1314.
预测变量 | 结果变量 | k | N | r | 95% CI | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 (情感温暖、理解) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28807 | 0.21*** | 0.17, 0.26 | 9.23 |
自尊 | 97 | 51274 | 0.31*** | 0.28, 0.33 | 26.43 | |
复原力 | 53 | 26960 | 0.41*** | 0.37, 0.44 | 19.67 | |
M1 (情感温暖、理解) | 学业成就 | 57 | 27984 | 0.22*** | 0.18, 0.25 | 11.71 |
自尊 | 94 | 50597 | 0.31*** | 0.29, 0.33 | 26.93 | |
复原力 | 51 | 25895 | 0.41*** | 0.38, 0.44 | 22.09 |
预测变量 | 结果变量 | k | N | r | 95% CI | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 (情感温暖、理解) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28807 | 0.21*** | 0.17, 0.26 | 9.23 |
自尊 | 97 | 51274 | 0.31*** | 0.28, 0.33 | 26.43 | |
复原力 | 53 | 26960 | 0.41*** | 0.37, 0.44 | 19.67 | |
M1 (情感温暖、理解) | 学业成就 | 57 | 27984 | 0.22*** | 0.18, 0.25 | 11.71 |
自尊 | 94 | 50597 | 0.31*** | 0.29, 0.33 | 26.93 | |
复原力 | 51 | 25895 | 0.41*** | 0.38, 0.44 | 22.09 |
预测变量 | 结果变量 | k | N | r | 95% CI | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 (惩罚、严厉) | 学业成就 | 43 | 22598 | −0.12*** | −0.17, −0.07 | −4.63 |
自尊 | 75 | 27327 | 0.05 | −0.01, 0.11 | 1.55 | |
复原力 | 34 | 15855 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −12.15 | |
F3 (拒绝、否认) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28555 | −0.13*** | −0.27, −0.10 | −9.10 |
自尊 | 94 | 50951 | −0.19*** | −0.22, −0.16 | −11.64 | |
复原力 | 53 | 26775 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −12.09 | |
F4 (过分、干涉) | 学业成就 | 42 | 22346 | −0.04 | −0.08, 0.01 | −1.63 |
自尊 | 67 | 26141 | −0.08*** | −0.13, −0.03 | −3.29 | |
复原力 | 30 | 14698 | −0.08** | −0.13, −0.03 | −3.24 | |
F5 (过度保护) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28162 | −0.08*** | −0.12, −0.04 | −3.90 |
自尊 | 93 | 50164 | −0.11*** | −0.13, −0.09 | −9.89 | |
复原力 | 50 | 25929 | −0.09*** | −0.13, −0.04 | −3.82 | |
M2 (惩罚、严厉) | 学业成就 | 44 | 21544 | −0.12*** | −0.15, −0.09 | −6.85 |
自尊 | 70 | 27331 | −0.20*** | −0.22, −0.17 | −15.66 | |
复原力 | 31 | 14790 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −10.11 | |
M4 (拒绝、否认) | 学业成就 | 56 | 27753 | −0.13*** | −0.16, −0.10 | −8.06 |
自尊 | 93 | 50996 | −0.22*** | −0.24, −0.18 | −17.69 | |
复原力 | 50 | 25584 | −0.23*** | −0.28, −0.19 | −9.54 | |
M5 (过分干涉、保护) | 学业成就 | 53 | 27121 | −0.05** | −0.08, −0.02 | −2.83 |
自尊 | 90 | 49473 | −0.10*** | −0.12, −0.08 | −9.17 | |
复原力 | 48 | 24864 | −0.09*** | −0.14, −0.04 | −3.76 |
预测变量 | 结果变量 | k | N | r | 95% CI | Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 (惩罚、严厉) | 学业成就 | 43 | 22598 | −0.12*** | −0.17, −0.07 | −4.63 |
自尊 | 75 | 27327 | 0.05 | −0.01, 0.11 | 1.55 | |
复原力 | 34 | 15855 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −12.15 | |
F3 (拒绝、否认) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28555 | −0.13*** | −0.27, −0.10 | −9.10 |
自尊 | 94 | 50951 | −0.19*** | −0.22, −0.16 | −11.64 | |
复原力 | 53 | 26775 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −12.09 | |
F4 (过分、干涉) | 学业成就 | 42 | 22346 | −0.04 | −0.08, 0.01 | −1.63 |
自尊 | 67 | 26141 | −0.08*** | −0.13, −0.03 | −3.29 | |
复原力 | 30 | 14698 | −0.08** | −0.13, −0.03 | −3.24 | |
F5 (过度保护) | 学业成就 | 54 | 28162 | −0.08*** | −0.12, −0.04 | −3.90 |
自尊 | 93 | 50164 | −0.11*** | −0.13, −0.09 | −9.89 | |
复原力 | 50 | 25929 | −0.09*** | −0.13, −0.04 | −3.82 | |
M2 (惩罚、严厉) | 学业成就 | 44 | 21544 | −0.12*** | −0.15, −0.09 | −6.85 |
自尊 | 70 | 27331 | −0.20*** | −0.22, −0.17 | −15.66 | |
复原力 | 31 | 14790 | −0.23*** | −0.27, −0.19 | −10.11 | |
M4 (拒绝、否认) | 学业成就 | 56 | 27753 | −0.13*** | −0.16, −0.10 | −8.06 |
自尊 | 93 | 50996 | −0.22*** | −0.24, −0.18 | −17.69 | |
