Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 965-974.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00965
• Conceptual Framework • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Fangjun(), WANG Shuman, LI Aimei, LI Bin
Received:
2018-06-21
Online:
2019-06-15
Published:
2019-04-22
Contact:
LI Fangjun
E-mail:lifangjun@jnu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
LI Fangjun, WANG Shuman, LI Aimei, LI Bin. Team voice effectiveness and its mechanism from the perspective of group information processing: The influence of voice quantity and quality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 965-974.
1 | 陈国权 . ( 2007). 团队学习和学习型团队: 概念、能力模型、 测量及对团队绩效的影响. 管理学报, 4( 5), 602-609. |
2 | 陈文平, 段锦云, 田晓明 . ( 2013). 员工为什么不建言: 基于中国文化视角的解析. 心理科学进展, 21( 5), 905-913. |
3 | 邓今朝, 黄中梅, 余绍忠 . ( 2015). 员工建言行为与团队绩效的关系——成员目标取向的作用. 软科学, 29( 6), 81-85. |
4 | 段锦云, 施嘉逸, 凌斌 . ( 2017). 高承诺组织与员工建言: 双过程模型检验. 心理学报, 49( 4), 539-553. |
5 | 段锦云, 钟建安 . ( 2012). 工作满意感与建言行为的关系探索: 组织承诺的缓冲影响. 管理工程学报, 26( 1), 170-174. |
6 | 李方君, 郑粉芳, 杨倩怡, 王舒曼 . ( 2018). 员工建言行为的结果及其调节机制. 心理科学进展, 26( 4), 710-718. |
7 | 梁建, 刘兆鹏 . ( 2016). 团队建言结构: 概念、前因及其对团队创新的影响. 中国人力资源开发, ( 5), 6-15. |
8 | 吕洁, 张钢 . ( 2013). 团队认知的涌现: 基于集体信息加工的视角. 心理科学进展, 21( 12), 2214-2223. |
9 | 莫申江, 谢小云 . ( 2009). 团队学习、交互记忆系统与团队绩效: 基于IMOI范式的纵向追踪研究. 心理学报, 41( 7), 639-648. |
10 | 吴梦, 白新文 . ( 2012). 动机性信息加工理论及其在工业与组织心理学中的应用. 心理科学进展, 20( 11), 1889-1898. |
11 | 肖君宜, 段锦云 . ( 2015). 团队层面建言行为研究: 员工建言研究的新视角. 人类工效学, 21( 2), 84-86. |
12 | 严瑜, 何亚男 . ( 2016). 领导对建言反应的动机感知作用机制: 基于归因理论的阐释. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1457-1466. |
13 | 于静静, 赵曙明 . ( 2013). 员工建言行为研究前沿探析与未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 35( 5), 23-30. |
14 | 赵祁, 李锋 . ( 2016). 团队领导与团队有效性: 基于社会认同理论的多层次研究. 心理科学进展, 24( 11), 1677-1689. |
15 | 周文娟 . ( 2013). 团队建言的前因与结果:变革型领导和任务互依性的作用(博士学位论文). 苏州大学. |
16 |
Ackoff, R. L . ( 1967). Management misinformation systems. Management Science, 14( 4), 147-156.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.14.4.B147 URL |
17 | Argote L., Gruenfeld D., & Naquin C . ( 2001). Group learning in organizations. Groups at Work: Theory and Research, 614, 369-411. |
18 |
Bang N., Chen J., & Cremer D. D . ( 2017). When new product development fails in China: Mediating effects of voice behaviour and learning from failure. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23( 4), 559-575.
doi: 10.1080/13602381.2017.1339455 URL |
19 |
Barry, M., & Wilkinson, A . ( 2016). Pro-social or pro-management? A critique of the conception of employee voice as a pro-social behaviour within organizational behaviour. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54( 2), 261-284.
