Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 62-74.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00062
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xin, HANG Mingli, LIANG Dandan()
Received:
2019-01-14
Online:
2020-01-15
Published:
2019-11-21
Contact:
LIANG Dandan
E-mail:ldd233@sina.com
CLC Number:
WANG Xin, HANG Mingli, LIANG Dandan. The cognitive neural mechanisms of verb argument structure complexity processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 62-74.
动词论元结构复杂性 | 功能脑区 | 所涉认知神经加工 |
---|---|---|
多论元 | 外侧裂周后部 | 论元语义表征 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工 | |
选择性论元范畴 | 左侧颞上回和颞叶中后部 | 表层句法加工 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工 | |
左侧额叶中后部 | 初始句法加工 | |
选择性题元角色指派 | 外侧裂周后部 | 论元语义表征 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工、动词次范畴确定 | |
左侧额叶中后部 | 初始句法加工、动词次范畴确定 | |
非典型映射 | 左侧颞上回、颞中回和颞叶后部 | 表层论元句法-语义整合 |
左侧额下回 | 句法移位、非宾格动词语义加工 |
动词论元结构复杂性 | 功能脑区 | 所涉认知神经加工 |
---|---|---|
多论元 | 外侧裂周后部 | 论元语义表征 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工 | |
选择性论元范畴 | 左侧颞上回和颞叶中后部 | 表层句法加工 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工 | |
左侧额叶中后部 | 初始句法加工 | |
选择性题元角色指派 | 外侧裂周后部 | 论元语义表征 |
左侧额下回 | 初始句法加工、动词次范畴确定 | |
左侧额叶中后部 | 初始句法加工、动词次范畴确定 | |
非典型映射 | 左侧颞上回、颞中回和颞叶后部 | 表层论元句法-语义整合 |
左侧额下回 | 句法移位、非宾格动词语义加工 |
1 | 柏晓鹏, 薛念文 . ( 2015). 多语言视角下汉语“V+事件NP宾语”的论元结构研究. 外国语, ( 5), 2-13. |
2 | 陈蓓 . ( 2017). 现代汉语非典型宾语的界定. 华中学术, ( 3), 176-184. |
3 | 封世文, 杨亦鸣 . ( 2011). 基于功能性磁共振成像的汉语轻动词及其神经机制研究. 语言文字应用, ( 2), 43-53. |
4 | 韩景泉 . ( 2019). 汉语非宾格动词的论元结构及其句法推导. 外语教学与研究, 51( 1), 31-43. |
5 | 郝暾 . ( 2018). 论元结构构式在汉语母语者与二语学习者句子理解中的作用. 语言教学与研究, ( 4), 90-101. |
6 | 何文广, 陈宝国 . ( 2013). 句子加工中核心名词动物性效应及其认知机制. 心理科学进展, 21( 3), 437-447. |
7 | 黄正德 . ( 2007). 汉语动词的题元结构与其句法表现. 语言科学, 6( 4), 3-21. |
8 | 刘涛, 江火 . ( 2016). 句法移位的脑神经加工机制——来自汉语被动句的ERPs研究. 语言科学, 15( 6), 612-624. |
9 | 刘涛, 杨亦鸣 . ( 2016). 基于事件相关电位的空语类分类的神经机制研究. 外语研究, ( 5), 14-21. |
10 | 任会启, 梁丹丹 .( 2014). 智障儿童动词论元遗漏的实验研究. 语言科学, 13( 5), 449-460. |
11 | 任鹰 . ( 2009). “领属”与“存现”:从概念的关联到构式的关联——也从“王冕死了父亲”的生成方式说起. 世界汉语教学, 23( 3), 308-321. |
12 | 沈家煊 . ( 2018). 比附“主谓结构”引起的问题. 外国语, 41( 6), 2-15. |
13 | 田启林 . ( 2018). 移还是不移——领主属宾句的生成方式探析. 外文研究,( 3), 1-6+14+105. |
14 | 王穗苹, 黄健 . ( 2019). 语言理解中的语义加工:不同模态神经影像的研究. 生理学报, ( 1), 127-139. |
15 | 王奇 . ( 2006). “领主属宾句”的语义特点与句法结构. 现代外语, 29( 3), 230-238. |
16 | 王小潞, 何代丽 . ( 2017). 汉语隐喻加工的fMRI研究. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 39( 4), 70-94. |
17 | 王鑫, 杨亦鸣 . ( 2018). 跨学科视阈下动词研究新视野——《构建论元:动词论元结构的跨学科研究》述评. 语言与翻译, ( 4), 89-94. |
18 | 王渊博, 闻素霞, 贾德梅 . ( 2017). 汉-维非熟练双语者非目标语言语音激活与语义激活差异的ERP研究. 心理科学, 40( 6), 1282-1288. |
19 | Agnew Z. K., van de Koot H., McGettigan C., & Scott S. K . ( 2014). Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29( 9), 1035-1045. |
20 | Alyahya R. S. W., Halai A. D., Conroy P ., & ambon Ralph, M. A. ( 2018). The behavioural patterns and neural correlates of concrete and abstract verb processing in aphasia: A novel verb semantic battery. Neuroimage Clinical, 17, 811-825. |
21 | Bachrach A., Roy I. , & tockall, L.( 2014). Structuring the argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. |
22 | Barbieri E., Brambilla I., Thompson C. K., & Luzzatti C . ( 2019). Verb and sentence processing patterns in healthy Italian participants: Insight from the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Journal of Communication Disorders, 79, 58-75. |
23 | Binder J. R., Desai R. H., Graves W. W., & Conant L. L . ( 2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767-2796. |
24 | Blanco-Elorrieta E., Kastner I., Emmorey K., & Pylkkänen L . ( 2018). Shared neural correlates for building phrases in signed and spoken language. S cientific Reports, 8( 1), 1-10. |
25 | Caley S., Whitworth A., & Claessen M . ( 2016). Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52( 1), 59-70. |