复原力 | 50 | 25584 | −0.23*** | −0.28, −0.19 | −9.54 | |
M5 (过分干涉、保护) | 学业成就 | 53 | 27121 | −0.05** | −0.08, −0.02 | −2.83 |
自尊 | 90 | 49473 | −0.10*** | −0.12, −0.08 | −9.17 | |
复原力 | 48 | 24864 | −0.09*** | −0.14, −0.04 | −3.76 |
结果 变量 | 预测 变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | r | 95% CI | 双侧检验 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qb | df | p | lower | upper | z | p | |||||
学业 成就 | F1 | 169.47 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 23 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 27.50 | <0.001 |
高中 | 12 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 14.55 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 19.11 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 110.36 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 23 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 23.32 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 11 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 14.23 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 19.17 | <0.001 | |||||
自尊 | F1 | 99.29 | 5 | <0.001 | 初中 | 18 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 33.83 | <0.001 |
高中 | 12 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 16.01 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 29 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 41.64 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 44.19 | 5 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 32.62 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 11 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 21.44 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 28 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 43.12 | <0.001 | |||||
复原力 | F1 | 115.485 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 57.17 | <0.001 |
高中 | 6 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 16.82 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 17 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 31.22 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 92.98 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 56.33 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 5 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 19.09 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 17 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 31.65 | <0.001 |
结果 变量 | 预测 变量 | 异质性检验 | 类别 | k | r | 95% CI | 双侧检验 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qb | df | p | lower | upper | z | p | |||||
学业 成就 | F1 | 169.47 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 23 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 27.50 | <0.001 |
高中 | 12 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 14.55 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 19.11 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 110.36 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 23 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 23.32 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 11 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 14.23 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 19.17 | <0.001 | |||||
自尊 | F1 | 99.29 | 5 | <0.001 | 初中 | 18 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 33.83 | <0.001 |
高中 | 12 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 16.01 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 29 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 41.64 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 44.19 | 5 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 32.62 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 11 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 21.44 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 28 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 43.12 | <0.001 | |||||