doi: 10.1111/bjir.2016.54.issue-2 URL |
20 | Bashshur, M. R., & Oc, B . ( 2015). When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management, 41( 5), 1530-1554. |
21 |
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M . ( 2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88( 3), 552-560.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552 URL |
22 |
Burris E. R., Detert J. R., & Romney A. C . ( 2013). Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organization Science, 24( 1), 22-38.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0732 URL |
23 |
Burris E. R., Rockmann K. W., & Kimmons Y. S . ( 2017). The value of voice to managers: Employee identification and the content of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60( 6), 2099-2125.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0320 URL |
24 | Byyny, R. L . ( 2016). Information and cognitive overload: How much is too much?. The Pharos of Alpha Omega Alpha-Honor Medical Society, 79( 4), 2-7. |
25 | Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C . ( 2011). Team development and functioning. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbooks in Psychology. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol, 1, pp. 597-650). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. |
26 |
Chatalalsingh, C., & Reeves, S . ( 2014). Leading team learning: What makes interprofessional teams learn to work well? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28( 6), 513-518.
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.900001 URL |
27 | Colquitt J., Lepine J. A., Wesson M. J., & Gellatly I. R . ( 2011). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (2th ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. |
28 |
de Dreu. C. K. W . ( 2007). Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92( 3), 628-638.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.628 URL |
29 |
Detert, J. R., & Burris, ER, . ( 2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50( 4), 869-884.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 URL |
30 |
Detert J. R., Burris E. R., Harrison D. A., & Martin S. R . ( 2013). Voice flows to and around leaders: Understanding when units are helped or hurt by employee voice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58( 4), 624-668.
doi: 10.1177/0001839213510151 URL |
31 |
Edmondson A . ( 1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44( 2), 350-383.
doi: 10.2307/2666999 URL |
32 |
Edmunds, A., & Morris, A . ( 2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 20( 1), 17-28.
doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(99)00051-1 URL |
33 |
Farh, C. I. C., & Chen, G . ( 2018). Leadership and member voice in action teams: Test of a dynamic phase model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103( 1), 97-110.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000256 URL |
34 | Fast N. J., Burris E. R., & Bartel C. A . ( 2015). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57( 4), 1013-1034. |
35 |
Flanagan, J. C . ( 1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51( 4), 327-358.
doi: 10.1037/h0061470 URL |
36 | Frazier, M. L . ( 2009). Voice climate in organizations: A group-level examination of antecedents and performance outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University. |
37 | Frazier, M. L., & Bowler, W. M . ( 2012). Voice climate, supervisor undermining, and work outcomes: A group- level examination. Journal of Management, 41( 3), 841-863. |
38 | Friedrich A. L., Sjöberg A., & Friedrich P . ( 2016). Leaned teamwork fattens workplace innovation: The relationship between task complexity, team learning and team proactivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25( 4), 561-569. |
39 | Halle, Y . ( 2016). Influence of leader and follower behavior on employee voice, team task responsibility, and team effectiveness (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Twente. |
40 | Hemp, P . ( 2009). Death by information overload. Harvard Bbusiness Review, 87( 9), 82-89. |
41 |
Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., & Vollrath D. A . ( 1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121( 1), 43-64.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 URL |
42 |
Hong T. M. B., Baruch Y., Chau V. S., & He H-W . ( 2016). Team learning: The missing construct from a cross- cultural examination of higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33( 1), 29-51.
doi: 10.1007/s10490-015-9426-z URL |
43 | Huang, L., & Patersonc, T. A . ( 2014). Group ethical voice: Influence of ethical leadership and impact on ethical performance. Journal of Management, 43( 4), 1157-1184. |
44 |
Jiang, J . ( 2017). Mean leader-member exchange and team voice: Roles of team task reflexivity and perspective taking. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45( 7), 1221-1232.
doi: 10.2224/sbp.6451 URL |
45 |
Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R . ( 2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64( 4), 408-417.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010 URL |
46 | Kahneman, D . ( 1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. |
47 |
Kaufman, B. E . ( 2015). Theorising determinants of employee voice: An integrative model across disciplines and levels of analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 25( 1), 19-40.