26 | Caplan, D. ( 2010). Task effects on BOLD signal correlates of implicit syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive. Processes, 25( 6), 866-901. |
27 | Caplan D., Alpert N., Waters G., & Olivieri A . ( 2000). Activation of Broca’s area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping, 9( 2), 65-71. |
28 | ChodorowM.S., . ( 1979). Time-compressed speech and the study of lexical and syntactic processing.In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett( pp. 87-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. |
29 | ChomskyN.( 1993). Lectures on government and binding.Dordrecht: Foris. |
30 | Cho-ReyesS., &Thompson C.K, . ( 2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26( 10), 1250-1277. |
31 | Constable R. T., Pugh K. R., Berroya E., Mencl W. E., Westerveld M., Ni W. J., Shankweiler D . ( 2004). Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 22( 1), 11-21. |
32 | CuervoM.C., . ( 2014). Alternating unaccusatives and the distribution of roots. Lingua, 141( 1), 48-70. |
33 | den Ouden D. B., Fix S., Parrish T. B., & Thompson C. K . ( 2009). Argument structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22( 2), 196-215. |
34 | Dronkers N. F., Wilkins D. P., an Valin, R. D. J., Redfern B. B., & Jaeger J. J . ( 2004). Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition, 92( 1-2), 145-177. |
35 | Europa E., Gitelman D. R., Kiran S., & Thompson C. K . ( 2019). Neural connectivity in syntactic movement processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, ( 13), 13-27. |
36 | Fadlon, J. ( 2016). The transitive-unaccusative alternation: A cross-modal priming study. Psycholinguist, 45(3), 671-696. |
37 | Faroqi-ShahY., &Thomson C.K, . ( 2003). Effect of lexical cues on the production of active and passive sentences in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 85( 3), 409-426. |
38 | Feng S., Legault J., Yang Y., Zhu J., Shao K., & Yang L . ( 2015). Differences in grammatical processing strategies for active and passive sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 33( S1), 104-117. |
39 | FriedericiA.D., . ( 2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91( 4), 1357-1392. |
40 | FriedericiA.., &Graetz P.A, . ( 1987). Processing passive sentences in aphasia: Deficits and strategies. Brain and Language, 30( 1), 93-105. |
41 | FriedericiA.., &Kotz S.A, . ( 2003). The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. Neuroimage, 20( S1), S8-S17. |
42 | Friedmann,N., Shapiro L.P . ( 2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 46( 2), 288-297. |
43 | Grodzinsky ,Y. ( 2000). Syntax in the brain: Linguistic versus neuroanatomical specificity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23( 1), 1-21. |
44 | Hernandez M., Fairhall S. L., Lenci A., Baroni M., & Caramazza A . ( 2014). Predication drives verb cortical signatures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26( 8), 1829-1839. |
45 | Hirotani M., Makuuchi M., Ruschemeyer S. A., & Friederici A. D . ( 2011). Who was the agent? The neural correlates of reanalysis processes during sentence comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 32( 11), 1775-1787. |
46 | LeeJ., &Thompson C.K, . ( 2011). Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study. Aphasiology, 25( 6-7), 813-825. |
47 | Mack J. E., Andrew Zu-Sern Wei., Gutierrez K., & Thompson C. K . ( 2016). Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 40, 98-111. |
48 | Mack J. E., Meltzer-Asscher A., Barbieri E., & Thompson C. K . ( 2013). Neural correlates of processing passive sentences. Brain Sciences, 3( 3), 1198-1214. |
49 | MalyutinaS., & denOuden, D . ( 2017). Task-dependent neural and behavioral effects of verb argument structure features. Brain & Language, 168, 57-72. |
50 | Malyutina S., Richardson J. D., & den Ouden D . ( 2016). Verb argument structure in narrative speech: Mining aphasia bank . Seminars in Speech and language, 37( 1), 34-47. |