复原力 | F1 | 115.485 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 57.17 | <0.001 |
高中 | 6 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 16.82 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 17 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 31.22 | <0.001 | |||||
M1 | 92.98 | 4 | <0.001 | 初中 | 19 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 56.33 | <0.001 | |
高中 | 5 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 19.09 | <0.001 | |||||
本科 | 17 | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 31.65 | <0.001 |
预测变量 | 结果变量 | r | 95% CI | 异质性检验结果 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lower | upper | Q | df | p | I2 | |||
PPS | 学业成就 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 2029.06 | 106 | <0.001 | 94.80 |
自尊 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 1248 | 190 | <0.001 | 84.80 | |
复原力 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 1103.73 | 103 | <0.001 | 90.70 | |
NPS | 学业成就 | −0.10 | −0.11 | −0.08 | 3094.38 | 345 | <0.001 | 88.90 |
自尊 | −0.16 | −0.17 | −0.15 | 5109.57 | 576 | <0.001 | 88.70 | |
复原力 | −0.17 | −0.19 | −0.15 | 3881.78 | 296 | <0.001 | 92.40 | |
PPS | 青少年积极发展 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 1257.60 | 5 | <0.001 | 99.60 |
NPS | 青少年积极发展 | −0.13 | −0.11 | −0.16 | 2556.28 | 20 | <0.001 | 99.20 |
预测变量 | 结果变量 | r | 95% CI | 异质性检验结果 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lower | upper | Q | df | p | I2 | |||
PPS | 学业成就 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 2029.06 | 106 | <0.001 | 94.80 |
自尊 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 1248 | 190 | <0.001 | 84.80 | |
复原力 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 1103.73 | 103 | <0.001 | 90.70 | |
NPS | 学业成就 | −0.10 | −0.11 | −0.08 | 3094.38 | 345 | <0.001 | 88.90 |
自尊 | −0.16 | −0.17 | −0.15 | 5109.57 | 576 | <0.001 | 88.70 | |
复原力 | −0.17 | −0.19 | −0.15 | 3881.78 | 296 | <0.001 | 92.40 | |
PPS | 青少年积极发展 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 1257.60 | 5 | <0.001 | 99.60 |
NPS | 青少年积极发展 | −0.13 | −0.11 | −0.16 | 2556.28 | 20 | <0.001 | 99.20 |
[1] | 边玉芳, 梁丽婵, 张颖. (2016). 充分重视家庭对儿童心理发展的重要作用. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 46-54. |
[2] | 蔡雪斌, 桂守才, 唐易齐, 张硕, 许明星. (2022). 父母教养方式对青少年心理复原力的影响:自我控制与调节聚焦的链式中介. 心理发展与教育, 38(4), 505-512. |
[3] | 曾练平, 葛文静, 姚良莎, 陈思洁, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. (2020). 青少年积极/消极情感与学校适应: 亲子亲合调节作用的性别差异. 中国特殊教育, (10), 83-89. |
[4] | 陈陈. (2002). 家庭教养方式研究进程透视. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (6), 95-103+109. |
[5] | 陈颖娇, 彭先桃, 周晓芸, 付雅琦. (2019). 正念教养对幼儿害羞和社交淡漠的影响: 亲子关系的中介作用. 学前教育研究, (5), 72-80. |
[6] |
丁凤琴, 赵虎英. (2018). 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?——一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 26(10), 1749-1764.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01749 |
[7] | 甘秀英, 阳作香, 李会霞, 幸维莉, 伍清文. (2018). 高中生积极心理品质与主观幸福感的关系研究. 中国特殊教育, (7), 92-96. |
[8] | 高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. (2023). 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析. 心理发展与教育, 39(1), 97-108. |
[9] | 侯日霞, 段熙明, 吉峰. (2011). 大学生的学习动机与父母教养方式的研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 19(1), 106-107. |
[10] | 胡月琴, 甘怡群. (2008). 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证. 心理学报, 40(8), 902-912. |