doi: 10.1111/hrmj.2015.25.issue-1 URL |
48 |
Killumets E., D’innocenzo L., Maynard M. T., & Mathieu J. E . ( 2015). A multilevel examination of the impact of team interpersonal processes. Small Group Research, 46( 2), 227-259.
doi: 10.1177/1046496415573631 URL |
49 |
Kouvonen A., Toppinen-Tanner S., Huuhtanen M. K. P., & Kalimo R . ( 2005). Job characteristics and burnout among aging professionals in information and communications technology. Psychological Reports, 97( 2), 505-514.
doi: 10.2466/PR0.97.6.505-514 URL |
50 | Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S . ( 2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman., D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley. |
51 | Li A. N., Liao H., Tangirala S., & Firth B. M . ( 2017). The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102( 8), 1259-1270. |
52 |
Liang J., Farh C. I., & Farh J-L . ( 2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55( 1), 71-92.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0176 URL |
53 |
Liang, J., & Rui, S . ( 2017). Employee voice and team innovation: Examining the role of team voice intensity in R&D teams. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017( 1), 11515.
doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.11515abstract URL |
54 |
Lin, S-H., & Johnson, R. E . ( 2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 5), 1381-1397.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000018 URL |
55 |
Liu W., Song Z., Li X., & Liao Z . ( 2017). Why and when leader’s affective states influence employee upward voice. Academy of Management Journal, 60( 1), 238-263.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.1082 URL |
56 | Luthans, F . ( 2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence- based approach. McGraw-Hill. |
57 |
Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M., & Podsakoff N. P . ( 2011). Challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational effectiveness: Do challenge- oriented behaviors really have an impact on the organization’s bottom line?. Personnel Psychology, 64( 3), 559-592.
doi: 10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-3 URL |
58 | McClean E. J., Martin S. R., Emich K. J., & Woodruff T . ( 2017). The social consequences of voice: An examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 61( 5), 1869-1891. |
59 |
Morrison, E. W . ( 2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1( 1), 173-197.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328 URL |
60 |
Morrison, E. W . ( 2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5( 1), 373-412.
doi: 10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 URL |
61 |
Mowbray P. K., Wilkinson A., & Tse, H. H. M . ( 2015). An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17( 3), 382-400.
doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12045 URL |
62 |
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C . ( 2012). Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33( 2), 216-234.
doi: 10.1002/job.754 URL |
63 | Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C . ( 2015). Idiosyncratic deals and voice behavior. Journal of Management, 41( 3), 893-928. |
64 | Oldroyd, J. B., & Morris, S. S . ( 2012). Catching falling stars: A human resource response to social capital’s detrimental effect of information overload on star employees. Academy of Management Review, 37( 3), 396-418. |
65 |
Rasheed M. A., Shahzad K., Conroy C., Nadeem S., & Siddique M. U . ( 2017). Exploring the role of employee voice between high-performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24( 4), 670-688.
doi: 10.1108/JSBED-11-2016-0185 URL |
66 | Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. A . ( 2018). Management (14th ed.). London, England: Pearson Education. |
67 |
Ruck K., Welch M., & Menara B . ( 2017). Employee voice: An antecedent to organisational engagement?. Public Relations Review, 43( 5), 904-914.
doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.008 URL |
68 |
Santos C. M., Passos A. M., & Uitdewilligen S . ( 2016). When shared cognition leads to closed minds: Temporal mental models, team learning, adaptation and performance. European Management Journal, 34( 3), 258-268.
doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.11.006 URL |
69 |
Sparrow, P . ( 1999). Strategy and cognition: Understanding the role of management knowledge structures, organizational memory and information overload. Creativity and Innovation Management, 8( 2), 140-148.
doi: 10.1111/caim.1999.8.issue-2 URL |
70 |
Speier C., Valacich J. S., & Vessey I . ( 1999). The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences, 30( 2), 337-360.