51 | MasonR., &Just, M . ( 2007). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127. |
52 | Mason R., Just M., Keller T., & Patricia A . ( 2003). Ambiguity in the Brain: What Brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 6), 1319-1338. |
53 | McAllister T., Bachrach A., Waters G., Michaud J., & Caplan D . ( 2009). Production and comprehension of unaccusatives in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23( 7-8), 989-1004. |
54 | Meltzer-Asscher A., Mack J. E., Barbieri E., & Thompson C. K . ( 2015). How the brain processes different dimensions of argument structure complexity: Evidence from fMRI. Brain & Language, 142, 65-75. |
55 | Meltzer-Asscher A., Schuchard J., den Ouden D. B., & Thompson C. K . ( 2013). The neural substrates of complex argument structure representations: Processing ‘alternating transitivity’ verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28( 8), 1154-1168. |
56 | Momma S., Robert S. L., & Phillips C . ( 2018). Unaccusativity in sentence production. Linguistic Inquiry, 49( 1), 181-194. |
57 | Perlmutter, D. ( 1978) . Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypojournal. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. |
58 | Rappaport-Hovav , M., & Levin, B. ( 2011). Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation.In Everart, M., Marelj, M., & Siloni, T. (Eds.),The Theta system:rgument structure at the interface[C]. Oxford:Oxford University Press. |
59 | Rodd J. M., Olivia A. L., Bill R., & Lorraine K. T . ( 2010). The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia, 48( 5), 1324-1335. |
60 | Rodriguez-Ferreiro J., Llorenc A., & Sanz-Torrent M . ( 2014). Argument structure and the representation of abstract semantics. PLoS One, 9( 8), 1-7. |
61 | ShetreetE., &Friedmann, N . ( 2012). Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage, 60( 3), 1800-1806. |
62 | Shetreet E., Friedmann N., & Hadar U . ( 2010 a). The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 10), 2306-2315. |
63 | Shetreet E., Friedmann N., & Hadar U . ( 2010 b). Cortical representation of optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 31( 5), 770-785. |
64 | Shetreet E., Palti D., Friedmann N., & Hadar U . ( 2007). Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex, 17( 8), 1958-1969. |
65 | Sullivan N., Walenski M., Love T., & Shapiro L. P . ( 2017). The comprehension of sentences with unaccusative verbs in aphasia: a test of the intervener hypojournal. Aphasiology, 31( 1), 67-81. |
66 | SungJ.E., . ( 2016). The effects of verb argument complexity on verb production in persons with aphasia: Evidence from a subject-object-verb language . Journal of Psycholingustic Research, 45( 2), 287-305. |
67 | ThompsonC.K., . ( 2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypojournal. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16( 2-3), 151-167. |
68 | Thompson C. K., Bonakdarpour B., &Fix S. F . ( 2010). Neural mechanisms of verb argument structure processing in agrammatic aphasic and healthy age-matched listeners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 9), 1993-2011. |
69 | Thompson C. K., Bonakdarpour B., Fix S., Blumenfeld H., Parrish T., Gitelman D., … Mesulam M . ( 2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19( 11), 1753-1767. |
70 | Thompson C. K. ,& Meltzer-Asscher, A.( 2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of verb argument structure processing.In A. Bachrach,I. Roy, & L. Stockall (Eds.), Structuring the argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure (pp. 141-168) .Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. |
71 | Thompson C. K., Riley , E. A, den Ouden , D. B., Meltzer- Asscher A., & Lukic S . ( 2013). Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: Behavioral and neural recovery patterns. Cortex, 49( 9), 2358-2376. |