[11] | 黄超. (2018). 家长教养方式的阶层差异及其对子女非认知能力的影响. 社会, 38(6), 216-240. |
[12] | 黄泽文, 叶宝娟, 杨强, 徐璐. (2020). 社会情绪能力对青少年生活满意度的影响: 一个链式中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(3), 615-618. |
[13] | 贾高鼎, 曾明, 王爱平, 杨子京. (2016). 父母教养方式对儿童自尊的独特贡献: 儿童气质的调节. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 535-539+543. |
[14] | 蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99. |
[15] | 雷浩, 刘衍玲, 田澜. (2012). 家庭环境、班级环境与高中生学业成绩的关系: 学业勤奋度的中介作用. 上海教育科研, (4), 17-20. |
[16] | 雷丽丽, 冉光明, 张琪, 米倩文, 陈旭. (2020). 父母教养方式与幼儿焦虑关系的三水平元分析. 心理发展与教育, 36(3), 329-340. |
[17] |
李世峰, 吴艺玲, 张福民, 许琼英, 周爱保. (2020). 自我肯定缓冲新冠疫情引发的焦虑反应: 一项随机对照研究. 心理学报, 52(7), 886-894.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00886 |
[18] | 李永鑫, 骆鹏程, 谭亚梅. (2008). 农村留守儿童心理弹性研究. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 13-18. |
[19] | 林丹华, 柴晓运, 李晓燕, 刘艳, 翁欢欢. (2017). 中国文化背景下积极青少年发展的结构与内涵——基于访谈的质性研究. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 14-22. |
[20] | 刘丹霓, 李董平. (2017). 父母教养方式与青少年网络成瘾:自我弹性的中介和调节作用检验. 心理科学, 40(6), 1385-1391. |
[21] | 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. (2023). 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系. 心理发展与教育, 39(5), 673-682. |
[22] | 刘文, 张靖宇, 于增艳, 高爽. (2018). 焦虑、抑郁与消极认知情绪调节策略关系的元分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(5), 938-943. |
[23] | 王芬芬, 张榆敏, 王霞. (2018). 父母教养方式与青少年心理健康关系的元分析. 青少年学刊, (3), 38-43+55. |
[24] | 王雁飞, 李云健, 黄悦新. (2011). 大学生心理资本、成就目标定向与学业成就关系研究. 高教探索, (6), 128-136+148. |
[25] | 魏运华. (1999). 父母教养方式对少年儿童自尊发展影响的研究. 心理发展与教育, (3), 7-11. |
[26] | 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵,... 迟新丽. (2024). 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用. 心理发展与教育, 40 (2), 257-269. |
[27] | 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. (2022). 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析. 心理发展与教育, 38(3), 366-379. |
[28] | 徐寒冬, 尹丽娟. (2019). 父母教养方式与大学生自尊关系的元分析. 教育现代化, 6(71), 221-225. |
[29] | 杨烨. (2008). 自我价值感二维模型的理论架构与实证研究 (博士学位论文). 北京大学. |
[30] | 阳毅. (2005). 大学生复原力量表的编制与应用 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉. |
[31] | 叶枝, 赵国祥, 务凯, 刘霞. (2017). 积极青少年发展类型特点及其与学校适应的关系——基于潜在剖面分析的实证研究. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 23-31. |
[32] | 易芳, 郭雅洁, 俞宗火, 徐霜雪. (2017). 中小学生学业成绩主要影响因素的元分析. 心理学探新, 37(2), 140-148. |
[33] | 于肖楠, 张建新. (2007). 自我韧性量表与Connor- Davidson韧性量表的应用比较. 心理科学, 30(5), 1169-1171. |
[34] | 袁梅芳. (2018). 家庭教养方式对幼儿品格形成的影响及误区分析. 当代教育实践与教学研究, (9), 240-241. |
[35] | 岳冬梅. (1993). 父母教育方式: EMBU的初步修订及其在神经症患者的应用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 7(3), 97-101+ 143. |
[36] | 约翰·哈蒂. (2015). 可见的学习: 最大程度地促进学习(教师版). (金莺莲, 洪超, 裴新宇, 译.). 教育科学出版社. (Original work published 2009) |
[37] | 张建人, 彭松黎, 凌辉, 刘佳怡, 甘义, 林红,... 申改华. (2019). 抑郁型人格障碍早期危险因素调查. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(5), 923-927. |
[38] | 张录全, 肖建伟. (2015). 大学新生心理健康水平调查. 心理与行为研究, 13(1), 70-75. |
[39] |
张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系: 基于中国学生群体的元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(6), 1005-1018.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01005 |
[40] | 朱美静, 刘精明. (2019). 教养方式对儿童学业能力的影响. 社会发展研究, 6(2), 43-62+243. |
[41] | Aremu, T. A., John-Akinola, Y. O., & Desmennu, A. T. (2019). Relationship between parenting styles and adolescents’ self-esteem. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 39(2), 91-99. |
[42] | Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M.,... van der Ende, J. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613-628. |
[43] |
Blake, J. (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18(4), 421-442.