doi: 10.1111/deci.1999.30.issue-2 URL |
71 |
Stvilia B., Gasser L., Twidale M. B., & Smith L. C . ( 2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58( 12), 1720-1733.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890 URL |
72 |
van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S . ( 2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48( 3), 532-547.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.17407918 URL |
73 | van Dyne, L., & Lepine, J. A . ( 1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41( 1), 108-119. |
74 |
Wang D., Gan C., Wu C., & Wang D . ( 2015). Ethical leadership and employee voice: Employee self-efficacy and self-impact as mediators. Psychological Reports, 116( 3), 751-767.
doi: 10.2466/01.07.PR0.116k29w9 URL |
75 |
Wei X., Zhang Z-X., & Chen X-P . ( 2015). I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 5), 1641-1652.
doi: 10.1037/a0039046 URL |
76 | Weiss, M., & Morrison, E. W . ( 2018). Speaking up and moving up: How voice can enhance employees’ social status. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Doi: 10.1002/job.2262 |
77 | West, M. A . ( 2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51( 3), 355-387. |
78 | Zhou, J., & Hoever I. J . ( 2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1( 1), 333-359. |
79 | Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E . (Eds.). ( 2007). Handbook of organizational creativity. New York, NY: Erlbaum. |
80 | Zhou J., Shin S. J., Brass D. J., Choi J., & Zhang Z. X . ( 2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94( 6), 1544-1552. |
[1] | CHENG Ken, WANG Yifei, LIN Yinghui, WANG Jing. Observer reactions to unethical pro-organizational behavior and their feedback effects [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(9): 1944-1954. |
[2] | CHEN Xiao, XIE Bin, PENG Jian, NIE Qi. The antecedents and consequences of workplace loneliness: A regulatory focus theory perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(7): 1463-1481. |
[3] | LI Pengbo, CHEN Limei, CHU Fulei, SUN Yuqing, ZHOU Ying. I am gifted! Perceived overqualification and its influence on employees [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(7): 1313-1330. |
[4] | TANG Yipeng, REN Zhiyu, PU Xiaoping, HAN Wei. The effect of interpersonal authenticity on coworker interactions within work team [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 597-609. |
[5] | WU Weijiong, FENG Jingming, LIN Yixun, ZHAO Xia. The dynamic effect and mechanism of commuting recovery activities on work passion [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 610-624. |
[6] | DONG Xiaowei, QIN Xin, CHEN Chen, HUANG Mingpeng, DENG Huiru, ZHOU Hansen, SONG Bodi. Time related research and future direction in organizational behavior field [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(4): 747-760. |
[7] | YAN Qiusi, SUI Yang, HAO Xuejing. Explanatory mechanism and theoretical model of unethical pro-organizational behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 338-352. |
[8] | YIN Kui, ZHANG Kaili, ZHAO Jing, GONG Zhenxing. The effects of employee empowerment expectation: The underlying theoretical explanations [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(2): 353-364. |
[9] | ZHAO Kai, XIANG Shuting. How to reconcile team innovation paradox? An explorative study from the perspectives of members’ cognitive style “composition” and “configuration” [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(1): 1-18. |
[10] | LI Pengbo, ZHOU Ying, WANG Zhen, SUN Yuqing. Present Buddha with borrowed flowers: Customer-oriented deviant behaviors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2150-2159. |
[11] | CHEN Silu, ZHANG Guanglei, LIU Wenxing. Multi-level mechanism of ethical human resource management practice: Based on social context and social cognitive theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(11): 1800-1813. |
[12] | XIANG Shuting, ZHAO Kai, NING Nan. The double-edged sword effect of leadership empowerment behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(11): 1814-1835. |
[13] | LI Fangjun, ZHONG Xupeng. The distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(11): 1939-1952. |
[14] | LI Xin, LIU Pei, XIAO Chenjie, WANG Xiaotian, LI Aimei. How does power in organizations promote prosocial behavior? The mediating role of sense of responsibility [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(9): 1586-1598. |
[15] | LI Mingze, YE Huili, ZHANG Guanglei. The influence mechanism of narcissistic leadership on the formation process of team creativity: A multi-perspective study [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(9): 1437-1453. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||