72 | VerniceM., &Guasti M.T, . ( 2015). The acquisition of SV order in unaccusatives: Manipulating the definiteness of the NP argument. Journal of Child Language, 42( 1), 210-237. |
73 | WangH., &Thompson C.K, . ( 2016). Assessing syntactic deficits in Chinese Broca's aphasia using the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences-Chinese (NAVS-C). Aphasiology, 30( 7), 815-840. |
74 | Wittenberg E., Jackendoff R., Kuperberg G., Paczynski M., Snedeker J. ,& Wiese, H.( 2014). The processing and representation of light verb constructions.In A. Bachrach,I. Roy, & L. Stockall (Eds.), Structuring the argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure (pp. 63-80) . Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company. |
[1] | YE Shuqi, YIN Junting, LI Zhaoxian, LUO Junlong. The influence mechanism of emotion on intuitive and analytical processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 736-746. |
[2] | CHENG Meixia, KUANG Ziyi, LENG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Yang, WANG Fuxing. Can learning by non-interactive teaching promote learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 769-782. |
[3] | YANG Qing, LI Yaqin. Is uncertainty bad? Mixed findings and explanatory model of error processing under uncertainty [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(3): 338-349. |
[4] | ZHANG Hao, XIAO Bangming, HUANG Minxue. The in-feed native advertising avoidance mechanism and re-targeting strategy based on user dynamic information processing mode [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 223-239. |
[5] | CHEN Zi-Wei, FU Di, LIU Xun. Better to misidentify than to miss: A review of occurrence mechanisms and applications of face pareidolia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(2): 240-255. |
[6] | DAI Xiaoyan, HU Yi, ZHANG Ya. Interpersonal synchrony: A new perspective to elucidate the essence of working alliance in psychological counseling [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 2078-2087. |
[7] | LIU Wei, SHEN Xiaoling. A dynamic perspective on the relationship between team reflection-in-action and innovation: A moderated mediation model integrating cognition and emotion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(8): 1759-1769. |
[8] | ZHOU Guomei, ZHENG Ruoying, LIN Jia, LIU Xinge. The holistic representation of facial attractiveness and the attractiveness enhancement mechanism of dynamic faces [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1429-1438. |
[9] | LIU Yaohui, XU Huiying, CHEN Qipeng, ZHAN Peida. The measurement of problem-solving competence using process data [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(3): 522-535. |
[10] | WANG Runzhou, BI Hongyan. A possible mechanism for the audiovisual temporal integration deficits in developmental dyslexia: Impaired ability in audiovisual temporal recalibration [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(12): 2764-2776. |
[11] | ZHAO Na, QIN Xuezhe, LIU Yaqian, SUN Ling. You get what you pay for? The mechanisms and moderators of price-quality effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(10): 2372-2380. |
[12] | YAN Lizhu, CHEN Yanxiu, LIU Xun, FU Shimin, NAN Weizhi. The flexibility of spatial-numerical associations and its internal mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(1): 51-64. |
[13] | WANG Runzhou, BI Hongyan. Auditory temporal processing deficits in developmental dyslexia [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1231-1238. |
[14] | SUI Xue, SHI Hanwen, LI Yutong. Perspective taking and its cognitive mechanism in language processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(6): 990-999. |
[15] | HE Weiqi, LI Shuaixia, ZHAO Dongfang. Neural mechanism underlying the perception of crowd facial emotions [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(5): 761-772. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||