pmid: 7308532 |
[44] | Card, N. A. (2015). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. Guilford Publications. |
[45] | Chen, X., Yuan, H., Zheng, T., Chang, Y., & Luo, Y. (2018). Females are more sensitive to opponent’s emotional feedback: Evidence from event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 275. |
[46] | Cruz, O., Barbosa-Ducharne, M., & Canário, C. (2020). Do adolescents’ perceptions of mothers’ and fathers’ parenting behaviors predict academic achievement and social skills?. Child Indicators Research, 13(1), 237-254. |
[47] | Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496. |
[48] | Ding, X., Zheng, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, N., Duan, H., & Wu, J. (2023). Parenting styles and psychological resilience: The mediating role of error monitoring. Biological Psychology, 108587. |
[49] | Doepke, M., & Zilibotti, F. (2017). Parenting with style: Altruism and paternalism in intergenerational preference transmission. Econometrica, 85(5), 1331-1371. |
[50] | Ebrahimi, L., Amiri, M., Mohamadlou, M., & Rezapur, R. (2017). Attachment styles, parenting styles, and depression. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(5), 1064-1068. |
[51] | Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629-634. |
[52] | Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. International Universities Press. |
[53] | Garcia, O. F., Fuentes, M. C., Gracia, E., Serra, E., & Garcia, F. (2020). Parenting warmth and strictness across three generations: Parenting styles and psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7487. |
[54] | Gralewski, J., & Jankowska, D. M. (2020). Do parenting styles matter? Perceived dimensions of parenting styles, creative abilities and creative self-beliefs in adolescents. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100709. |
[55] | Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557-560. |
[56] | Kozina, A., Wiium, N., Gonzalez, J. M., & Dimitrova, R. (2019). Positive youth development and academic achievement in Slovenia. Child & Youth Care Forum, 48(2), 223-240. |
[57] | Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. Springer US. |
[58] | Lerner, R. M., Agans, J. P., DeSouza, L. M., & Gasca, S. (2013). Describing, explaining, and optimizing within- individual change across the life span: A relational developmental systems perspective. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 179-183. |
[59] | Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S.,... von Eye, A. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), 17-71. |
[60] | Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Geldhof, G. J., Gestsdóttir, S., King, P. E., Sim, A. T., & Dowling, E. (2018). Studying positive youth development. In J. E. Lansford, & P. Banati (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Development Research and its Impact on Global Policy (pp.68-82). Oxford University Press. |
[61] | Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., P. Bowers, E., & John Geldhof, G. (2015). Positive youth development and relational- developmental-systems. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 2, 1-45. |
[62] | Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., & Lewin-Bi-zan, S. (2009). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 567-570. |
[63] | Lіght, R. J., & Ріllеmеr, D. В. (1984). Ѕummіng uр: Тhе science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press. |
[64] | Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). The way in which intervention studies have “personality” and why it is important to meta-analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 24(3), 236-254. |
[65] | Lorence, B., Hidalgo, V., Pérez-Padilla, J., & Menéndez, S. (2019). The role of parenting styles on behavior problem profiles of adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2767. |
[66] | Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). Research on resilience: Response to commentaries. Child Development, 71(3), 573-575. |
[67] | Mackova, J., Dankulincova Veselska, Z., Filakovska Bobakova, D., Madarasova Geckova, A., van Dijk, J. P., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2019). Crisis in the family and positive youth development: The role of family functioning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1678. |
[68] |
Mandleco, B. L., & Peery, J. C. (2000). An organizational framework for conceptualizing resilience in children. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 13(3), 99-112.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2000.tb00086.x pmid: 11111503 |
[69] | Masud, H., Thurasamy, R., & Ahmad, M. S. (2015). Parenting styles and academic achievement of young adolescents: A systematic literature review. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 49(6), 2411-2433. |
[70] | Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M.,... Group, P. -P. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-9. |
[71] | Mordeno, I. G., Gallemit, I. M. J. S., Lantud, S. S. B., & Hall, B. J. (2019). Personal psychological resources mediate parent-child relationship and mental health among left- behind children. Psychology Journal, 8(3), 318-329. |
[72] |
Napolitano, C. M., Bowers, E. P., Gestsdottir, S., Depping, M. K., von Eye, A., Chase, P. A., & Lerner, J. V. (2011). The role of parenting and goal selection in positive youth development: A person-centered approach. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), 1137-1149.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.008 pmid: 22118507 |
[73] | Perez-Gramaje, A. F., Garcia, O. F., Reyes, M., Serra, E., & Garcia, F. (2019). Parenting styles and aggressive adolescents: Relationships with self-esteem and personal maladjustment. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12(1), 1-10. |
[74] |
Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindström, H., von Knorring, L., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61(4), 265-274.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb00581.x pmid: 7446184 |
[75] |
Phelps, E., Balsano, A. B., Fay, K., Peltz, J. S., Zimmerman, S. M., Lerner, R. M., & Lerner, J. V. (2007). Nuances in early adolescent developmental trajectories of positive and problematic/risk behaviors: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16(2), 473-496.
pmid: 17349519 |
[76] | Rosenberg, M. (2015). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press. |
[77] | Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research, Rev ed. Sage Publications, Inc. |
[78] | Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Hayes, T. L. (2009). Fixed-versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62(1), 97-128. |
[79] | Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 5-14. |
[80] | Song, H., Zmyslinski-Seelig, A., Kim, J., Drent, A., Victor, A., Omori, K., & Allen, M. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely?: A meta analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446-452. |
[81] | Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second- order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. |
[82] |
Stevenson, C. W., Halliday, D. M., Marsden, C. A., & Mason, R. (2008). Early life programming of hemispheric lateralization and synchronization in the adult medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience, 155(3), 852-863.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.013 pmid: 18634856 |
[83] |
Tu, M., Guo, Y., Zhang, X., & Yu, Q. (2021). More similar to my father, better academic performance I will have: The role of caring parenting style. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1379-1388.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S314238 pmid: 34512048 |
[84] | Weinberger, N., & Stein, K. (2008). Early competitive game playing in same-and mixed-gender peer groups. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 54(4), 499-514. |
[85] | Wu, Q., Lu, D., & Kang, M. (2015). Social capital and the mental health of children in rural China with different experiences of parental migration. Social Science & Medicine, 132, 270-277. |
[86] | Zimmerman, M. A. (2013). Resiliency theory: A strengths- based approach to research and practice for adolescent health. Health Education & Behavior, 40(4), 381-383. |
[1] | SU Tao, ZENG Haowen, ZHONG Xiaolin, MA Wencong, CHEN Xiude. Woe-fortune interdependence: A meta-analysis of the two-sided effect of narcissistic leadership on subordinate effectiveness [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(9): 1463-1487. |
[2] | WANG Wangshuai, YI Yanxi, LUO Zhiwei, LI Jie. “Rat Race” or “Lying Flat”? The effect of competition stress on psychological compensation [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(7): 1057-1072. |
[3] | WU Jiahui, FU Hailun. A meta-analysis of the relationship between achievement goal orientation and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and student engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(7): 1104-1125. |
[4] | CHEN Silu, ZHANG Guanglei, LIU Wenxing, TIAN Yuan. The driving mechanism and its function mechanism of gratitude-focused human resource management practices [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(6): 908-927. |
[5] | WEN Siyan, YU Xuchen, JIN Lei, GONG Junru, ZHANG Xiaohan, SUN Jinglin, ZHANG Shan, LYU Houchao. A three-level meta-analysis of the relationship between family dysfunction and mental health of children and adolescents [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 771-789. |
[6] | YUAN Yue, WU Zhiming, XIE Qiushi. The effect of time pressure on individual work outcomes: A meta-analytic review [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(3): 465-485. |
[7] | YIN Kui, CHI Zhikang, DONG Niannian, LI Peikai, ZHAO Jing. The relationship between team reflexivity and team resources development, team resources utilization, and team outcomes: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(2): 228-245. |
[8] | MENG Xianxin, CHEN Yijing, WANG Xinyi, YUAN Jiajin, YU Delin. The relationship between school connectedness and depression: A three-level meta-analytic review [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(2): 246-263. |
[9] | KANG Dan, WEN Min, ZHANG Yingjie. The relationship between fine motor skills and mathematical ability in children: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1443-1459. |
[10] | LIU Beini, ZHANG Zhixue. What enables teams to “bounce back” from adversity? The influence of leader mindfulness on team resilience [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1146-1159. |
[11] | LI Ying, ZHAO Hongyu, ZHANG Mujun, FAN Zixuan, WANG Yue. The bilingual advantage effect on executive control and its moderators: Evidence from meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(6): 970-987. |
[12] | ZHANG Ting, ZHANG Kelin, ZHOU Renlai. HPA axis dysfunction in women with premenstrual syndrome: A meta-analysis based on cortisol levels [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(6): 988-1001. |
[13] | LI Yadan, DU Ying, XIE Cong, LIU Chunyu, YANG Yilong, LI Yangping, QIU Jiang. A meta-analysis of the relationship between semantic distance and creative thinking [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 519-534. |
[14] | ZENG Runxi, LI You. The Relationship between self-efficacy and online health information seeking: A meta-analysis [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 535-551. |
[15] | WU Jiahui, FU Hailun, ZHANG Yuhuan. A meta-analysis of the relationship between perceived social support and student academic achievement: The mediating role of student engagement [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(4): 552-569. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||